• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

06-21.2010. 113KB Jun 04 2011 12:07:14 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "06-21.2010. 113KB Jun 04 2011 12:07:14 AM"

Copied!
9
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

A NEW CLASS OF HARMONIC MULTIVALENT FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY AN INTEGRAL OPERATOR

Luminit¸a-Ioana Cotˆırl˘a

Abstract. We define and investigate a new class of harmonic multivalent functions defined by S˘al˘agean integral operator. We obtain coefficient inequalities and distortion bounds for the functions in this class.

2000Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45, 30C50, 31A05.

Keywords and phrases: Harmonic univalent functions, integral operator, distor-tion inequalities.

1. Introduction

For fixed positive integer p,denote by H(p) the set of all harmonic multivalent functionsf =h+gwhich are sense-preserving in the open unit diskU={z:|z|<1} where h andg are of the form

h(z) =zp+ ∞ X

k=2

ak+p1zk+p−1, g(z) = ∞ X

k=1

bk+p1zk+p−1, |bp|<1. (1)

The integral operator In was introduced by S˘al˘agean [9]. For fixed positive integer n and forf =h+g given by (1) we define the modified S˘al˘agean operator

Inf as

Inf(z) =Inh(z) + (−1)nIng(z); p > n, zU (2) where

Inh(z) =zp+ ∞ X

k=2

p k+p−1

n

ak+p−1zk+p−1

and

Ing(z) = ∞

X p n

(2)

It is known that, (see[3]), the harmonic functionf =h+g is sense- preserving in U if|g′|<|h′|inU. The classH(p) was studied by Ahuja and Jahangiri [1] and

the class H(p) forp= 1 was defined and studied by Jahangiri et al. in [6].

For fixed positive integersn, p, and for 0≤α <1, β≥0 we letHp(n+1, n, α, β) denote the class of multivalent harmonic functions of the form (1) that satisfy the condition

Re I nf(z)

In+1f(z) > β

Inf(z)

In+1f(z) −1

+α. (3) The subclassHp−(n+ 1, n, α, β) consists of functions fn=h+gn inHp(n, α, β) so that h and g are of the form

h(z) =zp− ∞ X

k=2

ak+p1zk+p−1, gn(z) = (−1)n−1 ∞ X

k=1

bk+p1zk+p−1, |bp|<1. (4)

The families Hp(n+ 1, n, α, β) and Hp−(n+ 1, n, α, β) include a variety of well-known classes of harmonic functions as well as many new ones. For example

H1−(1,0, α,0) ≡ HS(α) is the class of sense-preserving, harmonic univalent func-tions f which are starlike of order α in U, H1−(2,1, α,0) ≡ HK(α) is the class of sense-preserving, harmonic univalent functions f which are convex of orderα in U

and H1−(n+ 1, n, α,0)≡H−(n, α) is the class os S˘al˘agean type harmonic univalent functions.

For the harmonic functionsf of the form (1) with b1 = 0, Avei and Zlotkiewicz [2] showed that if

∞ X

k=2

k(|ak|+bk|)≤1, then f ∈HS(0) and if

∞ X

k=2

k2(|ak|+|bk|)≤1,

thenf ∈HK(0).Silverman [10] proved that the above two coefficient conditions are also necessary if f =h+g has negative coefficients. Later, Silverman and Silvia[11] improved the results of [6] and [9] to the case b1 not necessarily zero.

For the harmonic functions f of the form (4) with n = 1, Jahangiri [5] showed that f ∈HS(α) if and only if

∞ X

k=2

(k−α)|ak|+ ∞ X

k=1

(3)

and f ∈H1−(2,1, α,0) if and only if ∞

X

k=2

k(k−α)|ak|+ ∞ X

k=1

k(k+α)|bk| ≤1−α.

In this paper, the coefficient conditions for the classes HS(α) and HK(α) are extended to the class Hp(n+ 1, n, α, β), of the form (3) above. Furthermore, we determine distortion theorem for the functions in Hp−(n+ 1, n, α, β).

2.Main results

In the first theorem, we introduce a sufficient coefficient bound for harmonic functions in Hp(n+ 1, n, α, β).

Theorem 2.1. Let f =h+g be given by (1). If

∞ X

k=1

{Ψ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)|ak+p1|+ Θ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)|bk+p1|} ≤2, (5)

where

Ψ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β) = p k+p−1

n

(1 +β)−(β+α) k+pp1n+1

1−α ,

and

Θ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β) = p k+p−1

n

(1 +β) + k+pp1n+1(β+α)

1−α ,

ap = 1, 0≤α <1, β≥0, n∈N.Then f ∈Hp(n+ 1, n, p, α, β).

Proof. According to (2) and (3) we only need to show that Re I

nf(z)αIn+1f(z)βe|Inf(z)In+1f(z)|

In+1f(z)

≥0.

The caser= 0 is obvious. For 0< r <1 it follows that Re I

nf(z)αIn+1f(z)βe|Inf(z)In+1f(z)|

In+1f(z)

=

= Re

(1−α)zp+ ∞ X

k=2

ak+p−1zk+p−1Γn−αΓn+1

zp+ ∞ X

Γn+1ak+p−1zk+p−1+ (−1)n+1 ∞ X

(4)

+

(−1)n ∞ X

k=1

bk+p1zk+p−1

Γn+αΓn+1

zp+ ∞ X

k=2

Γn+1ak+p1zk+p−1+ (−1)n+1 ∞ X

k=1

Γn+1bk+p1zk+p−1

βeiΘ| ∞ X

k=2

ak+p−1zk+p−1

Γn−Γn+1

+ (−1)n ∞ X

k=1

bk+p−1zk+p−1

Γn+ Γn+1 |

zp+ ∞ X

k=2

Γn+1ak+p−1zk+p−1+ (−1)n+1 ∞ X

k=1

Γn+1bk+p−1zk+p−1

= Re

1−α+ ∞ X

k=2

ak+p−1zk−1Γn−αΓn+1

1+ ∞ X

k=2

Γn+1ak+p−1zk−1+ (−1)n+1 ∞ X

k=1

Γn+1bk+p−1zk+p−1z−p

+

(−1)n ∞ X

k=1

bk+p1zk−1+pz−p

Γn+αΓn+1

1+ ∞ X

k=2

Γn+1ak+p−1zk−1+ (−1)n+1 ∞ X

k=1

Γn+1bk+p−1zk+p−1z−p −

βeiΘz−p

∞ X

k=2

Γn−Γn+1

ak+p1zk+p−1+ (−1)n ∞ X

k=1

Γn+ Γn+1

bk+p1zk+p−1

1+ ∞ X

k=2

Γn+1ak+p1zk−1+ (−1)n+1 ∞ X

k=1

Γn+1bk+p1zk+p−1z−p

= Re (1−α) +A(z) 1 +B(z) , where

Γ = p

k+p−1. Forz=reiΘ we have

A(reiΘ) = ∞ X

k=2

(An−αAn+1)ak+p1rk−1e(k−1)Θi+

+(−1)n ∞ X

k=1

(5)

where

D(n+ 1, n, p, α) = =

∞ X

k=2

(An−An+1)ak+p−1rk−1e−(k+p−1)iΘ

+ (−1)n ∞ X

k=1

(An+An+1)bk+p1rk−1e−(k+p−1)iΘ ,

and

B(reiΘ) = ∞ X

k=2

An+1ak+p1rk−1e(k−1)Θi

+ (−1)n+1 ∞ X

k=1

An+1bk+p1rk−1e−(k+2p−1)Θi.

Setting

1−α+A(z)

1 +B(z) = (1−α)

1 +w(z) 1−w(z).

The proof will be complete if we can show that |w(z)| ≤ r < 1. This is the case since, by the condition (5), we can write:

|w(z)|=

A(z)−(1−α)B(z)

A(z) + (1−α)B(z) + 2(1−z) ≤ ∞

X

k=1

[(1 +β)(An−An+1)|ak+p−1|+ (1 +β)(An+An+1)|bk+p−1|]rk−1

4(1−α)− ∞ X

k=1

{[An(1 +β)−ΛAn+1]|ak+p−1|+ [An(1 +β) + ΛAn+1]|bk+p−1|}rk−1

<

<

∞ X

k=1

(1 +β)(An−An+1)|ak+p−1|+ (Am+An+1)(1 +β)|bk+p−1|

4(1−α)−{ ∞ X

k=1

[An(1 +β)−ΛAn+1]|ak+p−1|+ [An(1 +β) + ΛAn+1]|bk+p−1|} ≤

≤1,

where Λ =β+ 2α−1.

The harmonic univalent functions

f(z) =zp+ ∞

X 1

xkzk+p−1+ ∞

X 1

(6)

where n∈N,0≤α <1, β ≥0 and ∞ X

k=2 |xk|+

∞ X

k=1

|yk|= 1, show that the coefficient bound given by (5) is sharp.

The functions of the form (6) are inHp(n+ 1, n, α, β) because ∞

X

k=1

[Ψ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)|ak+p1|+ Θ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)|bk+p1|] =

= 1 + ∞ X

k=2 |xk|+

∞ X

k=1

|yk|= 2.

In the following theorem it is show that the condition (5) is also necessary for the function fn=h+gn,where hand gn are of the form (4).

Theorem 2.2. Let fn=h+gn be given by (4). Then fn∈ Hp−(n+ 1, n, α, β)

if and only if

∞ X

k=1

[Ψ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)ak+p−1+ Θ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)bk+p−1]≤2, (7)

ap = 1,0≤α <1, n∈N.

Proof. Since Hp−(n+ 1, n, α, β)⊂Hp(n+ 1, n, α, β),we only need to prove the ”only if” part of the theorem. For functions fn of the form (4), we note that the condition

Re Inf(z)

In+1f(z) > β

Inf(z)

In+1f(z) −1 +α is equivalent to

Re

(1−α)zp− ∞ X

k=2

(Γn−αΓn+1)ak+p−1zk+p−1

zp ∞ X

k=2

Γn+1ak+p−1zk+p−1+ (−1)2n ∞ X

k=1

Γn+1bk+p−1zk+p−1 +

+

(−1)2n−1 ∞ X

k=1

(Γn+ Γn+1α)bk+p1zk+p−1

zp ∞ X

k=2

Γn+1ak+p−1zk+p−1+ (−1)2n ∞ X

k=1

(7)

βeiΘ −

∞ X

k=2

(Γn−Γn+1)ak+p1zk+p−1+ (−1)2n−1 ∞ X

k=1

(Γn+ Γn+1)bk+p1zk+p−1

zp ∞ X

k=2

Γn+1ak+p−1zk+p−1+ (−1)2n ∞ X

k=1

Γn+1bk+p−1zk+p−1

(8) ≥0,

where Γ = p+kp1.

The above required condition (8) must hold for all values ofz∈U.Upon choosing

the values of z on the positive real axis where 0≤z=r <1,we must have

(1−α)− ∞ X

k=2

[Γn(1 +β)−(β+α)Γn+1]ak+p−1rk−1

1− ∞ X

k=2

Γn+1ak+p1rk−1+ ∞ X

k=1

Γn+1bk+p1rk+p−1

(9)

+ −

∞ X

k=1

[Γn(1 +β) + Γn+1(β+α)]bk+p1rk−1

1− ∞ X

k=2

Γn+1ak+p−1rk−1+ ∞ X

k=1

Γn+1bk+p−1rk−1 ≥0.

If the condition (8) does not hold, then the expression in (9) is negative for r suffi-ciently close to 1. Hence there exist z0 =r0 in (0,1) for which the quotient in (9) is negative. This contradicts the required condition for fn ∈Hp−(n+ 1, n, α, β).And so the proof is complete.

The following theorem gives the distortion bounds for functions in Hp−(n+ 1, n, α, β) which yields a covering results for this class.

Theorem 2.3. Let fn∈Hp−(n+ 1, n, α, β).Then for |z|=r <1 we have |fn(z)| ≤(1 +bp)rp+ [Φ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)−Ω(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)bp]rn+1+p

and

|fn(z)| ≥(1−bp)rp− {Φ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)−Ω(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)bp}rn+p+1

where,

(8)

Ω(n+ 1, n, p, α, β) = p (1 +β) + (α+β) p+1

n

(1 +β)− p+1p n+1(β+α).

Proof. We prove the right side inequality for |fn|. The proof for the left hand inequality can be done using similar arguments. Letfn∈Hp−(n+ 1, n, α, β).Taking the absolute value of fn then by Theorem 2.2, we can obtain:

|fn(z)|=|zp− ∞ X

k=2

ak+p−1zk+p−1+ (−1)n−1 ∞ X

k=1

bk+p−1zk+p−1| ≤

≤rp+ ∞ X

k=2

ak+p−1rk+p−1+ ∞ X

k=1

bk+p−1rk+p−1 =

=rp+bprp+ ∞ X

k=2

(ak+p1+bk+p1)rk+p−1 ≤

≤rp+bprp+ ∞ X

k=2

(ak+p1+bk+p1)rp+1=

= (1 +bp)rp+ Φ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β) ∞ X

k=2

1

Φ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)(ak+p−1+bk+p−1)r p+1

≤(1 +bp)rp+ Φ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)rn+p+1× ×[

∞ X

k=2

Ψ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)ak+p−1+ Θ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)bk+p−1]≤ ≤(1 +bp)rp+ [Φ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)−Ω(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)bp]rn+1+p.

The following covering result follows from the left hand inequality in Theorem 2.3.

Corollary 2.4. Let fn∈Hp−(n+ 1, n, α, β), then for|z|=r <1 we have {w:|w <1−bp−[Φ(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)−Ω(n+ 1, n, p, α, β)bp]⊂fn(U)}.

Forβ = 0 we obtain the results given in [4].

For β = 0, p = 1 and using the differential S˘al˘agean operator we obtain the results given [7].

(9)

References

[1]O.P. Ahuja, J.M. Jahangiri, Multivalent harmonic starlike functions, Ann. Univ. Marie Curie-Sklodowska Sect. A, LV 1(2001), 1-13.

[2]Y. Avci, E. Zlotkiewicz,On harmonic univalent mappings, Ann. Univ. Marie Crie-Sklodowska, Sect. A.,44(1991).

[3]J. Clunie, T. Scheil- Small, Harmonic univalent functions, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A. I. Math., 9(1984), 3-25.

[4] L. I. Cotˆırl˘a, Harmonic univalent functions defined by an integral operator, Acta Universitatis Apulensis, 17(2009), 95-105.

[5]J. M. Jahangiri,Harmonic functions starlike in the unit disc, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 235(1999).

[6]J. M. Jahangiri, G. Murugusundaramoorthy and K. Vijaya,S˘al˘agean harmonic univalent functions, South. J. Pure Appl. Math. ,2(2002), 77-82.

[7]A. R. S. Juma, L. I. Cotˆırl˘a, On harmonic univalent functions defined by generalized S˘al˘agean derivatives, submitted for publications.

[8]P. T. Mocanu,Three-cornered hat harmonic functions, Complex Variables and Elliptic Equation, 12(2009), 1079-1084.

[9]G.S. S˘al˘agean,Subclass of univalent functions, Lecture Notes in Math. Springer-Verlag, 1013(1983), 362-372.

[10]H. Silverman, Harmonic univalent functions with negative coefficients, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 220(1998), 283-289.

[11]H. Silverman, E. M. Silvia,Subclasses of harmonic univalent functions, New Zealand J. Math. 28(1999), 275-284.

Luminita-Ioana Cotˆırl˘a Babe¸s-Bolyai University

Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Alb Lupa¸s, On Sufficient Conditions for Certain Subclass of Analytic Functions Defined by Differential S˘ al˘ agean Operator, International Journal of Open Problem in Complex

Keywords and phrases: Analytic functions; Multivalent functions; Starlike func- tions; Subordination; Fractional calculus operators; Majorization

Motivated by above results, in this paper, we obtain the subordination results and integral means inequalities for the generalized class k− uniformly starlike func- tions..

Next, we will define the procedures just called above.After we selected the “Students” option, from the submenu “Overview”, the form (screen ) students.scx run and appears and

Lower bounds for the height can be used to obtain informations on the size of the ideal class group of a field K, following a general construction which we summarize as follows :..

Nous montrons qu’il existe un coefficient de Fourier non-trivial de la fonction indicatrice de A qui appartient `a P (si A ne poss`ede pas une structure sp´eciale explicite).. We

Ravichandran, Classes multivalent func- tions defined by Dziok-Srivastava linear operator and multiplier transformations, Kyungpook Math.. Mocanu, Second order differential

In this paper, we consider some properties such as growth and distortion theorem, coefficient problems, radii of convexity and starlikeness and con- vex linear combinations for