Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=vjeb20
Journal of Education for Business
ISSN: 0883-2323 (Print) 1940-3356 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjeb20
Quantitative Literacy for Undergraduate Business
Students in the 21st Century
Richard McClure & Sumit Sircar
To cite this article: Richard McClure & Sumit Sircar (2008) Quantitative Literacy for
Undergraduate Business Students in the 21st Century, Journal of Education for Business, 83:6, 369-374, DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.83.6.369-374
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.6.369-374
Published online: 07 Aug 2010.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 41
View related articles
he environment in which busi-ness enterprises operate today is radicallydifferentfromthatofprevious decades, requiring a reassessment of howundergraduatesinbusinessschools are taught. This environment has been shaped by deregulation, globalization, andtheInternet,whichhavecombined toproduceanintenselycompetitivesitu- ationinwhichcompaniesgenerallypro-duce similar products and have access tosimilartechnologies.Therefore,com-paniesmustcompetebydifferentiating their business processes, requiring the widespreaduseofbusinessanalyticsfor effectiveness(Davenport,2006;Daven-port&Harris,2007).
Thecentralthemeofthisarticleisthat quantitative methods can and should be appliedtoawidearrayofdecision-mak-ingscenariosandthatallbusinessstudents shouldhaveanadequatelevelofquantita-tiveliteracytomakecalculateddecisions intheincreasinglycomplex,information-oriented, knowledge-based world. We subscribe to the definition of quantita-tiveliteracyadoptedbytheInternational LifeSkillsSurvey(Dingwall,2000):“An aggregate of skills, knowledge, beliefs, dispositions, habits of mind, communi-cation capabilities, and problem solving skillsthatpeopleneedinordertoengage effectively in quantitative situations aris-inginlifeandwork”(p.147).
Although the termquantitative liter-acy is a superset of the termnumeracy
(Lange,2003),weusetheminterchange-ably. We strongly believe that numer-acy relates to numbers exactly as lit-eracyrelatestowords.Collegeeducation shouldstressthetwoequally,butsuchan equalstressdoesnotoccuratmostinsti-tutions.Unfortunately,numeracyisoften mistakenly equated with mathematics. Instead, it is more of an approach to solving problems and a state of mind. Students cannot achieve numeracy by taking more courses in the mathemat-ics department any more than educa-torscanachieveliteracybyaddingmore courses in English literature. The focus on quantitative literacy needs to be in everycourseineverydepartment,justas itshouldbeforliteracy.Steen(2004)and Richardson and McCallum (2004) have madethesamearguments.
Although business schools teach how swiftly the business environment is changing, instruction in quantitative methods has barely changed in almost halfacentury.Academicinstitutionsare exceedingly reluctant to change their curriculainquantumleaps(Bok,2005). Major external forces are necessary to bring about such change. We believe thattheseforcesarethechangingnature of business; the loss of U.S. competi- tiveness(only6ofthetop25informa-tion technology companies are based intheUnitedStates);globalizationand outsourcing to foreign countries; the threatofIndia,China,andSouthKorea
QuantitativeLiteracyforUndergraduate
BusinessStudentsinthe21stCentury
RICHARDMcCLURE SUMITSIRCAR MIAMIUNIVERSITY OXFORD,OHIO
T
ABSTRACT. Thecurrentbusinessenvironmentisawashinvastamountsof datathatongoingtransactionscontinually generate.Leading-edgecorporationsare usingbusinessanalyticstoachievecom-petitiveadvantage.However,educatorsare notadequatelypreparingbusinessschool studentsinquantitativemethodstomeet thischallenge.Formorethanhalfacentury, businessschoolshavereliedmostlyona courseincalculusandacourseinstatistics tomeettheneedsoftheirstudentsdespite aninformation-basedbusinessclimatethat haschangedsignificantly.Theauthorspro-posethateducatorspreparestudentsinthe areasofmathematicalmodelingandrisk managementandquantitativeskills,teach- ingtheminthecontextofmeaningfulbusi-nessproblems.
Keywords:businessstudents,mathematical modeling,quantitativeliteracy
Copyright©2008HeldrefPublications
VIEWPOINT
as major economic powers (14 of the world’s top 25 information technology companies are based inAsia); and the emergenceofaknowledge-basedecon-omyinwhich82%oftheworkforceis intheservicesector.
From our discussion with faculty in the present study, generally faculty resist increasing the quantitative liter-acy of business students because they believethat(a)allbusinessstudentsdo it being practically nonexistent in busi- nesscurricula(Kolata,1997).Ourobjec-tive for this article is to argue that to competegloballyandprepareAmerican businessstudentsforthefuture,thefol-lowing are necessary: (a) the increased useofquantitativemethodsinthecoreof theundergraduatebusinessprogram(i.e., therequiredcourses);(b)amodification ofthequantitativetoolscoveredtomeet emerging requirements in business; and (c) the use of sophisticated computer software, now commonly available to allorganizations,tomakeevencomplex computations relatively straightforward fortheordinarymanager.Inthenextsec-tions, we describe the emerging impact ofquantitativemethodsinbusiness,high-light the low standard of mathematics educationinU.S.highschools,andshow thatevenselectivebusinessschoolshave beenaffected.Wethendemonstratethat the quantitative methods courses now beingtaughtatselectedbusinessunder-graduate programs are inadequate and that the current business environment requires increased quantitative literacy on the part of all managers. Last, we make recommendations for appropriate courseworktomeettheseneeds.
TheFutureIsNow
Aftertransformingscienceandengi-neering,mathematicshasbeensteadily transforming many fields of business. Mathematics transformed finance and isnowchangingtheconductofawide array of (hitherto untouched) business
activities, ranging from advertising campaigns and newsroom research to the building of customer relationships (Baker, 2006). It is likely that faculty membersresistingtheuseofquantitative techniquesarenotawareoftheserecent developmentsinindustryandthatsome ofthosefacultywereprobablyeducated when mathematical approaches were not used. The situation is not unlike the rapid intrusion of computer graph-ics into advertising, which essentially renderedalargenumberofconventional commercialartistsobsolete.
Inarecentstudyof32organizations thathadcommittedtoquantitative,fact-basedanalysis,Davenport(2006)found that virtually all were leaders in their fields. They emphasized business ana- lyticsasanoverarchingstrategycham-calskillsbutalotofpeoplewiththevery bestanalyticalskills—andconsiderthem akeytoyoursuccess.
2.You not only employ analytics in almosteveryfunctionanddepartmentbut alsoconsideritsostrategicallyimportant thatyoumanageitattheenterpriselevel. 3.You not only are expert at number crunching but also invent proprietary metricsforuseinkeybusinessprocesses. (p.106)
Findingemployeesatalllevelswiththe necessary quantitative skills is a key problem.
MathematicsProficiencyinthe UnitedStates
Wehavenotfoundstatisticsthatspecifi-callyshowthemathematicsproficiencyof undergraduate business school students. We must infer this proficiency from the datathatisavailableforU.S.highschool andcollegestudentsingeneral.
In 2003, the Organization for Eco-nomic Cooperation and Development’s Program for International Student Assessment performed an internation-al survey of 15-year-olds (Chaddock, 2004). The U.S. 15-year-olds scored measurably better than their counter-partsinonly3ofthe30nationsinthe Organization for Economic
Coopera-tionandDevelopment.Eventhehighest U.S. achievers in mathematics literacy andproblemsolvingwereoutperformed by their peers in other industrialized nations.
Further,onceincollege,studentsface the following prospect described by a former president of Harvard University: “Most college seniors do not think that they have made substantial progress in improvingtheircompetenceinwritingor quantitative methods, and some assess-ments have found that many students actuallyregress”(Bok,2005,p.1).
QuantitativeCoursesRequiredat SampleU.S.BusinessSchools
Prior to suggesting an appropriate curriculumforquantitativeliteracy,itis instructivetoexaminethecurrentstatus ofthemathematicscoursesrequiredof business students at a number of U.S. universities. As we try to decide the minimum acceptable number of hours that each business student should have in mathematics, it is useful to exam-inethecurrentrequirementsofbusiness schools.Wehavefoundbysurveyinga number of business schools that these requirements predominantly include coursesincalculusandstatisticsof3–6 semesterhreach.
Thesecoursesdonotnormallycover some of the essential components of quantitativeliteracy.Thefollowingisa partiallistofquantitativeliteracyskills beyondarithmetic,geometry,andalge-bra (which are part of every school mathematics program) that the Mathe-maticalSocietyofAmerica(Sons,1996) endorsedandthatwebelieveeither(a) educatorstypicallydonotincludeinthe standard calculus and statistics courses or (b) students do not achieve a work-ablelevelofunderstanding.
1.Modeling: Formulatingproblems,seek-ingpatterns,anddrawingconclusions; recognizing interactions in complex systems; understanding linear, expo-nential, multivariate, and simulation models; understanding the impact of differentratesofgrowth.
2.Chance:Recognizingthatseemingly improbable coincidences are not uncommon; evaluating risks from availableevidence;understandingthe valueofrandomsamples.
Inthefollowingsections,weelaborateon beendescribedasdata-drenched.Arney (1999)arguedthat
The 21stcentury, with the dawning of the information age, brings new tools anddifferentrequirementsinmathemati-calknowledgetobeproductive.Because computerscanbeusedtoshouldermuch of the computational burden of future work, workers will face a new set of technologicalandquantitativechallenges. (p.224)
He further stated that understanding complexsystembehaviorisoneofthe mostimportanttopicsforthestudentto learntobepreparedforthecomplexities ofthe21stcentury.
Theproblemsthatpeopleinthebusi-ness world face are complex. To func-tion,businesspeoplecreateasimplified representationofaproblemtoassistin making decisions. This simplified rep-resentation of the problem is a model. A particular type of model of value to business students is a mathematical model, which is an algebraic represen-tation of a situation or problem. The advantage of expressing a problem in algebraictermsisthattheproblemmust beexplicitlydefined.Tobewelldefined, theproblemmustbewellunderstood.In fact, one purpose of model building is anincreasedunderstandingoftheprob-lem.Thisprevents,oratleastdecreases, theattempttosolveaproblemwithout understanding it or trying to solve the wrong problem. See Powell and Baker (2007) for a good introduction to the modelingprocess.
An additional advantage to using mathematicalmodelstorepresentprob-lems is that probmathematicalmodelstorepresentprob-lems of greater com-plexity can be represented and solved. Therearenumerousclassesofproblems that include a large number of deci-sionvariablesorvariableswithalarge number of possible values. Examples of this type of problem include the many classes of scheduling problems facedbybusinesspractitioners,includ-ing production scheduling, crew and workforce scheduling, and the routing
and scheduling of raw materials and finishedgoods.Findinggoodsolutions tosuchproblemswithouttheadvantage ofamathematicalmodel,oftenwithan associated algorithm, is not practical. See Ragsdale (2007) for a good intro-ductiontoanumberofthesemodels.
In addition, there are problems that arecomplexnotintermsofsizebutin terms of complex dynamic behavior. Examples include the behavior of any business system or parts of a business system, including the behavior of sup-ply chains for raw material and fin- ishedgoods,forthemanufacturingpro-cess and for the supply of labor (e.g., Manni & Cavana, 2003; McGarvey & Hannon, 2004; Pidd, 2004; Sterman, 2000). A mathematical representation of these problems using rate equations and simulation to predict the behavior of the system over time is a way to begintounderstandthesesystems.
Opponents of increased quantitative literacy argue that business students do not need mathematical modeling as partofthebusinesscurriculumandthat modeling is an approach for scientists andengineers.Contrarytothebeliefsof thisgroup,thetoolsofengineeringand science are rapidly entering the field of business decision making. A fairly recentexample is the field of financial engineering. The mathematics used to value options in the field of finance requiresmathematicalmodelingsophis-tication well beyond that acquired by the typical business student in the cur-rentcurriculum. tal budgeting, cash budgets, risk man- agement,workforcemanagement,ware-houselocation,pricing,mediaselection, supplychainanalysisandoptimization, andsoon.SeeTable1foranabbrevi-ated list of functional area problems andmodeltypesthathavebeenusedto guidethedecision-makingprocess.
The business world is facing more complicated problems and requires better problem-solving approaches to obtain better solutions. After all busi-ness students’ adequate preparation in pure mathematics, the use of
math-ematical modeling should be part of their preparation for the 21stcentury. AccordingtoArney(1999),theywillbe requiredto:
processdataandsynthesizeinformation, use and understand information technol-ogy, optimize elaborate plans, confront complexity, and leverage new technolo-gies. An essential component of mod-ern undergraduate mathematics becomes modeling (formulating and analyzing problems, using technical tools, and implementingsolutions)withanempha-sis on interdisciplinary problem solving. (p.224)
Schrage (2000) discussed the impor-tantrolethatmodelsandmodelingplay intheinnovationprocessofcompanies. The idea is to construct formal models andthenusethemodelsasinstruments forintrospection,discussion,anddebate. Hedescribedamodelasasharedspace that allows this collaboration. In par-ticular, “Any tools, technologies, tech-niques, or toys that let people improve howtheyplayseriouslywithuncertainty is guaranteed to improve the quality of innovation” (p. 2). He continued, “how organizations play with their models determineshowsuccessfullytheyman-age themselves and their markets” (p. 12). Schrage also pointed out that “the spreadsheettransformedthecultureand economics of global finance” (p. 12). Last,hesuggested,“Wheneveryoulook for the fundamental dynamics driving innovation,youfindinnovatorsmanag-ingmodels”(p.12).
Innovation and creativity are essen-tialforsuccessfulbusinesspractice.The problem is how to create an environ-ment or a process that will effectively generate creative solutions. These are not created in a vacuum: They usually result from a businessperson’s seeing a problem in a new way or creating a solutionprocedurethatisdifferentand better.Whatroledomodelsandmodel-ingplayinthiscreativeprocess?
Innovation in any but the simplest of situations can only take place if the problem or process is represented so thatnumerousstrategiesoroptionscan beeasilytriedandevaluated.Thisrep-resentation is a model, which is then used as an environment in which to experimentwithalternativeideas.Inthe business environment, many of these
representations are quantitative mod-els. A valuable model, in addition to allowing the testing of many alterna-tives, sometimes generates unexpected and surprising results or unanticipat-ed options. For example, consider a company’s supply chain, which needs to be as efficient as possible. There are numerous ways of configuring the chain. Which configuration would be most beneficial?Are there
unanticipat- edbenefitsfromaparticularconfigura- tion?Noonecanexplorethepossibili-tieswithoutaquantitativemodel,inthis caseprobablyastochasticsimulation.
The point is that innovation cannot take place without the model. Mental models are incomplete, and the for-mal quantitative model is the driver. Consider the relatively unsophisticated spreadsheet.Itsmainvalueisnotcom-putational results per se but the “what
if”factor:theabilitytocreatescenarios, explorehypotheticaldevelopments,and try out different options. The spread-sheet,asoneexecutivesaid,allowsthe userstocreateandthenexperimentwith “a phantom business within the com-puter” (Schrage, 2000, p. 44). This is howthequantitativemodelmakesinno-vationpossible.
Davenport(2006)describedthewide-spreaduseofmodelingandoptimization
TABLE1.FunctionalAreaProblemsandRelatedRelevantQuantitative Methods
Constrained Risk System
Areaandproblems optimizationa analysisb dynamicsc
Business
Short-termcashmanagement ¸ ¸ Currencytradingstrategies ¸ ¸
Capitalbudgeting ¸ ¸
Portfolioselection ¸ ¸
Projectingcashbudgets ¸
Retirementplanning ¸ ¸
Newproductdevelopment ¸
Multi-periodborrowingand
lending ¸ ¸ ¸
Managingcompanygrowth ¸
Organizationalstructure
dynamics ¸
Marketing
Warehouselocation ¸
Salesforceallocation ¸
Mediaselection ¸
Bidding ¸
Productpricing ¸ ¸
Airlineandhoteloverbooking ¸
Salesprojection ¸ ¸
Distributionstrategies ¸ ¸ Newproductriskassessment ¸
Marketsharestrategy ¸
Customerinterfacemodels ¸
Managingproductdemand ¸
Productdiffusionpattern ¸
Fadandfashionmodels ¸
Productlifecyclemodels ¸
Operationandsupplychain
Productmix ¸
Productscheduling ¸
Productionplanning ¸
Machinescheduling ¸
Facilitylocation ¸
Projectmanagement ¸ ¸
Centercapacityanalysis ¸ ¸
Systemconfiguration ¸
Supplierinterfacemodels ¸
Supplychainmodels ¸ ¸ ¸
Note.SourcesforfunctionalareaexamplesareF.W.WinstonandS.C.Albright(1997),J.Evans andD.Olson(2002),B.McGarveyandB.Hannon(2004),andJ.D.Sterman(2000).
a
Includeslinearprogramming,integerprogramming,nonlinearprogramming,andnetworkmod-els.bIncludesdecisiontrees,MonteCarlosimulation,andqueuingsimulation.cIncludesdiscrete
systemanalyticalmethodsandsystemsimulationmethods.
in the companies that he studied. He gaveseveralexamples:predictivemod- elingtoidentifythemostprofitablecus-tomers plus those with the most profit potential,optimizationofsupplychains, andestablishmentofpricesinrealtime to get the highest yield possible from eachcustomertransaction.
In essence, the student of today requires a curriculum that does not focus on computational methods of mathematics but on problem-solving methodsandtheuseofmathematicsas unknown and uncertain. Risk manage-ment, which assumes that future risks can be understood, measured, and—to some extent—predicted, is at the core of fields as diverse as business fore-casting, portfolio theory, odds making, insurance and derivatives, new product development, capital investment, mar-ket development, and global expansion. Bernstein(1998)indicated,“Theessence of risk management lies in maximiz- ingtheareaswherewehavesomecon-trolovertheoutcomewhileminimizing the areas where we have absolutely no control over the outcome and the link-age between effort and cause is hidden from us” (p. 107).Control is the result ofaknowledgeorunderstandingofthe causeandeffectrelationsthatareinher-ent in the structure of the problem or situation.Peoplehavenocontrolinsome partsoftheproblembecausetheydonot havethatunderstanding.Businesspeople typically characterize such parts of the problemasuncertainandtrytoquantify thatuncertaintybytheuseofprobabili-ties. The business decision maker then has the task of making decisions under the conditions just described. The use of the appropriate methods and mod-els available for decision making under theseconditionscangreatlyimprovethe decision-making process. Frequently, a model in conjunction with computer simulation is used as a means toward better analysis and decision making for thesetypesofproblems.
AProposaltoMeetthe QuantitativeLiteracyNeeds ofBusinessStudents
Because of the aforementioned need foradditionalquantitativetoolsforbusi-nessstudentstobeadequatelyprepared for the future, the question about how this can be achieved remains. Students ultimatelyneedtobepreparedtosolve practical problems by applying math-ematical concepts that are relevant.As discussed in the previous section, this requirementindicatesaneedforthemto beabletoconstructandusemodelsfor solvingbusinessproblems.Theyshould alsobepreparedtorespondtocomplex system behavior, which accompanies mostbusinesssituations.Anintroduction tooptimizationaspartoftheinstruction inmodelbuildingiswarrantedbecause businesspeoplearetryingtofindthebest solutions to problems. Last, a student should be introduced to working with uncertaintyandhowtomakegooddeci-sionseveniftheyareuncertain.
The calculus course provides the fun-damental mathematical underpinning of rates of change and accumulation nec-essary for a student to begin to model the behavior of complex systems. It is imperative that this course be presented so that the student sees the connection betweentheuseofcalculusandthesolv-ingofbusinessproblems.Thebridge,in ouropinion,istoincludemodelingaspart of, or in conjunction with, the calculus course. The discussion would focus on building simple models that involve rate equations.A simple example of the use ofrateequationsinbusinessisestimating a system over time. This discussion can bethelinkshowingthevalueofcalculus for problem solving.We do not propose that much time be spent on analytical methodsforsolvingthesemodelsbeyond someverysimpleones.Computeralgebra software or simulation methods, or even spreadsheets,canbeusedforthispurpose. For other examples of such models, see Giordano,Weir,andFox(2003).
We believe that educators and stu-dents can cover most of this material, includingthecalculus,inabout6semes-ably the most creative way to accom-plish this, but for many institutions this approachmaynotbeworkable.Instead, a practical approach is simply to add a required modeling course to the cur-riculumforallstudents.Thecoursemust focusonusingmodelingtosolverelevant functionalareaproblems.Inaddition,the courseshouldbethebridgethattiesthe preparation in calculus to the solving of business problems. The use of the spreadsheet as a modeling environment would certainly improvethechancesof seeingincreaseduseofmodelinginthe functional areas. Thus, the ideal course wouldfocusonbusinessproblemswith theuseofmodelingdemonstratedasthe routetobetterdecisions.
Ideally,thestudentsshouldseemod-eling across the curriculum, which meanstheuseofmodelingandmodels inthefunctionalareacoursesaswell.A bridgemustbebuiltbetweenthequan-titative and functional areas to allow thistohappen.Thefunctionalareafac-ulty,includingtheadministration,must be convinced that quantitative literacy is invaluable in achieving better busi-nessdecisions.TheworkofDavenport (2006)andothersmustbeusedassales tools, along with data about trends in industry, to convince others that the workisimportant.
Although this process seems difficult and requires much commitment and effort, we believe the results could be impressive.The objective of integrating modeling into the curriculum and the processthatwehavesuggestedreflectthe plansofanumberofbusinessschoolsto integratethefunctionalareasofbusiness. The proposed procedure for improving quantitative literacy could easily piggy-backontheoverallplanforintegration.
A widely acclaimed integrative approachthatincludesmanyoftheele-mentsthatwebelieveareimportantfor
businessstudentsaspartoftheattemptto improvequantitativeliteracywasdevel- opedoverthelastfewyearsattheUni-versityofArizonaundertheauspicesof a multiyear program sponsored by the MathematicalAssociationofAmerica.It in part two. Six other institutions had usedtheirmaterialasofNovember2002 (Albers, 2002). In addition, a number ofbusinessschoolsteachmodelingina stand-alone required or elective course thatmaybetitledManagementScience orOperationsResearch.
Conclusion
In trying to promote the importance ofquantitativeliteracyforbusinessstu-dents,weappreciatethatweareinsome sense trying to change a culture that believesthatmathematicsisnotvaluable for business students. The problem is morewidespreadthaninjustthebusiness community:Itisingrainedinthepopula-tion at large.A number of years ago, a presidentoftheAmericanMathematical Association pointed out that people are ashamed of being verbally illiterate but donotseemtopossessthesamelevelof guiltforbeingmathematicallyilliterate. Infact,manybragaboutit.
In the present study, we found the following:
1.The United States is behind the rest of the industrialized world in terms ofquantitativeliteracy.
2.This circumstance is true not only for the average student but also for studentsadmittedtoselectiveuniver-sitiesandtheirbusinessschools. 3.Quantitative methods courses have
not changed much in half a century, although the business environment
hasevolveddramaticallywithdevel-5.High school mathematics followed by college courses in calculus and statisticsareinsufficientforquantita-tiveliteracy.
6.Modeling and risk management are vital aspects of quantitative literacy thataremissedbyfocusingsolelyon calculusandstatistics.
7.Heavyuseshouldbemadeofwidely available computer software in busi-ness schools to more easily apply quantitative methods to business problems and to apply sophisticated analysestolargedatasets.
Inconclusion,itisimportantforedu-cators to remember that “for most stu-dents,skillslearnedfreeofcontextare skillsdevoidofmeaningandutility.To be effective, numeracy skills must be taught and learned in settings that are both meaningful and memorable” (QL DesignTeam,2001).
NOTES
RichardMcClure isprofessorofdecisionsci-encesintheFarmerSchoolofBusinessatMiami University.
Sumit Sircar is the Armstrong Professor of communications technology and management in the Farmer School of Business at Miami Uni-versity.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Dr. Richard McClure, Professor ofDecisionSciences,FarmerSchoolofBusiness, MiamiUniversity,Oxford,OH45056,USA.
E-mail:mcclurrh@muohio.edu
REFERENCES
Albers,D.J.(2002,November).Agenuineinter-disciplinary partnership: MAA unveils math-ematics for business decisions.Focus, Math-ematicalAssociationofAmerica,15. Arney,D.C.(1999).Undergraduatemathematics
forthefuture:Modelingandsolvingproblems, understanding the new sciences. Retrieved March 20, 2006, from http://www.projectinter math.org/docs/arney1.pdf
Baker,S.(2006,January23).Whymathwillrock yourworld.BusinessWeek,54–62.
Bernstein, P. (1998).Against the gods: The remarkablestoryofrisk.NewYork:Bernstein. Bok, D. (2005).Are colleges failing? Higher ed needsnewlessonplans.RetrievedDecember18, 2005,fromhttp://www.boston.com/news/globe/ editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005/12/18/ Chaddock, G. R. (2004).Math + test =Trouble
forUSeconomy.RetrievedDecember7,2004, from http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1207/ p01s04-ussc.html
Davenport, T. H. (2006, January). Competing on analytics.Harvard Business Review,84, 98–107.
Davenport,T.H.,&Harris,J.G.(2007). Compet-ing on analytics:The new science of winning. Boston:HarvardBusinessSchool.
Dingwall,J.(2000).InternationalLifeSkillsSur-vey.Policyresearchinitiative.Ottawa,Ontario, Canada:StatisticsCanada.
Evans, J., & Olson, D. (2002).Simulation and riskanalysis(2nded.).UpperSaddleRiver,NJ: PrenticeHall.
Giordano,F.R.,Weir,M.D.,&Fox,W.P.(2003). A first course in mathematical modeling(3rd ed.).PacificGrove,CA:Brooks/Cole. Kolata, G. (1997). Understanding the news. In
L. A. Steen (Ed.),Quantitative literacy for tomorrow’s America(pp. 23–29).New York: TheCollegeBoard.
Lange, J. D. (2003). Mathematics for literacy. In B. L. Madison & L. A. Steen (Eds.), Quantitative literacy(p. 81). Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Dis-ciplines.
Manni, K. E., & Cavana, R.Y. (2003).Systems thinkingandmodeling:Understandingchange and complexity.Albany, Auckland, New Zea-land:PearsonPrenticeHall.
McGarvey, B., & Hannon, B. (2004).Dynamic modeling for business management: An intro-duction.NewYork:Springer.
Pidd,M.(Ed.).(2004).Systemsmodelingtheory andpractice.WestSussex,England:Wiley. Powell, S. G., & Baker, K. R. (2007).
Manage-mentscience: Theartofmodelingwithspread-sheets(2nded.).Hoboken,NJ:Wiley.
QLDesignTeam.(2001).Thecaseforquantita-tiveliteracy.InL.A.Steen(Ed.),Mathematics anddemocracy(p.16).Princeton,NJ:National CouncilonEducationandtheDisciplines. Ragsdale,C.T.(2007).Spreadsheetmodelingand
decisionanalysis(5thed.). Mason,OH:Thom-sonSouth-Western.
Richardson, R. M., & McCallum,W. G. (2004). In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Achieving quantitative literacy.MathematicalAssociationofAmerica, MAANotes[report]62,14.
Schrage, M. (2000).Serious play: How the world’s best companies simulate to innovate. Boston:HarvardBusinessSchoolPress. Sons, L., Ed. (1996).Quantitative reasoning
for college graduates: A supplement to the standards.MAA Report 1, A report of the CUPM Committee on Literacy Requirements. Washington,DC:MathematicalAssociationof America.
Steen, L. A. (2004). Achieving quantitative lit-eracy.Mathematical Association of America, MAANotes[report],62,xii.
Sterman,J.D.(2000).Businessdynamics,systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston:McGraw-Hill.
Winston, F. W., & Albright, S. C. (1997). Practical management science, spreadsheet modeling and applications. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.