• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Change Requests | OGC

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Change Requests | OGC"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

All Fields marked with

*

are mandatory.

Name:

*

Stefan Below

Organization:

*

University of Muenster - Institute for Geoinformatics

Email:

*

[email protected]

Document

Name/Version:

*

SensorML Encoding Standard v 1.0 Schema Corregendum 1 / 1.01

OGC Project

Document:

*

07-122r2

If this is a revision of a previous submission and you have a Change Request Number, then check here:

Enter the CR number here:

Enter the Revsion Number that you are revising here:

Title:

*

Replace ref syntax with xpath

Source:

*

University of Muenster, Institute for Geoinformatics (IfGI)

Work item code:

Category:

*

Reason for

change:

*

The “ref” syntax used for connecting SensorML and SweCommon elements should be replaced. Navigating only on “property” elements or name attributes is error prone and cumbersome.

This is especially problematic when writing application schemas extending SensorML. Sticking to the property navigation mechanism results in serious naming issues. Different objects with the same property cannot be used since they aren’t accessible.

Also, the general OGC policy of reusing established IT technology implies the usage of XPath.

(2)

Summary of

change:

*

It is highly recommended to switch to the well-supported XPath technology. The syntax is safe and much easier to parse. Existing technology technology can be reused. The syntax and use is much better documented.

Consequences if

not approved:

Clauses affected:

*

throughout

Additional

Documents

affected:

Supporting

Documentation:

Comments:

Status:

Disposition:

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

GML uses an explicit syntax to instantiate a GML application schema conformant with the General Feature Model defined in ISO 19109 in an XML document. A feature is encoded as an

This conformance class is an extension of the Core conformance class, supporting registration of quality conformanceadditional metadata elements. Test case

Adding a circle property type would allow GMLSF to be used with these components more easily. Summary

The Harmonization Working Group is currently seeking to define common service metadata elements, and filter capabilities fall within the purview of this group.. 3.2.4 Implications

CityGML datasets enhanced with metadata at the level of features, attributes, or geometry values are currently not interoperable, since there is no standardized metadata model for

NetCDF classic datasets shall represent information using dimensions, vari- ables and attributes using the primitive data types as shown in the UML dia- gram in Figure 1. Te st m e

Semantic annotations extend the already existing annotations like the OGC Capabilities doc ument by linking particular metadata elements to conceptualized domain knowle dge.

Remove the incorrect statement that â �� all elements are substitutable for gml:AbstractValue (and thus transitively for gml:AbstractObject) so that they can be used directly by