Agustini, Nurlaela. 2014
PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN TES DIAGNOSTIK PILIHAN GANDA DUA TINGKAT UNTUK MENGIDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI IKATAN KIMIA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Alwi, H. (2007). Kamus besar bahasa indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Edisi Pertama. Bandung: Rosda.
Arifin. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam.
Barker, V. (1995). A longitudinal study of 16-18 year olds’ understanding of basic chemical ideas, unpublished Ph.D. (Tesis). Department of Educational Studies, University of York.
Bayrak, B.K. (2013). “Using two-tier test to identify primary student’s conceptual understanding and alternative conceptions in acid base”. Mevlana International Journal of Education,3(2), 19 – 26.
Berg, E. V. D. (1991). Miskonsespsi fisika dan remediasi. Salatiga: Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.
Bodner, G. M. (1991). “I have found you an argument: the conceptual knowledge of beginning chemistry graduate students”. Journal of Chemical Education, 68 (5), 385-388.
Boo, H. K. (1998). “Students’ understandings of chemical bonds and the energetics of chemical reactions”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 569 – 581.
Brady, J. E..(1990). General chemistry. Edisi kelima. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Brueckner, L.J., & Melby, E.O. (1981). Diagnostic and remedial teaching. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Cachapuz, A.F., and Martins, I.P. (1987). High school students' ideas about energy of chemical reactions. Dalam Novak, J., & Helm, H., (Penyunting), Proceedings of the International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mechanics, 3, 60-68.
105
Chang, R. (2003). Kimia dasar : Konsep-konsep inti. Penerjemah : Martoprawiro, M. A., dkk. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.
Depdiknas. (2003). Pedoman khusus pengembangan silabus dan penilaian.
Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Depdiknas. (2007). Tes diagnostik. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Lanjutan Pertama, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Ditjen PMPTK. (2008). Pendekatan, jenis, dan metode penelitian pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Duit, R. and Treagust, D.F. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (6), 671–688.
Fensham, P. (1975). Concept formation. Dalam D. J. Daniels (Penyunting), New movements in the study and teaching of chemistry (hlm. 199-217). London: Temple Smith.
Fini. (2011). Definisi Konsep. Tersedia online:
http://id.shvoong.com/writing-and-speaking/2164730-defenisi-konsep/#ixzz2mVCGwsyN [Tanggal akses 4 Desember 2013].
Firman, H. (2000). Penilaian Hasil belajar Dalam pengajaran Kimia. Bandung:
Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia FMIPA UPI.
Fisher, K. M. (1985). “A misconception in biology: Amino acids and translation”.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22,53-62.
Gillespie, R. J. (1997). “The great ideas of chemistry”. Journal of Chemical Education, 74 (7), 862-864.
Gronlund, N.E.. (1982). Constructing Achievement Tests. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Harnanto, A. dan Ruminten. (2009). Kimia Untuk SMA/MA Kelas X. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Hurst, O. (2002). “How we teach molecular structure to freshmen”. Journal of Chemical Education, 79 (6), 763-764.
106
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563 – 575.
Lewis, R. & Evans W. (2006). Chemistry. Edisi ketiga. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mehrens, W.A. & Lehmann, I.J. (1973). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. New York: Holt, Rinechart and Winston.
Moore, J. dan Langley, R. (2007). Chemistry for the utterly confused. USA: McGraw-Hill.
Novak, J. D. (Ed.) (1987). Proceeding of the second international seminar misconception and educational strategies in science and mathematics. 1, 2, 3. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.
Osborne, R. J. & Wittrock, M. (1983). “Learning science : A generative process”. Science Education, 67 (4), 489 – 508.
Pabuçcu, A & Geban, O. (2006). “Remediating misconceptions concerning chemical bonding through conceptual change text”. H.U. Journal of Education. H.U. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 184-192.
Prihantoro, A. (2012). Perihal tes diagnostik. [Online]. Tersedia di: http://agungprihantoro.wordpress.com/2012/04/03/perihal-tes-diagnostik/ Diakses 7 Maret 2014.
Purnamasari, R. (2012). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two-tier multiple choice untuk mengukur pemahaman konsep pada materi kelarutan dan hasil kali kelarutan. (Skripsi). FPMIPA UPI, Bandung.
Sari, N.K.E. (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two-tier sebagai instrumen alternatif untuk mendeteksi miskonsespsi siswa sma pada materi laju reaksi. (Skripsi). FPMIPA UPI, Bandung.
Sugiyono.(2012). Metode penelitian administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukardi. (2010). Evaluasi pendidikan : Prinsip dan operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Suparno, P. (2005). Miskonsepsi dan perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan fisika.
Jakarta: Grasindo.
107
Taber, K.S. (1997). “Student understanding of ionic bonding: Molecular versus electrostatic framework?”.School Science Review, 78, 85-95.
Taber, K. S. (1998a). “An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education”. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (5), 597-608. Taber K. (2002a). Chemical misconceptions - prevention, diagnosis and cure
(Volume I: theoretical background). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Takeuchi, Y. (2006). Pengantar Kimia (Terjemahan). Tokyo:Iwanami Publishing Company.
Tan, D.K-C. dan Treagust, D.F. (1999). “Evaluating students’ understanding of chemical bonding”. School Science Review, 81, 75–83.
Tarakchi, M., dkk. (1999). “A cross-age study of high school student’s understanding of diffusion and osmosis”. H.U. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,
15, 84 – 93.
Tinambunan, W. (1988). Evaluation of student achievement. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Treagust, D.F. (1995). “Diagnostic assessment of students’ science knowledge”. Dalam Glynn, S.M & Duit, R. (Penyunting), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (hlm. 327-346). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning and retention. UniServe Science Assessment Symposium Proceedings.
Tuysuz, Chengiz. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and
assess students’ understanding in chemistry. Academic Journals.
Whitten. (2004). General chemistry. Edisi ketujuh. Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing.
Winkel, W. S. (1991). Psikologi pengajaran. Jakarta : PT Grasindo.
