DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Morgan GE.Clinical Anesthesiology, 4th ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill
Companies, Inc; 2006. pp. 91-116
2. Aitkenhead AR, Smith G.Textbook Of Anaesthesia. 2nd ed. Edinburgh:
Churchill Livingstone;1990. p.365
3. Ayu R. Perbedaan Pengaruh Premedikasi Berbagai dosis Klonidin
Terhadap Respon Kardiovaskuler pada Laringoskopi dan Intubasi
Endotrakhea [tesis]. Semarang: Bagian Anestesi Fakultas Kedokteran
Universitas Diponegoro; 2013.
4. Hagberg, C, Georgi R, Krier C. Complications of managing the airway.
Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology; 2005;19(4):641-59
5. Sener EB, Ustun E, Ustun B, Sarihasan B. Haemodynamic responses and
upper airway morbidity following tracheal intubation in patients with
hypertension: Conventional laryngoscopy versus an intubating laryngeal
mask airway. Clinics; 2012;67(1):49-54
6. Siddiqui, Khan FZH. Haemodynamic response to Tracheal Intubation via
intubating laryngeal mask airway versus Direct Laryngoscopic Tracheal
Intubation. J Pak Med Assoc;2007;57(1): 11-4.
7. Simpson GD, Ross MJ, Mckeown DW, Ray DC. Tracheal intubation in
the critically ill: a multi-centre national study of practice and
endotracheal intubation. Acta Medica Iranica; 2004;42(6): 437.
9. Flemming DC, Orkin Fk, Kirby RR. Hazards of tracheal intubation. In:
Nikolous G, Robert RK. Complication in anesthesiology. 2nd ed.
Philadelphia: Lippincottraven; 1996. p. 229
10.Shribman AJ, Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to
laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth;
1997;59(3): 295-9
11.Ansari M, Javadi H, Pourbehi M, Moqharrabi M, Rayzan M, Semnani S,
Et al. The Association of rate pressure product (RPP) and myocardial
perfusion imaging (MPI) findings: a preliminary study. Perfusion;2012;
27(3):207-13
12.Hassan HG, el-Sharkawy TY, Renck H, Mansour G, Fouda A.
Hemodynamic and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with vs
without endotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scan.1991;35(5):442-7
13.Fujii Y, Tanaka H, Toyooka H. Circulatory responses to laryngeal mask
airway insertion or tracheal intubation in normotensive and hypertensive
patients. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia;1995;42(1): 32-6
14.Stone DJ, Gal TJ. Airway management. In: Miller RD. Anesthesia 5thed.
Philadelphia: Churchill livingstone; 2000. pp.1414-48
RK.Clinical Anesthesia. 5th ed. Philadelphia: William & Wilkins; 2006.
pp. 1247-346
16.Lecanwasam H, Dunn PF. Airway evaluation and management. In: Huford
WE, Bailin MT, Davidson JK. Clinical anesthesia procedures of the
massachusets general hospital. 6th.ed. Philadelphia: William & Wilkins;
2002. pp. 568-621
17.Mallick A, Klein H, Mosse E. Prevention of cardiovascular response to
tracheal intubation. Br J Anesth; 1996: 296-7
18.Sukron. Perbandingan Efek Magnesium Sulfat 30 mg/kgBB Intravena
dengan Lidokain 1,5 mg/kgBB terhadap Respon Kardiovaskuler Akibat
Tindakan Laringoskopi dan Intubasi [tesis]. Semarang: Bagian Anestesi
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro; 2009
19.Singh M. Stress response and anesthesia altering the pre and
post-operative management. Indian J Anesth; 2003; 47(6):427-34
20.Gulec H, Cakan T, Yaman T, Yaman H, Kilinc AS, Basar H. Comparison
of hemodynamic and metabolic stress responses caused by endotracheal
tube and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences; 2012;17(2):148-53
21.Handerson J. Airway mangement in adult. In: Miller RD,editor.
Anesthesia 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchil Livingstone;2010. pp. 1573-610
22.Mahjoubifar M, Boroojeny SB. Hemodynamic changes during orotracheal
intubation with glidescope and dyrect laryngoscope. Iranian Red Crecent
anaesthesiology; 2007;12(1): 5-9
24.Henderson J. Tracheal intubation of adult patient. In: Caldent F, Pearce A.
Core topics in airway management. New York: Cambridge university
press; 2005: 69-80
25.Fuji Y, Saitoh Y, Shinji. Combined diltiazem and lidocaine reduces
cardiovascular response to tracheal extubation and anesthesia emergence
in hyperternsive patients. Can J Anesth; 1999: 46:952-6
26.Muchtar A, Suyatna FD. Obat antiaritmia. Dalam: Ganiswarna S,
Setiabudy R, Suyatna FD, Purwantyastuti, Nafriadi, editor. Farmakologi
dan terapi. Edisi 4. Bagian Farmakologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas
Indonesia. Jakarta: Gaya Baru; 1995: 289-314
27.Peralta R, Poterack KA, Kelly RF. Toxicity lidocaine.Medscape.[internet]
2008.c2014 [updated 2014 Jan 8 ; cited 2014 Feb 2].available from:
http//www.emedicene.com/article/167309-overview
28.Stoelting RK. Cardiac antidysrhythhmic drugs. In: Stoelting RK.
Pharmacology and physiology in anesthetic practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia:
Lippincott William & Wilkins; 2006. pp. 370-86
29.Mikawa K, Nishina K, Maekawa N, Obara H. Comparison of nicardipine,
dilitiazem, and verapamyl for controlling the cardiovascular responses to
30.Stackhouse RA, Infosino A. Airway Management. In: Miller RD, Pardo
MC, editors. Basic of Anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier
Saunders;2011. pp.219-25
31.Atmawan DB, Villyastuti YW, Harahap MS. Perbedaan Tekanan Darah,
Laju Jantung dan Rate Pressure Product (RPP) Pada Pemberian Lidokain
1,5 Mg/Kgbb Intravena Sebelum Intubasi [tesis].Semarang: Bagian
Anestesi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro; 2009
32.Jerry AD, Susan AD. Understanding Anesthesia Equipment 5th Edition.
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Willkins; 2007. pp. 21-40
33.Wikipedia, Diver D. Laryngoscopes-Miller blades [internet]. Wikipedia
the free encyclopedia; c2014 [updated 2013 Jan 17 ; cited 2014 Feb 16].
Available from :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Laryngoscopes-Miller_blades.JPG#filehistory
34.Wikipedia, Sasata. Macintosh Blades [internet]. Wikipedia the free
encyclopedia; c2014 [updated 2010 Aug 13 ; cited 2014 Feb 16].
Available from : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Macintosh_Blades.
jpgmiller
35.Oklahoma State University,KoJCH. Airway Management and Ventilation
[internet]. Oklahoma (USA): Oklahoma State University;c2014 [updated
2014 February 16; cited 2014 February 16]. Available from :
2005: 57-67
37.Sulistiyono D, Villyastuti YW, Susilowati D. Intubasi endotrakea. Dalam :
Sunarjo, Jatmiko HD, editor. Anestesiologi. Semarang. Ikatan Dokter
Spesialis Anestesiologi Indonesia; 2010: 197-202
38.Dept of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, The Chinese University,Sally
F.Intubation [internet]. Hongkong: The Chinese University; c2014
[updated 2014 February 4; cited 2014 February 16]. Available from :
http://www.aic.cuhk.edu.hk/web8/Intubation.htm
39.Lestari AP. Perbedaan Pengaruh Pemberian Propofol Dan Tionpental
Terhadap Respon Hemodinamik Pada Induksi Anestesi Umum [tesis].
Semarang: Bagian Anestesi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro;
2010
40.Smith P, Smith FJ, Becker PJ. Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy
with and without tracheal intubation. Southern African Journal of
Lampiran 4. Output SPSS
A. OUTPUT SPSS SAMPEL PENELITIAN
Umur
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
BB
T-Test
Ranks
19 20.58 391. 00
19 18.42 350. 00
38 Kelompok
> 20 detik < 20 detik Total Umur
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Test S tatisticsb
160 .000 350 .000 -.59 9 .549
.563a Man n-Whitn ey U
Wilcoxon W Z
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed) E xa ct Sig. [ 2*(1-tailed S ig.)]
Umur
Not corrected for ties. a.
Group ing V ariable : Kelo mpok b.
Group Statistics
19 59. 79 11. 703 2.6 85
19 58. 11 8.7 04 1.9 97
Kelomp ok > 2 0 detik < 2 0 detik BB
N Me an Std. Deviation
TB
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Inde pende nt S ample s Test
.540 E quality o f Va riances
t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Mea n Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
E qual vari ances assum ed
E qual vari ances not assumed B B
Ranks
19 19.26 366.00
19 19.74 375.00
38 Kelompok
> 20 detik < 20 detik Total TB
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Test S tatisticsb
176 .000 366 .000 -.13 3 .894
.908a Man n-Whitn ey U
Wilcoxon W Z
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed) E xa ct Sig. [ 2*(1-tailed S ig.)]
T B
Not corrected for ties. a.
Crosstabs
E xp ected Count % within Ke lompo k % o f To tal
Count
E xp ected Count % within Ke lompo k % o f To tal
Count
E xp ected Count % within Ke lompo k
Chi-S quare Tests
.106b 1 .744 P earson Chi-S quare
Jenis kelamin * Kelompok
12.0 12.0 24.0
57.9 % 68.4 % 63.2 % 28.9 % 34.2 % 63.2 %
19 19 38
19.0 19.0 38.0
100 .0% 100 .0% 100 .0% 50.0 % 50.0 % 100 .0% Count
E xp ected Count % within Kelo mpok % o f Tot al
Count
E xp ected Count % within Kelo mpok % o f Tot al
Count
E xp ected Count % within Kelo mpok % o f Tot al
Laki-laki
P erempu an Jenis kel amin
T otal
> 20 detik < 20 detik K elompo k
T otal
Chi-S quare Tests
.452b 1 .501 P earson Chi-S quare
B. OUTPUT SPSS TDS
Lama Intubasi > 20 detik
T-Test
P aired Sam ples S tatis tics
115 .89 19 11.8 46 2.71 8
Paire d Sa mples Corre lations
19 .39 8 .09 2
N Correlat ion Sig.
P aire d Sa mples Te st
.000 .000 .007 .497
Mea n S td. Deviation S td. E rror M ean
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce P aired Diffe rences
Lama Intubasi < 20 detik
T-Test
Paired Samples Statistics
113. 53 19 12.812 2.939
130. 26 19 24.062 5.520
113. 53 19 12.812 2.939
120. 11 19 20.415 4.683
113. 53 19 12.812 2.939
113. 26 19 16.374 3.756
TDS.pre
Mean N Std. Dev iation
Std. Error Mean
Paired Samples Correlati ons
19 .627 .004
19 .439 .060
19 .581 .009
TDS.pre & TDS.1 Pair 1
TDS.pre & TDS.5 Pair 2
TDS.pre & TDS.10 Pair 3
N Correlation Sig.
P aire d Sa mples Te st
.001 .143 .934
Mea n
S td. Deviation S td. E rror Me an
Lower Upper 95% Co nfidence Interval of th e Difference P aired Differences
NPar Tests
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
T-Test
Ranks
4a 7.38 29.5 0
15b 10.7 0 160 .50
0c 19 Negative Ranks
P ositive Ran ks T ies
T otal T DS .2 - T DS .pre
N Mea n Rank S um of Ranks
T DS .2 < T DS .pre a.
T DS .2 > T DS .pre b.
T DS .2 = T DS .pre c.
Test S tatisticsb
-2.6 37a .008 Z
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed )
T DS .2 -T DS .pre
B ased on neg ative ranks. a.
Wilcoxon Sign ed Ranks T est b.
Group Statisti cs
19 115 .89 11.8 46 2.71 8
19 113 .53 12.8 12 2.93 9
Kelomp ok > 20 detik < 20 detik T DS.pre
N Mea n Std. Deviation
T-Test
Independent S ample s Test
.08 3
E quality o f Va riances
t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Me an Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of t he Differen ce t-te st for Equ ality of
Me ans
E qual variances assum ed
E qual variances not assumed T DS .pre
Group Statisti cs
19 141 .89 26. 727 6.1 32
N Me an Std. Deviation
Std. Error Me an
Inde pende nt S ample s Test
.594
E quality o f Va riances
t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Mea n Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
E qual vari ances assum ed
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
T-Test
Ranks
19 21.95 417. 00
19 17.05 324. 00
38 Kelompok
> 20 detik < 20 detik Total TDS.2
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Test S tatisticsb
134 .000 324 .000 -1.3 59 .174 .181a Man n-Whitn ey U
Wilcoxon W Z
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed) E xa ct Sig. [ 2*(1-tailed S ig.)]
T DS .2
Not corrected for ties. a.
Group ing V ariable : Kelo mpok b.
Group Statisti cs
19 126 .68 18. 547 4.2 55
19 120 .11 20. 415 4.6 83
Kelomp ok > 2 0 detik < 2 0 detik T DS.5
N Me an Std. Deviation
T-Test
Inde pende nt S ample s Test
.000
E quality o f Va riances
t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Mea n Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
E qual vari ances assum ed
E qual vari ances not assumed T DS .5
Group Statisti cs
19 118 .26 12.7 10 2.91 6
N Mea n Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mea n
Inde pende nt S ample s Test
.266
E quality o f Va riances t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Mea n Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
E qual vari ances assum ed
C. OUTPUT SPSS LAJU JANTUNG
Lama Intubasi > 20 detik
T-Test
Paired Samples Statistics
79.05 19 8.270 1.897
86.21 19 12.925 2.965
79.05 19 8.270 1.897
85.42 19 14.611 3.352
79.05 19 8.270 1.897
82.11 19 13.042 2.992
HR.pre
Paired Samples Correlations
19 .904 .000
N Correlation Sig.
P aire d Sa mples Te st
.000 .003 .199
Mea n
S td. Deviation S td. E rror M ean
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce P aired Diffe rences
NPar Tests
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
Lama Intubasi < 20 detik
T-Test
Test S tatisticsb
-.10 9a
Wilcoxon Sign ed Ranks T est b.
P aire d Sa mples Statistics
T-Test
Paire d Sa mple s Correlations
19 .69 3 .00 1
HR.pre & HR.10 Pair 4
N Correla tion Sig.
P aire d Sa mples Te st
.003 .015 .244 .785
Mea n S td. Deviation S td. E rror Me an
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce P aired Differences
t
Group S tatistic s
19 79.0 5 8.27 0 1.89 7
Inde pende nt S ample s Test
.112
E quality o f Va riances
t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Mea n Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
E qual vari ances assum ed
T-Test
N Me an Std. Deviation
Std. Error Me an
Inde pende nt S ample s Test
.000
E quality o f Va riances
t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Mea n Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
E qual vari ances assum ed
E qual vari ances not assumed HR.1
N Me an Std. Deviation
T-Test
Inde pende nt S ample s Test
.057
E quality o f Va riances
t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Mea n Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
E qual vari ances assum ed
E qual vari ances not assumed HR.2
N Me an Std. Deviation
Std. Error Me an
Inde pende nt S ample s Test
.265
E quality o f Va riances
t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Mea n Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
E qual vari ances assum ed
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
D. OUTPUT SPSS RPP
> 20 detik < 20 detik Total HR.10
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Test S tatisticsb
141 .000 331 .000 -1.1 55 .248 .258a Man n-Whitn ey U
Wilcoxon W Z
A symp. S ig. (2 -tailed) E xa ct Sig. [ 2*(1-tailed S ig.)]
HR.10
Not corrected for ties. a.
Group ing V ariable : Kelo mpok b.
P aire d Sa mples Sta tistics
917 1.42 19 138 9.882 318 .861
123 23.05 19 327 7.733 751 .964
917 1.42 19 138 9.882 318 .861
116 89.16 19 348 2.057 798 .839
917 1.42 19 138 9.882 318 .861
104 82.11 19 260 8.639 598 .463
917 1.42 19 138 9.882 318 .861
930 1.00 19 192 4.590 441 .531
T-Test
Paired Sa mples Correl ations
19 .652 .002
19 .788 .000
19 .430 .066
19 .400 .089
RPP.pre & RPP.1 Pair 1
RPP.pre & RPP.2 Pair 2
RPP.pre & RPP.5 Pair 3
RPP.pre & RPP.10 Pair 4
N Correlat ion Sig.
P aire d Sa mples Te st
-315 1.63 -251 7.7 -131 0.68 -129 .579 259 5.209 253 5.830 237 0.206 186 9.244
595 .382 581 .759 543 .762 428 .834
-440 2.48 -374 0.0 -245 3.09 -103 0.53 -190 0.78 -129 5.5 -168 .282 771 .368 -5.2 93 -4.3 28 -2.4 10 -.30 2
18 18 18 18
.000 .000 .027 .766
Mea n S td. Deviation S td. E rror Me an
Lower Upper 95% Co nfidence Interval of th e Difference P aired Differences
t
880 9.47 19 182 9.016 419 .605
105 18.68 19 340 8.552 781 .975
880 9.47 19 182 9.016 419 .605
105 92.89 19 305 6.632 701 .239
880 9.47 19 182 9.016 419 .605
977 0.05 19 290 3.928 666 .207
880 9.47 19 182 9.016 419 .605
871 8.26 19 220 2.898 505 .379
T-Test
Paired Sa mples Correl ations
19 .362 .128
19 .672 .002
19 .641 .003
19 .547 .015
RPP.pre & RPP.1 Pair 1
RPP.pre & RPP.2 Pair 2
RPP.pre & RPP.5 Pair 3
RPP.pre & RPP.10 Pair 4
N Correlat ion Sig.
P aired Sa mples Te st
-170 9.21 -178 3.42 -960 .579 91.2 11 323 2.532 227 4.874 222 8.886 194 7.137
741 .594 521 .892 511 .342 446 .704
-326 7.24 -287 9.88 -203 4.87 -847 .279 -151 .180 -686 .967 113 .710 102 9.700 -2.3 05 -3.4 17 -1.8 79 .204
18 18 18 18
.033 .003 .077 .840
Mea n S td. Deviation S td. E rror Me an
Lower Upper 95% Con fidence Interval of th e Di fference P aired Differences
t
Group S tatistic s
19 917 1.42 138 9.882 318 .861 19 880 9.47 182 9.016 419 .605 K elomp ok
Independent S ample s Test
.52 0 .47 5
.68 7 .68 7
36 33. 590
.49 7 .49 7
361 .947 361 .947
527 .011 527 .011
-70 6.880 -70 9.550
143 0.775 143 3.444
F S ig. Leven e's T est for
E quality o f Va riances
t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Me an Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of t he Differen ce t-te st for Equ ality of
Me ans
E qual variances assum ed
T-Test
T-Test
Group S tatisti cs
19 123 23.05 327 7.733 751 .964 19 105 18.68 340 8.552 781 .975 K elomp ok
Inde pende nt S ample s Test
.099 .755
1.66 3 1.66 3
36 35.9 45
.105 .105
180 4.368 180 4.368
108 4.866 108 4.866
-395 .842 -395 .959
400 4.579 400 4.696
F S ig. Leven e's T est for
E quality o f Va riances
t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Mea n Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
E qual vari ances assum ed
E qual vari ances not assumed RPP .1
Group S tatisti cs
T-Test
Inde pende nt S ample s Test
.490 .489
1.03 1 1.03 1
36 35.4 06
.309 .309
109 6.263 109 6.263
106 2.958 106 2.958
-105 9.516 -106 0.773
325 2.042 325 3.299
F S ig. Leven e's T est for
E quality o f Va riances
t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Mea n Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
E qual vari ances assum ed
E qual vari ances not assumed RPP .2
Group S tatisti cs
19 104 82.11 260 8.639 598 .463 19 977 0.05 290 3.928 666 .207 K elomp ok
Inde pende nt S ample s Test
.211 .649
.795 .795
36 35.5 94
.432 .432
712 .053 712 .053
895 .539 895 .539
-110 4.184 -110 4.904
252 8.289 252 9.009
F S ig. Leven e's T est for
E quality o f Va riances
t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Mea n Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
E qual vari ances assum ed
T-Test
Group Statistic s
19 930 1.00 192 4.590 441 .531
19 871 8.26 220 2.898 505 .379
Kelomp ok > 20 detik < 20 detik RPP.10
N Mea n Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mea n
Inde pende nt S ample s Test
.236 .630
.868 .868
36 35.3 63
.391 .391
582 .737 582 .737
671 .087 671 .087
-778 .291 -779 .143
194 3.765 194 4.617
F S ig. Leven e's T est for
E quality o f Va riances
t df
S ig. (2-t ailed) Mea n Differen ce
S td. E rror Differe nce
Lower Upper 95% Co nfiden ce Interval of th e Differen ce t-test for Equ ality of
Mea ns
E qual vari ances assum ed
Lampiran 5. Biodata
Nama : Rizky Mayo Hutama
NIM : 22010110130195
Tempat/tanggal lahir : Semarang, 8 Agustus 1992
Jeniskelamin : Laki - laki
Alamat : JL. Mangunharjo Raya no.1 Semarang
No Telp : -
No HP : 08112991112
Email : Rizkymayohutama@gmail.com
Riwayat Pendidikan
1.SD : SD H ISRIATI SEMARANG Lulus tahun: 2004
2.SMP : SMPN3 SEMARANG Lulus tahun: 2007
3.SMA : SMAN 1 SEMARANG Lulus tahun: 2010
