CHAPTER VI
CONCLUSION
6.
1 • SU!!lmaryAs it has been stated in chapter one, this study
aims at seeing whether there is a positive significant
correlation between the motivation of the first-year
stu-dents of S~"A in Surabaya in learning English and their
English acr.i evemer:. t or not. Besid-es, it is also designed
to see what type of motivation - instrumental or integra-ti,;::: - tile first-year students of SMA in Surabaya have in
learning English is more dominant.
There are 210 first-year students of SMA in
Suraba-ya whicb belong to the school year of
1987/1988
who becomeU:~ :3Ubje(:ts of this study. On May
1988,
a set ofqta:s;;ior""-'lires w:::ts administered to these students in order
t: ~easure their motivatio~ as well as to know
orientaticns in learning English. While, their
their
English
s.cr..:i eH;:'; '"'; '!:. was r epr esen ted by their English grades of the
?.t:e data on the con-::;lation between motivational
in-dex scorez and English grades were, then, analyzed, using
Sp·~ar:rw.n 1 .s formula for ra.nk correlation. The results of
sam-;;J..e c,f ;:h:'._,, study reveal that there is a positive
signifi-ca~t corrslation between the motivation of these students
in leal':li::g English and their English ac:b.ievement. After
the Spearrr:an's coefficient of rank correlation ( ~c. ) of
each ;roup was group, based on to which school they
be-long, and analyzed further, it was found that all the
C
ofeach schc:)l under· study is higher than
rt
And, in thefinal a::::.alysis, it was also found that ~c of all SMAs
un-der study which was +0. 714 was higher than the
rt
whichwas +0. y::<• Thus, it can be said that there is a positive
si&:ific.s . .:;t correlation between the ruotivation of the
fi!·st-yea.r students of Sl·~A in Surabaya in learning English
and tt&i r Sngli .sl: a chi evemen t.
It has also been found that KD of all sample SMAs
is :;,1 .04; . .,;, ~he value of KD confirms the above conclusion
bec?.use 51.04% o:f the English achievement of the
first-year students of S>iA in Surabaya is accounted for by their
mctiV3.tion in learning English. The rest 48.96% is caused
by otlH:r· factors which are outside the scope of this
the-sis.
_l:e type of motivation can be inferred from the
reaso:;r: fer stuciying Ell[lish. Thus, to determine what type
of r::::ti.ve:.tc .. on- instrumt:ntal or integrative- that the
learning
82
si.llts cf d?.ta ancclysis, it was found that Zc which was
was [reater than
+1.65.
This finding led the writerto conclude that for the significance at the five per cent
level the first-year students of SMA in Surabaya are more
instru:nentally motivated than integratively in learning
:Snglish.
5.2.
SuggestionsUsing inferential statistics, the writer has proved
tLat there is a positive signific!'tnt correlation between
the motivation of the first-year students of SMA in
Sura-baya in leclrning English and their English achievement. In
rega:·d to tbis finding, the writer would like to give the
following sugges;;ions :
1. As the teacher is the key to the motivation of the
stu-dents in the classroom, i t is essential for the. English
teachers, especially those of the first-year students
of
s:·'A,
to analyze their students' needs, that is by:r:eans c f observing ( 1) the goals for which the indi
vi-dual ap:Jears to be striving and (2) the effects that
occur when what appears to be goal objects are denied
they will be ai:>le to help
eYer:; .::tudent meet :b.is needs and hence, he will be
mo-.
Fr~derick J. ~c Donald,
U.s ....
~.• ,
Wads·1:orth Publishing Co.Educational Psychology,
2. As the needs and learned goal expectations differ from
2
person to person , the English teachers of the
first-year students of Sl·U;. should foster the acquisition of
the ne·"' needs of the students and broaden the students'
conception of their goals, that is by encouraging group
particip3tion and cooperation in the attainment of the
com:r:on c;oal, for under these conditions, a student's
concern is no longer over satisfying his individual
needs but rather integrating b.is needs with those of
the group.
3.
The school authorities should help the English teachersof the first-year students of SHA who have difficulties
both i:-1 inferring their students 1 needs and in finding
out "':!::8 way of how to help the students satisfy their nee-::.s.
' •ll'n"i c::: s+-urhr
'+ • -...~.._ "-.:• .... v...; ' however, should be continued, using more
sophisticated instruments and research techniques to
find whi.ch one of the two types of motivation -
instru-r::<:ntal or integrative- that makesthe first-year
stu-dents of SEA in Surabaya more successful in learning
English in order to give better· in forruation to the
Eng-lish teacher£. of the first-year students of Sl'-!A in
64
n~eds of the students and broadening the students'
1. Allen and Campbell, Teaching English as a Second Language, New Delhi, Tata Me Graw-Hill Co. Ltd.,
1972 0
2 • .-\rdhana, Wayan, Bebera a Hetode Statistik Untuk en
tian Pendidikan, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 19 2
3.
Bro~~.H.
Douglas, Principles of Language Learning. and l'eaching, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc., 19804.
Carpenter, Finley and Eugene E. Hadden, Systemat)cApplication of Psychology to Education, New York,
The 1-:acmillan Co.,
1969
5.
Chastain, Kenneth, Developing·Second Language Skills:From Theory to Practice, U.S.A., The Center for
Curriculum Development Inc.,
1976
6.
Chasta:Ln, Kenneth, The Develonment of ModernSkills; ·:rheory to Practice, U.S.A., The
for Curriculum Development Inc.,
1971
Language Center
7.
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan R.I., Kurikulum
Pengaiar-1984 SHA ; Petuniuk Pelaksanaan Materi
iill,, Jakarta, P.N. Balai Pustaka, 1984
8.
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan R.I., KurikulumSekolah ll;enengah Atas 1975. Buku IID2, Bidang
Studi Eahasa Inggris, Jakarta, P.N. Balai Pusta-ka, 1981
9.
2onald, FrederickJ.,
Educational Psychology, U.S.A. ,·,adsworth Publishing Co. Inc., 1965
1 ., I •
,;:;
I - •
~cod, Understanding Second Language Acquisition ,
:Jreat Britain, Oxford University Press,
1986
?a.i S3.1 t Sanapiah, Dasar dan Teknik r·ienyusun
Su.rabaya, Usaha Nasional, 1981 Angket. ,
::'erg-.;so!l, George A.,
and Education
Ltd., 197o
_$tatistical Analysis in Psycholo~
, 'l'okyo, Me Graw-Hill Kogakusha
13. ?i;-~•:;.oc i"J..aro, Fa!'Y, &nglish as a Second Language : From
86
Co., 1974
14. Furchan, Arief, Pengantar Peneli tian Dalarr; Pendidikan
terjemahan dari Introduction to Research in
Education by Donald Ary, Surabaya, Usaha
Nasio-nal, 1982
1.5. Gardner,
R.C.,
Social Psychology and Second LanguageLearning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation, London, Edward Arnold Ltd., 1985
16. Eadi,
Sutrisno, Metodologi Research Jilid3,
Yogyakar-ta, Yayasan Penerbitan Fakultas Psikologi Uni-versitas Gadjah Mada, 198717.
Jakooovits, Leon A., Foreign Language Learning;A
Psy-cholinguistic Analysis of the Issues, U.S.A.,
Newbury House Publishers, 1971
18 Krashen, Stephen D., Principles and Practice in Second
Language Acquisition, 'London, A. Wheaton
&
Co.Ltd., 1982
19 l' .. raslwn, Stephen D., Second Language Acauisi tion and
Second Language Learning, New York, Pergamon
Press Ltd., 1981
20 Erashen, Stephen D. and Terrel T., The Natural
Apprpach ; Language Acquisition in the
Class-rQQm, Oxford, Pergamon Press Ltd., 1983
21. Kress, Joseph
F.,
Psycholinguistics IntroductoryPers-Pectives, New York, Academic Press Inc., 1976
22. Leontiev, Alexei A., PsychologY and the Language
Learning Process, Great Britain, A. Wheaton Co.
I.. td.' 1981
Listye.wati, P.I-f.H., A. Study on the Influence of Visual
Aids on the ~nglish Achieyement of the
First-Year Students of SMP, Surabaya, Widya Mandala
University, 1987
24. !··'erc:;<do, Cezar E., How to Conduct Social Science
Re-search, Hanila, Sinag-Tala Publishing Inc., 1981
25. Mouly! George J., Psychology for Effective Teaching, U.S.A., Holt, Rinehart, and Winston Inc., 1960
26.
:C~ursL!to, Joko and I. Nyomatl Arcana, Pengantar Kuliah.Statistik II, Surabe.ya, Fal\ul tas F..kpnomi
28.
20
"
.
"''
_;'f\..1•
bridge U~iversity Press,
1986
Sindawaty, Yienny, A Descriptive Study on the
Motiva-tion of Private SMA Students in Sidoar.jo in
Studying English, Surabaya, 'Nidya Mandala Uni- .
versity,
1986
Ster~,
E.H.,
Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching,London, Oxford University Press, 1985
Sula1.man, N. "The Teaching of English in Indonesia" ,
English Teaching Forum, September-October
1970,
Volume
8,
Number V31. TbE:ivs.natha:r::pillai, Kanapathipilai T. and T.L. Baba ,
"StuC.ents' Variable in Second Language
Learn-ing", RELC Journal, ,June 1984, Volume
15,
Num-ber I
32 Vijchuleta, Boosakorn and Gan Siowck Lee, "A Survey
Students' l-~otivation for Learning English",
Journal, June 1985, Volume
16,
NumberI
of
RELC·
33.
Yor:-':eY, Richardc.,
Study Skills: For Students ofEng-lish as a Second Language, U.S.A.,
Me
Graw-Hill