• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Directory UMM :Journals:Journal_of_mathematics:OTHER:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Directory UMM :Journals:Journal_of_mathematics:OTHER:"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

ON FIXED POINTS OF PSEUDOCONTRACTIVE MAPPINGS

Arif Rafiq, Ana Maria Acu

Abstract. Suppose E =Lp (or lp),p≥2, and C is a nonempty closed

convex subset of E. Let T : C → C be a continuous pseudocontractive mapping. Let {αn}, {βn}, {γn} and {δn} be four real sequences, satisfying the following conditions:

(i) 0 ≤αn, βn, δn≤1, 0 < γn <1;

(ii) αn+βn+γn+δn= 1;

(iii) lim

n→∞βn= 0 = limn→∞αn; (iv)

∞ X

n=0

αn

αn+βn+δn

=∞; (v) δn=o(αn).

For arbitrary initial valuex1 ∈C and a fixed anchoru∈C, the sequence {xn} is defined byxn =αnu+βnxn−1+γnT xn+δnun, n≥1, where {un} is

abounded sequence of error terms. Then {xn} converges strongly to a fixed point of T.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 47H10.

Keywords and phrases: Lp (or lp), p ≥ 2 spaces, Mann type implicit

iteration process with errors, pseudocontractive mappings.

1. Introduction

Let E be a real Banach space andE∗ be its dual space. The normalized duality mapping J :E →2E∗

is defined as J(x) :=

(2)

Let C a closed convex subset of E. The mapping T : C → C is called pseudocontractive if

kx−yk ≤ kx−y+t((I−T)x−(I−T)y)k,

holds for every x, y ∈ C and t > 0. An equivalent definition of pseudocon-tractive mappings is due to Kato [3],

hT x−T y, j(x−y)i ≤ kx−yk2, for x, y ∈C and j(x−y)∈J(x−y).

Let U ={x∈E :kxk= 1} denote the unit sphere ofE. The norm on E is said to be Gateaux differentiable if the

lim

t→0

kx+tyk − kxk

t , (1)

exist for each x, y ∈ U and in this case E is said to be smooth. E is said to have a uniformly Frechet differentiable norm if the limit (1) is attained uniformly for x, y ∈ U and in this case E is said to be uniformly smooth. It is well known that if E is uniformly smooth then the duality mapping is norm-to-norm uniformly continuous on bounded subset of E.

Very recently, Yao et al. [5], introduced the following iterative scheme: Let C be a closed convex subset of real Banach spaceE and T :C →C be a mapping. Define {xn} in the following way:

x1 ∈C,

xn=αnu+βnxn−1+γnT xn, n ≥1, (2)

where u is an anchor and {αn}, {βn} and {γn} are three real sequences in (0,1) satisfying some appropriate conditions.

The following theorem is due to Yao et al. [5].

Theorem 1. Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real uniformly smooth Banach space E. Let T : C →C be a continuous pseudocontractive mapping. Let{αn}, {βn} and{γn}be three real sequences in(0,1)satisfying the following conditions:

(i) αn+βn+γn = 1;

(ii) lim

n→∞βn = 0 and nlim→∞ αn

βn

(3)

(iii) ∞ X

n=0

αn

αn+βn

=∞.

For arbitrary initial value x1 ∈C and fixed anchor u∈C, the sequence{xn}

is defined by (2). Then {xn} converges strongly to a fixed point of T.

Suppose now E =Lp, (or lp),p≥2,C ⊂E and j will always denote the

single-valued normalized duality mapping ofE into E∗.

In this paper, we modified the results of Yao et al. [5] for the implicit Mann type iteration process with errors, associated with pseudocontractive mappings to have the strong convergence in the setting of Lp (or lp), p≥ 2

spaces.

We shall need the following results.

Lemma 1. [2] For the Banach space E =Lp, (or lp), p 2, the following inequality holds for all x, y in E:

kx+yk2 ≤(p−1)kxk2+kyk2+ 2hx, j(y)i. Lemma 2. [4] Let βn be a nonnegative sequence satisfying

βn+1 ≤(1−δn)βn+σn,

with δn∈[0,1],

∞ X

i=1

δi =∞, and σn =o(δn). Then lim

n→∞βn= 0. 2. Main results

Now we prove our main results.

Theorem 2. Suppose E = Lp (or lp), p 2, and C is a nonempty closed convex subset of E. Let T : C → C be a continuous pseudocontractive mapping. Let {αn}, {βn}, {γn} and {δn} be four real sequences, satisfying the following conditions:

(i) 0≤αn, βn, δn≤1, 0< γn <1;

(ii) αn+βn+γn+δn= 1;

(iii) lim

n→∞βn= 0 = limn→∞αn; (iv)

∞ X

n=0

αn

αn+βn+δn

(4)

For arbitrary initial value x1 ∈ C and a fixed anchor u ∈ C, the sequence {xn} is defined by

x1 ∈C,

xn=αnu+βnxn−1+γnT xn+δnun, n≥1, (3)

where{un}is abounded sequence of error terms. Then{xn}converges strongly to a fixed point of T.

Proof. Indeed, suppose we take a fixed point xof T. Since {un} is a bounded sequence of error terms, set M1 = sup

n≥1

kun−x∗k. First, we show

that {xn} is bounded. Consider

xn−x∗ = (1−γn)

αn

1−γn

u+ βn 1−γn

xn−1+

δn

1−γn

un

+γnT xn−x∗

= (1−γn)

αn

1−γn

(u−x∗) + βn 1−γn

(xn−1−x∗)

+ δn 1−γn

(un−x∗)

+γn(T xn−x∗).

It follows that

kxn−x∗k 2

= hxn−x∗, j(xn−x∗)i

= D(1−γn)

αn

1−γn

(u−x∗) + βn 1−γn

(xn−1−x∗)

+ δn 1−γn

(un−x∗)

+γn(T xn−x∗), j(xn−x∗)

E

= (1−γn)

D αn 1−γn

(u−x∗

) + βn 1−γn

(xn−1−x∗)

+ δn 1−γn

(un−x∗), j(xn−x∗)

E

+γnhT xn−x∗, j(x−x∗)i ≤ (1−γn)

αn

1−γn

(u−x∗) + βn 1−γn

(xn−1−x∗)

+ δn 1−γn

(un−x∗)

kxn−x∗k+γnkxn−x∗k 2

(5)

implies

kxn−x∗k ≤

αn

1−γn

(u−x∗)+ βn 1−γn

(xn−1−x∗)+

δn

1−γn

(un−x∗)

(4)

≤ αn

1−γn

ku−x∗k+ βn 1−γn

kxn−1 −x∗k+

δn

1−γn

kun−x∗k

≤ αn

1−γn

ku−x∗k+ βn 1−γn

kxn−1 −x∗k+M1

δn

1−γn ≤ max{ku−x∗k,kxn−1−x

k, M1}. Now, induction yields

kxn−x∗k ≤max{ku−x∗k,kx1−x∗k, M1},

implies {xn} is bounded and so is {T xn}. Let M = sup

n≥1

kxn−x∗k+ sup n≥1

kT xn−x∗k+M1.

Finally, we prove that xn → x∗. Since δn = o(αn), implies there exist a

sequence {tn}such that tn →0 as n→ ∞ and δn=tnαn. Now

αn

1−γn

(u−x∗

)+ δn 1−γn

(un−x∗)

≤ αn

1−γn

ku−x∗

k+ δn 1−γn

kun−x∗

k(5)

≤ αn

1−γn

ku−x∗k+M δn 1−γn

= αn 1−γn

(6)

From Lemma 1 and relations (4), (5), we have

kxn−x∗k 2 = αn

1−γn

(u−x∗) + βn 1−γn

(xn−1−x∗) +

δn

1−γn

(un−x∗)

2 ≤ βn

1−γn

2

kxn−1−x∗k 2

+(p−1)

αn

1−γn

(u−x∗)+ δn 1−γn

(un−x∗)

2

+ 2D αn 1−γn

(u−x∗) + δn 1−γn

(un−x∗), j

βn

1−γn

(xn−1−x∗)

E

1− αn

1−γn

kxn−1−x∗k 2

+ (p−1)

αn

1−γn

(u−x∗)

+ δn 1−γn

(un−x∗)

2

+ 2 βn 1−γn

αn

1−γn

(u−x∗) + δn 1−γn

(un−x∗)

kxn−1 −x∗k

1− αn

1−γn

kxn−1−x∗k 2

+(p−1)

αn

1−γn

2

(ku−x∗k+M tn) 2

+ 2M αnβn (1−γn)2

(ku−x∗k+M tn)

=

1− αn

1−γn

kxn−1−x∗k 2

+ αn 1−γn

ηn,

where ηn =

(p−1) αn 1−γn

(ku−x∗k+M tn) + 2M

βn

1−γn

(ku−x∗k+M tn).

Now according to Lemma 2, we have xn→x∗.

Remark 1. Our results are true forLp (or lp),p2 space (Banach spaces) instead of uniformly smooth Banach spaces.

References

(7)

[2] C. E. Chidume, Iterative approximation of fixed point of Lipschitzian strictly pseudo-contractive mappings, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 99 (1987), 283-288.

[3] T. Kato,Nonlinear semigroups and evolution equations, J. Math. Soc. Japan 19(1967), 508-520.

[4] X. L. Weng, Fixed point iteration for local strictly pseudocontractive mappings, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 113 (1991), 727-731.

[5] Y. Yao et al., Strong convergence of an iterative algorithm for pseudo contractive mapping in Banach space, Nonlinear Anal. 67 (2007), 3311-3317.

Authors:

Arif Rafiq

Department of Mathematics

COMSATS Institute of Information Technology Islamabad, Pakistan

e-mail:[email protected] Ana Maria Acu

Department of Mathematics ”Lucian Blaga” University Sibiu, Romania

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

To begin organizational alignment with sustainability, Housing conducted an assessment of relevant ``leading edge sustainable practices'' in the areas of managerial decision

The approach taken here is to use an asymptotic approximation for the &amp; undershoot ' , the amount by which stock has fallen below the re-order level by the time an order is

Such an analysis should lead to the question, ``what if education is not linear but rather conforms to a nonlinear system pattern of behavior?'' What would this mean for our