Ram Mohammad Thomas` motivation in joining ``Who will Win a Billion?`` quiz as seen in Vikas Swarup`s Slumdog Millionaire.

(1)

G

N

I

N

I

O

J

N

I

N

O

I

T

A

V

I

T

O

M

’

S

A

M

O

H

T

D

A

M

A

H

O

M

A

R

“

W

H

O

W

I

L

W

I

N

A

B

I

L

I

O

N

?

”

Q

U

I

Z

A

S

E

N

I

N

V

I

K

A

S

’

P

U

R

A

W

S

L

U

M

D

O

G

M

I

L

I

O

N

A

I

R

E

A SARJANAPENDIDIKANTHESIS

f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a p s a d e t n e s e r

P theRequirement

toObtaint heSarjanaPendidikanDegree inEngilshLanguageEduca iton

y B

h i s g n i n ir S i t a w a n r E

3 4 0 4 1 2 1 7 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S

M A R G O R P Y D U T S N O I T A C U D E E G A U G N A L H S I L G N E

N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D

F O Y T L U C A

F TEACHERSTRAININGANDEDUCATION Y

T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S

A T R A K A Y G O Y

(2)

i

G

N

I

N

I

O

J

N

I

N

O

I

T

A

V

I

T

O

M

’

S

A

M

O

H

T

D

A

M

A

H

O

M

A

R

“

W

H

O

W

I

L

W N

I

A

B

I

L

I

O

N

?”

Q

U

I

Z

A

S

E

N

I

N

V

I

K

A

S

U

R

A

W

S

P

’

S

L

U

M

D

O

G

M

I

L

I

O

N

A

I

R

E

A SARJANAPENDIDIKANTHESIS

t n e m e r i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a p s a d e t n e s e r P

toObtaint heSarjanaPendidikanDegree inEngilshLanguageEduca iton

y B

3 4 0 4 1 2 1 7 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S

M A R G O R P Y D U T S N O I T A C U D E E G A U G N A L H S I L G N E

N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D

N O I T A C U D E D N A G N I N I A R T S R E H C A E T F O Y T L U C A F

Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S

A T R A K A Y G O Y

(3)

(4)

(5)

i v

STATEMENTOFWORK’SORIGINALITY

e v a h I h c i h w , s i s e h t s i h t t a h t e r a l c e d y lt s e n o h

I w irtten ,doe sno tcontaint hework d n a s n o it a t o u q e h t n i d e ti c e s o h t t p e c x e , e l p o e p r e h t o f o k r o w e h t f o s tr a p r o

. d l u o h s r e p a p c if it n e i c s a s a , s e c n e r e f e r

, a tr a k a y g o

Y 2 1May2012 r e ti r W e h T

(6)

v

N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E

L PERSETUJUAN

S I M E D A K A N A G N I T N E P E K K U T N U H A I M L I A Y R A K I S A K I L B U P

a d n a tr e b g n a

Y tangand ibawahi n,is ayamahasiswaUniverstia sSanataDharma: a

m a

N :Ernawat iS irningsih a

w s i s a h a M r o m o

N :071214043

n a k ir e b m e m a y a s , n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n a b m e g n e p i m e

D kepada Perpustakaan

:l u d u jr e b g n a y a y a s h a i m li a y r a k a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U

G

N

I

N

I

O

J

N

I

N

O

I

T

A

V

I

T

O

M

’

S

A

M

O

H

T

D

A

M

A

H

O

M

A

R

“

W

H

O

W

I

L

W N

I

A

B

I

L

I

O

N

?”

Q

U

I

Z

A

S

E

N

I

N

V

I

K

A

S

’

P

U

R

A

W

S

L

U

M

D

O

G

M

I

L

I

O

N

A

I

R

E

besetraperangka tyang dipelrukan( bliaada) .Dengandemikiansayamembeirkan , n a p m i y n e m k u t n u k a h a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k

n a l a k g n a p k u t n e b m a l a d a y n a l o l e g n e m , n i a l a i d e m k u t n e b m a l a d n a k h il a g n e m

u a t a t e n r e t n I i d a y n n a k i s a k il b u p m e m n a d , s a t a b r e t a r a c e s n a k i s u b ir t s i d n e m , a t a d

n i a l a i d e

m untuk kepenitngan akademi s tanpa pelru meminta iijn dar i saya tl

a y o r n a k ir e b m e m n u p u a

m i kepadasayaselamat etap mencantumkan namasaya .s

il u n e p i a g a b e s

. a y n r a n e b e s n a g n e d t a u b a y a s g n a y i n i n a a t a y n r e p n a i k i m e D

a tr a k a y g o Y i d t a u b i D

: l a g g n a t a d a

P 2 1Me i2012 n

a k a t a y n e m g n a

Y ,

(7)

v i

T C A R T S B A

. 2 1 0 2 . it a w a n r E , h i s g n i n ir

S Ram Mohammad Thomas’Mo itva iton i n Joining “Who wli l Win a Bliilon?” Quiz a s Seen in Vika s Swarup’ s Slumdog

e r i a n o il li

M . Yogyakatra : Engilsh Language Educaiton Study Program . d n a g n i n i a r T s r e h c a e T f o y tl u c a F . n o it a c u d E s tr A d n a e g a u g n a L f o t n e m tr a p e D

. y ti s r e v i n U a m r a h D a t a n a S . n o it a c u d E

s s u c s i d y d u t s s i h

T e s Ram Mohammad Thomas ’moitvaiton in joining ?

n o il li B a n i W l li w o h W

“ ” quiz in Vika sSwarup’ Slumdog Mliilonaire .Thi s T

d a m m a h o M m a R t u o b a s ll e t l e v o

n homas ,a young watie rwho becomes the .

z i u q e h t f o r e n n i w t s e g g i

b Having no forma leducaiton ,he dreamed to have .

e fi l y h tl a e

w The inciden thappened in hi sl fie had in lfuenced hi smoitvaiton in t

n I . z i u q e h t g n i n i o

j hi sstudy,t hewrtierdiscusse dtwoproblems:( 1) H owi sRam s

a m o h T d a m m a h o

M descirbedi nnovel?(2 )Ho wdoe sRamMohammadThomas , g

o d m u l s “ e h

t ”become amliilonariei nt henovel? l

b o r p e h t g n i v l o s n

I em s above , the wrtie r appiled the psychologica l r

B , n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t , r e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t , h c a o r p p

a aun’ s theory o f

t s ’ d u e r F d n a n o it a v it o

m heory o fpsychology .The method o fthi sstudy wa sa .

h c r a e s e r y r a r b

il Therewere t wo source sused i n t hi sstudy ,namely, t hep irmary s

a w h c i h w , a t a

d Slumdog Mliilonaire nove l tisefl ,and t he secondary data t aken f

o s k o o b m o r

f psychology ,character, characteirzaiton ,andhumanmoitvaiton. t a h t s e d u l c n o c y d u t s e h t ,r e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t e h t f o s i s y l a n a e h t n o d e s a B s a m o h

T si classi ifed a sa major ,dynamic ,and round character .Whlie based on ,

n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t e h

t analyzed through speech ,reaciton ,manneirsm , s

r e h t o y b n e e s d n a t h g u o h

t ,Thomasi sdescirbeda sakind ,responsible , asel lfess d

n

a ahardworkingperson .Then,t hi sstudyconclude stha tThomas ’moitvaiton i n ”

? n o il li B a n i W l li w o h W “ g n i n i o

j isi n lfuencedbyltieraland rt uemeanings .The l

a r e ti

l meaningo fThomas ’mo itvaitoni s tot aker evenge .Whlie the rt uemeaning ’

s a m o h T f

o moitvaiton i s t o win t hequiz .Thomas sw a really moitvated t o ge ta e

e p u r n o il li

b because he wanted t ao chieve hi sdreams ,w h hic raised his socia l ,

y t e i c o s m o r f t c e p s e r n i a g o t r e d r o n i s u t a t

s saved the one he love sfrom the

, n o it u ti t s o r

p andhelpe dhisf irends tg e abetterl fie. r e h t , s i s e h t s i h t f o t r a p t s a l e h t n

I e are two suggesiton .s The fris t n

o ) s ( r e h c r a e s e r e r u t u f r o f s i n o it s e g g u

s Slumdog Mliilonaire . The second t

n e m e l p m i o t s i n o it s e g g u

s SlumdogMliilonarieint eachingEngilsh ,especiallyi n e

s o r P g n i h c a e

t I Iclas .s :

s d r o w y e

(8)

v ii

K A R T S B A

. 2 1 0 2 . it a w a n r E , h i s g n i n ir

S Ram Mohammad Thomas’Mo itva iton i n Joining “Who wli l Win a Bliilon?” quiz a s Seen in Vika s Swarup’ s Slumdog

e r i a n o il li

M . Yogyakatra : Program Stud i Pendidikan Bahasa Ingg irs , Jurusan , n a k i d i d n e P u m lI n a d n a u r u g e K s a tl u k a F , i n e S n a d a s a h a B n a k i d i d n e P

e v i n

U rstia sSanataDharma.

a m o h T d a m m a h o M m a R i s a v it o m g n a t n e t s a h a b m e m i n i i d u t

S sdalam

s i u k i d g n u b a g r e

b “Who wli lWin a Bliilon?”dalam nove lSlumdog Mliilonarie g

n a t n e t n a k a ti r e c n e m i n i l e v o N . p u r a w S s a k i V h e l

o seorangpalayanyangmenjad i

. s i u k m a l a d a m a t u g n a n e m e

p Tidak memiilk i pendidikan formal , Thoma s p

u d i h i k il i m e m n a k i p m i m e

m mewah .Kejadian yang dia alami dalam hidupn ya r

a g n e p m e

m uh imo itvasinya nu tukbergabungdalamkui .sDalamstudii ni ,penuil s :

n a h a l a s a m r e p a u d s a h a b m e

m (1 ) Bagaimana Ram Mohammad Thoma s l

e v o n m a l a d n a k r a b m a g i

d ?( 2 )BagaimanaRamMohammadThomas ,“slumdog” w

a t u j i d a j n e

m and idalamnove.l

Untuk memecahkan dua permasalahan tersebut , penuils em nerapkan ,

i g o l o k i s p n a t a k e d n e

p teo irt okoh dant eor ipenokohan,t eor imoitvas iolehBraun h

e l o i g o l o k i s p i r o e t n a

d Freud .Metode yang digunakan dalam stud iin iadalah p

ir k s m a l a d n a k a n u g i d g n a y r e b m u s a u d a d A . a k a t s u p i d u t

s sii n iyatiu datautama

l e v o n n a k a p u r e m g n a

y Slumdog Mliilonaire sendiir ,dan data pendukung yang u

b a p a r e b e b i r a d l i b m a i

d ku mengena ipsikolog,i t okoh, penokohan ,dan moitvas i .

a i s u n a m

s a m o h T n a l u p m i s e k k ir a ti d r e t k a r a k i r o e t i r a d s i s il a n a n a k r a s a d r e B a g i

d mbarkan sebaga i karakte r utama , dinami s dan komplek . Sedangkan a

n a i d g n a y i s a s ir e t k a r a k i r o e t n a k r a s a d r e

b ilsi smelalu iucapan ,reaksi ,kebiasaan , i

pkrian dan pandangan tokoh lain ,Thoma sdigambarkan sebaga iseorang yang ,i

t a h k i a

b betranggung jawab, itdak egois ,seita dan pekejra keras .Selanjutkan m

o h T i s a v it o m n a l u p m i y n e m i n i i s p ir k

s a smengikut ikui s“Who wli lWin a ”

? n o il li

B dipengaruh ioleh makna yang tetruil sdan makna yang sesungguhnya. s

il u tr e t g n a y a n k a

M dar imo itvas iThoma sadalah untuk bala sdendam .Dan a

y n h u g g n u s e s g n a y a n k a

m dar imoitvas iThoma sadalah untuk memenangkan .

s i u

k Thoma ssangatt ermoitvas iuntukmendapatkanj utaanr upeekarenadiai ngin n

a k d u j u w e

m impianya, sepetr imenaikkan statu ssosia lhidupnya untuk diharga i h

e l

o masarakat ,membebaskan wantia yang dia cinta idar ipelacuran ,dan untuk a

y n t a b a h a s g n o l o n e

m mendapatkanhidupyangl ebihbaik.

a m a tr e p n a r a S . n a r a s a u d t a p a d r e t , i n i i s p ir k s r i h k a r e t n a i g a b a d a P

i ti l e n e p ) a r a p ( i g a b n a k u t n u r e p i

d Slumdog Mliilonaire selanjutnya .Saran kedua n

a p a r e n e p k u t n

u Slumdog Mliilonairedalampengajaran bahasaI ngg ir ,s t erutama i

d r a j a g n e m k u t n

u kela sProseI .I i

c n u K a t a

K :Moitvasi ,Maknayangt ertuli sdanMaknayangs esungguhnya,

(9)

v iii

S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C A

o t s k n a h t y m s s e r p x e o t e k il d l u o w I l l a f o t s ri

F Allah fo rHi sendles s

o t s e v i g e H t n e s e r p h c a e d n a h t g n e rt s , e c n a d i u g , e v o

l mei n every singleday . In

t n e m e g n a r r a e m it t c e f r e p s i

H , Irtulybeilevet ha tHeha splannedal levent swhich i

w d n a d e n e p p a h e v a

h l lhappeni nmyl fie.

r o s n o p s y m o t s k n a h t y m s s e r p x e o t e k il d l u o w

I

s r

D .Heru ijyanto M.A,. Ph.D. fo rbeing paitent ,fathelry understanding ,and .s

i s e h t s i h t g n i h s i n if n i g n it a v it o

m Iwould ilke to expres smy grea tthank sto .s

r

D .J B .Gunawan ,M.A. a ndmypreciou slecturers o fPBI .It hank mthe very h

c u

m fo rthei rgrea tcontirbu iton in my development ,thei rhonesty and thei r g

n ir a h s l a c it ir

c . Iwould ilke t o express t hankst o al lstaffs in t he secretaira tfo r m

g n it r o p p u

s es incemyveryf ris tdayi ncampus . Ialsot hankt oallt he ilbrarians ’

s t n e d u t s e d i v o r p d n a , e m p l e h o t g n il li w s y a w l a e r a o h

w need sin the ilbrary

. s e c i v r e

s Then Isend my deep grattiude to Sister Margaretha fo rthe time , e

c n e it a p d n a t r o p p u

s to check my grammar . Ithank to Mis sAdesit and Mis s e

n e ll

A fo rgivingmeadviceands uggesitons,s oI cani mprovemyEngilshs kill .s m

d e t a c i d e d

I y deepes t grattiude t o my beloved fathe,r Bapak u

S domo .He i smy hero and my i do lsince Iwa sa ltilte gri lun it lnow . Iwould m

s s e r p x e o t e k

il y deepes tgrattiude t o my mothe ,r I bu Sukemi, who alway s d

n a t

s s behind me to suppor t me every itme I need her . I thank them fo r y

a r p h c a e y b e c i o h c y m h g u o r h t g n i k l a w n i e m g n i n e h t g n e rt

(10)

i x

o s l a I n e h T . h a ll

A thankmy onlybrother ,NanangBudiyanto forl ovingmeand g

n it r o p p u

s me . Iamveryl uckyt ohavet hemal la smyf amliy. ,

d n e ir f t s e b y m o t o g s k n a h t t s e r e c n i s y

M Erilnwa it who i sthe bes t

it a r g l a i c e p s y M . r e v e d n e ir

f tude also go to my close firend sin Kasuar iPtiu , it

a w a n o B , it a w s e n g

A , Siwiwa it , Ntia , Ibu Mira and other s Waites. I ifnd f o g n il e e f t s e t a e r g e h t e r a h s d n a t c e p s e r d n a , y t s e n o h , p i h s d n e ir f s u o i c e r p

. m e h t h ti w p i h s d n e ir

f Ialso thank my preciou sf irend sof P ,BI Geb iGendut, ,

o k e R , e n i h p E , i n a

Y Oren ,Kechup ,Artdo, Indah ,Khares ,M ak b Sep it ,Amel , y

b e

G Kecli, Siska ,Pepep , aEil ndal loft hem Icanno tmenitononebyone. y m , d n e ir f t s e t a e r g y m o t s e o g y ll a n if n o it a i c e r p p a t a e r g y M , d n e ir f y o

b AgungJaya Shak it .Hei st heone Iwantt o havei n t hisl fie. Iwould o

s l

a eil k toexpres smygreatt hankst ohisf amliy ,Ibuand Bapa k Nyoman ,Oiln , b

M ak Pen iand Mas Tomi . t I hank them very much fo rsupporitng words , .

e v o l d i d n e l p s d n a , t n e m e g a r u o c n e g n ir i p s n i

it a w a n r

(11)

x

e

l

p

o

e

p

e

h

t

o

t

o

G

m

e

h

t

g

n

o

m

a

e

v

i

L

m

e

h

t

m

o

r

f

n

r

a

e

L

m

e

h

t

e

v

o

L

m

e

h

t

h

t

i

w

n

a

l

P

w

o

n

k

y

e

h

t

a

h

w

h

t

i

w

t

r

a

t

S

e

v

a

h

y

e

h

t

a

h

w

n

o

d

l

i

u

B

) n e Y s e m a J . C . Y ( n e Y y m m i J

t

e

v

o

l

d

n

a

e

d

u

ti

t

a

r

g

h

ti

w

d

e

t

a

c

i

d

e

D

o

,f

l

e

s

y

m

,s

d

n

e

ir

f

y

m

d

n

(12)

x i

L APPENDIXE S

X I D N E P P

A 1 ThePorrtai to fVika sSwarup. ... .... 61 2

X I D N E P P

A ThePorrtai to fSlumAreai nMumbai . ... .... .. 6 2 X

I D N E P P

A 3 Summaryo fSlumdogMliilonaire... . .. .. 65 4

X I D N E P P

A Vika sSwarup’ sBiography... 6 7 5

X I D N E P P

A TheI mplementaitono fSlumdogMliilonaire

g n i h c a e T n

i ProseI IUsingPar toft heNove l h

tr u o F e h t r o

f SemesterStudents o fEngilsh n

o it a c u d E e g a u g n a

L StudyProgram. ... 7 0 6

X I D N E P P

A Mate iralt oTeachProseI IUsingSlumdog e

r i a n o il li

(16)

1

1 R E T P A H C

N O I T C U D O R T N I

e h t f o d n u o r g k c a b e h t h ti w s tr a t s t I . s tr a p x i s o t n i d e d i v i d s i r e t p a h c s i h T

, y d u t s s i h t f o c i p o t e h t t u o b a n o it a n a l p x e s e v i g h c i h w , y d u t

s and t he reason fo r

f o e v it c e j b o e h t s r e v o c t r a p d n o c e s e h T . ti g n i s o o h

c the study in which the

e s o p r u

p fo wrtii ng thi sstudy i sstated .Problem Formulaiton t ha tconsist soft wo t

n e s e r p t r a p h tr u o f e h T . tr a p d ri h t e h t n i d e t a t s s i s n o it s e u

q s ProblemLimtiaitono f

e h

t study t ha t provides t he focu sof t he problems .The l as tpatr i sDeifniiton o f . y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u s m r e t e h t f o n o it a n a l p x e e h t h ti w y lf e ir b s l a e d t a h t s m r e T

. 1 .

1 ResearchBackground

e r u t a r e ti

L da n realtiy have a very close relaitonship .Many wrtiers have d

e r u o

p outt hei rheatr ni ot ltierarywork. Ltieraryworkdescirbes et h realtiywhich t

s i x

e s in the wrtiers ’ itmes .Wellek and Warren (1977 )state, tha tltierature i sa s n o it n e v n o c y b d e t a e r c s i tI . n o it a e r c l a i c o s a , y lt c a x e e r o m r o , n o it u ti t s n i l a i c o s

s m r o n d n

a whichoccuri nt hes ociety.I naddiiton,l tieraturer epresentsl fiei nl arge f o d lr o w e v it c e j b u s e h t d n a d lr o w l a r u t a n e h t h g u o h t n e v e y ti l a e r l a i c o s a , e r u s a e m

e e b o s l a e v a h l a u d i v i d n i e h

t n object sof l tierary i mtiaiton. They conitnue staitng t

a r e ti l t a h

t ure i s no t a rejeciton o f the socia lprocess , bu tthe essence ,the f o n o i s s e r p x e n a s i k r o w y r a r e ti L . y r o t s i h l l a f o y r a m m u s d n a t n e m e g d ir b a

s s e b ir c s e d e r u t a r e ti L . s c it ir c ’ s e it e i c o

(17)

d n a s a e d i r i e h t s s e r p x e e l p o e p t n e r e f fi

D expe irences abou t thei r

s g n i d n u o r r u

s d fiferenlty .The wrtierwould expres shi so rher expeirenceo frea l e

fi

l through novels ,edtio ira l ilnes ,sto ires ,etc .Fo rsome people ,demonsrtaiton ir

w , s r e h t o r o f e li h w , m s i c it ir c r i e h t s s e r p x e o t y a w d o o g a e b y a

m itngacomplain t

n i s e l y t s n w o r i e h t e v a h o s l a s t a m o l p i D . n o it u l o s r e tt e b a s e m o c e b r e tt e l

. n o i n i p o r i e h t g n i s s e r p x e

s a k i

V Swarup ai s n Indian diplomat. He wrote a book enitlted Slumdog e

r i a n o il li

M . whichwa spub ilshedi n2005 .Thi sbookwasi nsp ried b ty heexisitng y

ti l a e

r where “Who Wants to be a Mliilonarie?” quizbecame the most popula r t

t a d lr o w e h t n i z i u

q h at itme .The quiz display sthe powe ro fmoney. T he n i n o it a c u d e l a m r o f e v a h d n a s k o o b d a e r o h w e s o h t e r a s t n a t s e t n o c d e t c e p x e

d n a l o o h c

s universtiy (Heinemann : 2010 .) Swarup’ s inspriaiton wa s also d

e tr o p p u

s by t her ealtiy whereacompute rwtihani nterne tconneciton wa sputi n m u l s t a h t f o n e r d li h c e h t , h t n o m a r e tf a d e ti s i v e r s a w m u l s e h t n e h W . m u l s i h l e D a

d a

h learn thow t o use t he W do W lr ideW be .I tmadeSwarup fascinated and he t

a h t d e z il a e

r there w as an innate ablitiy in everyone to do something ,

y r a n i d r o a rt x

e provided he o rshe w as given an oppo truntiy .Chlidren wtih no n

o it a c u d

e w ere ablet o l earn using the Internet .Thi sshow stha tknowledgew as t

s u j t o

n preserveoft heeltie(Isahtia :2011 .)

t o n s a h o h w t n a t s e t n o c a e v a h o t g n it s e r e t n i e b d l u o w t i t a h t s e v e il e b e H

e g d e l w o n k t o g o h w e n o e h t , d n u o r g k c a b l a n o it a c u d e l a m r o f a d a

h andexpeirence

s t e e rt s e h t m o r

(18)

m o r

f aslumarea .Thoma ,st he“slumdog”go tabliilonr upeest hatt urnhimi ntoa e

ri a n o il li

b .Swarup t irest o presen tunusua ldepiciton to t hereaders ,showst hem t s e w o l m o r f e r a y e h t h g u o h t n e v e h c ir e m o c e b n a c e n o y n a h c i h w n i y ti l a e r e h t

. n o it a c u d e l a m r o f o n h ti w y t e i c o s f o s s a l

c Moreover ,Thomas’ moitvaiton i s y

b d e c n e u lf n

i both ltiera land rt ue meanings ni winning the quiz .Thi snove l s

w o h

s ther eader et h realtiy i n which anyonecan become irch even t hough heo r s

i e h

s from t helowes tclas so fsociety wtihouthavingforma leducaiton.Nothing .

d lr o w s i h t n i e l b i s s o p m i s i

) 1 1 0 2 ( p u r a w

S explainsi nhi saritclet hatSlumdogMliilonaireist heothe r o

e m a

n fQ & A .O irginally, i twa spubilshed a sQ & A;t hebook ha snow been s

a d e u s s i e

r Slumdog Mliilonaire. Q &Awa smadei nto af limi n2008 ,Slumdog e

r i a n o il li

M ,driectedbyDannyBoyle .I twast heauthor’sf ris tnovel .Seti nI ndia , e h t s e m o c e b o h w r e ti a w g n u o y a , s a m o h T d a m m a h o M m a R f o y r o t s e h t s ll e t ti

o n h ti w s n o it a s u c c a n o l i a j o t t n e s e b o t y l n o , y r o t s i h n i r e n n i w w o h s z i u q t s e g g i b

. d e t a e h c e h t a h t e c n e d i v

e nI SlumdogMliilonaire ,RamMohammadThoma stell s o

t s e h

t ryo fhisl fieandall fo ti sdfiifculites .He ilved i n aslumarea ,whichmade m

i

h undermined byt hesociety .Havingnof orma leducaiton ,he dreame d to h e av aweatlhyl fie da n toberespecte .d Hei sj us teighteen,ye theha sexpe irencedone

ll o r a f o l l e

h e -r coaste r irde o fa lfie .I n orde ro fthe quesiton son the show , s

a m o h

T tellst her eaderwhichamazingadventuresi nhi ssrteet-kidl fiet augh thim l

e r d n u o c s a d n u o f e h , y e n r u o j s i h n I .s r e w s n a e h

t who alway sto trure shi spa trne r g

n i v a h e li h

(19)

; d a e

d healsohadt o truredNtiaunit lshewa shosptiailzed .Thoma swa sexrtemely n

i s i h T . d e n e p p a h t a h w o t y r g n

a ciden talso moitvated Thomas to join the quiz .

w o h s

s ’ p u r a w

S Slumdog Mliilonairebecome san i nteresitng l tierary work t o be d

e z y l a n

a fo rsome reason .s Frislty ,the word play sin the itlte, “slumdog” and s

u o r a , e ri a n o il li

M e the interest .The wo lrd “slumdog” usually refer sto poo r n

i e v il o h w e l p o e

p aslum area ,whereast heword mliilonarie i sused t odescirbe n

o n e m o n e h p l a u s u n u n a s i tI . y h tl a e w s i o h w e n o e m o

s ,which occursi nt heslum

” g o d m u l s “ n a c w o h , r e v o e r o M . a e r

a become a bliilonarie remembeirng tha tthe r

e w o

l clas s people hardly eve r move on to be middle clas .s Thi s thought g

n i k o v o r

p d irves cu irostiy i n reading t hi snove land knowing what t hi snovel i s .

t u o b a y ll a u t c a

d a m m a h o M m a R , y l d n o c e

S Thomas’ fil e, especiallyhisj ourneyi n el sfi h a d

e r u t p a

c thereaderinterest .Living i n a mslu areawhere poo rpeople ilve i n bad n

o it i d n o

c s da n unfeasible faciilite si sbeileved to b irng a lo tof in lfuence to hi s fi

l e .Moreover , ifndingou twha thisr ea lmotivaiton inj oiningt hequizi sanothe r n

o s a e

r from expilctir easonsaboutw shati expressedi nt henove.l n

s i h

T ove lexrtemely a valuable t llhat t s e abou tw , hat the economic , a

i d n I n i e r u tl u c d n a s c it il o

p i s ilke. Thenove lshow show l iving i n t hesrteet so f s

a m o h T d e d i v o r p s a h a i d n

I wtih knowledge simlia r to wha t student s learn .l

o o h c s n i y ll a m r o

f Therearemany t hingst ha tcan beanalyzed in t hi snovel ,but s

i h t n

(20)

e b e h w o h d n a y ti l a n o s r e p ’ s a m o h

T comes a bliilonarie a sseen in Swarup’s .

e r i a n o il li M g o d m u l S

. 2 .

1 ResearchObjec itves

s a h e n o y r e v e t a h t e e s o t s i y d u t s e h t f o m i a e h

T hi so rhermoitvaitonand

l a u q

e irgh tto achieve anything she o rhe wants a sseen in Ram Mohammad s

’ p u r a w S f o r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t ,s a m o h

T SlumdogMliilonaire.

. 3 .

1 ProblemFormula iton

t y b d e t c e ri d s i y d u t s s i h

T heser esearchquesitons: .

1 Howi sRamMohammadThomasdescirbedi nt henovel? .

2 How doe sRam Mohammad Thoma ,s t he “slumd ”, og become a bliilonarie in ?

l e v o n e h t

. 4 .

1 ProblemLimtia iton

’ s a m o h T o t d e ti m il e b l li w y d u t s s i h t n i n o i s s u c s i d e h

T personaltiy. The

f o s i s y l a n

a personaltiyleadst ot he ifndingo fThomas ’moitvaiton .Thediscussion s

e b ir c s e

(21)

. 5 .

1 De ifniitono fTerms

, s i s y l a n a e h t g n i d a e r n i g n i d n a t s r e d n u e t a r u c c a d n a r a e l c a e v a h o t r e d r o n I e r e h

t ares omet ermst hats houldbedeifneds ot hatt hemeaningoft heset erm scan .

d e ti m il e b

. 1 . 5 .

1 Mo itva iton

n h o J o t g n i d r o c c

A Jung( 1974) ,moitvaitonreferst odesries ,wishes ,plans , r

r o e s u a c e h t o t s r e f e r o s l a t I . s e s o p r u p d n a , s e s l u p m i ,s t n e t n i ,s l a o

g easons t ha t

s r e f e r n o it a v it o m , y d u t s s i h t n I . ) 4 . p ( r o i v a h e b n e v i g a e n il r e d n

u to su fraceand

g n i n a e m r e p e e

d s fo Ram Mohammad Thomas’moitvaiton i n j oining “Who w lli n

i

W aBliilon? ”

.

15.2 .“Whowli lWinaBliilon?”

“W W tho a st n o b e a Mliilonarie?” thesyndicated t elevision quizshow, i s n

o n

a -ai rprogram o f thitry minutes . Fo reach episode o f the program ,the r

e c u d o r

p wli lselec tcontestantsf romt hecontestan tpoolt o appea ra scontestant s e

h t n o e m a g e h t y a l p l li w o h

w programi n which t heycan win up t o onemliilon do llar s($1,000,000 )by correclty answeirng up to iftfeen (15 )mulitple-choice

y tl u c if fi d g n i s a e r c n i f o s n o it s e u

q .(ABC Domesitc Television :2011) .In thi s ,

y d u t

s “Who Want sto be a Mliilonarie?” refer sto “Who wli lWin a Bliilon?” t

s o

(22)

.

1 35. .“Slumdog”

t a h t s e t a t s ) 4 0 0 2 ( t a ti b a H N

U slummeansanareat ha tcombinest ova irou s t

n e t x

e s t hefollowing characteirsitcs: Inadequateaccesst o safewater ,inadequate a

ti n a s o t s s e c c

a iton and othe rinfrasrtucture ,poo rsrtuctural qualtiy o fhousing , overcrowding ,insecurer esidenita lstatus .In t hi sstudy ,“slumdog”r eferst ol owe r y l n e d d u s o h w , s a m o h T d a m m a h o M m a R , a e r a m u l s a n i g n i v il n o s r e p s s a l c

a s e m o c e

(23)

8

2 R E T P A H C

E R U T A R E T I L D E T A L E R F O W E I V E R

s i h t f o c i p o t e h t e z y l a n a o t d e s u e r a t a h t s e ir o e h t e h t s e s s u c s i d r e t p a h c s i h T

d e t a l e R f o w e i v e R s t n e s e r p t r a p t s ri f e h T . s tr a p e e r h t o t n i d e d i v i d s i t I . y d u t s

s e ir o e h

T tha tconsists fo theo ires fo character,t heoryo fcharacteirzaiton,theory fo ,

n o it a v it o

m ciritca lapproachand t heory o fpsychologyin t hel tierary study. The s

i tr a p d n o c e

s Theoreitca lFrameworktha texplains somet heorie susedt oanalyze r

p e h

t oblemformulaitonoft hes tudy .Thel as tpar tpresent sContex toft heNove.l

s e i r o e h T d e t a l e R f o w e i v e R . 1 . 2

e r e h

T areseveralt heo ire sneededi nanalyzingal tierarywork ,especiallya s

e ir o e h t e r a e s o h T . l e v o

n o f character , theory o fcharacteirzaiton , theory fo t

, n o it a v it o

m heoryo fpsychologica lapproachandt heoryo fpsychology. s

e i r o e h T . 1 . 1 .

2 fo Character

t s i tI . k r o w y r a r e ti l n i s t n e m e l e t n a tr o p m i t s o m e h t f o e n o s i r e t c a r a h c

A he

e k a m t a h t e n

o s thestoryseemailve,i nteresitng, andunderstandablet or ead.I tcan t

c a rt t

a et h readert obemoredeeplyinvolvedint hes tory . r

e t c a r a h c e h t f o e p a h s e h

T dependsont her eaders’i nterpretaiton ,whichi s .

r e t c a r a h c e h t d e t e r p r e t n i s r e d a e r e h t w o

h Stanton (1965) say stha tthe term o f r

e t c a r a h

c i scommonlyusedi nt woway .sI tcanber eferr edtot hei ndividual swho d

n a y r o t s e h t n i r a e p p

(24)

s l a u d i v i d n i e s e h t f o h c a e e p a h s t a h t s e l p i c n ir

p .(p 17) .Hefu trhe rstate sthat i n a d

n a h c e e p s , n o it c if d o o

g aciton ea r no tonlyastepi nt heplot ,bu tmanfiestaitono f ti

n i d e d u l c n i o s l a s i r e t c a r a h

c .(p 1 . 8)

r e h tr u

F Henkle (1977 ) divided characte r into major and secondary r

e t c a r a h

c s. Themajo rcharacter i s t he characte rt hattakes the reader’ satteniton. The effecitvenes so fthe nove ldepends on the ablitiy o fthe majo rcharacte rin

o T . y r o t s e h t n i e u s s i e h t g n i z it a m a r d d n a g n i s s e r p x

e a grea textent ,majo r

o t n o it n e tt a d n a e d u ti l p m a e h t n e v i g e r a y e h t y l n o e s u a c e b d e t a e r c e r a s r e t c a r a h c

s n o it a z it a m a r d g n i c n i v n o c t n e s e r

p o fhuman issue so fthe book .On the othe r s

m r o f r e p r e t c a r a h c y r a d n o c e s , d n a

h ilmtied f unciton .Secondarycharacte rusually n

o s e m o

c the scene frequen lty commenitng on event so rinteracitng wtih the n i t u o g n ir b o t r e d r o n i r e t c a r a h c r o j a m e h t h ti w t c a r e t n i y e h T . r e t c a r a h c r o j a

m to

. r e t c a r a h c r o j a m e h t f o t n e m a c i d e r p r o e r u t a n e h t f o s t n e m e l e l a i c u r c n e p o e h t

r e t c a r a h c r o j a m e h t f o e s o h t n a h t t n a tr o p m i s s e l e r a s r e t c a r a h c y r a d n o c e

S p( p . 29

-9 )4 .

m o r f t n e r e f fi

D Henkle ,Abram sandHarpham( 2009 )disitnguisht wot ype s n

, r e t c a r a h c f

o amely lfa tand round characters. Fla tcharacte rpresents a single r

e t c a r a h c t a l F . y ti l a u q r o a e d

i descirbes adequately i n asinglephraseo rsentence d

n

a presents wtihou t much individuailzing detali . On the othe rhand ,round a

r e p m e t n i x e l p m o c s i r e t c a r a h

c men tand moitvaiton. Round characte rpresents h

ti

w sublteparitculalry thati sdif ifcutlt odescirbewtih anyadequacya saperson .

e fi l l a e r n

i Therei salway sasurp irseelementi nr oundcharacte r(a sctiedi nE .M .)

(25)

o t g n i d r o c c

A R roh berge r and Wood s (1971 ) the proces s o f creaitng s

i s r e t c a r a h

c called characteirzaiton .Thereare t wo p irncipa lway san autho rcan e

z ir e t c a r a h

c .Fri sst i d riect ,which they descirbe physica lappearance ,second si ,

c it a m a r

d whichplaces ituaiton showthecharacterbehave sands peaks( p .2 0 .)

n o it a z i r e t c a r a h C f o y r o e h T . 2 . 1 . 2

) 2 7 9 1 ( y h p r u

M poin tou tnine way so fhow an autho rmay reveals the .r

e d a e r e h t o t s ti a rt d n a y ti l a n o s r e p ’ s r e t c a r a h

c They are persona ldescirpiton , s

r e h t o y b n e e s s a r e t c a r a h

c , speech ,p ta l ,s fi ce onversaiton o fothers ,reaciton , driec tcomment ,thought and manneirsm .Fris ti spersona ldescirpiton .I tmean s the autho rdescirbe sthe characters ’physica lappereance sand clothe sdrieclty ,

s ’ y a w a t s a c e h t d n a , s e y e , n i k s , e c a f e h t s a h c u

s ex rtaordinaryclothing. Second i s character sa sseen by o rt she ,which mean sthe autho rdescirbe sthe character

. r e h t o n a f o n o i n i p o d n a s e y e e h t h g u o r h

t Ther eade rcan knowt hemaincharacte r o

m i h t u o b a t h g u o h t d n a g n i y a s ’ s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o g n i d n a t s r e d n u y

b rhe.r Thrid i s

speech .Fromwha tcharacte rsayst heautho rcangivet her eade rsomecluest ohi s .

r e t c a r a h c r e h r

o Wheneve raperson speaks ,wheneve rhei si n conversaiton wtih s

i e h , n o i n i p o n a d r a w r o f s t u p e h r e v e n e h w , r e h t o n

a giving cluet ohi scharacte r .s s

i h tr u o

F p ta l es fi ,which mean sthe autho rgives a clue to the character’ spas t s

t n e v

e . hT rough the person’ sthoughts ,through hi sconversaiton o rthrough the r

e h t o n a f o m u i d e

m person, t hereade rcan have t hepictureabou tthe character’ s e

fi l t s a

(26)

r e h t o f o n o it a s r e v n o

c peopleand thet hingst heysayabou thim. Sixth i sreaciton , t

s n a e m h c i h

w heauthor sgive clues t o aperson’ scharacte rby l etitng t he reader e

z i n g o c e

r howt ha tpersonr eactst ovairouss tiuaiton sandevents .Seventhi sd riec t comment from the autho rto the character .Eighth i sthought . The autho rgives

r s i h t n I .t u o b a g n i k n i h t s i n o s r e p a t a h w f o e g d e l w o n k t c e ri

d espect ,hei sablet o

r e d a e r e h t t a h w o

d canno tdo i nr eall fie .Hecant el lu swha tdfiferen tpeopleare .

g n i k n i h

t Thel as tonei smanneirsm .Theautho rdescirbe saperson’ smanneirsms , s

ti b a

h ori diosyncrasies ,whichmayalsot el luss omethingabou thi scharacter .

. 1 .

2 3 .Theoryo fMo itva iton

i c a

D (1975 )say stha tthe expeirmen ton pain and cogniitve dissonance c i s n ir t x e d n a c i s n ir t n i : n o it a v it o m f o s e s s a l c o w t n e e w t e b n o it c n it s i d n o s e s u c o

f .

e b o t d e r e d i s n o c s i d r a w e r l a n r e t x e e m o s f o e s u a c e b n e k a tr e d n u s i t a h t r o i v a h e B

g n o l f o e s u a c e b n e k a tr e d n u s i t a h t r o i v a h e b d n a , d e t a v it o m y ll a c i s n ir t x

e -term

b o t d e r e d i s n o c s i s e c n e r e f e r p d e h s il b a t s e s ’l a u d i v i d n i n a r o s l a o

g e intirnsically

s a ( d e t a v it o

m ctiedi nBraun ,1983 .)

.

2 31 .. Theoryo fCri itca lApproache s

e t a t s ) 1 7 9 1 ( s d o o W d n a r e g r e b r h o

R thatt hereare ifveapproachest ha tcan r

a r e ti l a y d u t s o t d e s u e

b y work (pp .6-15) . Those are formails tapproach , l

a r u tl u c o i c o s , h c a o r p p a l a c i h p a r g o i

b -histo irca lapproach ,mytphopoeic approach .

(27)

f s i t s ri

F ormails tapproachconcenrtate sont het otali ntegrtiyoft hel tierary e fi l s ’ r o h t u a f o s t c a f o t e c n e r e f e r t u o h ti w t r a f o k r o w e h t e n i m a x e o t s e ir t tI . k r o w

e h T . k r o w e h t f o e r n e g r

o formails tbeileve sin t he idea o fthe work tisefl .The formails tentriely on ti sestheitc value by ;frist ,demonsrtaitng the harmoniou s

s i g n i n a e m w o h t u o g n it n i o p , d n o c e s ; e l o h w e h t o t s tr a p e h t l l a f o t n e m e v l o v n i

. e r u t c u rt s e n i m r e t e d e u q i n h c e t f o s r e tt a m w o h , t s a l e h t d n a ; e r u t c u rt s m o r f d e v ir e d

Second i sbiographica lapproach ,which si used when the researchers y

r a r e ti l a e g d u j o t d n e t n

i work based on the impo trance o facknowledging the p

e e d a r o f e fi l l a n o s r e p s ’ r o h t u

a e drun erstandingofl tierarywork. s

s i d ri h

T ociocutlural-histo ircal approach . Th is approach asse tr s the analysi so fthe social ,cutlura land histo irca lbackground a sa reference to the t n e m g d u j l a c i h t e n a o t d a e l n a c h c a o r p p a s i h T . y r o t s e h t f o g n i d n a t s r e d n u r e h tr u f

t x e t e h t f o y ti d il a v e h t g n i h s il b a t s E . t n e m e t a t s s ’ r o h t u a n a f o h t u rt e h t g n i n r e c n o c

if e h t s

i rstj obo fhisto irca lc iritcism . c i e o p o h t y m s i h tr u o f e h

T approach .The proponen,t who has a majo r h

c a o r p p a c i e o p o h t y m e h t n i t s e r e t n

i , attempts to ifnd paritcularr ecurren tpattern s ,

t h g u o h t n a m u h f

o which i sconsidered to s e har the same universa lbeilefs to .

d n i m y ti n u m m o c n i a tr e

c Those recurrent pattern sare found being expressed in c

i s a b o s e r a d n a s e ti r k l o f d n a s h t y m t n e i c n

a to human through tha tthey have n

e m l l a r o f g n i n a e

m .

The l ast i spsychologica lapproach ,which relfects l fie and representaiton d

n a n o it a v it o m n a m u h f

o behavior .Here, t he psychologica lapproach i sused to rt

s n o m e d d n a r e v o c s i

(28)

s e ir o e h t l a c i g o l o h c y s

p such a s human moitvaiton , personaltiy , and behavio r s

t c e j b o y r a r e ti l n i n e tt ir w n r e tt a

p can beanalyzed. The approach ifnd swha tthe r

e h c r a e s e r e h t s ll e t k r o

w aboutt he human mind and i nvolvest heeffo tr t o l ocate t

,s u h T . n r e tt a p t n e r r u c e r n i a tr e c e t a rt s n o m e d d n

a he knowledge o fpsychologica l .

s k r o w y r a r e ti l f o s d n i k e m o s r e h tr u f y d u t s o t r e d r o n i s i s d l e if

l a c i g o l o h c y s p s e s u r e ti r w e h t , l e v o n e h t f o s i s y l a n a e h t t c u d n o c o T

o R . y g o l o h c y s p f o y r o e h t e h t n o d e s a b h c a o r p p

a hrberge r (1971 ) say s tha t l

a c i g o l o h c y s

p approach analyzes a nove lbased on theory o fpsychology .Thi s e

b ir c s e d r e t c a r a h c e h t s e z y l a n a h c a o r p p

a d int henove ldeepert hrough t hel en so f s

e s u r e ti r w e h T . y g o l o h c y s

p psychological approach to analyze the main r

a h

c acter , Ram Mohammad Thoma ,s deepe r so that i t help s the wrtie r to r

e t c a r a h c e h t d n a t s r e d n

u andmo itvaitonthroughhi spersonaltiy.

. 4 . 1 .

2 Theoryo fPsychology

n ir e d i s n o

C g the topic o fthe thesi ,s the theory o fpsychology i sused e

s u a c e

b character’ smoitvaitoni nt erm so fhi so rhe rdesriei nachievingt hei raim s C

. d e n i a l p x e e b o t d e e

n haracters ’personaltiy in thei rrelaitonship wtih anothe r .

e z y l a n a o t t n a tr o p m i o s l a s i r e t c a r a h

c Thepsychoanalysist heoryt hati sdiscussed e

r e

h i h st emajors ystem so fpersonaltiy;theyareid ,e og andsuperego. (

n u a r

B 1938 )divide spersonaltiy into three patrs ;the ego ,the superego , e

h t d n

a id .Each oft hem ha s ti sown highly speci ifc role i n maintaining norma l n

i d e ti c s a ( g n i n o it c n u f y ti l a n o s r e

(29)

e s u d u e r

F s the ego sa lch ,which mean s“I” ,the par to fthe personaltiy e

h t o t g n i d r o c c a s t c a o g e e h T . fl e s e n o s a d e t p e c c a d n a d e z i n g o c e

r realtiyp irnciple

ti t a h

t seekst o pleaset he id’ sd irvei n reailsitcwayst ha twli lbeneftii n t hel ong e

h T . f e ir g g n i g n ir b n a h t r e h t a r m r e

t ego conrtols t heid in doing someacitviites . e

h

T ego conrtol s the individua’l s aciton and manipulates the envrionment , s

ll a c t i t a h t f o e s u a c e

b the execu itve agency o fpersonaltiy .The ego i salso the .

tr a p c it s il a e r , d e z i n a g r o

s a l l a c o g e r e p u s e h

T uberich thu smeans“overtheI ”. Superego refers to

. y t e i c o s y b f l e s e h t n o d e s o p m i s i t a h t t n e n o p m o c l a r o m e h

t Superego playst he

i a , e h c y s p e h t n i e l o r g n i z il a r o m d n a l a c it ir

c m sfo rperfeciton ,include sego’ s e

h T . tl i u g f o s g n il e e f h ti w r o i v a h e b s i m s e h s i n u p d n a , s l a e d

i superego ist ha tpar t

e v n o c s a y t e i c o s e h t f o s d r a d n a t s l a r o m e h t s t n e s e r p e r t a h t y ti l a n o s r e p e h t f

o yedt o

s t n e r a p e h t y b d li h c e h

t .Superego represent sthe idea lworld rathe rthan the .

e r u s a e l

p Superego’s main funciton i sto decide whethe rsomething i s irgh tor t

c a n a c y e h t t a h t o s g n o r

w in accordance wtih mora lstandard autho irzed by t he .

m e h t d n u o r a y t e i c o s

s e s u d u e r

F fo rid sa es ,which mean s “ti” , implying an ailen force , e

h T . fl e s e h t f o t r a p s a d e z i n g o c e r t o n s i t a h t n o s r e p a n i g n i h t e m o

s idmaybes een

i e h t s

a nsitnctua lbiologica ld irve stha tpresents in every person a tbi trh .The di k

l a

t s abouti nsitnc,twhichi st hesourcef ort heegoandt hes uperego .Thei nsitnct s e

s

ti fl ah ev two t ype ,s Ero sandTh Oe pposedo fEros .TheEro si sincluded ni the s

o r E f o y g r e n e e h T . n o o s d n a x e s , h t m r a w , d o o f r o f d e e

n si called ilbido ,a

s i e p y t d n o c e s e h T . e fi l h g u o r h t g n il l e p o r p d n a y ti l a n o s r e p f o e c r o f g n i v ir

(30)

Opposed o fEros . tIi sabou tdeath i nsitnct .Freud also call sid ast hep irncipleo f s

a e l

p ure ,only t akesi nto accoun twhati twant ,s and disregard sal lconsequences . e

h t n e h

W idfalisr eleasingani ndividualf romas rtain , tit irest oatl eastr educet he .

n o it i d n o c t n a t s n o c e h t o t k c a b s e o g c i h c y s p e h t t a h t o s n i a rt s

o w e m a r F l a c it e r o e h T . 2 .

2 r k

s e ir o e h t e h

T o fcharacte randtheoryo fcharacteirzaitonusedt oanswert he n

o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p t s ri

f ,How is Ram Mohammad Thoma sdesc irbed in the ?

l e v o

n Those theo ire sare used to help the proces so f ifnding Ram Mohammad ’

s a m o h

T characte randl ate rdecidehispersonaltiyporrtayedi nt henovel . h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p f o y r o e h t d n a n o it a v it o m f o y r o e h

T i sappiled t o

h t s e s u r e ti r w e h T . m e l b o r p d n o c e s e h t r e w s n

a ose theo ire s to understand z

i u q e h t g n i n n i w n i n o it a v it o m s ’ s a m o h

T da n to understand how the autho r y

a w e h t s e b ir c s e

d Thoma sbecomes ab liilonarie .Besides ,thestudy o fltieraland e

u

rt meaning si alsoconductedandanalyzedusingtheoryo fpsychology.

. 3 .

2 Contex toft heNovel

t r a p s i h

T descirbes a majo relement setitng o fthe story .The nove’l s i

v a r a h D s i e c a l p f o g n it t e

s ,aslumareaaround Mumbai ,India. Approximately a a

e r a m u l s s i h t t i b a h n i s e v it a n d n a s t n a r g i m m i m o r f e l p o e p n o il li

m .The nove’l s

e m it f o g n it t e

s i samodernera . g n it t e s e h t f o t s o

M f orthestory t akes placei n acorne ro fMumba icalled ,i

v a r a h

(31)

s e it il i c a f t n e c e d n

i .I tcan be sai d tha tDharav ii snot a place fo rhuman beings. 5 0 0 2 ( p u r a w

S )ha sdescirbedt hestiuaitono fMumbaii nthenove:l d e r d n u h d e p m a r c a n i ,i v a r a h D

“ -square-foots hackt ha tha snonatura lilgh t t I .t i r e v o f o o r e h t s a g n i v r e s t e e h s l a t e m d e t a g u r r o c a h ti w , n o it a li t n e v r o g n i n n u r o n s i e r e h T . d a e h r e v o s e s s a p n i a rt a r e v e n e h w y lt n e l o i v s e t a r b i v d n a r e t a

w san tiaiton .T eh er are mliilon speople ilke me ,packed in two -d e r d n u

h -hectare t irangle o fswampy urban wasteland ,wherewe ilve ilke y rt n u o c e h t r e v o l l a m o r f s t n a r g i m e t u ti t s e D . s t c e s n i e k il e i d d n a s l a m i n a g g i b s ’ a i s A n i y k s f o l u f d n a h n w o r i e h t r o f r e h t o h c a e h ti w e lt s o

j es tslum.

s e l b b a u q s y li a d e r a e r e h

T -ove rinche so fspace ,ove ra bucke to fwater- y t s u d e h t m o r f e m o c s t n e d i s e r s ’i v a r a h D . y l d a e d s n r u t s e m it t a h c i h w ” t a r a j u G d n a u d a N l i m a T d n a P U d n a r a h i B f o s r e t a w k c a

b (p .156 ;ch .6).

h ti w i a b m u M o t e m o c e l p o e p y n a

M dreamsi nt hei rhea tr so fstirkingtobe r e p p u g n i v il d n a h c

ir -middle-clas s ilves . Changing thei rsocia lstatu sbecomes s n o s a e r ri e h t f o e n

o f mo r igraitont oMumbai .Swarup( 2005 )addeddescirpitono f : w o l e b s a , i a b m u M n i n o it a u ti s , i a b m u M o t e m o c y e h T

“ the ctiy gold ,wtih dream sin thei rheatr so f il d n a h c ir t i g n i k ir t

s ving upper-middle-clas s ilves .Dharavii sno taplace v u J s ’i h l e D . h s i m a e u q s e h t r o

f enlieHomediminished t hem ,bu tDharav’i s tI . m e h t s e s a b e d d n a s n e d a e d r o l a u q s n a b r u f o e p a c s d n a l m ir

g sopen

t n e m e r c x e , g n i k n it s s tI . s e o ti u q s o m h ti w m e e t s n i a r

d -ilned communa l

d n a l l e m s e h t t u o b a s s e l k n i h t u o y e k a m h c i h w , s t a r f o l l u f e r a s e n ir t a l n o e il e g a b r a g y h tl if f o s d n u o M . e d i s k c a b r u o y g n it c e t o r p t u o b a e r o m g a r h c i h w m o r f , r e n r o c y r e v

e -picker sstli lmanage to ifnd something s ti h g u o r h t e z e e u q s o t h t a e r b r u o y n i k c u s o t e v a h u o y s e m it t a d n A . l u f e s u , i v a r a h D f o s e c n e d i s e r g n i v r a t s e h t r o f t u B . s y e ll a c i b o h p o rt s u a l c , w o r r a n 6 5 1 . p p ( ” e m o h s i s i h

t -167 ;ch .6 .)

r a li m i s s i e v o b a t n e m e t a t s e h

T tot hef ac taboutMumbaii nr eall fie .Feely , r

e h n

i aritclestates tha tMumbaii soneoft hel arges tciitesi n India. Thel ureo f y ti c e h t o t n i n o it a r g i M . s a e r a l a r u r n i g n i v il e s o h t n o l l u p e g u h a s i y ti c e h t n i s b o j r l a it n e n o p x e t a w o r g o t s e u n it n o c i a b m u M f

(32)

f o n o it a l u p o p e h T . d lr o w e h t f o l a ti p a c m u l s e h t g n i e b f o d r o c e r s u o i b u d e h t

2 1 y l e t a m i x o r p p a s i i a b m u

M mliilon people .She added t hat ,almos t60% oft he s

m u l s n i s e v il n o it a l u p o p l a t o

t and the irch own 90%oft hel and ,whlie t hepoor .

(33)

18

3 R E T P A H C

Y G O L O H D T E M H C A E S E R

s s i h t n i d e y o l p m e y g o l o d o h t e m h c r a e s e r e h t s e s s u c s i d r e t p a h c s i h

T tudy.I t

, y l e m a n s tr a p e e r h t f o s t s i s n o

c objec to fthe study ,approach o fthe study and methodoft hes tudy.

y d u t S e h t f o t c e j b O . 1 . 3

t c e j b o e h

T oft hi sstudy i sSlumdog Mliilonairewirtten by VikasSwarup. t

I si ab -est known novel ,which wa spubilshed in London in February2005 .Thi s s

a k i V f o e m ir p e h t s i l e v o

n Swarup’snovel; i twa spreviouslypubilshed a sQ&A .

5 0 0 2 n

i Slumdog Mliilonaire sh a at ota lof 382page sand tii sdivided into fou r s i d ri h t e h t ,s r e t p a h c 2 1 f o s t s i s n o c t r a p d n o c e s e h t , e u g o l o r P s i tr a p t s ri f e h t ,s tr a p

i p

E logueandt hel as tpatri sacknowledgmen.t e

r i a n o il li M g o d m u l

S wa swirtten based on the expeirence o fthe author

o h

w wa sinspried by theslum area stiuaiton i n Mumbai .Set i n India , tit ellst he z i u q t s e g g i b e h t s e m o c e b o h w r e ti a w g n u o y a , s a m o h T d a m m a h o M m a R f o y r o t s

y r o t s i h n i r e n n i w w o h

s .In t he novel ,Thomast ellst hestory o fhisl fieand al lo f e

it l u c if fi d s

ti s .Li gvi n i naslumarea ,hedreamedt ohaveaweatlhyl fie da n to be t

c e p s e

r e d by t he society .Hi sdreams had mo itvated him t o ge twha the wanted . ,

w o h s e m a g e h t n o s n o it s e u q e v l e w t f o r e d r o e h

T Thomas t ell sthe readers t hat

s i h n i s e r u t n e v d a g n i z a m

(34)

2 .

3 .Approachoft heStudy

e h t , s i s e h t s i h t g n it c u d n o c n

I wrtie rexplained the approach used in thi s s

i t a h t h c a o r p p a e n o d e s u y l n o r e ti r w e h T . y d u t

s thepsychologica lapproach .Thi s n

o d e s u c o f y d u t

s Thomas’ om itvaiton i n j oining t he quiz .Then, thewrtie rused t

u o d n if o t h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h

t the personaltiy and moitvaiton of the r

e ti r w e h t d e p l e h h c a o r p p a s i h T . z i u q e h t g n i n i o j n i r e t c a r a h

c to ge tthe deepe r

i v d n a n o it a v it o m r e t c a r a h c e h t f o n o it p ir c s e

d ew t hecharacter‘ spersonaltiyi nt he .

y r o t s

.

3 3 .Methodoft heStudy

s i y d u t s s i h

T al ibraryr esearch .Getitngthenove lSlumdogMliilonaire ,the n

e k a t p e t s t s ri

f wasr eadingt henoveland t akingnotesf ort he purposeo fhaving d

o o t s r e d n

u the story .Beside ,s t here were also otherstepsthe wrtier used du irng y

d u t s e h t f o s s e c o r p e h

t , suchasr eadi ngsomebook sa sdataands ources ,andt hen g

n it t u

p wha tw asapprop iratei nt heanalysis .

d a e r r e ti r w e h t ,t s ri F . r e ti r w e h t y b e n o d s p e t s e m o s e r a e r e h t , y d u t s s i h t n I

r e ti r w e h t , d n o c e S . l e v o n e h t f o a e d i e h t t e g o t d n a d n a t s r e d n u o t l e v o n e h t

e m o s d n u o f r e ti r w e h t , d ri h T . l e v o n e h t n o d e s a b m e l b o r p h c r a e s e r e h t d e t a l u m r o f

d e t a l e r s e c n e r e f e

r to the novel .Fou trh ,the wrtie rdetermined the approp irate d e z y l a n a r e ti r w e h t , h tf i F . y d u t s s i h t n i m e l b o r p h c r a e s e r e h t r e w s n a o t h c a o r p p a

r e ti r w e h t ,t s a l e h T . s m e l b o r p e h t r e w s n a o t s e ir o e h t d e t a l e r e m o s g n i s u k r o w e h t

e h t n o d e s a b y d u t s e h t d e d u l c n o

(35)

t i , y d u t s e h t e t e l p m o c o t r e d r o n

I requ ries a lo to fthough ta swel la s e

c n e r e f e

r s, book sand source sfrom elecrtonic sources .There are many source s r

e ti r w e h t t a h

t usedi nanalyzingt hemaincharacter’ smoitvaiton sinj oining“Who a

n i W l li

w Bliilon?”quiza sseen i n Swarup’s Slumdog Mliilonaire .Thesource s m o c e b t a h t e c r u o s y r a m ir p s i t s ri f e h T . s tr a p o w t o t n i d e d i v i d y ll a c i s a b e r

a est he

e h t f o s i s a

b analysis .The p irmary source si Slumdog Mliilonaire nove.l The s

i t r a p d n o c e

s secondary source s tha t become supporitng source sin giving r

e ti r w e h t o t n o it a m r o f n

i ’ sstudya silstedi nt her eference spa tr .Besides,t hereare r

e h t o y n a

(36)

2 1 4 R E T P A H C

S I S Y L A N A

o t r e w s n a e h t s e s s u c s i d r e t p a h c s i h

T the quesiton formulated in the

. n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r

p Thediscussioni sdividedi ntot wopa trs .Thef ris tpatri st he

t s a l e h t r o t r a p d n o c e s e h T . l e v o n e h t n i d e b ir c s e d y ti l a n o s r e p ’ s a m o h T f o s i s y l a n a

f o s i s y l a n a e h t s i t r a

p the ltiera land rt ue meaning o fThomas ’moitvaiton in

. z i u q e h t g n i n i o j

. 1 .

4 TheDescrip itono fRamMohammadThomas ’Personaltiy

s e b ir c s e d t r a p s i h

T Thomas ’ personaltiy in the novel .The theory o f

Ram Mohammad Thomas` motivation in joining ``Who will Win a Billion?`` quiz as seen in Vikas Swarup`s Slumdog Millionaire.

A SARJANAPENDIDIKANTHESIS

P theRequirement

F TEACHERSTRAININGANDEDUCATION Y

toObtaint heSarjanaPendidikanDegree inEngilshLanguageEduca iton

STATEMENTOFWORK’SORIGINALITY

TABLEOFCONTENTS

S TOFWORK’SORIGINALITY............................ i v I

L APPENDIXE S

1 ResearchBackground

1 ResearchObjec itves

1 De ifniitono fTerms

1 35. .“Slumdog”

2 fo Character

2 3 .Theoryo fMo itva iton

2 Theoryo fPsychology

2 Contex toft heNovel

3 .Approachoft heStudy

4 TheDescrip itono fRamMohammadThomas ’Personaltiy