OVERVIEW
Objective
¾
To describe the role of analytical procedures in the audit process and the use of substantive analysis.WHEN USED
OVERALL REVIEW STAGE PLANNING
STAGE
¾ Stages in the audit
¾ Purposes
¾ Need for
¾ Based on
¾ Financial condition
FLUCTUATIONS SUBSTANTIVE
PROCEDURES MEANING AND
NATURE
¾ Sufficiency
¾ Financial statement assertions
¾ Extent of use
¾ Types of test
¾ Proof in total
¾ Extent of reliance
¾ Need for
¾ Examples
¾ Meaning
¾ Comparison
¾ Relationships
1
MEANING AND NATURE
1.1
Meaning
¾
The analysis of significant ratios and trends including the resulting investigation of fluctuations and relationships: that are inconsistent with other relevant information; or which deviate from predicted amounts.
1.2
Comparisons of financial information
With Examples
¾
prior periods¾
anticipated results (from budgets and forecasts)
2007 2007 2006 Actual Budget Actual
Turnover ($) 11,900 12,000 10,000
¾
predictive estimates Depreciation for year ≈ 15% × year end cost¾
similar industryinformation. Receivables turnover vs industry average
1.3
Consideration of relationships
Between
Examples
¾
Elements of financial information expectedto conform to a predicted pattern. Gross profit % to sales
¾
Financial information and relevantnon-financial information. Payroll costs to number of employees
1.4
Methods
¾
Range from simple comparisons to intricate analyses using advanced statistical techniques. May be applied to: consolidated financial statements;
components (e.g. subsidiaries, divisions, segments);
2
WHEN USED
¾
Analytical procedures are required to be undertaken at the planning and overall review stages. They may also be used at other stages, as a procedure for obtaining audit evidence, ie substantive analytical procedures. To assist in planning nature, timing and extent of other audit procedures.
As substantive procedures at the detailed testing stage – when more effective or efficient than tests of detail.
As an overall review, to conclude whether financial statements as a whole are consistent with auditors’ knowledge of the business.
3
PLANNING STAGE
3.1
Need for
¾
Analytical procedures should be applied to help: understand the business; and identify areas of potential risk.
¾
“Preliminary” analytical procedures are used to: assess financial condition (see 3.3 below); increase knowledge of the business (see Session 9) through the accumulation of information on trends in key relationships;
plan the nature, timing and extent of other audit procedures.
3.2
Based on
¾
Interim financial and non-financial information¾
Budgets/forecasts and management accounts¾
Draft financial statements3.3
Financial condition
3.3.1
Importance
¾
Deterioration potentially increases inherent risk as deliberate misstatement/manipulation is more likely.3.3.2
How assessed
¾
Short-term – liquidity indicators such as the current ratio.¾
Long-term – gearing and profitability indicators, e.g.: debt/equity ratio
return on capital employed (ROCE) gross profit (GP)%
earnings per share (EPS).
¾
Loans and borrowings – defaults in and renegotiation of repayments.¾
Cash flow projections – receipts from operations less than maturing debt.4
SUBSTANTIVE ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
4.1
Sufficiency
¾
Analytical procedures can themselves provide sufficient audit evidence where an item can be verified directly by reference to another (valid) item (e.g. commission on sales, bank interest, rental expense, depreciation). (See proof in total below.)¾
Analytical procedures may be effective in testing for understatement (i.e. completeness). For example, in predicting sales from purchases and known margins.¾
Where sufficient substantive evidence is not obtained by analytical procedures alone, some tests of detail will also be required.Illustration 1
Payroll
(assertions)
Analytical procedures
Tests of detail (ideas in
outline)
¾
Completeness¾
Compare cost with budget/prior period(s) – month on month and for year¾
“Proof in total” (eg that the number of employees on the payroll can be verified to independent control totals – say in HR)¾
Postings from payroll to general ledgerPayroll
(assertions)
Analytical procedures
Tests of detail (ideas in
outline)
¾
Occurrence¾
Compare cost with budget/prior period(s) and similar organisation/ industry¾
Ratio analysis e.g. average cost per employee by department and comparing with prior periods, otherdepartments
¾
Cash book/bank payments and transfers¾
Starters and leavers , eg agreeing that all leavers in a period have been excluded from the payroll for that period and all joiners included¾
Measurement (amount and in correct period)¾
Compare accruals (e.g. statutory deductions, holiday pay, etc) with prior period(s)¾
Labour turnover (should decrease with increasing remuneration)¾
Postings from payroll to general ledger¾
Sample of payrolltransactions (accuracy, etc) and cut-off testing at period end
¾
Presentationand disclosure
¾
Compare disclosure with prior year financial statements¾
Ratios e.g. payroll to cost of sales, average pay per employee¾
Disclosure checklist¾
Postings from generalledger to payroll
4.2
Financial statement assertions
Example 1
(a) For each of the following financial statement assertions relevant to sales revenue suggest a suitable analytical procedure.
Solution
Revenue
(assertions)
Analytical procedures
Tests of detail (ideas in
outline)
¾
Completeness¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
Occurrence¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
Measurement (amount and in correct period)¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
4.3
Extent of use
4.3.1
Factors to consider
4.3.2
Impact on use
¾
Audit objectives (see assertionsabove) and extent of reliance See extent of reliance (below)
¾
Degree of disaggregation ofavailable information Procedures are more effective when applied to components
¾
Availability of financial andnon-financial data Independently prepared non-financial data should result in more effective procedures.
¾
Reliability of informationavailable Budgets prepared with sufficient care will facilitate more effective procedures.
¾
Relevance of information Budgets based on expectation are more useful than goals to be achieved.¾
Sources of information Independent sources are more reliable¾
Comparability of information Broad industry data may not be relevant to specialized products.¾
Knowledge gained previously¾
Nature of enterprise and itsoperations. Steady trends develop in some businesses therefore easier to know what to expect and identify variations.
Example 2
Albatross Ltd had 100 employees last year with total wages of $840,000 and 100 employees this year with a wage bill of $950,000, an increase of 13% The annual pay rise was 6% and the level of business has remained approximately constant.
Required:
(a) Suggest reasons other than error or irregularity which could account for the greater than expected increase.
(b) In the absence of a satisfactory reason for the increase, suggest how the payroll could have been inflated by error or irregularity.
Solution
(a)
Business reasons
¾
¾
(b)
Possible error or irregularity
¾
¾
¾
4.4
Types of test
Trend analysis (graphical
time series or regression
analysis)
Ratio analysis
Reasonable test
= “proof in total”
¾
“Scattergraph” relies on visual inspection¾
Time-series analysis can be cumbersomeExamples
receivables collection period
inventory turnover asset turnover
payables payment period
Examples (see later) on payroll depreciation investment income rental income
¾
Statistical regression (using computer program) is most objective¾
Ratios identify stable relationships therefore more relevant than absolute changes¾
“Models” can be very precise, even simple models can be very effective¾
Useful for income and expenditure a/c analysis.¾
Useful for both statement of financial position and income andexpenditure a/c analysis.
¾
Most useful for income and expenditure a/c analysis.Illustration 2
Testing petrol costs in a taxi firm
Steps
Application
1 Identify factors likely to influence
the amount to be tested Petrol costs determined by kilometres driven 2 Clarify relationship and confirm it
3 Predict likely range of values Kms
driven price per Average litre ($)
Expected petrol cost
($)
Jan 2,387 1.59 825 – 716 Feb
etc 2,954 1.61 1034 – 897 4 Compare predictions with actual Prediction ($) Actual ($)
Jan 716 – 825 755
Feb 897 – 1034 1200
5 Investigate variances and
corroborate explanations January is within range, February is not
4.5
Proofs in total
¾
An independent check on the total value of a population4.5.1
Mechanics
¾
Calculate the expected value of a population. The base data must be independent of the population being tested or otherwise confirmed to be materially correct.¾
Compare with recorded value.¾
Difference should not be material.4.5.2
Examples
¾
Depreciation – for each category of asset:(Cost + Additions – Disposals) × straight-line % = Charge for year
Alternatively, using reducing balance method, adjust accumulated depreciation for additions and disposals also and calculate depreciation on net amount.
¾
Payroll – use information about workforce, numbers of starters and leavers, wage rates, pay rises, productivity bonuses etc to construct a model for the total payroll figure. For example:¾
Hotel revenue – income for year Occupancy × Room rate; or
Last year’s income (audited) × (1+i) where i is the percentage increase in room rate
¾
Fuel (petrol) costs – for each category of vehicle running on different grades of fuel (e.g.leaded, unleaded, diesel) calculate consumption. For example, as:
Mileage (per tacograph or mile-meter) ÷ consumption rate (e.g. miles per gallon or kilometres per litre)
4.6
Extent of reliance
4.6.1
Factor
4.6.2
Impact on reliance — Examples
¾
Materiality of itemsinvolved Cannot rely only on analytical procedures for material inventory balances, but may rely solely for immaterial income and expense items.
¾
Other procedures Reviewing subsequent cash receipts might confirm or dispel queries raised by analytical procedures on an ageing of customers’ accounts.¾
Accuracy ofpredictions Greater consistency expected in comparing gross profit margins from one period to another than in comparing discretionary expenses (e.g. research or advertising).
¾
Risk assessments(IR and CR) If internal control over sales order processing is weak (i.e. CR is high) more reliance on tests of details in drawing conclusions on receivables may be required.
4.6.3
Greatest use
¾
Existing well-established client¾
Well-known, stable industry¾
Predictive information available (budgets, cash flow forecasts)¾
Effective accounting and internal control systems.5
OVERALL REVIEW STAGE
5.1
Need for
5.2
Examples
¾
Comparison of current year results with previous year(s).¾
Review of significant trends and ratios to identify emerging patterns or changes in known patterns e.g. if liquidity ratios deteriorating.¾
Recalculation of key ratios and trends to reflect adjustments to the financial statements.6
INVESTIGATION OF FLUCTUATIONS
Significant fluctuations, inconsistent relationships or deviations from predicted amounts should be investigated and adequate explanations and appropriate corroborative evidence obtained.
¾
Unexpected trends or deviations should be discussed with management in the first instance.¾
Explanations must be substantiated (e.g. by reference to existing knowledge and audit evidence already obtained).¾
If management’s explanation in inadequate, further audit procedures may be necessary.FOCUS
You should now be able to:
¾
describe and explain the nature and purpose of analytical procedures in planning;¾
compute and interpret key ratios used in analytical procedures;EXAMPLE SOLUTION
Solution 1 — Sales revenue assertions
Revenue
(assertions)
Analytical procedures
Tests of detail (ideas in
outline)
¾
Completeness¾
Comparison with budget, prior period(s) etc¾
Review of gross profit %(s)¾
Reasonableness test (wheremargins known)
¾
Cut-off tests (goods despatch)¾
Postings from sales day bookto general ledger
¾
Sales orders to despatch notes and invoices¾
Occurrence¾
Ratio of sales returns to sales¾
Average number or value ofcredit notes per month
¾
Sales invoices to customer orders¾
Post year-end credit notes¾
Sales returns and allowances¾
Direct confirmation¾
Measurement (amount and in correct period)¾
As for completeness¾
Ratio of discounts to creditsales
¾
Postings from sales day book to general ledger¾
Cutoff tests (goods despatch)¾
Sample of invoices (prices, etc)¾
Direct confirmationSolution 2 — Total wages
(a)
Business reasons
¾
There may have been a change in sales mix with previously bought-in goods being replaced by goods manufactured in-house, resulting in substantial authorized overtime.¾
There could have been a switch to more skilled (therefore more expensive) labour.(b)
Possible error or irregularity
¾
Misposting in the general (nominal) ledger¾
“Dummy” employees on the payroll¾
Unauthorized overtime being paid