• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

S ING 1100179 Table of content

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "S ING 1100179 Table of content"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE OF APPROVAL ... i

STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION ... ii

PREFACE ... iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ... iv

ABSTRACT ... vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS ... vii

LIST OF TABLES ... x

LIST OF CHARTS ... xii

LIST OF FIGURE ... xiii

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ... 1

1.1 Background of the Study ... 1

CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW ... 7

2.1 Cooperative Learning ... 7

2.1.1 Definition ... 7

2.1.2 Basic Elements of Cooperative Learning ... 8

2.1.3 Benefits of Cooperative Learning Method ... 10

2.2 Writing ... 10

2.2.1 Definition ... 10

2.2.2 Steps of Teaching Writing ... 11

2.3 Written Text ... 12

2.3.1 Definition ... 12

(2)

viii Anne Denti Agrian, 2015

EXPLORING COOPERATIVE LEARNING METHOD AS THE STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

2.4 Integrating the Process of Writing and Cooperative Learning Method 15

2.5 Relevant Research ... 17

2.6 Concluding Remark ... 18

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ... 19

3.1 Research Design ... 19

3.1.1 Variables ... 20

3.2 Research Hypotheses ... 20

3.3 Population and Sample ... 20

3.4 Data Collection ... 21

3.4.1 Research Location ... 21

3.4.2 Instrument and Material ... 21

3.5 Research Procedure ... 22

3.5.1 Designing Lesson Plan ... 22

3.5.2 Organizing the Research Instruments ... 22

3.5.3 Administering the Pilot Test ... 22

3.5.4 Administering the Pre-test ... 23

3.5.5 Teaching and Learning Process ... 23

3.5.6 Posttest ... 25

3.5.7 Conducting Questionnaire ... 25

3.6 Data Analysis ... 26

3.6.1 Scoring Technique ... 26

3.6.2 Pilot Data Analysis ... 28

3.6.3 Pre-test and Post-test Data Analysis ... 29

3.6.3.1 Normality Distribution ... 29

3.6.3.2 Independent t-test ... 30

3.6.3.3 Dependent t-test ... 30

3.6.3.4 Effect Size ... 31

3.6.4 Questionnaire Data Analysis ... 32

3.7 Concluding Remark ... 32

CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION ... 33

4.1 Finding and Discussion of Pilot Test ... 33

4.1.1 Pre-test and Post-test ... 33

4.1.2 Questionnaire ... 34

4.1.2.1Validity Test ... 34

4.1.2.2Reliability Test ... 35

4.2 Pretest Analysis ... 36

(3)

ix

4.2.2 Independent T-Test on Pretest Scores ... 37

4.3 Posttest Analysis ... 39

4.3.1 Normality Distribution Test ... 39

4.3.2 Independent T-Test on Posttest Scores ... 40

4.4 Dependent T-Test on Pretest and Posttest Scores ... 41

4.5 The Calculation of Effect Size... 44

4.6 Finding and Discussion from Questionnaire ... 44

4.6.1 Positive Interdependence ... 45

4.6.2 Face-to-face Promotive Interaction ... 49

4.6.3 Individual Accountability ... 51

4.6.4 Interpersonal and Small Group Skills ... 53

4.6.5 Group Processing ... 55

4.7 Concluding Remark ... 58

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ... 59

5.1 Conclusion ... 59

5.2 Suggestion ... 60

REFERENCES ... 62

(4)

x Anne Denti Agrian, 2015

EXPLORING COOPERATIVE LEARNING METHOD AS THE STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1 Basic Elements of Cooperative Leraning by Johnson, Johnson

and Holubec (1991) ... 8

Table 2.2 Writing Assessment Rubric ... 13

Table 3.1 Quasi Experimental Design ... 19

Table 3.2 Schedule of Teaching and Learning Activity ... 23

Table 3.3 The Criteria and Technique of Scoring ... 27

Table 3.4 The Scale of Effect Size ... 32

Table 4.1 Item-Total Statistics ... 34

Table 4.2 Case Processing Summary ... 36

Table 4.3 Reliability Statistics ... 36

Table 4.4 Frequencies ... 37

Table 4.11 Paired Samples Statistics ... 42

Table 4.12 Paired Samples Correlations ... 42

Table 4.13 Paired Samples Test ... 42

Table 4.14 Frequencies of students’ response on question number 1 ... 45

Table 4.15 Frequencies of students’ response on question number 2 ... 46

Table 4.16 Frequencies of students’ response on question number 3 ... 46

Table 4.17 Frequencies of students’ response on question number 4 ... 47

Table 4.18 Frequencies of students’ response on question number 5 ... 47

(5)

xi

Table 4.20 Frequencies of students’ response on question number 7 ... 49

Table 4.21 Frequencies of students’ response on question number 8 ... 50

Table 4.22 Frequencies of students’ response on question number 9 ... 52

Table 4.23 Frequencies of students’ response on question number 10 ... 53

Table 4.24 Frequencies of students’ response on question number 11 ... 53

Table 4.25 Frequencies of students’ response on question number 12 ... 55

Table 4.26 Frequencies of students’ response on question number 13 ... 55

Table 4.27 Frequencies of students’ response on question number 14 ... 56

(6)

xii Anne Denti Agrian, 2015

EXPLORING COOPERATIVE LEARNING METHOD AS THE STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

LIST OF CHARTS

Chart 4.1 Data percentage of question number 1 ... 45

Chart 4.2 Data percentage of question number 2 ... 46

Chart 4.3 Data percentage of question number 3 ... 46

Chart 4.4 Data percentage of question number 4 ... 47

Chart 4.5 Data percentage of question number 5 ... 47

Chart 4.6 Data percentage of question number 6 ... 49

Chart 4.7 Data percentage of question number 7 ... 50

Chart 4.8 Data percentage of question number 8 ... 50

Chart 4.9 Data percentage of question number 9 ... 52

Chart 4.10 Data percentage of question number 10 ... 53

Chart 4.11 Data percentage of question number 11 ... 54

Chart 4.12 Data percentage of question number 12 ... 55

Chart 4.13 Data percentage of question number 13 ... 56

Chart 4.14 Data percentage of question number 14 ... 56

(7)

xiii

LIST OF FIGURE

Figure 2.1 The relationship between cooperative learning method and the

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

 Untuk setiap pemilik ini, sertakan kopi DNPD prints menunjukan nama dan TIN pemilik  Tunjukkan jumlah pemilik tanpa TIN yang individu (pribadi) dan yang warga negara Timor-Leste:

Dalam proses belajar mengajar pendidikan jasmani terjadi interaksi antara guru.. dan siswa, dan hal itu merupakan syarat utama dari proses belajar

Sebuah butir tes dikatakan valid apabila setelah dilakukan penedekatan signifikansi yaitu t-hitung lebih besar atau sama dengan t-tabel, maka butir butir pertanyaan

katuntasan minimal (KKM) mata pelajaran basa Sunda di SMP Negeri 3.. Sangkan leuwih jéntré bisa dititénan dina tabél 3.2. 4) nganalisis hasil obsérvasi aktivitas

Pemanfaatan Limbah Padat Pulp Untuk Bahan Baku pembuatan Keramik Berpori Yang Diaplikasikan Sebagai Filter Gas Buang Kendaraan Bermotor Dengan Bahan Bakar Premium..

Modél Mind Mapping Pikeun Ngaronjatkeun Kaparigelan Nyaritakeun Pangalaman Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu. Pangalaman (Panalungtikan

Sikap mental karyawan yang positif terhadap situasi kerja itulah yang memperkuat motivasi kerjanya untuk mencapai kinerja yang maksimal.. Tiga unsur yang merupakan

Untuk melihat keberhasilan sasaran yang ditetapkan maka perlu adanya indikator sasaran yang ingin dicapai yaitu dengan menentukan target bintek yang diadakan baik