DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Panjaitan, R. Pharmaceutical care untuk pasien penyakit artritis rematik.
Jakarta: Direktorat Bina Farmasi Komunitas dan Klinik, Ditjen Bina
Kefarmasian dan Alat Kesehatan, Departemen Kesehatan; 2006.
2. Andriyasa, K, Tjokorda Raka Putra. Korelasi antara derajat beratnya
osteoartritis lutut dan cartilage oligomeric matrix protein serum. J Peny
Dalam. 2012: 13(1):10.
3. M.A., Sabara-Saga. Diet intensif dan aktifitas fisik untuk wanita lansia
penderita osteoartritis dengan obesitas. Medula. 2013: 2(1):115.
4. Nursyarifah, R.S. Hubungan antara obesitas dengan kejadian osteoartritis
lutut di RSUP dr. Kariadi Semarang. Semarang: Universitas
Muhammadiyah Semarang; 2012.
5. Koentjoro, Sara Listyani, J. Adji Suroso, Bantar Suntoko. Hubungan
antara indeks massa tubuh (IMT) dengan derajat osteoartritis lutut menurut
Kellgren-Lawrence.
Semarang:
Fakultas
Kedokteran
Universitas
Diponegoro; 2010.
6. Altman, R.D. Criteria for the classification of osteoarthritis of the knee
and hip. Scand J Rheumatology. 1987; (Suppl.65):31-39.
7. Soeroso J, Isbagio H, Kalim H, Broto R, Pramudiyo R. Osteoartritis. In:
Sudoyo AW, Setiyohadi B, Alwi I, Simadibrata M, Setiati S, editors. Buku
ajar ilmu penyakit dalam. 4
thed. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan Ilmu Penyakit
Dalam Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia; 2006. p. 1195-1201.
8. Firestein Gary S, Ralph C.Budd, Edward D. Harris, Iain B.McInnes,
Shaun Ruddy, John S.Sergent. Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology 8
thedition volume II. Canada: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
9. Moskowitz, Roland W., David S. Howell, Roy D. Altman, Joseph A.
Buckwalter, Victor M. Goldberg. Osteoarthritis 3
rdedition diagnosis and
medical / surgical management. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company;
2001.
10. Gabriella M van Dijk, Cindy Veenhof, Francous Shchellevis, Harry
Hulsmans, Jan PJ Bakker, Henk Arwert, et al. Comorbidity, limitations in
activities and pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. BMC
Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008;9:95.
11. Palmer, Keith T. Occupational activities and osteoarthritis of the knee.
British Medical Bulletin. 2012; 102:147-170.
12. Kulcu, Duygu Geler, Burcu Yanik, Hakan Atalar, Gulcin Gulsen.
Associated factors with pain and disability in patients with knee
osteoarthritis. Turkish Journal of Rheumatology. 2010; 25(2):077-081.
(Abstrak)
13. Kalim, Handono, Sri Andarini, Faradiana Rasyidi. Hubungan indeks
massa tubuh (IMT) dengan derajat nyeri pada penderita osteoartritis lutut.
Malang: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawijaya; 2012.
14. Reijman, M., H A P Pols, A P Bergink, J M W Hazes, J N Belo, A M
Lievense et al. Body mass index associated with onset and progression of
osteoarthritis of the knee but not of the hip: The Rotterdam Study. Ann
Rheum Dis. 2007; 66:158-162.
15. Koesoemawati, Herni, Huriawati Hartanto, Ivo Novita Salim, Lyana
Setiawan, Valleria, Wanny Suparman. Kamus kedokteran Dorland edisi
29. Jakarta: EGC; 2000.
16. Marsland, Daniel, Sabrina Kapoor. Crash course rheumatology and
orthopaedics 2
ndedition. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008.
17. Price, Sylvia A, Lorraine M. Wilson. Patofisiologi konsep klinis
proses-proses penyakit edisi 6. Jakarta: EGC; 2003.
18. Sadhana, Udadi. Patologi anatomi 2. Semarang: Badan Penerbit
Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; 2011.
19. Adnan HM. Diagnosis arthritis rheumatoid dan perbandingannya
arthritis-arthritis lain. Kongres Nasional I, Ikatan Reumatologi Indonesia,
Semarang, 1983 : 43-57.
20. Fauci, Anthony S., Dennis L. Kasper, Dan L. Longo, Eugene Braunwald,
Stephen L. Hauser, J. Larry Jameson et al. Harrison’s principles of general
medicine 17
thedition. 2008. p. 2159-2161.
21. Maharani, Eka Pratiwi. Faktor-faktor risiko osteoartritis lutut. Semarang:
Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; 2007.
22. Soejoto, Soetedjo, Sultana MH Faradz, RB Bambang W, Neni
Susilaningsih, Ratna D Purnawati et al. Lecture notes histologi I.
Semarang: Bagian Histologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro
Semarang; 2011.
23. JF, Woessner, Gunja-Smith Z. Role of metalloproteinases in human
osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1991; 27:99-101.
24. Patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis: an important subgroup of knee
osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2007; 46(7):1057-1062.(Abstrak)
25. Wahyuningsih, Nur Aini Sri. Hubungan obesitas dengan osteoartritis lutut
pada lansia di Kelurahan Puncangsawit Kecamatan Jebres Surakarta.
Surakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta;
2009.
26. Ambardini, Rachmah Laksmi. Peran Latihan Fisik dalam Manajemen
Terpadu Osteoartritis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
27. Waddell D.D. Integrating viscosupplementation into a comprehensive
osteoarthritis treatment program. Medscape Multispecialty; 2014.
28. Cooper C et al. in: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander LS, eds,
Osteoarthritis. Oxford, NY. Oxford University Press; 1998, page 237-249
29. Marc C. Hochberg et al. Recommendations for the use of
nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip,
and knee. Arthritis Care & Research. 2012; 64(4):465-474.
30. Syarif, Amir, Ari Estuningtyas, Arini Setiawati, H. Armen Muchtar,
Azalla Arif, Bahroelim Bahry et al. Farmakologi dan terapi edisi 5.
Jakarta: Departemen Farmakologi dan Terapeutik Fakultas Kedokteran
Universitas Indonesia; 2007.
31. Dieppe, Paul A., Lohmander L. Stefan. Pathogenesis and management of
pain in osteoarthritis. The Lancet. 2005; 365 : 965 – 973.
32. Lequesne MG. The algofunctional indices for hip and knee osteoarthritis.
J Rheumatol. 1997; 24(4):779-81.
33. Basaran, S., Rengin Guzel, Gulsah Seydaoglu, Fusun Guler-Uysal.
Validity, reliability, and comparison of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index
and Lequesne algofunctional index in Turkish patients with hip or knee
osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 29:749-756.
34. Murphy L, Bolen J, Helmick CG, Brady TJ. Comorbidities are very
common among people with arthritis. Poster 43. 20th National Conference
on Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, CDC. Feb 2009.
35. Sabah J-M AL Rubiae, Ali AL-Qazaz. The frequency of comorbidities
associated with knee osteoarthritis in men and women in Babylon and
their impact on pain. Medical Journla of Babylon. 2014; 8:4.
36. Leite, Alice Abath, Aline Jurema Gesteira Costa et al. co morbidities in
patients with osteoarthritis: frequency and impact on pain and physical
function. Rev Bras Reumatol 2011;51(2):113-123.
37. Schmitt, Laura C et al. Instability, laxity, and physical function in patients
with medial knee osteoarthritis. Phys Ther. Dec 2008; 88(12): 1508-1516.
38. Kim KW, Han JW, Cho HJ, Chang CB, Park JH, Lee JJ et al. Association
between comorbid depression and osteoarthritis symptom severity in
patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg AM. 2011 Mar
16;93(6):556-63. (Abstrak)
39. Mansournia MA et al. Effect of physical activity on functional
performance and knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis : analysis with
marginal structural models. Epidemiology. 2012 Jul;23(4):631-40.
40. Bosomworth, N.J. Exercise and knee osteoarthritis: benefit or hazard?
CFP (Canadian Family Physician). 2009 Sept:55(9):871-878.(Full text)
41. Niu J, Zhang YQ, Torner J, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Aliabadi P, et al. Is
obesity a risk factor for progressive radiographic knee osteoarthritis.
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Mar 15;61(3):329-35.(Abstrak)
42. Graverand MPHL, Brandt K, Mazzuca SA, Raunig D, Vignon E.
Progressive increase in body mass index is not associated with a
progressive increase in joint space narrowing in obese women with
osteoarthritis of the knee. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
2009;68:1734-1738.(Abstrak)
43. N. Belo J, Berger MY, Reijman M, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM.
Prognostic factors of progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a
systematic review of observational studies. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Feb
15;57(1):13-26.(Abstrak)
44. Manninen, P., H. Riihimäki, M. Heliövaara, O. Suomalainen. Physical
exercise and risk of severe knee osteoarthritis requiring arthroplasty.
Oxford Journals. Rheumatology (2001) 40 (4): 432-437.
Lampiran 1. Ethical Clearance
Lampiran 2. Ijin penelitian
Lampiran 3. Sampel Informed consent
JUDUL PENELITIAN
: Hubungan antara Faktor Risiko Osteoartritis Lutut
dengan Nyeri, Disabilitas, dan Berat Ringannya
Osteoartritis
INSTANSI PELAKSANA
: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
PENELITI
: Maya Yanuarty (CP : 085642993128)
Persetujuan Setelah Penjelasan
(INFORMED CONSENT)
Bapak/Ibu Yth :
Peneliti tersebut di atas adalah Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas
Diponegoro yang bermaksud ingin melibatkan Bapak/Ibu untuk menjadi responden
dalam penelitian ini dengan tujuan mengetahui hubungan antara faktor risiko osteoartritis
lutut dengan nyeri, disabilitas, dan berat ringannya osteoartritis. Osteoartritis sendiri
merupakan peradangan pada sendi yang menyebabkan timbulnya rasa nyeri dan kaku
pada sendi yang terkena. Penelitian ini bermanfaat dalam bidang akademik yaitu sebagai
sumbangan ilmu pengetahuan. Keuntungan yang dapat diperoleh dari penelitian ini
adalah Bapak/Ibu dapat mengetahui faktor risiko osteoartritis lutut yang Bapak/Ibu miliki
yang berkaitan dengan nyeri dan kaku sendi, apabila Bapak/Ibu menghubungi peneliti
dalam waktu minimal 3 bulan setelah penelitian. Penelitian ini juga dapat bermanfaat
dalam bidang pelayanan kesehatan, yaitu sebagai pertimbangan penerapan terapi dan
edukasi lebih lanjut pada pasien osteoartritis lutut selanjutnya.
Peneliti akan melakukan wawancara, pengukuran tinggi dan berat badan kepada
Bapak/Ibu, dan mengumpulkan data yang ada di rekam medis tentang berat ringannya
osteoartritis lutut. Peneliti menjamin kerahasiaan identitas dan informasi yang diberikan.
Informasi tersebut hanya digunakan untuk kepentingan penelitian serta pengembangan
ilmu kedokteran. Apabila dalam perjalanan nantinya, Bapak/Ibu menghendaki
mengundurkan diri, maka peneliti menghormati keinginan tersebut.
Pada akhir wawancara, peneliti akan memberikan sebuah souvenir / bingkisan
sebagai ungkapan terima kasih atas kerjasama Bapak/Ibu.
Lampiran 4. Spreadsheet data
No Nama
Usia
Sex
BB
TB
IMT
Kriteria IMT
Komorbid
1
K
59
P
73
1.52
31.6
Obesitas derajat 2
0
2
P
55
P
48.5
1.455
22.9
Normal
<3
3
W
61
P
54
1.45
25.7
Obesitas derajat 1
> 3
4
S
66
P
74
1.45
35.2
Obesitas derajat 2
> 3
5
M
58
L
58
1.59
22.9
Normal
> 3
6
M
69
P
66
1.53
28.2
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
7
MD
68
L
79
1.7
27.3
Obesitas derajat 1
> 3
8
P
57
P
54.5
1.51
23.9
Overweight
> 3
9
S
51
L
116
1.63
43.7
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
10
EY
54
P
62
1.55
25.8
Obesitas derajat 1
> 3
11
Z
58
P
43
1.55
17.9
Underweight
0
12
W
67
L
57
1.7
19.7
Normal
<3
13
PN
61
P
58
1.54
24.5
Overweight
<3
14
SS
65
P
71.5
1.495
32
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
15
JH
57
P
61
1.55
25.4
Obesitas derajat 1
> 3
16
S
74
P
66
1.515
28.8
Normal
<3
17
SH
74
L
66
1.6
25.8
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
18
SW
52
P
87
1.69
30.5
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
19
I
62
P
51.5
1.47
23.8
Overweight
<3
20
ES
56
P
65
1.38
34.1
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
21
S
58
P
57
1.485
25.8
Obesitas derajat 1
> 3
22
S
60
P
76.5
1.62
29.1
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
23
NM
52
P
76
1.43
37.2
Obesitas derajat 2
> 3
24
S
66
L
60
1.67
21.5
Normal
<3
25
SR
60
P
54
1.485
24.5
Overweight
0
26
S
66
P
52
1.455
24.6
Overweight
> 3
27
EI
57
P
67
1.54
28.3
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
28
S
73
P
34
1.435
16.5
Underweight
> 3
29
SM
51
P
58
1.51
25.4
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
30
MA
65
P
68
1.5
30.2
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
31
M
52
P
76
1.56
31.2
Obesitas derajat 2
> 3
32
S
68
P
72
1.59
28.5
Obesitas derajat 1
> 3
33
TNS
58
P
70
1.52
30.3
Obesitas derajat 2
> 3
No Aktivitas Fisik
Riwayat
Fisioterapi
Nyeri
Disabilitas
Kriteria
skor
WOMAC
Grade OA
1
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 2
2
No weight bearing
ya
Berat
Berat
Berat
Grade 1
3
No weight bearing
tidak
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 4
4
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 3
5
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 1
6
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 4
7
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Sedang
Sedang
Grade 3
8
Weight bearing
tidak
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 3
9
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Berat
Sedang
Grade 4
10
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 4
11
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 1
12
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
13
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Ringan
Ringan
Grade 3
14
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Berat
Sedang
Grade 4
15
No weight bearing
ya
Berat
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 1
16
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
17
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 3
18
Weight bearing
tidak
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 3
19
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
20
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
21
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Sedang
Ringan
Grade 2
22
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
23
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Sedang
Sedang
Grade 1
24
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 3
25
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
26
No weight bearing
ya
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 3
27
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 3
28
No weight bearing
tidak
Berat
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 3
29
Weight bearing
tidak
Sedang Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
30
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
31
Weight bearing
tidak
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 1
32
No weight bearing
ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 1
No
Nama
Usia
Sex
BB
TB
IMT
Kriteria IMT
Komorbid
34
AEL
54
P
74
1.51
32.5
Obesitas derajat 2
> 3
35
S
76
L
42
1.59
16.6
Underweight
> 3
36
AR
51
P
81.5
1.48
37.2
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
37
S
74
L
71
1.65
26.1
Obesitas derajat 1
> 3
38
R
55
P
89
1.54
37.5
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
39
KM
64
L
72
1.635
26.9
Obesitas derajat 1
> 3
40
MYS
56
P
74
1.58
29.6
Obesitas derajat 1
> 3
41
SD
57
P
57.5
1.57
23.3
Overweight
> 3
42
W
68
P
49
1.44
23.6
Overweight
<3
43
A
68
L
68
1.62
25.9
Overweight
> 3
44
S
53
L
65.5
1.66
23.8
Overweight
0
45
R
69
P
53
1.46
24.9
Overweight
<3
46
R
51
P
81
1.495
36.2
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
47
R
72
L
80
1.72
27
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
48
IS
64
P
68
1.5
30.2
Obesitas derajat 2
0
49
TMK
51
P
77
1.44
37.1
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
50
M
64
P
63
1.515
27.4
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
51
S
53
L
69
1.53
29.5
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
52
N
51
P
71
1.48
32.4
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
53
SBW
60
P
71
1.62
27.1
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
54
R
55
P
84
1.56
34.5
Obesitas derajat 2
> 3
55
R
51
P
60
1.535
25.5
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
56
SM
59
P
62
1.51
27.2
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
57
M
55
P
90
1.49
40.5
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
58
K
66
P
59
1.47
27.3
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
59
S
64
L
96
1.68
34
Obesitas derajat 2
> 3
60
I
67
P
63
1.52
27.3
Obesitas derajat 1
<3
61
RO
56
P
55
1.56
22.6
Normal
<3
62
MK
74
L
48
1.61
18.5
Normal
0
63
M
64
P
54.5
1.48
24.9
Overweight
<3
64
SN
70
P
84.5
1.46
39.6
Obesitas derajat 2
<3
65
MSH
60
P
46
1.53
19.7
Normal
<3
No Aktivitas Fisik
Riwayat
Fisioterapi
Nyeri
Disabilitas
Kriteria
skor
WOMAC
Grade OA
34
No weight bearing ya
Berat
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 2
35
No weight bearing ya
Ringan Sedang
Ringan
Grade 2
36
No weight bearing ya
Sedang Berat
Sedang
Grade 4
37
No weight bearing ya
Ringan Sedang
Sedang
Grade 2
38
No weight bearing ya
Berat
Sedang
Sedang
Grade 4
39
No weight bearing ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
40
No weight bearing ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
41
Weight bearing
tidak
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
42
No weight bearing ya
Sedang Berat
Berat
Grade 1
43
No weight bearing ya
Sedang Ringan
Ringan
Grade 3
44
No weight bearing ya
Sedang Ringan
Ringan
Grade 1
45
No weight bearing tidak
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 1
46
No weight bearing ya
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 3
47
No weight bearing ya
Sedang Berat
Sedang
Grade 3
48
Weight bearing
tidak
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 4
49
No weight bearing ya
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 4
50
No weight bearing tidak
Ringan Sedang
Ringan
Grade 3
51
No weight bearing ya
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 4
52
No weight bearing ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 1
53
No weight bearing ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 1
54
No weight bearing ya
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 1
55
Weight bearing
tidak
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 1
56
Weight bearing
tidak
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 2
57
Weight bearing
tidak
Sedang Sedang
Sedang
Grade 4
58
No weight bearing ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 2
59
No weight bearing ya
Berat
Berat
Berat
Grade 4
60
No weight bearing ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 4
61
No weight bearing ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 3
62
No weight bearing ya
Sedang Berat
Berat
Grade 3
63
No weight bearing ya
Ringan Sedang
Ringan
Grade 2
64
No weight bearing tidak
Sedang Ringan
Ringan
Grade 4
65
No weight bearing ya
Ringan Ringan
Ringan
Grade 1
Jenis Kelamin 15 23.1 23.1 23.1 50 76.9 76.9 100.0 65 100.0 100.0 pria wanita Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Lampiran 5. Output analisis data
Frequencies
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic Df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Usia .105 65 .071 .945 65 .006
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction Usia
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid 51 7 10.8 10.8 10.8 52 3 4.6 4.6 15.4 53 2 3.1 3.1 18.5 54 2 3.1 3.1 21.5 55 4 6.2 6.2 27.7 56 3 4.6 4.6 32.3 57 4 6.2 6.2 38.5 58 4 6.2 6.2 44.6 59 2 3.1 3.1 47.7 60 4 6.2 6.2 53.8 61 2 3.1 3.1 56.9 62 1 1.5 1.5 58.5 64 5 7.7 7.7 66.2 65 2 3.1 3.1 69.2 66 4 6.2 6.2 75.4 67 2 3.1 3.1 78.5 68 4 6.2 6.2 84.6 69 2 3.1 3.1 87.7 70 1 1.5 1.5 89.2 72 1 1.5 1.5 90.8 73 1 1.5 1.5 92.3 74 4 6.2 6.2 98.5 76 1 1.5 1.5 100.0 Total 65 100.0 100.0 Statistics Usia N Valid 65 Missing 0 Mode Minimum 51 51 Maximum 76
Riwayat Fisioterapi 51 78.5 78.5 78.5 14 21.5 21.5 100.0 65 100.0 100.0 ya tidak Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Kriteria IMT
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Underweight 3 4.6 4.6 4.6 Normal 8 12.3 12.3 16.9 Overweight 11 16.9 16.9 33.8 Obesitas derajat 1 22 33.8 33.8 67.7 Obesitas derajat 2 21 32.3 32.3 100.0 Total 65 100.0 100.0 Penyakit Komorbid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak ada 6 9.2 9.2 9.2
Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid 36 55.4 55.4 64.6 Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid 23 35.4 35.4 100.0 Total 65 100.0 100.0 Aktivitas Fisik
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Weight bearing 9 13.8 86.2 86.2 No weight bearing 56 86.2 13.8 100.0 Total 65 100.0 100.0 Nyeri
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Ringan 32 49.2 49.2 49.2 Sedang 27 41.5 41.5 90.8 Berat 6 9.2 9.2 100.0 Total 65 100.0 100.0
Disabilitas
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Ringan 30 46.2 46.2 46.2 Sedang 27 41.5 41.5 87.7 Berat 8 12.3 12.3 100.0 Total 65 100.0 100.0 Grade OA Lutut
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Grade 4 14 21.5 21.5 21.5 Grade 3 16 24.6 24.6 46.2 Grade 2 19 29.2 29.2 75.4 Grade 1 16 24.6 24.6 100.0 Total 65 100.0 100.0
Kriteria IMT * Nyeri
Kriteria IMT * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri
Total
Ringan Sedang Berat
Kriteria IMT Underweight Count 2 0 1 3
Expected Count 1.5 1.2 .3 3.0 % within Nyeri 6.3% .0% 16.7% 4.6% % of Total 3.1% .0% 1.5% 4.6% Normal Count 5 2 1 8 Expected Count 3.9 3.3 .7 8.0 % within Nyeri 15.6% 7.4% 16.7% 12.3% % of Total 7.7% 3.1% 1.5% 12.3% Overweight Count 5 6 0 11 Expected Count 5.4 4.6 1.0 11.0 % within Nyeri 15.6% 22.2% .0% 16.9% % of Total 7.7% 9.2% .0% 16.9%
Obesitas derajat 1 Count 15 6 1 22
Expected Count 10.8 9.1 2.0 22.0
% within Nyeri 46.9% 22.2% 16.7% 33.8%
% of Total 23.1% 9.2% 1.5% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 2 Count 5 13 3 21
Expected Count 10.3 8.7 1.9 21.0 % within Nyeri 15.6% 48.1% 50.0% 32.3% % of Total 7.7% 20.0% 4.6% 32.3% Total Count 32 27 6 65 Expected Count 32.0 27.0 6.0 65.0 % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 41.5% 9.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 14.361a 8 .073 Likelihood Ratio 16.247 8 .039 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.695 1 .193 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .28.
Kriteria IMT * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri
Total
Ringan Sedang / Berat
Kriteria IMT Underweight / Normal Count 7 4 11
Expected Count 5.4 5.6 11.0 % within Nyeri 21.9% 12.1% 16.9% % of Total 10.8% 6.2% 16.9% Overweight Count 5 6 11 Expected Count 5.4 5.6 11.0 % within Nyeri 15.6% 18.2% 16.9% % of Total 7.7% 9.2% 16.9%
Obesitas derajat 1 Count 15 7 22
Expected Count 10.8 11.2 22.0
% within Nyeri 46.9% 21.2% 33.8%
% of Total 23.1% 10.8% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 2 Count 5 16 21
Expected Count 10.3 10.7 21.0 % within Nyeri 15.6% 48.5% 32.3% % of Total 7.7% 24.6% 32.3% Total Count 32 33 65 Expected Count 32.0 33.0 65.0 % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 50.8% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.567a 3 .023 Likelihood Ratio 9.941 3 .019 Linear-by-Linear Association 3.496 1 .062 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.42.
Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri
Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri
Total
Ringan Sedang Berat
Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada Count 2 4 0 6
Expected Count 3.0 2.5 .6 6.0 % within Nyeri 6.3% 14.8% .0% 9.2% % of Total 3.1% 6.2% .0% 9.2% Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid Count 20 14 2 36 Expected Count 17.7 15.0 3.3 36.0 % within Nyeri 62.5% 51.9% 33.3% 55.4% % of Total 30.8% 21.5% 3.1% 55.4% Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid Count 10 9 4 23 Expected Count 11.3 9.6 2.1 23.0 % within Nyeri 31.3% 33.3% 66.7% 35.4% % of Total 15.4% 13.8% 6.2% 35.4% Total Count 32 27 6 65 Expected Count 32.0 27.0 6.0 65.0 % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 41.5% 9.2% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 4.500a 4 .343 Likelihood Ratio 4.690 4 .321 Linear-by-Linear Association .740 1 .390 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .55.
Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri Total Ringan Sedang / Berat Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada / Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid Count 12 17 29 Expected Count 14.3 14.7 29.0 % within Nyeri 37.5% 51.5% 44.6% % of Total 18.5% 26.2% 44.6% Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid Count 20 16 36 Expected Count 17.7 18.3 36.0 % within Nyeri 62.5% 48.5% 55.4% % of Total 30.8% 24.6% 55.4%
Total Count 32 33 65 Expected Count 32.0 33.0 65.0 % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 50.8% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.291a 1 .256 Continuity Correctionb .787 1 .375 Likelihood Ratio 1.296 1 .255
Fisher's Exact Test .321 .188
Linear-by-Linear Association
1.272 1 .259
N of Valid Cases 65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.28. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Aktivitas Fisik * Nyeri
Aktivitas Fisik * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri
Total
Ringan Sedang Berat
Aktivitas Fisik Weight
bearing Count 3 6 0 9 Expected Count 4.4 3.7 .8 9.0 % within Nyeri 9.4% 22.2% .0% 13.8% % of Total 4.6% 9.2% .0% 13.8% No Weight bearing Count 29 21 6 56 Expected Count 27.6 23.3 5.2 56.0 % within Nyeri 90.6% 77.8% 100.0% 86.2% % of Total 44.6% 32.3% 9.2% 86.2% Total Count 32 27 6 65 Expected Count 32.0 27.0 6.0 65.0 % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 41.5% 9.2% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.089a 2 .213 Likelihood Ratio 3.765 2 .152 Linear-by-Linear Association .108 1 .743 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .83. Frequencies Aktivitas Fisik N Nyeri dimension1 Weight bearing 9 No weight bearing 56 Total 65
Test Statisticsa
Nyeri
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .185
Positive .185
Negative -.107
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .514
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .954
a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Nyeri
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri
Total
Ringan Sedang Berat
Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count 27 19 5 51
Expected Count 25.1 21.2 4.7 51.0 % within Nyeri 84.4% 70.4% 83.3% 78.5% % of Total 41.5% 29.2% 7.7% 78.5% tidak Count 5 8 1 14 Expected Count 6.9 5.8 1.3 14.0 % within Nyeri 15.6% 29.6% 16.7% 21.5% % of Total 7.7% 12.3% 1.5% 21.5% Total Count 32 27 6 65 Expected Count 32.0 27.0 6.0 65.0 % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 41.5% 9.2% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.792a 2 .408 Likelihood Ratio 1.771 2 .413 Linear-by-Linear Association .540 1 .462 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.29. Frequencies Riwayat Fisioterapi N Nyeri dimension1 ya 51 tidak 14 Total 65 Test Statisticsa Nyeri
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .172
Positive .172
Negative -.027
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .571
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .900
Kriteria IMT * Disabilitas
Kriteria IMT * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas
Total
Ringan Sedang Berat
Kriteria IMT Underweight Count 1 2 0 3 Expected Count 1.4 1.2 .4 3.0 % within Disabilitas 3.3% 7.4% .0% 4.6% % of Total 1.5% 3.1% .0% 4.6% Normal Count 5 1 2 8 Expected Count 3.7 3.3 1.0 8.0 % within Disabilitas 16.7% 3.7% 25.0% 12.3% % of Total 7.7% 1.5% 3.1% 12.3% Overweight Count 7 3 1 11 Expected Count 5.1 4.6 1.4 11.0 % within Disabilitas 23.3% 11.1% 12.5% 16.9% % of Total 10.8% 4.6% 1.5% 16.9%
Obesitas derajat 1 Count 12 9 1 22
Expected Count 10.2 9.1 2.7 22.0
% within Disabilitas 40.0% 33.3% 12.5% 33.8%
% of Total 18.5% 13.8% 1.5% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 2 Count 5 12 4 21
Expected Count 9.7 8.7 2.6 21.0 % within Disabilitas 16.7% 44.4% 50.0% 32.3% % of Total 7.7% 18.5% 6.2% 32.3% Total Count 30 27 8 65 Expected Count 30.0 27.0 8.0 65.0 % within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.2% 41.5% 12.3% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 11.119a 8 .195 Likelihood Ratio 12.344 8 .136 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.905 1 .167 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .37.
Kriteria IMT * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas
Total Ringan
Sedang / Berat
Kriteria IMT Underweight / Normal Count 6 5 11
Expected Count 5.1 5.9 11.0 % within Disabilitas 20.0% 14.3% 16.9% % of Total 9.2% 7.7% 16.9% Overweight Count 7 4 11 Expected Count 5.1 5.9 11.0 % within Disabilitas 23.3% 11.4% 16.9% % of Total 10.8% 6.2% 16.9%
Obesitas derajat 1 Count 12 10 22
Expected Count 10.2 11.8 22.0
% within Disabilitas 40.0% 28.6% 33.8%
% of Total 18.5% 15.4% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 2 Count 5 16 21
Expected Count 9.7 11.3 21.0 % within Disabilitas 16.7% 45.7% 32.3% % of Total 7.7% 24.6% 32.3% Total Count 30 35 65 Expected Count 30.0 35.0 65.0 % within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.2% 53.8% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 6.507a 3 .089 Likelihood Ratio 6.776 3 .079 Linear-by-Linear Association 3.844 1 .050 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.08.
Penyakit Komorbid * Disabilitas
Penyakit Komorbid * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas
Total
Ringan Sedang Berat
Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada Count 3 2 1 6
Expected Count 2.8 2.5 .7 6.0 % within Disabilitas 10.0% 7.4% 12.5% 9.2% % of Total 4.6% 3.1% 1.5% 9.2% Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid Count 22 8 6 36 Expected Count 16.6 15.0 4.4 36.0 % within Disabilitas 73.3% 29.6% 75.0% 55.4% % of Total 33.8% 12.3% 9.2% 55.4% Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid Count 5 17 1 23 Expected Count 10.6 9.6 2.8 23.0 % within Disabilitas 16.7% 63.0% 12.5% 35.4% % of Total 7.7% 26.2% 1.5% 35.4% Total Count 30 27 8 65 Expected Count 30.0 27.0 8.0 65.0 % within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.2% 41.5% 12.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 15.702a 4 .003 Likelihood Ratio 16.171 4 .003 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.202 1 .273 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .74.
Penyakit Komorbid * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas Total Ringan Sedang / Berat Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada / Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid Count 12 17 29 Expected Count 13.4 15.6 29.0 % within Disabilitas 40.0% 48.6% 44.6% % of Total 18.5% 26.2% 44.6% Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid Count 18 18 36 Expected Count 16.6 19.4 36.0 % within Disabilitas 60.0% 51.4% 55.4% % of Total 27.7% 27.7% 55.4% Total Count 30 35 65 Expected Count 30.0 35.0 65.0 % within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.2% 53.8% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .480a 1 .488 Continuity Correctionb .196 1 .658 Likelihood Ratio .481 1 .488
Fisher's Exact Test .618 .329
Linear-by-Linear Association
.473 1 .492
N of Valid Cases 65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.38. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Aktivitas Fisik * Disabilitas
Aktivitas Fisik * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas
Total
Ringan Sedang Berat
Aktivitas Fisik Weight
bearing
Count 4 5 0 9
Expected Count 4.2 3.7 1.1 9.0
% within Disabilitas 13.3% 18.5% .0% 13.8%
No weight bearing Count 26 22 8 56 Expected Count 25.8 23.3 6.9 56.0 % within Disabilitas 86.7% 81.5% 100.0% 86.2% % of Total 40.0% 33.8% 12.3% 86.2% Total Count 30 27 8 65 Expected Count 30.0 27.0 8.0 65.0 % within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.2% 41.5% 12.3% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.786a 2 .409 Likelihood Ratio 2.846 2 .241 Linear-by-Linear Association .246 1 .620 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.11. Frequencies Aktivitas Fisik N Disabilitas dimension1 Weight bearing 9 No weight bearing 56 Total 65 Test Statisticsa Disabilitas
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .143
Positive .020
Negative -.143
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .398
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .997
a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Disabilitas
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas
Total
Ringan Sedang Berat
Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count 24 19 8 51
Expected Count 23.5 21.2 6.3 51.0 % within Disabilitas 80.0% 70.4% 100.0% 78.5% % of Total 36.9% 29.2% 12.3% 78.5% tidak Count 6 8 0 14 Expected Count 6.5 5.8 1.7 14.0 % within Disabilitas 20.0% 29.6% .0% 21.5% % of Total 9.2% 12.3% .0% 21.5% Total Count 30 27 8 65 Expected Count 30.0 27.0 8.0 65.0 % within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.2% 41.5% 12.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.284a 2 .194 Likelihood Ratio 4.891 2 .087 Linear-by-Linear Association .303 1 .582 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.72.
Kriteria IMT * Nyeri dan Disabilitas
Kriteria IMT * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation
Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Total
Ringan Sedang Berat
Kriteria IMT
Underweight Count 2 1 0 3
Expected Count 1.6 1.2 .2 3.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
5.9% 3.7% .0% 4.6%
% of Total 3.1% 1.5% .0% 4.6%
Normal Count 5 1 2 8
Expected Count 4.2 3.3 .5 8.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
14.7% 3.7% 50.0% 12.3%
% of Total 7.7% 1.5% 3.1% 12.3%
Overweight Count 8 2 1 11
Expected Count 5.8 4.6 .7 11.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 23.5% 7.4% 25.0% 16.9% % of Total 12.3% 3.1% 1.5% 16.9% Obesitas derajat 1 Count 14 8 0 22 Expected Count 11.5 9.1 1.4 22.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 41.2% 29.6% .0% 33.8% % of Total 21.5% 12.3% .0% 33.8% Obesitas derajat 2 Count 5 15 1 21 Expected Count 11.0 8.7 1.3 21.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
14.7% 55.6% 25.0% 32.3%
% of Total 7.7% 23.1% 1.5% 32.3%
Total Count 34 27 4 65
Expected Count 34.0 27.0 4.0 65.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 19.106a 8 .014 Likelihood Ratio 19.504 8 .012 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.975 1 .160 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .18.
Kriteria IMT * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation
Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Total Ringan Sedang/Berat Kriteria IMT Underweight / Normal Count 7 4 11 Expected Count 5.8 5.2 11.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
20.6% 12.9% 16.9%
% of Total 10.8% 6.2% 16.9%
Overweight Count 8 3 11
Expected Count 5.8 5.2 11.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
23.5% 9.7% 16.9%
% of Total 12.3% 4.6% 16.9%
Obesitas derajat 1 Count 14 8 22
Expected Count 11.5 10.5 22.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
41.2% 25.8% 33.8%
% of Total 21.5% 12.3% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 2 Count 5 16 21
Expected Count 11.0 10.0 21.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
14.7% 51.6% 32.3%
% of Total 7.7% 24.6% 32.3%
Total Count 34 31 65
Expected Count 34.0 31.0 65.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 52.3% 47.7% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 10.373a 3 .016 Likelihood Ratio 10.765 3 .013 Linear-by-Linear Association 6.151 1 .013 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.25.
Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri dan Disabilitas
Penyakit Komorbid * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Total
Ringan Sedang Berat
Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada Count 3 2 1 6
Expected Count 3.1 2.5 .4 6.0 % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 8.8% 7.4% 25.0% 9.2% % of Total 4.6% 3.1% 1.5% 9.2% Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid Count 24 10 2 36 Expected Count 18.8 15.0 2.2 36.0 % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 70.6% 37.0% 50.0% 55.4% % of Total 36.9% 15.4% 3.1% 55.4% Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid Count 7 15 1 23 Expected Count 12.0 9.6 1.4 23.0 % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 20.6% 55.6% 25.0% 35.4% % of Total 10.8% 23.1% 1.5% 35.4% Total Count 34 27 4 65 Expected Count 34.0 27.0 4.0 65.0 % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.592a 4 .048 Likelihood Ratio 9.284 4 .054 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.596 1 .206 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .37.
Penyakit Komorbid * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Total Ringan Sedang / Berat Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada / Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid
Count 14 15 29
Expected Count 15.2 13.8 29.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 41.2% 48.4% 44.6% % of Total 21.5% 23.1% 44.6% Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid Count 20 16 36 Expected Count 18.8 17.2 36.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
58.8% 51.6% 55.4%
% of Total 30.8% 24.6% 55.4%
Total Count 34 31 65
Expected Count 34.0 31.0 65.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 52.3% 47.7% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .341a 1 .559 Continuity Correctionb .112 1 .738 Likelihood Ratio .341 1 .559
Fisher's Exact Test .622 .369
Linear-by-Linear Association
.336 1 .562
N of Valid Cases 65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.83. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Aktivitas Fisik * Nyeri dan Disabilitas
Aktivitas Fisik * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Total
Ringan Sedang Berat
Aktivitas Fisik Weight
bearing
Count 4 5 0 9
Expected Count 4.7 3.7 .6 9.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 11.8% 18.5% .0% 13.8% % of Total 6.2% 7.7% .0% 13.8% No weight bearing Count 30 22 4 56 Expected Count 29.3 23.3 3.4 56.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
88.2% 81.5% 100.0% 86.2%
% of Total 46.2% 33.8% 6.2% 86.2%
Total Count 34 27 4 65
Expected Count 34.0 27.0 4.0 65.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.260a 2 .532 Likelihood Ratio 1.776 2 .412 Linear-by-Linear Association .008 1 .928 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .55.
Frequencies
Aktivitas Fisik N
Kriteria Skor WOMAC
dimension1 Weight bearing 9 No Weight bearing 56 Total 65 Test Statisticsa Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .091
Positive .091
Negative -.071
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .254
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000
Chi-Square Tests 1.424a 2 .491 2.253 2 .324 .070 1 .791 65 Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .86.
a.
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Nyeri dan Disabilitas
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Total
Ringan Sedang Berat
Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count 27 20 4 51
Expected Count 26.7 21.2 3.1 51.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 79.4% 74.1% 100.0% 78.5%
% of Total 41.5% 30.8% 6.2% 78.5%
tidak Count 7 7 0 14
Expected Count 7.3 5.8 .9 14.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 20.6% 25.9% .0% 21.5%
% of Total 10.8% 10.8% .0% 21.5%
Total Count 34 27 4 65
Expected Count 34.0 27.0 4.0 65.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% 100.0%
Frequencies
Fisioterapi N
Kriteria Skor WOMAC
dimension1 ya 51 tidak 14 Total 65 Test Statisticsa Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .078
Positive .029
Negative -.078
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .260
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000
Kriteria IMT * Grade OA Lutut
Kriteria IMT * Grade OA Lutut Crosstabulation Grade OA Lutut Total Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 Kriteria IMT Underweight Count 0 1 1 1 3 Expected Count .6 .7 .9 .7 3.0 % within Grade OA Lutut .0% 6.3% 5.3% 6.3% 4.6% % of Total .0% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 4.6% Normal Count 0 3 2 3 8 Expected Count 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.0 8.0 % within Grade OA Lutut .0% 18.8% 10.5% 18.8% 12.3% % of Total .0% 4.6% 3.1% 4.6% 12.3% Overweight Count 0 4 4 3 11 Expected Count 2.4 2.7 3.2 2.7 11.0 % within Grade OA Lutut .0% 25.0% 21.1% 18.8% 16.9% % of Total .0% 6.2% 6.2% 4.6% 16.9% Obesitas derajat 1 Count 5 5 8 4 22 Expected Count 4.7 5.4 6.4 5.4 22.0 % within Grade OA Lutut 35.7% 31.3% 42.1% 25.0% 33.8% % of Total 7.7% 7.7% 12.3% 6.2% 33.8% Obesitas derajat 2 Count 9 3 4 5 21 Expected Count 4.5 5.2 6.1 5.2 21.0 % within Grade OA Lutut 64.3% 18.8% 21.1% 31.3% 32.3% % of Total 13.8% 4.6% 6.2% 7.7% 32.3% Total Count 14 16 19 16 65 Expected Count 14.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 65.0 % within Grade OA Lutut 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 13.800a 12 .314 Likelihood Ratio 17.555 12 .130 Linear-by-Linear Association 4.434 1 .035 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 14 cells (70.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .65.
Kriteria IMT * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA Total Grade 3/4 Grade 2 Grade 1 Kriteria IMT Underweight / Normal / Overweight Count 8 7 7 22 Expected Count 10.2 6.4 5.4 22.0 % within Grade OA 26.7% 36.8% 43.8% 33.8% % of Total 12.3% 10.8% 10.8% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 1 Count 10 8 4 22
Expected Count 10.2 6.4 5.4 22.0
% within Grade OA
33.3% 42.1% 25.0% 33.8%
% of Total 15.4% 12.3% 6.2% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 2 Count 12 4 5 21
Expected Count 9.7 6.1 5.2 21.0 % within Grade OA 40.0% 21.1% 31.3% 32.3% % of Total 18.5% 6.2% 7.7% 32.3% Total Count 30 19 16 65 Expected Count 30.0 19.0 16.0 65.0 % within Grade OA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.2% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 3.026a 4 .553 Likelihood Ratio 3.097 4 .542 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.463 1 .227 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.17.
Penyakit Komorbid * Grade OA Lutut
Penyakit Komorbid * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA Total Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada Count 1 1 2 2 6
Expected Count 1.3 1.5 1.8 1.5 6.0 % within Grade OA 7.1% 6.3% 10.5% 12.5% 9.2% % of Total 1.5% 1.5% 3.1% 3.1% 9.2% Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid Count 10 9 10 7 36 Expected Count 7.8 8.9 10.5 8.9 36.0 % within Grade OA 71.4% 56.3% 52.6% 43.8% 55.4% % of Total 15.4% 13.8% 15.4% 10.8% 55.4% Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid Count 3 6 7 7 23 Expected Count 5.0 5.7 6.7 5.7 23.0 % within Grade OA 21.4% 37.5% 36.8% 43.8% 35.4% % of Total 4.6% 9.2% 10.8% 10.8% 35.4% Total Count 14 16 19 16 65 Expected Count 14.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 65.0 % within Grade OA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 2.629a 6 .854 Likelihood Ratio 2.715 6 .844 Linear-by-Linear Association .379 1 .538 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 5 cells (41.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.29.
Penyakit Komorbid * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA Total Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 Penyakit Komorbid Tidak ada / Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid Count 10 5 5 9 29 Expected Count 6.2 7.1 8.5 7.1 29.0 % within Grade OA 71.4% 31.3% 26.3% 56.3% 44.6% % of Total 15.4% 7.7% 7.7% 13.8% 44.6%
Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid Count 4 11 14 7 36 Expected Count 7.8 8.9 10.5 8.9 36.0 % within Grade OA 28.6% 68.8% 73.7% 43.8% 55.4% % of Total 6.2% 16.9% 21.5% 10.8% 55.4% Total Count 14 16 19 16 65 Expected Count 14.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 65.0 % within Grade OA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 8.681a 3 .034 Likelihood Ratio 8.897 3 .031 Linear-by-Linear Association .646 1 .422 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.25.
Aktivitas Fisik * Grade OA Lutut
Aktivitas Fisik * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA
Total
Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1
Aktivitas Fisik Weight bearing Count 2 2 3 2 9 Expected Count 1.9 2.2 2.6 2.2 9.0 % within Grade OA 14.3% 12.5% 15.8% 12.5% 13.8% % of Total 3.1% 3.1% 4.6% 3.1% 13.8% No weight bearing Count 12 14 16 14 56 Expected Count 12.1 13.8 16.4 13.8 56.0 % within Grade OA 85.7% 87.5% 84.2% 87.5% 86.2% % of Total 18.5% 21.5% 24.6% 21.5% 86.2% Total Count 14 16 19 16 65 Expected Count 14.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 65.0 % within Grade OA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .111a 3 .990 Likelihood Ratio .110 3 .991 Linear-by-Linear Association .002 1 .968 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.94.
Frequencies Aktivitas Fisik N Grade OA dimension1 Weight bearing 9 No weight bearing 56 Total 65 Test Statisticsa Grade OA
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .028
Positive .020
Negative -.028
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .077
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000
a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Grade OA Lutut
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA
Total Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1
Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count 10 12 16 13 51
Expected Count 11.0 12.6 14.9 12.6 51.0 % within Grade OA 71.4% 75.0% 84.2% 81.3% 78.5% % of Total 15.4% 18.5% 24.6% 20.0% 78.5% tidak Count 4 4 3 3 14 Expected Count 3.0 3.4 4.1 3.4 14.0 % within Grade OA 28.6% 25.0% 15.8% 18.8% 21.5% % of Total 6.2% 6.2% 4.6% 4.6% 21.5% Total Count 14 16 19 16 65 Expected Count 14.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 65.0 % within Grade OA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .968a 3 .809 Likelihood Ratio .968 3 .809 Linear-by-Linear Association .676 1 .411 N of Valid Cases 65
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.02. Frequencies Fisioterapi N Grade OA Lutut dimension1 ya 51 tidak 14 Total 65
Test Statisticsa
Grade OA Lutut
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .140
Positive .000
Negative -.140
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .464
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .982
