• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

THE EFFECT OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING ON THE STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING HORTATORY.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "THE EFFECT OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING ON THE STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING HORTATORY."

Copied!
13
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

THE EFFECT OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE

TEACHING ON THE STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN

WRITING HORTATORY

A THESIS

Submitted to the English Department, Faculty of Language and Arts, State University of Medan in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement

for the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan

By:

Fatin Nadifa Tarigan

Reg. No. 2102121007

ENGLISH AND LITERATURE DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

a) Generic Structure of Hortatory Exposition .. 11

b) Language Features of Hortatory Exposition 13 2. Students’ Achievement in Writing ... 13

3. Approach ... 14

a. Communicative Language Teaching ... 15

1) Principles of Communicative Language Teaching ... 16

2) The Advantages of Communicative Language Teaching ... 17

3) The Application of Communicative Language Teaching ... 19

C.The Instruments of Collecting Data ... 24

D.The Procedure of Study... 24

(7)

2. Treatment ... 25

3. Post Test ... 28

E. Scoring of the Test ... 28

F. Validity and Reliability of Test ... 31

1. Validity of Test ... 31

2. Reliability of Test ... 31

G.Technique of Analyzing Data ... 32

CHAPTER IV : DATA ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH FINDING ... 34

A.The Data ... 34

B.Data Analysis ... 37

1. Data Analysis by Using T-test Formula ... 37

2. Testing Hypothesis ... 38

C.Research Finding... 39

CHAPTER V : CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ... 41

A.Conclusion ... 41

B.Suggestion ... 41

REFERENCES ... 43

(8)

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1 Editing Checklist ... 20

Table 3.1 Research Design ... 23

Table 3.2 Teaching Procedures in Experimental Group ... 25

Table 3.3 Teaching Procedures in Control Group ... 27

Table 3.4 Rubric Assessment for Writing Hortatory Exposition Text ... 29

Table 3.5 The Level of Students’ Evaluation ... 30

Table 4.1 The Result of Pre Test and Post Test of Experimental Group ... 35

(9)

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A. The result of Pre Test in Experimental Group ... 45

Appendix B. The result of Post Test in Experimental Group ... 47

Appendix C. The Calculation of T-test ... 49

Appendix D. The Calculation of the T-observed ... 53

Appendix E. Percentage Points of The T Distribution ... 54

Appendix F. Writing Test ... 55

Appendix G. Lesson Plan ... 56

Appendix H. Pre Test ... 89

(10)

41

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

A. Conclusion

Based on the result of research, there was a significance difference in the

achievement between the students who were taught through Communicative

Language Teaching and the students who were taught without Communicative

Language Teaching. After applying Communicative Language Teaching

approach, it was known that t-observed value 3.855, with the degree of freedom

(df) 34 is higher than the value of t-table 2.120 at the level of significance of 0.05

of two tailed test. It can be concluded that the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is

accepted. It means that Communicative Language Teaching significantly affects

the students’ achievement in writing hortatory.

B. Suggestion

This study showed that using of Communicative Language Teaching could

improve students’ achievement in writing hortatory text. Some suggestions are

pointed out for :

1. English teachers to use Communicative Language Teaching approach in

teaching writing. CLT approach practices the students to identify

(11)

2. Students to use Communicative Language Teaching in observing and

researching the teaching learning process. The activities of this approach

can make teaching learning process more enjoyable and communicative.

3. Other researchers to conduct further researches of Communicative

(12)

43

REFERENCES

Ahmad, S. 2013. Applying Communicative Approach in Teaching English as a Foreign Language: a Case Study of Pakistan. Porta Linguarum 20,junio

2013,187-203, retrieved from http://www.academic.edu on November 29,

2013.

Bajracharya, I.K. 2007. A Study of Student Achievement and Effect of Parents'Education on Grade VIII Students in Mathematics. Journal of

Mathematics Education Student's Society of Nepal 1(1),25-29, retrieved

from http://www.slashdocs.com on February 14,2014.

Barker, A. 2011. Improve Your Communication Skills. London : Koga Page.

Brown, D. H. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. San Francisco: Longman.

__________ , 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to

Language Pedagogy (Second Edition). San Francisco: Longman.

Fatima, S. 2012. Teaching Report Writing Skills through Communicative Activities. American International Journal of Contemporary Research 2(2) retrieved from http://www.aijcrnet.com on November 29, 2013.

Harmer, J. 2003. The Practice of English Language. Cambridge: Longman.

_________ , 2004. How to Teach Writing. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Heaton, J.B. 1975. Writing English Language Tests.New York:Longman.

Hughes, A. 2003. Testing for Language Teachers (Second Edition). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Knapp, P and Watkin, M. 2005. Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for

Teaching and Assessing Writing. Sidney: University of New South Wales

Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D. 2000. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. New York : Oxford University Press.

Pardiyono. 2007. Teaching Genre Based Writing. Yogyakarta : Andi.

Pateel, M.F and Jain, M. P.2008. English Language Teaching:Methods, Tools and

(13)

44

Savignon, S.J. 2002. Interpreting Communicative Language Teaching Contexts

And Concerns In Teacher Education. London : Yale University Press.

Setiyadi, B. 2006. Teaching English as A Foreign Language. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Ontario. 2005. A Guide to Effective Instruction in Writing: Kindergarten to Grade

3.California: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.

WU, Y. 2009. The Application of CLT in College English Vocabulary Teaching.

Journal of Cambridge Studies 4(3) retrieved from http://www.srcf.ucam.org

November 29, 2013.

Gambar

Table 2.1  Editing Checklist  .........................................................................

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Puji syukur dan ucapan terima kasih Kepada Tuhan Yang Maha Esa atas limpahan berkat dan rahmatnya kepada penulis sehingga penulis dapat menyelesaikan penulisan hukum yang

Abstrak : Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui 1) model pembinaan keagamaan di UNY 2) metetahui apakah ada perbedaan dalam perilaku religius antara mahasiswa

[r]

TA adalah karya ilmiah yang ditulis oleh mahasiswa dari hasil penelitian dan atau pengkajian ilmiah terhadap satu objek yang berkaitan dengan bidang ilmunya pada

Prestasaun Impostu Rendimentu – Taxa foun ba Prestasaun Taxa foun ba prestasaun impostu rendimentu tama iha vigór iha loron-1 Jullu 2008 ba Jullu 2008 nian no períodu sira

Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu: mengetahui faktor-faktor determinan yang memengaruhi terbentuknya jiwa wirausaha siswa SMK dan mengetahui bagaimana masing-masing

PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN PERMAINAN BOLA KECIL TERHADAP PENINGKATAN KETERAMPILAN GERAK DASAR DAN HASIL BELAJAR.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |

Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, penulis tertarik untuk melakukan penelitian tentang pengelompokan wilayah yang berdasarkan potensi tanaman jagung, dengan judul