DAFTAR PUSTAKA
American Diabetes Association. (2018). Standard medical care in diabetes 2018.
The Journal of Clinical and Applied Research and Education, 41(1).
https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-Sint01
American Diabetes Association. (2021). Diabetes and Emotional Health A Practical Guide for Health Professionals Supporting Adults with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.
Anugerah, A. (2020). Buku ajar: diabetes dan komplikasinya (Guepedia (ed.)).
Guepedia.
https://books.google.co.id/books?id=2dZMEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcove r&dq=Buku+Diabetes+Melitus&hl=jv&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=
Buku Diabetes Melitus&f=true
Aragão, E. I. S., Portugal, F. B., Campos, M. R., Lopes, C. de S., & Fortes, S. L.
C. L. (2017). Different patterns of social support perceived and their association with physical (Hypertension, diabetes) or mental diseases in the context of primary health care. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 22(7), 2367–2374.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232017227.26712015
Asi, F. A. E., Saragih, R. E., & Ranimpi, Y. Y. (2018). Persepsi dan Status Kesehatan Mental Penderita Diabetes Melitus Tipe II Suku Dayak. In Jurnal Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat (Vol. 12, Issue 2).
Behavioral Diabetes Institute. (2014). Breaking Free From Depression And Diabetes. 1–24. www.behavioraldiabetes.org
Bibi, N., Wara, B., Mughal, S., Morrissey, H., & Ball, P. (2019). A critical literature review and audit of real world data to inform the relationship between mental ill-health and type-2 diabetes favourable prognosis.
International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 12(2), 43–
47. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijpps.2020v12i2.36393
Bryan, R. N., Bilello, M., Davatzikos, C., Lazar, R. M., Murray, A., Horowitz, K., Lovato, J., Miller, M. E., Williamson, J., & Launer, L. J. (2014). Effect of diabetes on brain structure: The action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes MR imaging baseline data. Radiology, 272(1), 210–216.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14131494
Chepulis, L., Morison, B., Lao, C., Keenan, R., Paul, R., & Lawrenson, R. (2020).
The prevalence of mental health medication use in a cohort of New Zealand patients with diabetes. Primary Care Diabetes, 14(6), 703–708.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2020.07.004
Consoli, L. M. F. V., Franco, L. J., & Oliveira, R. E. M. de. (2021). Emotional distress in elderly people with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending primary healthcare centres. Pediatric Diabetes, 20(7), 964–973.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12886
Dewi, K. S. (2012). Buku ajar kesehatan mental. In upt undip Press Semarang.
http://eprints.undip.ac.id/38840/1/KESEHATAN_MENTAL.pdf
Dijkers, M. (2015). What is a Scoping Review? CPAG Training, 4(1).
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/36/section/22%0Awww.celcis.or g%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1177/030857598009900106%0Ahttps://coramvoice.
org.uk/whatmakeslifegood%0Ahttps://corambaaf.org.uk/updates/special- guardians-speak-out-about-lack-support-during-pr
El Sherbini, H., & Abdou, R. (2014). Diabetes Distress among Patients with Type II Diabetes in Alexandria. Alexandria Scientific Nursing Journal, 16(2), 177–
192. https://doi.org/10.21608/asalexu.2014.208811
Elbert, R. (2021). Evaluasi program pengelolaan penyakit kronis (prolanis) di
indonesia pada masa pandemi covid-19.
https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15206.75848
Engidaw, N. A., Wubetu, A. D., & Basha, E. A. (2020). Prevalence of depression and its associated factors among patients with diabetes mellitus at Tirunesh- Beijing general hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 266. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8360-2
Fakhriyani, D. V. (2019). Kesehatan mental (M. Thoha (ed.)). Duta Media Publishing.
https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Gan8DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover
&dq=kesehatan+mental&hl=jv&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=true Fandinata, S. S., & Ernawati, I. (2020). Manajemen terapi pada penyakit
degeneratif (Mengenal dan Mencegah Penyakit Degeneratif (Diabetes Mellitus dan Hipertensi)) (N. Reny (ed.)). Graniti.
https://books.google.co.id/books?id=oFIMEAAAQBAJ&pg=PR5&dq=Patof isiologi+diabetes+melitus+2020&hl=jv&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiKmZfhx6_2 AhXSmeYKHaBiDYgQ6AF6BAgCEAI#v=onepage&q=Patofisiologi diabetes melitus 2020&f=true
Filho, B. F. de L., Dias, V. da N., Carlos, A. G., Fontes, F. P., Sousa, A. G. P. de,
& Gazzola, J. M. (2019). Factors related to depressive symptoms in older adult patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Experimental Gerontology, 117, 72–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2018.11.006
Garrett, C., & Doherty, A. (2014). Diabetes and mental health. 14(6), 669–672.
Gebeyehu, D. A. (2021). Depression in Adults with a Physical Disability ; An Institution Based Cross Sectional Study. Journal of Depression and Anxiety, 9(May), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-1044.20.9.365
Gilbert, L., Nikolaou, A., Quansah, D. Y., Rossel, J.-B., Horsch, A., & Puder, J. J.
(2021). Mental health and its associations with glucose-lowering medication in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. A prospective clinical cohort
study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 124, 105095.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.105095
Gilbert, L., Rossel, J.-B., Quansah, D. Y., Puder, J. J., & Horsch, A. (2021).
Mental health and its associations with weight in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. A prospective clinical cohort study. Journal of
Psychosomatic Research, 146, 110489.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110489
Hafizfadillah, D., & Oktarlina, R. Z. (2021). Diabetes Mellitus akibat Anti Psikotik pada Pasien Skizofrenia. Medula, 10(4), 627–632.
http://journalofmedula.com/index.php/medula/article/view/121
Harista, R. A., & Lisiswanti, R. (2015). Depresi pada Penderita Diabetes Mellitus Tipe 2. Majority, 4, 73–77. http://jukeunila.com/wp- content/uploads/2016/02/13.pdf
International Diabetes Federation. (2021). Idf diabetes atlas 10th edition.
Ismail, K., & Price, H. (2017). The management of diabetes in adults and children with psychiatric disorders in inpatient settings. May, 1–39.
www.diabetes.org.uk/joint-british-diabetes-society%0Ahttps://diabetes- resources-production.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/resources-s3/2018- 03/JBDS_HypoGuideline.pdf FINAL 28.02.18.pdf
Kalra, G., Gill, S., Tang, T. S., & Psych, R. (2020). Depression and diabetes distress in South Asian adults living in low and middle income countries: A scoping review. Canadian Journal of Diabetes.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.06.007
Kementerian Kesehatan. (2014). Undang - Undang Republik Indonesia Tentang Kesehatan Mental No. 18 Tahun 2014. 1, 1–42.
Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (2019). Infodatin dituasi kesehatan jiwa di indonesia.
https://pusdatin.kemkes.go.id/download.php?file=download/pusdatin/infodati n/InfoDatin-Kesehatan-Jiwa.pdf
Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (2020). INFODATIN Tetap Produktif, Cegah, dan
Atasi Diabetes Melitus.
https://pusdatin.kemkes.go.id/article/view/20111800001/diabetes-
melitus.html
Kusumastiwi, T., Suryani, L., P, D. A., Yogyakarta, U. M., Yogyakarta, D. I., Studi, P., Universitas, W., & Yogyakarta, M. (2019). Meningkatkan Kesehatan Mental Penderita Diabetes Melitus di Komunitas dengan Kegiatan Kelompok Swabantu (Self Help Group). Jurnal Surya Masyarakat, 1(2), 92–
98.
https://doi.org/https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/JSM/article/view/4456 Mojahed, A., Fallah, M., Ganjali, A., & Heidari, Z. (2019). The role of social
support and coping strategies in the prediction of psychological well-being in type 2 diabetic patients of Zahedan. Bali Medical Journal, 8(1), 281–286.
https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v8i1.663
Mousavi, S. A., Vahedi, Z., Kiaea, Z., & Rahimi, M. A. (2017). The relationship between social support and quality of life in cancer patients. Journal of
Research & Health, 7(2), 7-12–718.
https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jrh.7.2.712
Nadhiroh, Y. F. (2015). Pengendalian emosi (Kajian Religio-Psikologis tentang Psikologi Manusia). Jurnal saintifika islamica, 2(1), 53–62.
Nisa, W. I. (2019). Penanganan kesehatan mental berbasis komunitas. Media
Nusa Creative.
https://books.google.co.id/books?id=YnRMEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcov er&dq=kesehatan+mental&hl=jv&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=true Noosha, N., Kim, M., Lindy, F. S., Shirley, G., Stacey, M., Nikki, F., Christopher, R., & Stephen, M. (2013). What is schizophrenia? Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, 2–7. https://www.gamian.eu/wp- content/uploads/2016/09/Schizophrenia-guide_FINAL_02-Sept-2016.pdf Ornelas, VM, A., MG, C., AE, N., & G, K. (2017). Mental Disorders in Subjects
with Diabetes: A Systematic Review. Health Care : Current Reviews, 05(04). https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4273.1000216
Pan American Health Organization. (2018). The Burden of Mental Disorders in the Region of the Americas, 2018.
Perkumpulan Endokrinologi Indonesia. (2021). Pedoman dan pencegahan diabetes melitus tipe 2 di indonesi 2021 (1st ed.). PB PERKENI.
Perrin, N. E., Davies, M. J., Robertson, N., Snoek, F. J., & Khunti, K. (2017).
Systematic Review or Meta-analysis The prevalence of diabetes-specific emotional distress in people with Type 2 diabetes : a systematic review and
meta-analysis. DIABETICMedicine, 1508–1520.
https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13448
Peter M, Godfrey M Christina, Mcinerney P, S. B. (2015). The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers‟ Manual 2015: Methodology for JBI scoping reviews.
Joanne Briggs Institute, February 2016, 1–24.
Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141–146.
https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., &
Mcewen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123
Pranata, A., Mudatsir, & Jannah, S. R. (2021). Diabetes Distress in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus of the Aceh Tamiang Regional Hospital.
Easpublisher.Com, 3(6), 294–297.
https://doi.org/10.36349/easjnm.2021.v03i06.009
Purba, D. H., Purba, A. M. V., Saragih, H. S., Megasari, A. L., Argaheni, N. B., Utami, N., & Darmawan, D. (2021). Kesehatan mental (J. Simarmata (ed.)).
Yayasan Kita Menulis.
https://books.google.co.id/books?id=NvlTEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover
&dq=kesehatan+mental&hl=jv&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=true Robinson, D. J., Coons, M., Haensel, H., Vallis, M., & Yale, J. (2018). Diabetes
and Mental Health. Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 42(1), 130–141.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.031
Sarfika, R. (2019). Hubungan Keputusasaan dengan Depresi pada Pasien Diabetes Melitus di Padang. NERS Jurnal Keperawatan, 15(1), 14.
https://doi.org/10.25077/njk.15.1.14-24.2019
Simatupang, R. (2020). Pedoman diet penderita diabetes melitus. Yayasan Pendidikan dan Sosisal Indonesia Maju (YPSIM).
https://books.google.co.id/books?id=HAf1DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA31&dq=me ntal+pasien+diabetes+melitus&hl=jv&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjEu76W7oX1A hVCxzgGHY_rAnsQ6AF6BAgJEAI#v=onepage&q=mental pasien diabetes melitus&f=true
Stenov, V., Joensen, L. E., Knudsen, L., Lindqvist Hansen, D., & Willaing Tapager, I. (2020). “Mental Health Professionals Have Never Mentioned My Diabetes, They Don‟t Get Into That”: A Qualitative Study of Support Needs in Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes and Severe Mental Illness.
Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 44(6), 494–500.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.02.006
Thorley, L., Henrion, E., & Groves, L. (2019). Ethical standards rapid literature review Final Report (Vol. 44).
Tricco, A., E, L., W, Z., KK, O., H, C., & D, L. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMAScR): Checklist and Explanation.
https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.2
World Health Organization. (2019). Classification of diabetes mellitus.
World Health Organization. (2020). Diagnosis and Management of Type 2 Diabetes.
World Health Organization. (2021). Comprehensive mental health action plan 2013-2030.
LAMPIRAN
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist
SECTION ITEM PRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEM
REPORTED ON PAGE # TITLE
Title 1 Identify the report as a scoping review. 1
ABSTRACT Structured
summary 2
Provide a structured summary that includes (as applicable): background, objectives, eligibility criteria, sources of evidence, charting methods, results, and conclusions that relate to the review questions and objectives.
1
INTRODUCTION
Rationale 3
Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. Explain why the review questions/objectives lend themselves to a scoping review approach.
3
Objectives 4
Provide an explicit statement of the questions and objectives being addressed with reference to their key elements (e.g., population or participants, concepts, and context) or other relevant key elements used to conceptualize the review questions and/or objectives.
3
METHODS Protocol and registration
5
Indicate whether a review protocol exists; state if and where it can be accessed (e.g., a Web address); and if available, provide registration information, including the registration number.
4
Eligibility criteria
6
Specify characteristics of the sources of evidence used as eligibility criteria (e.g., years considered, language, and publication status), and provide a rationale.
5
Information sources*
7
Describe all information sources in the search (e.g., databases with dates of coverage and contact with authors to identify additional sources), as well as the date the most recent search was executed.
4
Search 8
Present the full electronic search strategy for at least 1 database, including any limits used, such that it could be repeated.
Fig.1
Selection of sources of evidence†
9 State the process for selecting sources of evidence (i.e., screening and eligibility) included in the scoping review.
5
Data charting process‡
10
Describe the methods of charting data from the included sources of evidence (e.g., calibrated forms or forms that have been tested by the team before their use, and whether data charting was done independently or in duplicate) and any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigators.
5
Data items 11 List and define all variables for which data were sought and any assumptions and simplifications made.
5
Critical appraisal of individual sources of evidence§
12
If done, provide a rationale for conducting a critical appraisal of included sources of evidence; describe the methods used and how this information was used in any data synthesis (if appropriate).
5
Synthesis of results
13 Describe the methods of handling and summarizing
the data that were charted. 5
RESULTS Selection of sources of evidence
14
Give numbers of sources of evidence screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally using a flow diagram.
5, Fig.2
Characteristics of sources of evidence
15 For each source of evidence, present characteristics for which data were charted and provide the citations.
6-12
Critical appraisal within sources of evidence
16 If done, present data on critical appraisal of included sources of evidence (see item 12).
-
Results of individual sources of evidence
17
For each included source of evidence, present the relevant data that were charted that relate to the review questions and objectives.
14-36
Synthesis of results
18 Summarize and/or present the charting results as they
relate to the review questions and objectives. 14-36 DISCUSSION
Summary of evidence
19
Summarize the main results (including an overview of concepts, themes, and types of evidence available), link to the review questions and objectives, and consider the relevance to key groups.
37-41
Limitations 20 Discuss the limitations of the scoping review process. 41
Conclusions 21
Provide a general interpretation of the results with respect to the review questions and objectives, as well as potential implications and/or next steps.
41-42
FUNDING
Funding 22
Describe sources of funding for the included sources of evidence, as well as sources of funding for the scoping review. Describe the role of the funders of the scoping review.
43
JBI = Joanna Briggs Institute; PRISMA-ScR = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.
* Where sources of evidence (see second footnote) are compiled from, such as bibliographic databases, social media platforms, and Web sites.
† A more inclusive/heterogeneous term used to account for the different types of evidence or data sources (e.g., quantitative and/or qualitative research, expert opinion, and policy documents) that may be eligible in a scoping review as opposed to only studies. This is not to be confused with information sources (see first footnote).
‡ The frameworks by Arksey and O‟Malley (6) and Levac and colleagues (7) and the JBI guidance (4, 5) refer to the process of data extraction in a scoping review as data charting.
§ The process of systematically examining research evidence to assess its validity, results, and relevance before using it to inform a decision. This term is used for items 12 and 19 instead of
"risk of bias" (which is more applicable to systematic reviews of interventions) to include and acknowledge the various sources of evidence that may be used in a scoping review (e.g., quantitative and/or qualitative research, expert opinion, and policy document) (Tricco et al., 2018).
