T IPA 1302498 Bibliography

(1)

101

Diana Ayu Rostikawati, 2016

REKONSTRUKSI BAHAN AJAR DENGAN KONTEKS SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES PADA MATERI ZAT ADITIF MAKANAN UNTUK MENINGKATKAN LITERASI SAINS SISWA

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Adisendjaja, Y.H. (2009). Analisis buku ajar biologi SMA kelas X di kota Bandung berdasarkan literasi sains. Bandung: FPMIPA-Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Retrieved from http://file.upi.edu

Al-Rasa’i, M.S. (2013). Promoting scientific literacy by using ICT in science teaching. International Education Studies, 6(9), 175-186. Retrieved from files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068658.pdf

Anwar, S. (2013). Pengolahan bahan ajar. Handout Perkuliahan. Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. (Cetakan ke-3). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Baker, D.R., Lewis. E.B., Uysal, S., Purzer, S. & Lang, M. (2009). The communication in science inquiry project (CISIP): a project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities: International Journal of Environmental & Science

Education, 4(3), 259-274. Retrieved from

http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ884396.pdf

Belitz, H.D., Grosch, W. & Schieberle, P. (2009). Food chemistry 4th revised and

extended edition.Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction. New York: Longman.

Branen, A.L., Davidson, P.M., Salminen, S. & Thorngate III, J.H. (Editor). (2002). Food additives second edition revised and expanded. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

BSNP. (2006). Panduan penyusunan KTSP jenjang pendidikan dasar dan

menengah. Jakarta: Puskurbuk.

BSNP. (2009). Standar penilaian buku teks pelajaran. Jakarta: Puskurbuk.

Burek, K. (2012). The impact of socioscientific issues based curriculum involving environmental outdoor education for fourth grade students. Dissertations, University of South Florida. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5193&contex t=etd

(2)

Cooper, S.J. (2004). Addressing scientific literacy through content area reading and processes of scientific inquiry: What teachers report. Dissertations, University of Central Florida. Retrieved from purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/CFE0000266

Colthorpe.K., Zimbardi K., Bugarcic, A. & Smith, A. (2015). Progressive dvelopment of scientific literacy through assessment in inquiry-based biomedical science curricula. International Journal of Innovation in

Science and Mathematics Education, 23(5), 52-64. Retrieved from

http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au

Dawson, V. (2001). Addressing controversial issues in secondary school science.

Australian Science Teachers Journal, 47(4), 38-44.

Dawson, V., & Venville, G.J. (2009). High-school student’s informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: an indicator of scientific literacy?. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), Abstract. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/

De Boer, G.E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform.

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. Retrieved from

http://web.nmsu.edu/~susanbro/eced440/docs/scientific_literacy_another _look.pdf

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Panduan pengembangan bahan ajar. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Dick, W. & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction. (4th Edition). New York: Harper Collins College Publisher.

Dolan, T.J., Nichols, B.H. & Zeidler, D.L. (2009). Using socioscientific issues in

primary classrooms. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(3),

1-12. Retrieved from

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03174719

Doloksaribu, F., Mudzakir, A., Sholihin, H. & Sudargo, F. (2014). Model education reconstruction (MER) bahan ajar penelitian laboratorium (PL) konteks Ze-Olit berbasis problem solving-decision making (PSDM).

Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 31(2), 109-116. Retrieved from

journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JPP/article/viewFile/5694/4565

(3)

Duit, R. (2007). Science education research internationally. Conceptions, research methods, domains of research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science &

Technology Education, 3(1), 3-15. Retrieved from

http://www.ejmste.org/v3n1/EJMSTEv3n1_Duit.pdf

Duit, R., Gropengiesser, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M. & Parchmann, I. (2012). The Model of educational reconstruction- a framework for improving teaching and learning science: Science Education Research and Practice

in Europe. 5 (1), 13-37. Retrieved from

https://www.sensepublishers.com/.../1341

Eilks, I. (2001). Teaching ‘Biodiesel’: A sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching and students’ first views on it. Chemistry

Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 3(1), 77-85. Retrieved

from http://www.uoi.gr/cerp/2002_February/pdf/07Eilks.pdf

Eilks, I., Marks, R. & Feierabend, T. (2008). Science education research to prepare future citizens-chemistry learning in a sociocritical and problem-oriented approach. Promoting Successfull Science Education, 75-86. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255703752

Ekborg, M. & Ottanderr, C. (2013). Working with socio-scientific issues. Students’ and teachers’ experiences. Paper presented at The XIV Symposium of the International Organization for Science and

Technology Education (IOSTE). Retrieved from https://dspace.mah.se/

Fang, Z., & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving middle school students’ science literacy through reading infusion. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 262-273. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJEJ879927

Feierabend, T. & Eilks, I. (2010). Raising students’ perception of the relevance of science teaching and promoting communication and evaluation capabilities using authentic and controversial socio-scientific issues in the framework of climate change. Science Education International,

21(3), 176-196. Retrieved from

http://www.icaseonline.net/sei/september2010/p4.docx

Fibonacci, A., & Sudarmin. (2014). Development fun-chem learning materials integrated socio-science issues to increase students scientific literacy.

International Journal of Science and Research, 11(3), 708-713.

Retrieved from http://www.ijsr.net/

Fowler, S.M., Zeidler, D.L. & Sadler, T.D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students.

International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279-296. Retrieved

(4)

Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E. & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate

research in education. 8th Edition. Boston: McGraw Hill.

Gresch, H., Hasselhorn, M. & Bogeholz, S. (2011). Training in Decision-Making Strategies: An approach to enhance students’ competences to deal with socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/.../233325158

Gucluer, E. & Kesercioglu, T. (2012). The effect of using activities improving scientific literacy on students’ achievemennt in science and technology lesson. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 1(1). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED534087.pdf

Gutierez, S.B. (2015). Integrating socio-sientific issues to enhance the bioethical decision-making skills of high school students. International Education

Studies, 8(1), 142-151. Retrieved from files.eric.ed.gov › fulltext

Hake, R.R. (1998). Analyzing change/gain score. American Educational Research

Association’s Division Measurement and Research Methodology. Retrieved from www.physics.indiana.edu/

Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy.

International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3),

275-288. Retrieved from https://www.pegem.net/.../138340-20131231103

Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: Language, theories,

methods, history, traditions, and values. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Retrieved from https://www.sensepublishers.com

Hottecke, D., Henke, A., & Riess, F. (2010). Implementing history and philosophy in science teaching: Strategies, methods, results, and experiences from the european HIPST project. Science & Education, 21 (1), 1233-1261. Retrieved from www.bu.edu/.../Höttecke-HPS

Kattmann, U., Duit, R., Gropengiesser, H. & Komorek, M. (1996). Educational reconstruction-bringing together issues of scientific clarification and students’ conceptions. Paper of Presented at the Annual Meeting of the

National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST), St.

Louis. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/

(5)

Klosterman, M.L., & Sadler, T.D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based

instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017-1043. Retrieved from eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ884177

Kurniawan, K. (T.t). Handout mata kuliah menulis buku ajar/ilmiah. Retrieved from http://file.upi.edu.

Laherto, A. (2010). An analysis of the educational significance of nanoscience and nanotechnology in scientific and technological literacy. Science

Education International, 21(3), 160-175. Retrieved from

www.icaseonline.net/sei/september2010/p3.pdf

Laherto, A. (2012). Nanoscience education for scientific literacy. Opportunities

and challenges in secondary school and in out-of-school settings.

(Disertasi). Helsinki: Academic Dissertation. Retrieved from https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/.../nanoscie.pdf

Laius, A. & Rannikmae, M. (2005). The influence of social issues-based science teaching on students’ creative thinking. Science Educational

International, 16(4), 281-289. Retrieved from

www.icaseonline.net/.../16-04-2005-281_289.pdf

Lawshe. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Journal Personnel

Psycology. (28), hlm. 563-575. Retrieved from

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download

Lederman, N.G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2012). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education. Retrieved from tl.unlv.edu/.../Lederman_Antink_Bartos_2012.pdf

Lindahl, B., et al. (2011). Socio-scientific issues- A way to improve students’ interest and learning?. US-China Educatin Review B, 3(1), 342-347. Retrieved from www.diva-portal.org/.../FULLTEXT01.pdf

Lindahl, M.G., & Folkesson, A.M. (2015). Attitudes and language use in group discussions on socio-scientific issues. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,

Science & Technology Education, 12(2), 283-301. Retrieved from

http://www.ejmste.com/Makale.aspx?kimlik=2438

Marks, R. & Eilks, I. (2009). Promoting scientific literacy using a sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching concept, examples, experiences. International Journal of Environmental & Science

Education, 4(3), 231-245. Retrieved from

(6)

Marks, R., Stuckey, M., Belova, N. & Eilks, I. (2014). The societal dimension in german science education-from tradition toward selected cases and recent developments. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology

Education, 10(4), 285-296. Retrieved from http://www.ejmste.com/

Nielbert, K. & Gropengiesser, H. (2013). The model of educational reconstruction: A framework for designof theory-based content specific content specific interventions. The examples of climate changes.

Educational Design Research-Part B, 511-513. Retrieved from

nternational.slo.nl/bestanden/Ch25.pdf/

Nuangchalerm, P. & Kwuanthong, B. (2010). Teaching “ Global Warming” through socioscientific issues-based instruction. Asian Social Science,

6(8), 42-47. Retrieved from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45266211

Nurhayati, H. M. (2014). Pengembangan bahan ajar berkonteks socio scientific issues (SSI) untuk mengeksplisitkan hakikat sains (NOS) dan berpikir kritis pada materi pencemaran lingkungan dan pemanasan global.

Abstrak, Universitas Negeri Malang. Retrieved from

http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa.

Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: The Nuffield Fundation. Retrieved from www.nuffieldfoundation.org › sites › files

Ozden, M. (2015). Prospective elementary school teachers’ views about socioscientific issues: A concurrent parallel design study. International

Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(3), 333-354. Retrieved

from files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068052.pdf

Pinzino, D.W. (2012). Socioscientific issues: a path towards advanced scientific literacy and improved conceptual understanding of socially controversial scientific theories. Dissertations, University of South Florida. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi

Raymundus, R. (2015). Empat Bahan Kimia Berbahaya di Jajanan Sekolah. Retrieved fromhttp://metro.tempo.co/read/news

Raveendran, A., & Chunawala, S. (T.t). Towards an understanding of socioscientific issues as means to achieve critical scientific literacy.

Proceedings of epiSTEME 5, India. Retrieved from

(7)

Rostikawati, D.A., & Permanasari, A. (2015). Analisis bahan ajar IPA SMP kelas VIII berbasis socio-scientific issues untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA dan Lingkungan

Hidup, Universitas Pakuan. Indonesia.

Sadler, T.D (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: a critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(1), 513-536. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068658.pdf

Sahin, S. (2013). Teaching socio-scientific issues (SSI) in Takhar province, Afghanistan. Methods of teaching SSI in upper secondary schools.

Dissertation, Karlstads University. Retrieved from

http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:722641/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Sam, A., Niebert. K., Hanson. R. & Twumasi. A.K. (2015). The model of educational reconstruction: Scientists’ and students’ conceptual balances to improve teaching of coordination chemistry in higher education.

International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection, 3(7), 67-77.

Retrieved from www.idpublications.org/

Sari, N.I. (2014). Konstruksi buku ajar senyawa organik SMK program keahlian agrobisnis rumput laut. Tesis, tidak dipublikasikan. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Saunders, K.J. & Rennie, L.J. (2011). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientific issues in science. Research Science Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/.../257659560

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian pendidikan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Cetakan ke-19. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Surapranata, S. (2012). Analisis, validitas, reliabilitas, dan interpretasi hasil tes. (Cetakan ke-4). Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Tal, T. & Kedmi, Y. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: Classrooms culture and students’ performances. Culture Science Education. Retrieved from stwww.weizmann.ac.il › docs › TAL

Tobin, K. (2015). Handbook pengajaran dan pembelajaran sains. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S. & Rustaman, A. (2011). Membangun literasi sains

(8)

Topcu, M.S., Mugaloglu, E.Z. & Guven, D. (2014). Socioscientific issues in science education: The case of Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory &

Practices 4(6), 2340-2348. Retrieved from

Universitas Brawijaya. (2011). Pedoman umum penulisan bahan ajar PDKLP. Retrieved from http//ml.scribd.com

Villanueva, M.G. (2010). Integrated teaching strategies model for improved scientific literacy in second language learners. Dissertations, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University. Retrieved from http://www.nmmu.ac.za/helpingteachers/GroupProjectWebb/

Webb, P. (2009). Towards an integrated learning strategies approach to promoting scientific literacy in the south african context. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 313-334. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ884400.pdf

Willmott, C., & Willis, D. (2008). The increasing significance of ethics in the bioscience curriculum. Journal of Biological Education, 42 (1), 99-102. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/.../50294494

Wilson, R., Pan, W. & Schumsky, D.A. (2012). Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Association for Assesment in

Counseling and Education. Retrieved from http://mec.sagepub.com

Yahaya, J.M., Zain. A.N.Md. & Kapurdewan, M. (2012). Understanding socioscientific issues in a low literate society for achievement of the millenium development lopment goals. International Scholarly and

Scientific Research & Innovation, 6(12), 3372-3375. Retrieved from

http://waset.org/publications/15900/understanding-socioscientific-issues-

in-a-low-literate-society-for-the-achievement-of-the-millennium-development-goals

Yakob, N., Yunus, H.M. & May, C.Y. (2015). Knowledge and practice in teaching socio-scientific issues among malaysian primary school science teachers. US-China Education Review A, 5(9), 634-640. Retrieved from http://www.davidpublisher.org/Public/uploads/Contribute/5605106320fb 5.pdf

Yuenyong, C. & Nurjaikaew, P. (2009). Scientific literacy and Thailand science education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ884401

(9)

Zeidler, D., & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues and disourse in science education. In D. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning and the status of sociosientific issues

and discourse in science education (7-38). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic

Press. Retrieved from www.springer.com/us/book/9781402014116

Zeidler, D.L., Sadler, T.D., Simmons, M.L. & Howes, E.V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science

Education, 89(1), 357-377. Retrieved from

faculty.education.ufl.edu/tsadler/BeyondSTS.pdf

Zeidler, D.L. & Nichols, B.H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: theory and practices.

Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58. Retrieved from

Zo’bi, A.S. (2014). The effect of using socio-scientific issues approach in teaching environmental issues on improving the students’ ability of making approriate decision towards these issues. International Education

Studies, 9(8), 113-123. Retrieved from

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering student’s knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in

Science Teaching. 39 (1). (Abstrak). Retrieved from