TEACHER
’
S
STRATEGIES IN OVERCOMING STUDENTS’
DIFFICULTIES IN READING COMPREHENSION OF
NARRATIVE TEXTS
(A Case Study at a Boarding School in Bandung Regency)
A Research Paper
Submitted to English Education Department, Faculty of Language and Literature Education, Indonesia University of Education as a partial
fulfillment for the requirement of Sarjana Pendidikan degree
Yulia Vera Wati
(0807303)
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE EDUCATION
INDONESIA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION
ABSTRACT
The research entitled Teacher’s Strategies in Overcoming Students’ Difficulties’ in Reading Comprehension of Narrative Texts is a case study research conducted at the eighth grade of a boarding school in Bandung Regency.
This research aims to find out what difficulties faced by the students in reading
comprehension of narrative text and what strategies used by the teacher to
overcome those difficulties. The research was conducted in a class which
consisted of 20 participants and 15 of them were taken as the samples. The data in
this study were obtained from task-giving, interview and observation. The
findings revealed that the students faced some difficulties in reading
comprehension of narrative texts; limited vocabulary knowledge, problems with
processing information, and problems in recalling information after reading. To
overcome those difficulties, the teacher used some strategies; repeat the word,
describe and support with visual, connected words to students’ lives. Based on
this research, it is suggested that those teacher’s strategies can be used at school to
improve students’ reading comprehension.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE ... i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ... ii
ABSTRACT ... iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS ... v
LIST OF TABLES ...viii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ...1
1.1. Background of the Study ...1
1.2. Research Questions ...3
1.3. Aims of the Study ...3
1.4. Scope of the Study ...4
1.5. Significance of the Study...4
1.6. Research Methodology...4
1.7. Clarification of Terms ...5
1.8. Organization of the Paper ...6
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW...7
2.1.1. Definition of Teaching Strategies ...7
2.1.2. Strategies for Reading Comprehension...8
2.2. Reading Comprehension ...11
2.2.1. Definition of Reading Comprehension ...11
2.2.2. Componen of Reading Comprehension...13
2.2.3.Comprehension Difficulties ...16
2.3. Narrative Text...19
2.3.1. Definition of Narrative Text...19
2.3.2. How Narrative Text is Different ...20
2.3.3. Generic Structure of Narrative Text...21
2.3.4. Language Feature of Narrative Text ...21
2.3.5. Example of Narrative Text...22
2.4. Related Previous Research ...23
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY...24
3.1. Research Design ...24
3.2. Research Site ...25
3.3. Participants ...25
3.4.2 Interview...27
3.4.3. Observation...29
3.5. Data Analysis ...29
CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS ...32
4.1. Findings from Students’ Difficulties ...32
4.2. Findings from Teacher’s Strategies ...35
4.2.1 Identifying Detail Information (IDI) ...36
4.2.2 Identifying Implied Information (III)...38
4.2.3 Identifying Main Idea (IMI) ...39
4.2.4 Identifying Word Meaning (IWM) ...41
4.2.5 Identifying Word Reference (IWR)……… ...43
4.2.6 Completing Paragraph (CP) ...44
4.2.7 Arranging Jumble Sentences (AJS)...46
CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS...49
5.1. Conclusions ...49
5.2. Suggestions ...50
REFERENCES...ix
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents the introductory section of the study. It covers
background of the study, research questions, aims of the study, scope of the study,
significance of the study, research methodology, clarification of terms, and
organization of the paper.
1.1. Background of the Study
Reading, as one of four language skills that should be mastered by the
students, is the most stable and durable of foreign language modalities (Barnhart,
1991:259). Reading is also a gateway to get information and knowledge.
Furthermore, it provides opportunities for all students to think, write, or discuss
what they have already read. “With good reading skills, students will make great progress and attain great development in all academic areas” (Anderson, 1999:21).
The ultimate goal of teaching reading is comprehension. It means that the
students need to have the ability to understand the text. Furthermore, based on the
National Curriculum (2013), students of junior high school are expected to be able
to comprehend texts and develop their ability both oral and written to achieve
informational level which they are capable of accessing language ability in daily
and academic context.
There are five text types which are taught in the Junior High School, one
of which is Narrative Text. It is a text that tells a written story in order to gain
readers’ interest by entertaining them. It is supported by Anderson & Anderson
(2003:8) who states that narrative is a piece of text which tells a story and, in
Based on the writer’s teaching experience, most of the students face
difficulties in learning reading, especially in learning narrative text. It is difficult
for them to find both the main ideas and the supporting ideas in a text or
paragraph. Likewise, they are quite unfamiliar with synonym in the text. Most of
the students think that learning to read is simply reading, but actually reading in
this context is more than just to read a paragraph or texts and it involves
understanding or comprehending the meaning of the text.
The most fundamental problem found in most Indonesian school is
mastering vocabulary. Most of the students easily forget the word meaning since
they do not use English as a routine. And also there are only few activities that can
support and help the students establish their vocabulary. Furthermore, the students
have been very much thinking that learning to read English text is a distressing
task. The students do not seem to understand what they read. Their lack of
exposure in acquiring English words and grammars made them were not ready
enough to deal with text genres, especially narrative. .
To solve the problem, teachers’ strategy plays a very important role in
helping students to overcome the students’ reading difficulties. The teacher needs
to find the right technique to make the students understand a text such as the
ability to recognize and infer meanings of unfamiliar words, the ability to
understand the text structure, and the ability to recognize relations of meanings
through the use of cohesive devices.
There have been a number of research projects concerning on reading
difficulties. One of them was a case study conducted by Prahara (2010) to find out
students’ difficulties in answering multiple-choice questions in narrative text. This study focuses on the difficulties faced by the students in the National Exam. It is
found that the students’ difficulty is their inability to access the content in a text
and the most challenging type of task in the worksheet is questions about word
Previous research as mentioned above was investigated students’ difficulties
in answering multiple choice question, however, there is no strategy offered by
the teacher to help them. To enrich the reference about the methodology in
teaching reading, the present research focuses on teacher’s strategy in overcoming students’ reading difficulties. Thus, the aims of this research are both to see what
difficulties faced by the students in reading comprehension of narrative text and to
find out what kind of strategies used by the teacher to overcome the difficulties.
Narrative text is chosen because, as stated before, it is a text type which the
Indonesian junior high school students have to learn. Moreover, narrative text is
used most commonly to describe text types (Kent, 1984).
1.2. Research Questions
This study is conducted to answer these following questions:
1. What are the difficulties faced by the students in reading comprehension of
narrative texts?
2. What are the strategies used by the teachers in overcoming students’
difficulties in reading comprehension of narrative texts?
1.3. Aims of the Study
According to the research questions, the study is aimed:
1. To investigate the students’ difficulties in reading comprehension of
narrative texts.
2. To investigate the teachers’ strategies in overcoming students’ difficulties
1.4. Scope of the Study
This study focuses on the difficulties faced by the students in reading
comprehension of narrative texts and the strategies used by the teacher in
overcoming those difficulties in a boarding school in Bandung Regency.
1.5. Significance of the Study
This study is significant from two aspects. Theoretically, this study could
be used as a reference for research on reading skill, especially in comprehending
English texts. Practically, this study is expected to give information about
students’ difficulties in reading and strategies used by the teacher to overcome the
difficulties. This result of the study is useful for both students and teachers.
Students could be more careful and they do not make the same mistake.
Meanwhile, teachers can select and determine which strategies are helpful and
relevant for their students’ needs.
1.6. Research Methodology
This study was located in qualitative approach. Qualitative is the
collection, analysis, and interpretation of comprehensive narrative and visual data
in order to gain insights into a particular phenomenon of interest (Gay, 2006:399).
Case study is the design which is chosen. According to Gillham (2000:1), case
study is one which investigates to answer specific research questions and which
seeks a range of different kinds of evidence to get the best possible answers to the
research questions.
In this study, the data were collected through task-giving, interviews, and
observation. The task-giving and students’ interview is given to find out students’
observation are used to find out teacher’s strategies to overcome those difficulties.
The participants of the study are an English teacher and fifteen students of eight
grades in a Boarding School in Bandung Regency.
The collected data were then analyzed in some steps. The first step was to
check the students’ task giving. The second step was to analyze the transcription of students and teacher’s interview. The last step was to analyze the field notes of
observation. The interview and observation was analyzed using descriptive
analysis
1.7. Clarification of Terms
In order to avoid misinterpretation in understanding this writing, some
terms are clarified as follows:
1. Teachers’ strategies: an effort, initiative or plan from the teacher to
achieve expected learning objectives by using skilful way (Mintzberg,
1994).
2. Overcoming: find the answer or way to problems and difficulties (Oxford
Advance Learners’ Dictionary, 2003). What is meant by overcoming in this study is how the teachers find the ways to help their students to solve
their reading difficulties they encounter.
3. Difficulties: a thing or situation that causes problems (Oxford Advance
Learners’ Dictionary, 2003)
4. Reading comprehension: the ability to understand information in a text and
interpret it appropriately (Grabe and Stoller, 2002:17)
5. Narrative text: a piece of writing which has purpose to entertain. It deals
with problematic events that lead to crisis and turning point (Gerrot &
1.8. Organization of the Paper
This paper will be presented into five chapters. The chapters will be
divided into subtopics to elaborate the issue given as follows:
Chapter I is an introduction. It presents the background of the study,
research questions, aims of the study, scope of the study, significance of the study,
research methodology, clarification of terms, and organization of the paper.
Chapter II provides the theoretical frameworks which are relevant to this
study including reading, reading comprehension, teacher’s strategies, and
narrative text.
Chapter III contains the methodology used for the study to answer the
problems which is included the design of the study and how the data were
collected and analyzed.
Chapter IV is findings and discussion which reports the result of the study.
The result will explain to answer of the research questions.
Chapter V is conclusion and suggestion. It shows some conclusions of the
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the methodological aspects of the study. It covers
research design, research site, participant, data collection, and data analysis.
3.1. Research Design
The research design of this study is qualitative design and case study is
used in this research. According to Richards (2003:20), case study is a design
which focuses on a particular unit or set of units – institutions, programs, events,
etc – and the aim is providing a detailed description of the units. In addition,
Nisbet and Walt’s (1984, cited in Cohen et al., 2005:184) point out that case study: (1) can be done by a single researcher without needing a full team; (2) is
strong on reality; (3) gives insight into similar situations; (4) catches specific
elements and unexpected events; and (5) has results which are easily understood
by the reader and immediately intelligible as they speak for themselves.
This study is categorized as case study because of several reasons. First, it
is conducted in a small scale for a single case (Stake, 1985 as cited in Emilia,
2008), and it is similar with this study focusing on a small scale, namely one
English teacher and fifteen eight grader students in a Boarding School in Bandung
and concerning with students’ reading comprehension considered as a single case.
Second, case study investigates phenomenon within its real context (Yin, 2003)
and this study also investigates the teachers’ strategies to overcome students’
3.2. Research Site
The place where this study was conducted is a boarding school in Bandung
Regency. It is dedicated for elementary up to senior high school students. The
school has been chosen as the site of the research because the school provides the
necessary data that the researcher needs.
3.3. Participants
The participants involved in this study were an English teacher and a class
consisted of 20 students of second grades in Junior High School. From the
participants, 15 students were taken as the sample and they represented the three
categories of low, middle, and high achiever. The students have been chosen as
the participants because they have learned narrative text.
3.4. Data Collection
The data were collected through task giving, interview, and observation.
From the task giving, the data were in form of students’ answer sheet. Meanwhile,
from the interview the data were in form of transcription. Then data were
crosschecked with observation. Each technique of the data collection is described
thoroughly below.
3.4.1 Task Giving
The students were given 20 questions about narrative text in form of
multiple-choice question to be answered. A set of question titled Soal-soal
Narrative Text taken from http://www.belajarbahasainggris.web.id then was
utilized. The task was given twice. The first task was given without any treatment
to get information about students’ difficulties from answering the questions. And
how to answer each type of questions. The second task is aimed to find out
academic year 2010-2011 published by Indonesia Department of National
Education. Students’ reading comprehension was tested through seven indicators,
which were: identifying main idea (IMI), identifying detailed information (IDI),
identifying implied information (III), identifying word reference (IWR),
identifying word meaning (IWM), arranging jumbled sentences (AJS), and
After giving those tasks to the students, the writer noticed that there were
five easy numbers, 10 moderate numbers, and five hard numbers of questions. The
data of their TDR were served as follows:
Table 3.1 Task Difficulty Rate
No TDR Numbers Percentage
1 Easy 5 25%
2 Moderate 10 50%
3 Hard 5 25%
We can see from the table above showing that 25% of the question number
(1,2,7,8, and 12) was considered to be easy. Then about 50% of question number
(3,4,9,13,14,16,17,18,19, and 20) was considered to be moderate. Meanwhile,
25% of question number (5,6,10,11, and 15) was considered to be hard. Having
seen the data, the writer believed that the TDR for the task was quite proportional.
It almost went along with Hasan and Zainul (2001).
3.4.2 Interview
Another method of collecting data in this study is interview with the
participants. Hancock and Algozzine (2006:39) mention that interviews are
frequently used in case study research. Interview is a method to get specific
information which is taken from direct interaction between interviewer and
interviewee (Cohen and Manion, 1994:271). Interview is needed to collect
information which was not covered in task giving.
The interview used in this study was open interview where the interviewer
teacher’s interview. In students’ interview, group interview was chosen because it
the conversation communicative and natural. Audio-taping is required in this
study to avoid losing important information provided by the participants, as
suggested by Creswell (2007:134).
These are the following questions of the interview:
Questions for student:
1. Menurut kamu bagaimana soal-soal yang telah dikerjakan? Mudah atau
sulit?
ketika mengerjakan soal. Bagaimana tanggapan anda mengenai hal
tersebut?
(From the students’ task result and interview, it is found that there were
some difficulties faced by your students when they answered the
questions. What do you think about that?)
2. Menurut anda, apakah ada kesulitan lain yang membuat mereka tidak bisa
(In your opinion, are there another difficulties which made them fail to
answer the question correctly?)
3. Bagaimana cara anda membantu mereka menghadapi kesulitan tersebut?
(How did you help them to overcome those difficulties?)
3.4.3 Observation
Observation is an instrument of collecting data that can be used to obtain a
comprehensive picture of situation (Ary, 2010:47). Thus, in order to crosscheck
the strategy which is used by the teacher in overcoming students’ difficulties in
answering each type of questions and to determine whether or not that strategies
effectively, the study employed observation. The observation was equipped by
field notes to crosscheck the data from the interview before.
3.5 Data Analysis
As the data have been conducted, the next step to do is to analyze the data.
Bogdan (1975 cited in Sugiyono, 2009:334) states that data analysis is a process
of systematically searching and arranging the interview transcripts, notes, and
other materials accumulated to increase the understanding of them.
Analyzing qualitative data requires understanding how to make sense of
text and images in order to form answers to our research questions. In this study,
the writer applied six steps involved in analyzing and interpreting qualitative data
suggested by Creswell (2008), they are:
1. Preparing and Organizing Data
The first thing to do was to check students’ task and make a list of their score.
Then, made transcription of interviews (students and teacher’s interview) to make
2. Exploring and Coding the Database
After organizing the data from task giving, interview, and observation, the
process continued to explore the whole data to find the parts related to study in
order to answer the research questions. Then, the data was coded as the process of
segmenting and labeling text to form descriptions and broad themes in the data.
3. Describing Findings and Forming Themes
The result of coding was continued by forming themes. Themes (also called
categories) are similar codes aggregated together to form a major idea in the
database. It was done by examining codes which participants discuss frequently,
difficulties in reading and teacher’s strategies, or the writer might expect to find
when studying the topic.
4. Representing and Reporting Findings
After forming themes, the findings were represented and reporting. The report
was presented in descriptive analysis, a primary form for representing and
reporting findings in a qualitative research.
5. Interpreting the Meaning of the Findings
Interpretation involves making sense of the data, or the “lesson learned” as
described by Creswell (2008). Interpretation in this study means that the writer
stepped back and form some larger meaning about the phenomena based on her
personal views.
6. Validating the Accuracy of the Findings
After being interpreted, the findings were validated. Validating finding here
means that the writer determined the accuracy or credibility of the findings
7. Data Reduction
Data reduction means reducing the non-related data for answering the
research questions. Data reduction helped to focus on the aim of the research.
8. Data Display
Data display means taking the reduced data and displaying it in an organized,
compressed way so that conclusion can be more easily drawn. Since this study
used qualitative design, data displayed in descriptive sentence and tables.
9. Conclusion; Drawing or Verification
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter presents findings from data analysis of students’ task transcription. These data were processed to investigate the rank of difficulties in
reading skill from the most frequent up to the rarest one.
5.1 Conclusions
This study has investigated the strategies used by the teacher to overcome students’ difficulties in reading comprehension of narrative text. Based on the data obtained from task-giving, interviews, and observation, this study formed two
conclusions related to the two questions: (1) What are the difficulties faced by the
students in reading comprehension of narrative text?; and (2) What are the
strategies used by the teachers in overcoming those difficulties? The conclusions
are stated as follow:
Firstly, there were some difficulties faced by the students in reading
comprehension of narrative text. The result was obtained through task score and
interview. (1) limited vocabulary knowledge; (2) problems with processing
information; and (3) problems in recalling information after reading. Furthermore, the lack of reading comprehension also happens because of the students’ limited knowledge in constructing main idea from specific details in the text, using hints
to draw a good conclusion, understanding pronouns, recognizing past form of
verb, and comprehending generic structures of a text. Also, the most challenging
type of task in the worksheet is questions about word meaning. This research
strengthens the fact that reading failure in Junior High School level is started from
their inability to access content at word level. It can be concluded that vocabulary
Second, the various strategies used by the teacher to help the students to
overcome those difficulties were obtained through interview and observation.
They showed that the teacher served several ways to help students in mastering
vocabulary. Among others are: repeating words in varied context, describing
words, supporting words with visual, connecting words to students’ lives,
extending words with anecdotes, making associations, comparing and contrasting,
questioning, charting characteristics, rephrasing sentence, analyzing structure,
providing tactile examples, giving examples of correct and incorrect usage.
Moreover, to overcome the students’ difficulties in each type of question, terms of teacher’s strategies to overcome students’ difficulties in reading comprehension of narrative text.
Firstly, since this study concerns on student’s reading skill only, it is
suggested for further researcher to conduct a study with other language skills
(listening, speaking, and writing).
Secondly, for the teacher who wants to improve students’ reading comprehension, it is recommended to use those strategies in the classroom. It aims
to make them accustomed to reading and answering those types of question. So,
REFERENCES
Allen, V. F. (1983). Techniques in Teaching Vocabulary. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Anderson, M. & Anderson, K. (1997). Text Type in English 2. South Yarra:
Macmillan Education Australia.
August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2008). Developing Reading and Writing in 2nd
Language Learners: Lessons from the report of the National Literacy Panel
on language-minority children and youth. New York: Routledge.
Barnhart, C. L. (1991). The World Book Dictionary. Retrieved from
http://www.ncsl.org./programs/employ/contextlearn.htm.
Boardman, A. G., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Murray, C. S., &
Kosanovich, M. (2008). Effective Instruction for Adolescent Stuggling
Readers: A Practice Brief. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation,
Center on Instruction.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to
Language Pedagogy. San Francisco State University: Longman.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s Reading Comprehension
Ability: Cocurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and
Component Skills. Journal of Educational Psychology Copyright 2004 by
the American Psychological Association, Inc. -2004, Vol.96, No.1, 31-42.
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching Language to Young Learners. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press
Anaphora WM Test. The Spanish Journal of Psychology – 2011, Vol.14,
No.1, 37-49.
Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., Beard El-Dinary, P., & Robbins, J. (1999). The
Learning Strategies Handbook: Longman
Cresswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research: planning, conducting, and
evaluating quantitative abd qualitative research (3rd ed,). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc
Davis, James R. (1997). Better Teaching, More Learning. Phoenix: American
Council on Education Oryx Press Series on Higher Education. Retrieved
October 5th, 2013, from http://www.ntlf.com/html/lib/btml_xrpt.htm
Emilia, E. (2011). Pendekatan Genre- Based dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa
Inggris: Petunjuk untuk Guru. Bandung: RIZQI Press.
Feeze, S. & Joyce, H. (2000). Writing Skills: Narrative & Non-fiction Text Type.
Australia: Phoenix Education Pty Ltd.
Fountas, I., & Pinnell, G. (2006). Teaching for Comprehension and Fluency:
Teaching, Talking, and Writing about Reading, K-8. Portsmouth, NH:
Heinemann.
Gerrot, Linda & Wignell, Peter. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar.
Australia: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
Grabe W. & F. L. Stoller. (2002). Teaching and Researching Reading. Harlow:
Pearson Education Ltd. Retrieved August 19th, 2014, from
http://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/1420
Hardiani, R. Fitri Fratiwi. (2011). Stuents’ Reading Strategies and Their Reading
Hedge, Tricia. (2003). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. UK:
OUP.
Krashen, S. D. (1993). The Power of Reading: Insights from the research.
Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Krashen, S. D. & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language
Acquisition in the Classroom. Oxford and San Francisco: Pergammon,
Almany.
Kurnia, Asep D. (2009). Instructional Scaffolding in Teaching Descriptive
Writing. A Thesis. UPI: Bandung. Unpublished.
Lehr, F., Osborn, J., & Hiebert, E. H. (2003). A Focus on Vocabulary. Honolulu:
Pacific. Resources for education and Learning. Retrieved October 3rd, 2013,
from http://www.prel.org/products/re_/ES0419.htm
Linzu, J. (2009). Genre-based Approach for Teaching English Factual Writing.
Retrieved December 16th, 2013, from
http://www.htlmag.co.uk/dec13/mart02.htm.
Mastropieri, M. A., Leinart, A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1999). Strategies to Increase
Reading Fluency. Vol.34, No.5, May 1999, 279.
Mikulecky, Beatrice S. (1990). A Short Course in Teaching Reading Skills. New
York: Addison-Wesley.
Moats, L. (1999). Reading is Rocket Science: What expert teachers of reading
should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: American Federation of
Teachers. Retrieved August 2nd, 2013 from:
http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/downloads/teachers/rocketsci.pdf
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2008). Reading
Framework for the National Assessment of Educational Progress. US
Department of Education: National Assessment Governing Board. Retrieved
September 11st, 2013, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
Nurlaila, Winda. (2009). Exploring Teacher’s Strategies in Encouraging
Students’ Participation in the Language Classroom. A Paper. UPI: Bandung. Unpublished.
Sucipto, Maya Gustina, dkk. (2014). Detik-detik Ujian Nasional Bahasa Inggris.
Klaten: Intan Pariwara
Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sunarto, Meirina Dikhramdhanie. (2012). Students’ Reading Comprehension and
Strategies in Reading Non-Fiction Texts. A Paper. UPI: Bandung.
Unpublished.
Trabasso, T. (2002). Teaching Readers How to Comprehend text Strategically.
New York: Guilford
Westwood, Peter. (2008). What Teachers Need to Know about Reading and
Writing Difficulties. Australia: ACER Press
Woolley, G. (2011). Reading Comprehension: Assisting Children with Learning