ELLIPSIS AND AMBIGUITY FOUND IN
THE TWEETS
ON TWITTER
A THESIS
Submitted to the English Applied Linguistics Study Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of
Magister Humaniora
By:
IRMA SARI NASUTION Registration Number: 809111034
ENGLISH APPLIED LINGUISTICS STUDY PROGRAM
POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
ELLIPSIS AND AMBIGUITY FOUND IN
THE TWEETS
ON TWITTER
A THESIS
Submitted to the English Applied Linguistics Study Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of
Magister Humaniora
By:
IRMA SARI NASUTION Registration Number: 809111034
ENGLISH APPLIED LINGUISTICS STUDY PROGRAM
POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
i
ABSTRACT
Nasution, Irma Sari, Registration Number, 809111034, Ellipsis and Ambiguity Found in the Tweets on Twitter. A Thesis. English Applied Linguistics Study Program. Postgraduate School, State University of Medan. 2014.
ii
ABSTRAK
Nasution, Irma Sari, Nomor Registrasi, 809111034, Ellipsis dan Ambiguitas ditemukan dalam Kicauan Twitter. Tesis. Linguistik Terapan Bahasa Inggris, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Medan. 2014.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First of all the writer would like to express her very special gratitude to
Allah SWT, the Almighty His Blessing and Mercy, until this can be completed in
due course. It should be admitted that a number of people have directly helped the
process in many varied and thought provoking ways. She would like to express
sincere gratitude to them.
Her thankfulness is directed to Prof. Dr. Busmin Gurning, M.Pd, as the First
Adviser and Head of English Applied Linguistic Study Program whose advice,
encouragement, constructive criticisms, and suggestions have been a feature of the
writing process from its very beginning.
Next, Dr. T. Thyrhaya Zein, M.A, her second adviser, deserves her special
gratitude for being so helpful in assisting her to build up ideas and thoughts to
finish up this thesis.
She would like to extend her sincere thankfulness to Dr. Sri Minda Murni,
M.S, the secretary of the department, for her helps in all administration matters
and deep mental support and all the lecturer who have taught a lot of knowledge
to her.
To Prof. Amrin Saragih, M.A, Ph.D, Dr. Rahmad Husein, M.A, and Dr. Sri
Minda Murni, M. S, as reviewers and examiners for their valuable feedback,
To her lovely parents, Drs. H. Syaiful Bahri Nst and Hj. Warnidah Lubis,
brothers and sisters M. Faisal Ansari Nst, M.Pd, and Latifah Nst, S.Pd. for their
full support, endless love, prayers, and motivation in carry out this academic task.
Finally, her very special thanks is directed to her beloved husband, Putra
Kamal Sidik, S.H, and dearest son Akhtar Al-Farabi Kamal for the very special
love, care, encouragement, understanding and motivation given to her for the
success of her study, and to all of her friends in LTBI (XVII) class A.
May Allah SWT Bless Us !
Medan, August 2014
The Writer,
Irma Sari Nasution
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT...i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS………...………..v
LIST OF TABLE...ix
CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Background of the Study….……….…………...1
1.2 The Problems of the Study…….……….…..4
1.3 The Objectives of the Study….……….…4
1.4 The Scope of the Study….……….…5
1.5 The Significances of the Study………...5
CHAPTER II : REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 2.1 Semantics………...6
2.2 Ellipsis…………..……….………....7
2.2.1 Types of Ellipsis……….10
2.3 Ambiguity……….………...17
2.3.1 Types of Ambiguity………...18
2.4 Theories of Text and Context………..22
2.5 Social Media Networking…….………...26
2.7. The Contents of Twitter………...……...28
2.8 Related Studies………31
CHAPTER III : RESEARCH METHOD 3.1 The Research Design……….………..33
3.2 The Source of Data and The Data..……….34
3.3 The Instruments of Data Collection………..…..34
3.4 The Technique of Data Collection………...…………34
3.5 The Technique of Data Analysis...………...35
3.6 The Trustworthiness of The Study………...36
3.7 Triangulation……….37
CHAPTER IV : DATA PRESENTATIONS, DATA ANALYSIS, FINDINGS, AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Data Presentation...………..39
4.1.1 Types of Ellipsis……….39
4.1.2 Percentage of Ellipsis in Tweets on Twitter....…..42
4.2 Data Analysis...………...43
4.2.1 Analysis of Tweets on Twitter...………...43
4.3 Findings...………...64
4.4 Discussions..……….65
CHAPTER V : CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 5.1 Conclusions...………..67
5.2 Suggestions...………...67
i
List of Tables
Table Page
2.2 Yes/No Questions Ellipsis…..…..….………...……….18
4.1 Three Types of Ellipsis………...……….…40
4.2 Percentage of Ellipsis in The Tweets on Twitter....………43
4.3. Types of Nominal Ellipsis Found in The Tweets on Twitter..………44
4.4 Types of Verbal Ellipsis Found in The Tweets on Twitter..………..…….50
4.5 Types of Clausal Ellipsis Found in The Tweets on Twitter………55
1 CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Background of the Study
People in carrying out all activities always involve language as a means to
interact with each other. The main function of language is as a communication
tool used by every human in life . In communicating people can express their
ideas, thoughts , desires , opinions and information which are expressed through
language differently in a community and culture. It is considered that there are
four reasons of communication, namely: entertainment, integration into
community, relationship maintenance, and identity construction (Patrick, 2010: 1).
In communication, people assign various attributes to language forms; they may
feel that a language or variety of a language is ‘elegant’, ‘expressive’, ‘vulgar’,
‘guttural’, or ‘musical’, or that one language form is ‘more polite’ or more
‘aesthetically leasing or displeasing’ than another one (Thomas, 1999:194).
This communication will be effective if people are able to master and
understand language in spoken and written way. In spoken language, speaker
communicates directly to the listeners using pauses, hesitations, tone of voices,
stress, and intonations. Different from spoken language, written language does not
use direct communication but only some written documents with more complex
grammmar to deliver the words to the readers. It can make the readers confuse in
determining the meaning of the written sentences with omitted words called
2
Ellipsis occurs when sentence of word, phrase, clause needed to complete
the construction of meaning is omitted from a sentence or clause in order to avoid
repetition. The example of ellipsis can be found in the texts below:
1. Santi suka pelajaran Bahasa Inggris lebih dari Sinta suka pelajaran Bahasa Inggris.
Santi likes English lesson more than Sinta likes English lesson.
Ellipsis :
Santi suka pelajaran Bahasa Inggris lebih dari Sinta. Santi likes English lesson more than Sinta does.
In the sentence above, the phrase pelajaran Bahasa Inggrisis omitted, referring to
sentence Santi suka pelajaran Bahasa Inggris, in order to avoid repetition.
2. Perampok berlari ke halaman sekolah secepat polisi berlari ke halaman sekolah.
The robber runs to school yard as fast as the policeman runs to school yard.
Ellipsis:
Perampok berlari ke halaman sekolah secepat polisi berlari. The robber runs to school yard as fast as the policeman runs.
In sentence 2 , the phrase ke halaman sekolahis omitted, referring to the sentence
Perampok berlari ke halaman sekolah, in order to avoid repetition.
Repeating words can often sound clumsy or inelegant. People try to avoid
repeating the same word in a single sentence and also in a response to a previous
sentence. When writer omit words this way, it must be possible for reader to
reconstruct the full sentence by implication or context. Sometimes reader need to
have read to what was written immediately before the complete sentence. But, in
reading an elliptical sentence, a reader should realize in what context is the text
3
Ambiguity appears when there are two or more meanings belong to a word
or phrase. It occurs not only in oral but also in written sentences. There are four
types of ambiguity namely: lexical ambiguity, structural ambiguity, phonetic
ambiguity and referential ambiguity. People convey information from a text by a
variety of means. One unclear sentence can be interpreted differenly by different
people. They give positive and negative reaction due to their understanding about
the meaning of the unclear sentence. That’s why, in order to communicate
meaning precisely, it is important to write the sentence in clear meaning to avoid
ambiguity.
Nowadays, some problems of ambiguity tend to appear in social media
network such as twitter and it causes a miscommunication and different
interpretation to the readers about what the writer’s meaning in the text written in
tweets on twitter. Each person must have a reason for every action, as well as
twitter every tweet has the intent and purpose.
Twitter is one of popular social media network beside Facebook that can
be accessed via internet by using modern gadget such as laptop and desktop
computers, though the brevity of tweets makes the application particularly suited
to mobile devices, with users providing a running commentary on their daily
routines. It has more than 300 million worldwide users
(http://wikipedia.org/wiki/twitter). It is very popular in the U.S., Indonesia, Brazil,
Japan, Venezuela, Netherlands. Twitter can be considered as microblogging, users
can post as many as 140 characters of text, called tweets, which are distributed to
4
taken as a kind of text which will be analyzed. At the time of observing the texts
used in tweets on twitter, it is found that there are ellipsis and ambiguity.
Recently, the number of twitter users grows rapidly every day. Based on
the researcher own experience in using twitter, it was found that most of twitter
users tend to type the tweets by omitting some words and phrase or it is called as
ellipsis. The tweets are not only about the user’s privacy but also information to
be read by other people. If it is written in ellipsis, it can raise misunderstanding to
the outsider readers or followers because of ambiguous meaning of the word or
phrase .The fact of this phenomenon atrracted the researcher to conduct a research
concern with the analysis on ellipsis and ambiguity found in tweets on twitter.
1.2 The Problems of the Study
Based on the explanation above, these problems of the study are
formulated as the following.
1) What types of ellipsis are found in the tweets on twitter?
2) What types of ambiguity are found in the tweets on twitter?
3) How are the tweets on twitter realized as ellipsis?
1.3 The Objectives of the Study
In relation to the problem of the study, the main objectives of this study
are to:
1) describe the types of ellipsis found in the tweets on twitter,
2) describe the types of ambiguity found in the tweets on twitter, and
5 1.4 The Scope of the Study
This study focuses on the analysis on ellipsis and ambiguity found in the
tweets on twitter which were written in English. The limitation of the study is
only the investigation of the types of ellipsis and types of ambiguity found in the
tweets on twitter and also the investigation of how the tweets on twitter realized as
ellipsis.
1.5 The Significances of the Study
The significance of the study is generally to give great theoritical and
practical contribution to researchers as well as readers. The findings of this study
are expected to be useful theoritically and practically. Theoritically, the findings
of this study are expected to enrich knowledge of theories on ambiguity and
ellipsis. Therefore, the findings of this study can provide basis for further
researchers of different stages who want to do in depth research in linguistic
development as the follow – up of this study.
Practically, the findings of this study are expected to be useful for twitter
users and followers as information to help overcome the difficulties in interpreting
sentences containing ellipsis and ambiguity. Thus, the findings of this study are
expected to significantly contribute to researcher for future research about ellipsis
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
5.1 Conclusions
The objectives of this study are to describe types of ellipsis and
ambiguity found in the tweets on twitter. In addition, the study attempted to
describe the occurrences of ambiguity in types of ellipsis. In order to gain the
objectives, the data collected for this study were one hundred tweets typed by
twitter users. It can be conluded that:
1. Types of ellipsis found in the tweets on twitter are Nominal, Verbal and
Clausal.
2. Types of ambiguity found in the tweets on twitter are 3 Lexical ambiguity,
9 Structural ambiguity and 15 Referential ambiguity. Not all ellipsis can
cause ambiguity.
3. It is realized that there is 30% elliptical tweets on twitter consist of 12%
Nominal, 10% Verbal and 8% Clausal ellipsis explained by using Halliday
and Hasan’s theory.
5.2 Suggestions
In relation to the conclusion, some suggestions are presented as follows: It
is expected that the findings of the study will be useful and give beneficial for the
1) The findings of this study can be used for twitter followers to help
overcome the difficulties in interpreting tweets containing ellipsis and
ambiguity.
2) The findings of this study are also suggested to be used for further
researchers as reference to conduct in-depth research about linguistic
REFERENCES
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian. Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. 4th edition. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Arceneaux, Noah, and Amy Schmitz Weiss. 2010. Seems Stupid Until You Try It: Press Coverage of Twitter, 2006-9. New Media and Society. Journal.
Ary, D. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Beaugrande, R. & Dressler, W. An Introduction to Text Linguistics, London, Longman, 1981 paper of XIV Congress of Linguists, Berlin 1987
Brown, Keith.2006. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier.
Dash, Niladri Sekhar. 2008. Context and Contextual Word Meaning. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics. 2008, vol. 5, no. 2. (pp.21-31)
Denzin,N.K, Lincoln,Y.S. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Fortin, Catherine R. 2007. Verb Phrase Ellipsis in Indonesian. Journal of Proceedings of thirty-seventh Western Conference of Linguistics. Vol 18, (pp.44-55).
Gibbs, G. 2002. “Qualitative analysis with Nvivo”, Open University Press, Buckingham.
Grenat, H. Mohammed, Dr. & Taher, M. Mohammed, Dr. On The Translation of Structural Ambiguity. Journal of Al- Satil, (pp.9-20).
Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as a Social Semiotic. London: Longman.
Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English.New York: Longman
Johnson, R.B. 1997. Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education,Vol. 118, No.2, (pp.282-292).
Kaplan, Andreas M.,Michael Haenlein.2010.Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons 53 (1): (pp.59–68). Journal.
Kusumawati. 2001. The Study of Ambiguity in the Articles of Hello Magazine. Thesis. Unpublished Thesis. Medan : English Applied Linguistics Program. State University of Medan.
Leech, G. 1981. Introducing English Semantic. New York: Routledge.
Lincoln, Y., Guba, E. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Malia, Ema. 2013. Headlines News of The Jakarta Post . Thesis. Unpublished Thesis. Medan : English Applied Linguistics Program. State University of Medan.
Martin, J. 1992. Process and Text: Two Aspects of Human Semiosis. Norwood: NJ.
Miller, G. 2001. Ambiguous Words. IMP Magazine. March 22, 2001.
Madjdi, Hilai A. 2009. Discourse Analysis” dan Kegunaannya Dalam
Pengajaran Tatabahasa dan Kosakata. http://www.jurnal.umk.aci.id.
Accessed on 3thJuly 2012.
Merriam-webster.2012. An Ensyclopedia Britannica Company. http://www.merriam-webster.com. Accessed on 17thApril 2012.
Nieuwland, S.Mante & Berkum, J.A. Van Jos. 2008. The Neurocognition of Referential Ambiguity in Language Comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass 2/4 (pp :603–630). Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Nunan, David .1993. Introducing Discourse Analysis. London: Penguin English.
O’Neill, Mark. The Complete Guide to Twitter. http://www.makeuseof.com. Accessed on 3th July 2012.
Oxford Dictionary. 2012. http://oxforddictionaries.com. Accessed on 17th April 2012.
Palmer, J. 1983. Semantic. New York: Longman.
Patrick, K. 2010. Finding Meaning in Facebook. Unpublished thesis. Butler University
Puotinen, L. Sara. 2011. Twitter Cares? Using Twitter to Care About, Care for
and Care With Women Who Have HadAbortions. Journal of IRIE Vol. 16.
No:12 (pp. 80-83)
Rusche, Harry. 2002.Ambiguity. English Department. Emory University Rusche.
Saragih, Amrin. 2007. Introducing Systemic Functional Grammar. State University of Medan.
Shenton K. Andrew. 2004. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects: Newcastle
Thomas, Linda. 1999. Language, Society and Power. London: Routledge.
Wisudawanti. 2010. Ambigous Meaning Used in Headlines of the Daily Jakarta Post . Thesis. Unpublished Thesis. Medan : English Applied Linguistics Program. State University of Medan.
Http://online.sfsu.edu/~kbach/ambguity.html. Accessed on 10thApril 2012.