• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

paper 17-18-2009. 97KB Jun 04 2011 12:03:07 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "paper 17-18-2009. 97KB Jun 04 2011 12:03:07 AM"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

AN INTEGRAL OPERATOR ON ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS WITH NEGATIVE COEFFICIENTS

Mugur Acu1, Sevtap Sumer Eker

Abstract. In this paper we consider an integral operator on analytic functions and prove some preserving theorems regarding some subclasses of analytic functions with negative coefficients.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:30C45

Keywords and phrases: Function with negative coefficients, integral op-erators, S˘al˘agean operator

1. Introduction

Let H(U) be the set of functions which are regular in the unit disc U, A = {f ∈ H(U) : f(0) = f′

(0) − 1 = 0}, Hu(U) = {f ∈ H(U) :

f is univalent in U} and S ={f ∈A:f is univalent in U}.

We denote with T the subset of the functionsf ∈S, which have the form

f(z) =z−

X

j=2

ajzj, aj ≥0, j ≥2, z∈U (1)

and with T∗

= T T

S∗

, T∗

(α) = TT

S∗

(α), Tc = T T

Sc and Tc(α) =

T T

Sc(α), where 0α <1.

Theorem 1.1 [5] For a function f having the form (1) the following

assertions are equivalents:

(i)

X

j=2

jaj ≤1 ;

(ii) f ∈T;

(2)

(iii) f ∈T∗

.

Regarding the classes T∗

(α) and Tc(α) with 0 α < 1, we recall here

the following result:

Theorem 1.2 [5]A function f having the form (1) is in the class T

(α)

if and only if:

X

j=2 j−α

1−αaj ≤1, (2)

and is in the class Tc(α) if and only if:

X

j=2

j(j−α)

1−α aj ≤1. (3)

Definition 1.1 [2] Let S

(α, β) denote the class of functions having the form (1) which are starlike and satisfy

zf′(z)

f(z) −1

zf′(z)

f(z) + (1−2α)

< β (4)

for 0≤α <1 and 0< β≤1. And let C∗

(α, β) denote the class of functions such that zf′

(z) is in the class S∗

(α, β).

Theorem 1.3[2]A functionf having the form (1) is in the classS

(α, β)

if and only if:

X

j=2

{(j−1) +β(j+ 1−2α)}aj ≤2β(1−α), (5)

and is in the class C∗

(α, β) if and only if: ∞

X

j=2

j{(j−1) +β(j+ 1−2α)}aj ≤2β(1−α). (6)

Let Dn be the S˘al˘agean differential operator (see [3]) defined as:

Dn:AA , n N and D0f(z) = f(z) D1f(z) = Df(z) = zf

(z) , Dnf(z) = D(Dn−1

(3)

In [4] the author define the classTn(α, β), from which by choosing different

values for the parameters we obtain variously subclasses of analytic functions with negative coefficients (for example Tn(α,1) = Tn(α) which is the class

of n-starlike of order α functions with negative coefficients and T0(α, β) = S∗

(α, β)T

T, where S∗

(α, β) is the class defined by (4)).

Definition 1.2 [4] Let α [0,1), β (0,1] and n N. We define the class Sn(α, β) of the n-starlike of order α and type β through

Sn(α, β) ={f ∈A; |J(f, n, α;z)|< β}

where J(f, n, α;z) = D

n+1f(z)Dnf(z)

Dn+1f(z) + (12α)Dnf(z), z ∈ U . Consequently

Tn(α, β) =Sn(α, β)TT .

Theorem 1.4 [4] Let f be a function having the form (1). Then f Tn(α, β) if and only if

X

j=2

jn[j−1 +β(j+ 1−2α)]aj ≤2β(1−α). (7)

2. Main results

Let consider the integral operator Iλ,γ : A → A, where 1 < λ < ∞ and

γ = 1,2, . . ., defined by

f(z) = Iλ,γ(F(z)) =λ

1

Z

0

uλ−γ−1

F(uγz)du. (8)

Remark 2.1 For F(z) =z+

P

j=2

ajzj, from (8) we obtain

f(z) = Iλ,γ(F(z)) =z+ ∞

X

j=2

λ

λ+ (j−1)γajz

j.

Also, we notice that 0 < λ

(4)

Remark 2.2 It is easy to prove, by using Theorem 1.1 and Remark 2.1,

that for F(z) ∈ T and f(z) = Iλ,γ(F(z)), we have f(z) ∈ T, where Iλ,γ is the integral operator defined by (8).

By using the previously remark and the Theorem 1.2, we obtain the following result:

Theorem 2.1 Let F(z) be in the class T

(α), α ∈ [0,1), F(z) = z −

P

j=2

ajzj, aj ≥ 0, j ≥ 2. Then f(z) = Iλ,γ(F(z)) ∈ T∗(α), where Iλ,γ is the integral operator defined by (8).

Proof. From Remark 2.2 we obtain f(z) =Iλ,γ(F(z))∈T .

From (2) we have

X

j=2 j−α

1−αaj ≤1 and f(z) = z−

P

j=2

bjzj, where

bj =

λ

λ+ (j−1)γaj. By using the fact that 0 <

λ

λ+ (j−1)γ < 1, where 1 < λ < ∞, j ≥ 2, γ = 1,2, . . ., we obtain j−α

1−αbj < j −α

1−αaj and thus

X

j=2 j−α

1−αbj ≤1. This mean (see Theorem 1.2) that f(z) = Iλ,γ(F(z)) ∈ T∗

(α).

Similarly (by using Remark 2.2 and the Theorems 1.3 and 1.4) we obtain: Theorem 2.2 Let F(z) be in the class Tc(α), α [0,1), F(z) = z

P

j=2

ajzj, aj ≥ 0, j ≥ 2. Then f(z) = Iλ,γ(F(z)) ∈ Tc(α), where Iλ,γ is the integral operator defined by (8).

Theorem 2.3 Let F(z) be in the class C

(α, β), α ∈ [0,1), β ∈ (0,1],

F(z) = z −

P

j=2

ajzj, aj ≥ 0, j ≥ 2. Then f(z) = Iλ,γ(F(z)) ∈ C ∗

(α, β), where Iλ,γ is the integral operator defined by (8).

Theorem 2.4LetF(z)be in the class Tn(α, β), α[0,1), β (0,1],n

N, F(z) =z

P

j=2

ajzj, aj ≥ 0, j ≥ 2. Then f(z) =Iλ,γ(F(z)) ∈ Tn(α, β), where Iγ,γ is the integral operator defined by (8).

Remark 2.3By choosingβ = 1, respectivelyn = 0, in the above theorem,

(5)

Remark 2.4 If we consider γ = 1 and λ =c+δ, where 0< c < and 1≤δ <∞, we obtain the results from [1].

References

[1] A.M. Acu and E. Constantinescu, Some preserving properties of a integral operator, General Mathematics, Vol. 15, No. 2-3(2007), 184-189.

[2] V.P. Gupta, P.K. Jain, Certain classes of univalent functions with negative coefficients, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc., 14(1976), 409-416.

[3] G.S. S˘al˘agean, Subclasses of univalent functions, Complex Analysis. Fifth Roumanian-Finnish Seminar, Lectures Notes in Mathematics, 1013, Springer-Verlag, 1983, 362-372.

[4] G.S. S˘al˘agean, Analytic functions with negative coefficients, Mathe-matica, 36(59), 2(1994), 219-224.

[5] H. Silverman, Univalent functions with negative coefficients, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 51(1975), 109-116.

Authors:

Mugur Acu

”Lucian Blaga” University Department of Mathematics Str. Dr. I. Ratiu 5-7 550012 Sibiu, Romania

E-mail: acu [email protected]

Sevtap S¨umer Eker

Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science and Letters Dicle University

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Making use of certain linear operator, we define a new subclass of meromorphically uniformly convex functions with positive coefficients and obtain coefficient estimates, growth

The purpose of this paper is to generalize the definition of G n,α by means of the Al-Oboudi differential operator and investigate univalence condition of this generalized

For this general integral operator we study some interesting univalence properties, to which a number of univalent conditions would follow upon specializing the parameters

Abstract.We define and investigate a new class of harmonic univalent functions defined by an integral operator.. We obtain coefficient inequalities, extreme points and distortion

The main purpose of this paper is to prove the sharp function inequality for the multilinear commutator related to the singular integral op- erator with variable

These results deduce some in- teresting sufficient conditions for analytic functions containing generalized integral operator satisfying the sandwich theorem for Φ-like functions..

The purpose of this paper is to derive certain results on mul- tivalent functions in the open unit disc involving Wright Hypergeometric func- tion operator W m.. p.l

Srivastava, Certain subclasses of analytic functions asso- ciated with the generalized hypergeometric function, Integral Trans.. Srivastava, Generalized hyper- geometric