Riset dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat:
Project Success How?
Engagement
Ownership clearly defined
Clear division of responsibilities Realism!! (purpose)
Connection Activities – Objectives Capacity to handle risks
Flexibility
RBM and Logical Framework Approach
(LFA)
The LFA is an RBM tool used for
LFA Characteristics
Finding the “roots” before setting the objectives
Objectives & beneficiary oriented
Participatory/ Ownership! Consensus oriented
Focus on logical links
The Logical Framework Approach (i)
Features of LFA :
¾ stakeholder involvement ¾ needs-based approach
¾ logical intervention approach
¾ framework for assessing relevance,
The Logical Framework Approach (ii)
Features of LFA :
¾
results-oriented – not activity driven¾
logically sets objectives and their causal relationships¾
shows whether objectives have been achieved: I ndicators (for M&E)Main steps:
• Stakeholder Analysis • SWOT Analysis
• Problem Tree Analysis • Objective Tree Analysis
• Logical Framework Matrix • Monitoring and evaluation
Stakeholder is any individuals, group or organization, community, with an interest in the outcome of a programme/ project.
Purpose:
To identify:
The needs and interest of stakeholders
The organizations, groups that should beencouraged to participate in different stages of the project;
Potential risks that could put at risk programme;SWOT Analysis (i)
Purpose:
To assess the performance and capacity of
the participating units, divisions of organization.
Each participating unit has to undertake
SWOT Analysis (ii)
SWOT analysis is a tool for institutional
appraisal and a brainstorming exercise in which the representatives of the
SWOT Analysis (iii)
SWOT stands for:
Strengths
- the positive internalattributes of the organisation
Weaknesses
- the negative internalattributes of the organisation
Opportunities
- external factors whichcould improve the organisation’s prospects
Threats
- external factors which couldPurpose:
- to identify major problems and their main causal relationships.
Output:
problem tree with cause and effects
Steps in Undertaking Problem Tree
1. I dentify the major problems that the project
will address. State problems in negative manner.
2. Group problems by similarity of concerns. 3. Develop the problem tree:
a) Select a focal problem from the list and relate other
problems to the focal problem.
b) I f the problem is a cause of the focal problem it is
placed below the focal problem
c) I f the problem is an effect of the focal problem is
Problem Tree
Analysis of Objectives
Transforming the problem tree into an
objectives tree by restating the problems as objectives.
Problem statement converted in to
positive statements
Top of the tree is the end that is desired Lower levels are the means to achieving
The relationship between the problems
tree and the objective tree
PROBLEM TREE OBJECTI VE TREE
Focal problem Project Purpose
Effects Overall
Objectives
Strategy Analysis (i)
The aim of strategy analysis is division of the
objectives tree into more consistent smaller sub-units that may, compose the core for a project.
Each of the sub-units of the objective tree can
represent an alternative strategy for the future project.
The project objectives set the framework for the
Strategy Analysis (ii)
Criteria for selection of the project strategy:
1. RELEVANCE: the strategy corresponds to the needs of the stakeholders.
2. EFFECTI VENESS: the lower level objectives of the strategy will contribute to achievement of
the project purpose
3. EFFI CI ENCY: cost-effectiveness of the
strategy in transforming the means into results. 4. CONSI STENT with development policies
The Logframe Matrix
The main output of the LFA is the logframe
matrix.
The Logical Framework Matrix is used to present
information about project objectives, outputs and activities in a systematic and logical way.
The Logical Framework Matrix
Objectives & activities
Indicators Means of
verification Assumptions
What needs to be fulfilled before activities
Pre- conditions
Assumptions (i)
Describe necessary internal and external
conditions in order to ensure that the activities will produce results
Assumptions are risks, which can jeopardize
the success of the project
Are worded positively, i.e. they describe
Assumptions (ii)
Should be relevant and probable
I f an assumption is not important or
almost certain: Do not include
I f an assumption is unlikely to occur:
Assumptions (iii)
Example of Assumptions for the Goal
and Purpose:
Political – stability of NSO and government
staff
Economic – sustainable economy
Assumptions (iv)
Example of Assumptions:
Adequate funds materials.
Skilled people – training needs.
Approvals & contracts – legal,
administrative.
27
I ndicators (i)
I ndicators measure to verify to what extant the
results are achieved.
Specify how the achievement of an objective can
be verified or demonstrated
Provide a basis for Monitoring and Evaluation 3 Dimensions of I ndicators
Means of Verification
Tools or means to obtain the information
required by the indicators
I nclude:
project documents
field verification
Monitoring and Evaluation
Based on t he logical f ramework St rengt hens account abilit y and
t ransparency
Provides inf ormat ion f or ef f ect ive
management
Helps det ermine what works well and
what requires improvement
Purpose of Monitoring and
Evaluation
I t is the continuous process of
collecting, processing and assessing information about the:
Project implementation Project progress
Monitoring (i)
Continuous function that aims to
provide early indications of progress or lack thereof in the achievement of
Monitoring (ii)
Assumes the validity of the existing
plan
Takes place at project level
I s the responsibility of the project
management
I s based on the indicators defined in
Monitoring Responsibility
Project Management
Activities
Output indicators
Early outcome indicators
Project Target Group
Outcome indicators
Evaluation
Time-bound exercise to assess the
relevance, performance and success of on-going or completed projects
Questions the validity of existing planning I s related to the impact of a project
Evaluation Quality Criteria
Relevance (overall)
Efficiency (activities, outputs)
Effectiveness (outputs, outcome) I mpact (outcome, impact)
The
nine steps
of an LFA analysis
1 Analysis of project´ s Context 2 Analysis of Stakeholders
3 Problem Analysis/ Situation Analysis 4 Objectives Analysis
5 Plan of Activities
Why different steps in LFA?
Relevance;
Step 1 – 4 Context, Stakeholder-, Problem- and Objectivesanalysis. Logical links between problems and
solutions, Relevant to support? (in accordance with strategies and problems in the country/ sector?)
Feasible
;
Step 5 – 7 Plan of Activities, Resources/ inputs and I ndicators.Are the resources sufficient to achieve the
objectives? (Resources: Personnel, time, funding, equipment)
Sustainable
; Step 8 – 9 Risk analysis and Assumptions. I f the project isI nternet information on LFA
www.google.com/ logical framework approach
http: / / www.ausaid.gov.au/ ausguide/ ausguidelines/ 1.ht ml
http: / / lgausa.com/ logframe_approach.htm
http: / / www.cgiar.org/ isnar/ gender/ hambly.htm
LFA summary
Relevant, Feasible and Sustainable projects/ programs - success!
Participation & ownership! Joint approach to project
Make problem analysis with accuracy / time to correctly analyze causes & effects
Connection problems and objectives
Add analysis such as cost effectiveness and gender, study on environmental aspects and make a clear division of responsibilities
How the LFA method works
depends on its users
Assignment
Apply LFA in creating value-added