• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

LAMPIRAN 1 : DAFTAR SAMPEL BANK UMUM SYARIAH NAMA BANK 1. BANK MUAMALAT 2. BANK BRI SYARIAH 3. BANK BNI SYARIAH 4.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Membagikan "LAMPIRAN 1 : DAFTAR SAMPEL BANK UMUM SYARIAH NAMA BANK 1. BANK MUAMALAT 2. BANK BRI SYARIAH 3. BANK BNI SYARIAH 4."

Copied!
15
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

92

LAMPIRAN

(2)

LAMPIRAN 1 :

DAFTAR SAMPEL BANK UMUM SYARIAH

NO NAMA BANK

1. BANK MUAMALAT

2. BANK BRI SYARIAH

3. BANK BNI SYARIAH

4. BANK MEGA SYARIAH

5. BANK BCA SYARIAH

6. BANK MANDIRI SYARIAH

7. BANK BUKOPIN SYARIAH

8. BANK ACEH SYARIAH

(3)

DATA RASIO KEUANGAN BANK UMUM SYARIAH 2013-2018

No Bank Umum

Syariah Tahun CAR BOPO NPF DPK FDR ROA

% % % % % %

1 Bank

Muamalat

2013 14.05 93.86 1.56 13.59 99.99 0.50 2014 13.91 97.33 4.85 13.65 84.14 0.17 2015 12.00 97.36 4.20 13.6 90.30 0.20 2016 12.74 97.76 1.40 13.56 95.13 0.22 2017 13.62 97.68 2.75 13.63 84.41 0.11 2018 12.34 98.24 2.58 13.6 73.18 0.08

2 BRI Syariah

2013 14.49 90.42 3.26 13.05 102.70 1.15 2014 12.89 99.77 3.65 13.11 93.90 0.08 2015 13.94 93.79 3.89 13.19 84.16 0.77 2016 20.63 91.33 3.19 13.22 81.42 0.95 2017 20.05 95.34 4.75 13.3 71.87 0.51 2018 29.72 95.32 4.97 13.32 75.49 0.43

3 BNI Syariah

2013 16.23 83.94 1.13 12.98 97.86 1.37 2014 16.26 89.80 1.04 13.14 92.60 1.27 2015 15.48 89.63 1.46 13.24 91.94 1.43 2016 14.92 86.88 1.64 13.33 84.57 1.44 2017 20.14 87.62 1.50 13.39 80.21 1.31 2018 19.31 85.37 1.52 13.43 79.62 1.42

4 Bank Mega Syariah

2013 12.99 86.09 2.98 12.81 93.37 2.33 2014 19.26 97.61 1.81 12.7 93.61 0.29 2015 18.74 99.51 3.16 12.57 98.49 0.30 2016 23.53 88.16 2.81 12.65 95.24 2.63 2017 22.19 89.16 2.75 12.66 91.05 1.56 2018 20.54 88.16 1.96 12.72 95.24 0.93

5 BCA Syariah

2013 22.40 90.20 0.01 12.16 83.50 1.00

2014 29.60 92.90 0.10 12.31 91.20 0.80

2015 34.30 92.50 0.52 12.46 91.40 1.00

2016 36.70 92.20 0.21 12.54 90.10 0.80

2017 29.40 87.20 0.04 12.61 88.50 1.20

2018 24.30 87.40 0.28 12.7 89.00 1.20

(4)

6

Bank Mandiri Syariah

2013 14.76 86.46 2.29 13.68 89.37 1.53 2014 14.12 98.49 4.29 13.73 81.92 0.17 2015 12.85 94.78 4.05 13.73 81.99 0.56 2016 14.01 94.12 3.13 13.78 79.19 0.59 2017 15.89 94.44 2.71 13.82 77.66 0.59 2018 16.26 90.68 1.56 13.88 77.25 0.88

7

Bank Bukopin

Syariah

2013 11.10 92.29 3.68 12.48 100.29 0.69 2014 14.80 96.77 3.34 12.58 92.89 0.27 2015 16.31 91.99 2.74 12.64 90.56 0.79 2016 15.15 109.62 4.66 12.69 88.18 0.76 2017 19.20 99.20 4.18 12.68 82.44 0.02 2018 19.31 99.45 3.65 12.62 93.40 0.02

8 Bank Aceh Syariah

2013 17.56 70.72 1.01 13.07 86.80 3.44

2014 19.93 73.32 0.82 13.08 92.38 3.22

2015 19.44 76.07 0.81 13.15 84.05 2.83

2016 20.74 83.05 0.07 13.14 84.59 2.48

2017 21.50 78.00 0.04 13.25 69.44 2.51

2018 19.67 79.09 0.04 13.24 71.98 2.38

(5)

STATISTIK DESKRIPTIF

Statistics

CAR BOPO NPF DPK FDR ROA

N Valid 44 44 44 44 44 44

Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mean 17.7450 91.8711 2.4200 13.1207 86.9975 .9709

Median 16.2600 92.1400 2.7250 13.1700 88.3400 .7950

Std. Deviation 4.70901 6.57026 1.50111 .45981 8.30596 .77589

Minimum 11.10 76.07 .01 12.16 69.44 .02

Maximum 29.72 109.62 4.97 13.88 102.70 2.83

(6)

LAMPIRAN 4 UJI NORMALITAS

Model 1

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

Unstandardized Residual

N 44

Normal Parametersa,b Mean -.0456047

Std. Deviation .66094445

Most Extreme Differences Absolute .106

Positive .106

Negative -.046

Test Statistic .106

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .200c,d

a. Test distribution is Normal.

b. Calculated from data.

c. Lilliefors Significance Correction.

d. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

Model 2

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

Unstandardized Residual

N 44

Normal Parametersa,b Mean -.5358571

Std. Deviation 6.00644769

Most Extreme Differences Absolute .090

Positive .070

Negative -.090

Test Statistic .090

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .200c,d

a. Test distribution is Normal.

b. Calculated from data.

c. Lilliefors Significance Correction.

d. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

(7)

UJI AUTOKORELASI SEBELUM OULIER Model 1 Runs Test

Unstandardized Residual

Test Valuea -.07190

Cases < Test Value 24

Cases >= Test Value 24

Total Cases 48

Number of Runs 18

Z -1.897

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .058 a. Median

Model 2 Runs Test

Unstandardized Residual

Test Valuea .29923

Cases < Test Value 24

Cases >= Test Value 24

Total Cases 48

Number of Runs 16

Z -2.480

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .013 a. Median

(8)

LAMPIRAN 6

UJI AUTOKORELASI SESUDAH OUTLIER Model 1 Runs Test

Unstandardized Residual

Test Valuea -.07190

Cases < Test Value 22

Cases >= Test Value 22

Total Cases 44

Number of Runs 18

Z -1.373

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .170

a. Median

Model 2

Runs Test

Unstandardized Residual

Test Valuea -.40901

Cases < Test Value 22

Cases >= Test Value 22

Total Cases 44

Number of Runs 18

Z -1.373

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .170

a. Median

(9)

UJI MULTIKOLONIERITAS

Model 1

Model 2 Coefficients

a

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

Collinearity Statistics

B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF

1 (Constant) 300.312 34.587 8.683 .000

CAR -.930 .240 -.528 -3.880 .000 .690 1.448

BOPO -.327 .124 -.300 -2.635 .012 .985 1.015

NPF -.146 .683 -.026 -.213 .832 .838 1.194

DPK -12.599 2.302 -.697 -5.472 .000 .787 1.271

a. Dependent Variable: FDR

Coefficients

a

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

Collinearity Statistics

B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF

1 (Constant) 4.438 6.478 .685 .497

CAR .004 .031 .027 .143 .887 .498 2.007

BOPO -.002 .015 -.024 -.168 .867 .836 1.196

NPF -.278 .075 -.538 -3.719 .001 .837 1.195

DPK -.125 .335 -.074 -.372 .712 .445 2.247

FDR -.012 .018 -.123 -.658 .515 .498 2.009

b. Dependent Variable: ROA

(10)

LAMPIRAN 8

UJI HETEROSKEDASTISITAS

Model 1 Coefficients

a

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) -1.350 4.101 -.329 .744

CAR .011 .020 .122 .557 .581

BOPO .007 .009 .132 .781 .440

NPF -.013 .047 -.045 -.268 .790

DPK -.017 .212 -.018 -.078 .938

FDR .014 .011 .278 1.264 .214

a. Dependent Variable: Abs_RES1

Model 2 Coefficients

a

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 1.611 21.596 .075 .941

CAR -.202 .150 -.246 -1.350 .185

BOPO .065 .078 .129 .842 .405

NPF -.764 .426 -.297 -1.792 .081

DPK .166 1.438 .020 .116 .909

a. Dependent Variable: Abs_RES2

(11)

HASIL KOEFISIEN DETERMINASI Model 1 Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 .579a .335 .248 .67298

a. Predictors: (Constant), FDR, NPF, BOPO, CAR, DPK

Model 2 Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 .709a .502 .451 6.15340

a. Predictors: (Constant), DPK, BOPO, NPF, CAR

(12)

LAMPIRAN 10 UJI STATISTIK F

Model 1 ANOVA

a

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 8.676 5 1.735 3.831 .007b

Residual 17.210 38 .453

Total 25.886 43

a. Dependent Variable: ROA

b. Predictors: (Constant), FDR, NPF, BOPO, CAR, DPK

Model 2 ANOVA

a

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 1489.819 4 372.455 9.837 .000b

Residual 1476.709 39 37.864

Total 2966.527 43

a. Dependent Variable: FDR

b. Predictors: (Constant), DPK, BOPO, NPF, CAR

(13)

UJI STATISTIK T

Model 1 Coefficients

a

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 4.438 6.478 .685 .497

CAR .004 .031 .027 .143 .887

BOPO -.002 .015 -.024 -.168 .867

NPF -.278 .075 -.538 -3.719 .001

DPK -.125 .335 -.074 -.372 .712

FDR -.012 .018 -.123 -.658 .515

a. Dependent Variable: ROA

Model 2 Coefficients

a

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 300.312 34.587 8.683 .000

CAR -.930 .240 -.528 -3.880 .000

BOPO -.327 .124 -.300 -2.635 .012

NPF -.146 .683 -.026 -.213 .832

DPK -12.599 2.302 -.697 -5.472 .000

a. Dependent Variable: FDR

(14)

LAMPIRAN 12

UJI INTERVENING CAR TERHADAP PROFITABILITAS MELALUI FDR

LAMPIRAN 13

UJI INTERVENING BOPO TERHADAP PROFITABILITAS MELALUI FDR Sobel test statistic: 2.09414374

One-tailed probability: 0.01812359 Two-tailed probability: 0.03624718

A: -0.528 B: -0.123 SEA: 0.240 SEB: 0.018

A: -0.300 B: -0.123 SEA: 0.124 SEB: 0.018

Sobel test statistic: 2.28063207

One-tailed probability: 0.01128511

Two-tailed probability: 0.02257023

(15)

UJI INTERVENING NPF TERHADAP PROFITABILITAS MELALUI FDR

LAMPIRAN 15

UJI INTERVENING DPK TERHADAP PROFITABILITAS MELALUI FDR

A: -0.026 B: -0.123 SEA: 0.683 SEB: 0.018

Sobel test statistic: 0.03806676 One-tailed probability: 0.48481723 Two-tailed probability: 0.96963445

Sobel test statistic: 0.30248340 One-tailed probability: 0.38114179 Two-tailed probability: 0.76228358

A: -0.697 B: -0.123 SEA: 2.302 SEB: 0.018

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah :Untuk mengetahui pengaruh pola curah hujan terhadap produktivitas padi di Kecamatan Pagerbarang Kabupaten Tegal..

dapat dilihat dari hasil belajar yang telah diperolehnya dalam proses belajar. Hasil belajar tampaknya sebagai terjadinya perubahan tingkah laku pada peserta didik

 Diperkirakah manfaat yang diperoleh dari berkurangnya kematian adalah sebesar $10,000 pada tahun ke 4, terus meningkat hingga mencapai $110,000 pada akhir proyek..

Ada beberapa perusahaan daerah yang bergerak dalam bidang pelayanan bidang Cipta Karya, seperti di sektor air minum, persampahan dan air limbah.Kinerja keuangan dan

Hasil Uji T-Statistik Pengaruh Intellectual Capital Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Sektor Barang Konsumsi Dengan Size Sebagai Variabel Moderasi ... Hasil Uji T-Statistik Pengaruh

Deskripsi Materi yang disajikan mulai dari pengenalan konsep, definisi, prosedur, contoh, kasus, latihan, sampai dengan interaksi antar konsep sesuai dengan tingkat pendidikan

Metode Section Technique digunakan untuk menganalisis keandalan sistem distribusi, dengan membagi beberapa bagian penyulang distribusi, masing-masing kegagalan peralatan

PT Sarana Menara Nusantara Tbk (TOWR) menyiapkan dana belanja modal (capex) senilai Rp 3.5 Tn tahun 2020 dan mayoritas dana akan dialokasikan pada pengembangan