Kuesioner Efektivitas Media Komunikasi dalam Sosialisasi Perubahan Logo Baru Best Western Papilio Hotel Surabaya

(1)

Lampiran 1: Lembar Kuesioner

Kuesioner Efektivitas Media Komunikasi dalam Sosialisasi Perubahan Logo Baru Best Western Papilio Hotel Surabaya

Responden yang terhormat, dalam rangka penelitian untuk Skripsi S1, saya Lidya Gosalim mahasiswa program studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Kristen Petra, memohon kesediaan

anda untuk mengisi kuesioner berikut ini. Jawaban yang anda berikan akan sangat membantu dalam penelitian ini oleh karena itu dimohon untuk mengisi kuesioner dengan

jujur. Atas kesediaannya, saya ucapkan Terima kasih.

I. Identitas Responden

Berikan tanda centang (√) sesuai dengan identitas anda.

1. Jenis Kelamin:

Laki-laki Perempuan

2. Departemen:

A&G – Administration & General FO – Front Office

ACC - Accounting FB Service

S&M - Sales & Marketing FB Product

HK – House Keeping ENG - Engineering

HR & Security

3. Lama Bekerja:

1 bulan – 6 bulan 7 bulan – 12 bulan 13 bulan – 24 bulan

> 25 bulan

(2)

Lampiran 1: Lembar Kuesioner (Sambungan)

II. Efektivitas Media Komunikasi dalam Sosialisasi Perubahan Logo Baru Best Western Papilio Hotel Surabaya

Jawablah pernyataan berikut ini:

Ya : Jika Setuju Tidak : Jika Tidak Setuju

Berikan tanda centang (√) pada kolom di bawah ini.

1. Intranet

Merupakan media komunikasi internal karyawan berupa e-mail.

No. Pernyataan Ya Tidak

a.

1 Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui media intranet dapat dipercaya karena disebar / dikirimkan oleh HOD (Head of Department ).

2 Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui media intranet dapat dipercaya karena terdapat gambar logo baru dalam e-mail yang terkirim.

b.

1 Sosialisasi perubahan logo baru melalui media intranet dapat diakses oleh semua karyawan di Best Western Papilio Hotel Surabaya.

2 Frekuensi sosialisasi perubahan logo baru cukup sebanyak 1 kali melalui media intranet.

c.

1 Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui bentuk jaringan internal media intranet sesuai dengan kebutuhan karyawan akan informasi.

2 Sosialisasi perubahan logo dengan sifat media intranet yang up to date sesuai dengan kebutuhan karyawan akan informasi.

d.

1 Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui media intranet dapat diakses setiap saat oleh karyawan.

2 Media intranet memudahkan karyawan untuk mengakses kembali informasi terkait perubahan logo baru Best Western Papilio Hotel Surabaya.

3 Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui media intranet bersifat fleksibel karena dapat diakses di komputer kantor.

4 Tampilan media intranet dalam sosialisasi perubahan logo mudah dan nyaman dibaca oleh karyawan.

e.

1 Suasana / ruangan tempat karyawan mengakses media intranet kondusif untuk mendapatkan informasi terkait sosialisasi perubahan logo.

Kredibilitas

Jangkauan dan frekuensi Pemaparan Informasi

Efisiensi

Fleksibilitas

Konteks

(3)

Lampiran 1: Lembar Kuesioner (Sambungan) 2. General Staff Meeting (GSM)

a. Kredibilitas

1. Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui GSM dapat dipercaya karena dihadiri oleh BOD (Board of Director).

2. Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui GSM dapat dipercaya karena memiliki HOD (Head of Department) sebagai narasumber.

b. Jangkauan dan frekuensi Pemaparan Informasi

1. Sosialisasi perubahan logo baru melalui GSM dapat diikuti oleh semua karyawan Best Western Papilio Hotel Surabaya.

2. Durasi 2 jam dalam GSM cukup untuk menyosialisasikan pesan terkait perubahan logo di Best Western Papilio Hotel Surabaya.

3. Frekuensi GSM sebanyak 1 bulan sekali cukup untuk melakukan sosialisasi perubahan logo.

4. GSM menjangkau semua karyawan saat menyosialisasikan pesan perubahan logo baru.

c. Efisiensi

1. Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui media GSM efisien karena diikuti oleh semua karyawan Best Western Papilio Hotel Surabaya.

2. Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui media GSM efisien karena sesuai dengan kebutuhan karyawan akan informasi.

d. Fleksibilitas

1. Frekuensi sosialisasi perubahan logo saat GSM sekali dalam 1 bulan fleksibel untuk karyawan menerima informasi.

2. Sosialisasi perubahan logo saat GSM fleksibel karena karyawan dapat melakukan tanya jawab sehingga informasi lebih jelas.

e. Konteks

1. Sosialisasi perubahan logo saat GSM tepat dengan momen perubahan logo Best Western Papilio Hotel Surabaya.

2. Sosialisasi perubahan logo saat GSM menggunakan ruangan yang kondusif sehingga karyawan dapat menerima informasi dengan baik.

(4)

Lampiran 1: Lembar Kuesioner (Sambungan) 3. Briefing per Departemen

a. Kredibilitas

1. Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui briefing dapat dipercaya karena memiliki narasumber salah satu HOD (Head of Department).

2. Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui briefing dapat dipercaya karena diikuti oleh karyawan dalam departemen

1.

Sosialisasi perubahan logo baru melalui briefing dapat menjangkau semua karyawan Best Western Papilio Hotel Surabaya dalam departemen yang berbeda-beda.

2. Durasi 30 menit briefing cukup untuk sosialisasi perubahan logo kepada karyawan.

3. Frekuensi 1 kali briefing dalam satu hari cukup untuk melakukan sosialisasi perubahan logo agar dapat dimengerti oleh karyawan.

c. Efisiensi

1. Bentuk small group (kelompok kecil) dalam briefing efisien untuk menyosialisasikan perubahan logo.

2. Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui media briefing efisien karena sesuai dengan kebutuhan karyawan akan informasi.

1. Frekuensi sosialisasi perubahan logo saat briefing 1 hari satu kali fleksibel untuk karyawan menerima informasi.

2. Sosialisasi perubahan logo saat briefing fleksibel karena karyawan dapat melakukan tanya jawab sehingga informasi lebih jelas.

e. Konteks

1. Sosialisasi perubahan logo saat briefing tepat dengan momen perubahan logo Best Western Papilio Hotel Surabaya.

2. Sosialisasi perubahan logo saat briefing menggunakan ruangan yang kondusif sehingga karyawan dapat menerima informasi dengan baik.

(5)

Lampiran 1: Lembar Kuesioner (Sambungan) 4. Papan Pengumuman

a. Kredibilitas

1. Sosialisasi perubahan logo baru melalui papan pengumuman kredibel karena dikeluarkan oleh HR (Human Resources) Departement.

2. Sosialisasi perubahan logo baru melalui papan pengumuman kredibel karena terdapat cap / stempel dari HR (Human Resources) Departement.

1. Penempatan papan pengumuman strategis sehingga dapat dilihat oleh semua karyawan.

2. Frekuensi karyawan melihat dan membaca sosialisasi perubahan logo sering karena letak papan pengumuman yang tetap.

c. Efisiensi

1. Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui papan pengumuman efisien.

2. Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui papan pengumuman sesuai dengan kebutuhan karyawan akan informasi.

1. Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui papan pengumuman mudah dibaca.

2. Sosialisasi perubahan logo melalui papan pengumuman fleksibel.

e. Konteks

1. Penempatan papan pengumuman yang disertai penerangan yang jelas memudahkan karyawan untuk memperoleh sosialisasi perubahan logo.

2. Sosialisasi perubahan logo yang diberikan melalui papan pengumuman selalu up-to-date dan waktunya tidak terlambat.

(6)

Lampiran 2: Tabel Validitas VALIDITAS MEDIA INTRANET

IC1 IC2 IRE1 IRE2 IE1 IE2 IF1 IF2 IF3 IF4 ICX1 ICX2 TOTAL Pearson Correlation 1 .812^** .077 .030 .117 -.028 .379^* -.023 .152 .065 -.255 -.358^* .394^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .615 .844 .444 .855 .010 .880 .320 .669 .090 .016 .007

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .812^** 1 .205 -.028 .197 -.023 .567^** .075 -.082 .157 -.176 -.238 .480^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .178 .855 .195 .882 .000 .623 .592 .303 .248 .115 .001

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .077 .205 1 .287 .298^* .091 .152 .201 .123 .157 .327^* -.028 .544^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .615 .178 .056 .046 .553 .319 .185 .420 .303 .029 .855 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .030 -.028 .287 1 .023 .077 -.100 .093 .057 .065 .093 .127 .335^* Sig. (2-tailed) .844 .855 .056 .881 .615 .513 .544 .711 .669 .544 .405 .024

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .117 .197 .298^* .023 1 .095 .355^* .247 .220 .130 .360^* .023 .594^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .444 .195 .046 .881 .535 .017 .101 .146 .396 .015 .881 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation -.028 -.023 .091 .077 .095 1 -.055 .201 .328^* .157 .327^* .392^** .480^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .855 .882 .553 .615 .535 .718 .185 .028 .303 .029 .008 .001

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .379^* .567^** .152 -.100 .355^* -.055 1 .298^* -.262 .171 -.046 -.100 .455^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .010 .000 .319 .513 .017 .718 .047 .082 .260 .765 .513 .002

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation -.023 .075 .201 .093 .247 .201 .298^* 1 -.068 .092 .306^* .209 .480^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .880 .623 .185 .544 .101 .185 .047 .657 .548 .041 .168 .001

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .152 -.082 .123 .057 .220 .328^* -.262 -.068 1 .025 .159 .152 .361^* Sig. (2-tailed) .320 .592 .420 .711 .146 .028 .082 .657 .870 .298 .320 .015

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .065 .157 .157 .065 .130 .157 .171 .092 .025 1 .092 .194 .406^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .669 .303 .303 .669 .396 .303 .260 .548 .870 .548 .203 .006

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation -.255 -.176 .327^* .093 .360^* .327^* -.046 .306^* .159 .092 1 .209 .433^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .090 .248 .029 .544 .015 .029 .765 .041 .298 .548 .168 .003

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation -.358^* -.238 -.028 .127 .023 .392^** -.100 .209 .152 .194 .209 1 .296^* Sig. (2-tailed) .016 .115 .855 .405 .881 .008 .513 .168 .320 .203 .168 .048

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .394^** .480^** .544^** .335^* .594^** .480^** .455^** .480^** .361^* .406^** .433^** .296^* 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .007 .001 .000 .024 .000 .001 .002 .001 .015 .006 .003 .048

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

TOT AL IRE2

IE1

IE2

IF1

IF2

IF3

IF4

ICX1

ICX2

Correlations

IC1

IC2

IRE1

(7)

Lampiran 2: Tabel Validitas (Sambungan)

VALIDITAS MEDIA MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (GSM)

GC1 GC2 GRE1 GRE2 GRE3 GRE4 GE1 GE2 GF1 GF2 GCX1 GCX2 TOTAL Pearson Correlation 1 .237 .419^** .101 -.059 .064 .144 .207 .171 -.005 .137 -.227 .382^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .116 .004 .508 .701 .675 .345 .172 .263 .976 .368 .134 .010

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .237 1 .190 .092 .418^** .148 .312^* .092 .237 .092 .342^* .006 .566^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .116 .211 .549 .004 .333 .037 .549 .116 .549 .021 .968 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .419^** .190 1 .351^* .080 .088 .294^* .026 .101 .135 .392^** .009 .534^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .004 .211 .018 .601 .564 .050 .863 .508 .378 .008 .953 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .101 .092 .351^* 1 -.120 .088 .172 .135 .101 .026 .281 .110 .402^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .508 .549 .018 .432 .564 .260 .378 .508 .863 .062 .471 .006

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation -.059 .418^** .080 -.120 1 .214 .159 -.020 .039 .080 .226 .206 .401^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .701 .004 .601 .432 .159 .298 .896 .798 .601 .136 .175 .006

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .064 .148 .088 .088 .214 1 .058 .088 -.061 -.040 .114 .237 .328^* Sig. (2-tailed) .675 .333 .564 .564 .159 .704 .564 .689 .795 .456 .117 .028

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .144 .312^* .294^* .172 .159 .058 1 .294^* .624^** .172 .578^** .183 .684^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .345 .037 .050 .260 .298 .704 .050 .000 .260 .000 .228 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .207 .092 .026 .135 -.020 .088 .294^* 1 .313^* .243 .170 .211 .478^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .172 .549 .863 .378 .896 .564 .050 .036 .108 .264 .164 .001

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .171 .237 .101 .101 .039 -.061 .624^** .313^* 1 .101 .355^* -.029 .511^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .263 .116 .508 .508 .798 .689 .000 .036 .508 .017 .852 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation -.005 .092 .135 .026 .080 -.040 .172 .243 .101 1 .170 .211 .384^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .976 .549 .378 .863 .601 .795 .260 .108 .508 .264 .164 .009

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .137 .342^* .392^** .281 .226 .114 .578^** .170 .355^* .170 1 .256 .696^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .368 .021 .008 .062 .136 .456 .000 .264 .017 .264 .090 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation -.227 .006 .009 .110 .206 .237 .183 .211 -.029 .211 .256 1 .382^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .134 .968 .953 .471 .175 .117 .228 .164 .852 .164 .090 .010

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .382^** .566^** .534^** .402^** .401^** .328^* .684^** .478^** .511^** .384^** .696^** .382^** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .010 .000 .000 .006 .006 .028 .000 .001 .000 .009 .000 .010

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

GCX2

TOTAL

Correlations GC1

GC2

GRE1

GRE2

GRE3

GRE4

GE1

GE2

GF1

GF2

GCX1

(8)

Lampiran 2: Tabel Validitas (Sambungan) VALIDITAS MEDIA BRIFING

BC1 BC2 BRE1 BRE2 BRE3 BE1 BE2 BF1 BF2 BCX1 BCX2 TOTAL Pearson Correlation 1 .367^* .144 .334^* .504^** .144 .246 .190 .029 .203 .103 .598^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .013 .345 .025 .000 .345 .103 .212 .850 .182 .502 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .367^* 1 .298^* .024 .298^* .183 .359^* .117 .152 .187 .245 .602^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .013 .047 .873 .047 .228 .015 .443 .319 .218 .105 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .144 .298^* 1 .267 .167 .028 .075 -.087 .201 -.139 -.134 .321^* Sig. (2-tailed) .345 .047 .076 .274 .856 .623 .569 .185 .362 .382 .032

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .334^* .024 .267 1 .134 .267 .282 .450^** .161 .050 -.029 .514^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .025 .873 .076 .382 .076 .061 .002 .290 .746 .852 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .504^** .298^* .167 .134 1 .028 .327^* .058 .075 -.139 .000 .437^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .047 .274 .382 .856 .029 .704 .623 .362 1.000 .003

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .144 .183 .028 .267 .028 1 .327^* .349^* .201 .557^** .535^** .646^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .345 .228 .856 .076 .856 .029 .019 .185 .000 .000 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .246 .359^* .075 .282 .327^* .327^* 1 .377^* .091 .287 .282 .660^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .103 .015 .623 .061 .029 .029 .011 .553 .056 .061 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .190 .117 -.087 .450^** .058 .349^* .377^* 1 -.018 .140 .171 .477^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .212 .443 .569 .002 .704 .019 .011 .909 .358 .262 .001

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .029 .152 .201 .161 .075 .201 .091 -.018 1 .077 .161 .387^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .850 .319 .185 .290 .623 .185 .553 .909 .615 .290 .009

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .203 .187 -.139 .050 -.139 .557^** .287 .140 .077 1 .161 .451^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .182 .218 .362 .746 .362 .000 .056 .358 .615 .290 .002

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .103 .245 -.134 -.029 .000 .535^** .282 .171 .161 .161 1 .447^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .502 .105 .382 .852 1.000 .000 .061 .262 .290 .290 .002

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .598^** .602^** .321^* .514^** .437^** .646^** .660^** .477^** .387^** .451^** .447^** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .032 .000 .003 .000 .000 .001 .009 .002 .002

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Correlations

BC1

BC2

BRE1

BRE2

BRE3

BE1

BE2

BF1

BF2

BCX1

BCX2

TOTAL

(9)

Lampiran 2: Tabel Validitas (Sambungan) VALIDITAS MEDIA PAPAN PENGUMUMAN

NC1 NC2 NRE1 NRE2 NE1 NE2 NF1 NF2 NCX1 NCX2 TOTA

L Pearson Correlation 1 -.064 .031 .141 .052 .141 .140 .031 -.082 .140 .319^* Sig. (2-tailed) .675 .839 .355 .734 .355 .358 .839 .591 .358 .033

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation -.064 1 -.109 .006 .169 .277 .019 .171 .164 .140 .378^* Sig. (2-tailed) .675 .477 .969 .267 .066 .902 .262 .281 .358 .010

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .031 -.109 1 -.055 -.155 .193 .385^** .100 .076 .273 .387^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .839 .477 .718 .308 .203 .009 .513 .622 .070 .009

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .141 .006 -.055 1 .116 .037 -.098 .442^** .256 .118 .433^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .355 .969 .718 .449 .807 .520 .002 .090 .442 .003

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .052 .169 -.155 .116 1 .116 .176 .167 .221 -.197 .397^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .734 .267 .308 .449 .449 .246 .272 .144 .194 .007

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .141 .277 .193 .037 .116 1 .226 .193 .256 .010 .538^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .355 .066 .203 .807 .449 .136 .203 .090 .950 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .140 .019 .385^** -.098 .176 .226 1 -.062 .263 .127 .509^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .358 .902 .009 .520 .246 .136 .686 .081 .405 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .031 .171 .100 .442^** .167 .193 -.062 1 .189 .161 .523^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .839 .262 .513 .002 .272 .203 .686 .214 .290 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation -.082 .164 .076 .256 .221 .256 .263 .189 1 .066 .560^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .591 .281 .622 .090 .144 .090 .081 .214 .668 .000

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .140 .140 .273 .118 -.197 .010 .127 .161 .066 1 .415^**

Sig. (2-tailed) .358 .358 .070 .442 .194 .950 .405 .290 .668 .005

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Pearson Correlation .319^* .378^* .387^** .433^** .397^** .538^** .509^** .523^** .560^** .415^** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .033 .010 .009 .003 .007 .000 .000 .000 .000 .005

N 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45

Correlations NC1

NC2

NRE1

NRE2

NE1

NE2

NF1

NF2

NCX1

NCX2

TOTAL

(10)

Lampiran 3: Tabel Reliabilitas Scale: ALL VARIABLES

RELIABILITY

/VARIABLES=IC1 IC2 IRE1 IRE2 IE1 IE2 IF1 IF2 IF3 IF4 ICX1 ICX2 GC1 GC2 GRE1 GRE2 GRE3 GRE4 GE1 GE2 GF1 GF2 GCX1 GCX2 BC1 BC2 BRE1 BRE2 BRE3 BE1 BE2 BF1 BF2 BCX1 BCX2 NC1 NC2 NRE1 NRE2 NE1 NE2 NF1 NF2 NCX1 NCX2

/SCALE('ALL VARIABLES') ALL /MODEL=ALPHA.

N %

Valid 45 100.0

Excluded^a 0 0.0

Total 45 100.0

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.897 45

Case Processing Summary Cases

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

(11)

Lampiran 4: Tabel Frekuensi Identitas Responden

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Jenis_Kelamin Departemen Lama_Bekerja /ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Jenis_Kelamin Departemen Lama_Bekerja

Valid 90 90 90

Missing 0 0 0

FREQUENCY TABLE

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Laki-Laki 60 66.7 66.7 66.7

Perempuan 30 33.3 33.3 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

A&G 3 3.3 3.3 3.3

ACC 10 11.1 11.1 14.4

S&M 8 8.9 8.9 23.3

HK 17 18.9 18.9 42.2

HR & Security 5 5.6 5.6 47.8

FO 16 17.8 17.8 65.6

FB Service 10 11.1 11.1 76.7

FB Product 15 16.7 16.7 93.3

ENG 6 6.7 6.7 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

1-6 bulan 10 11.1 11.1 11.1

7-12 bulan 4 4.4 4.4 15.6

13-24 bulan 25 27.8 27.8 43.3

>25 bulan 51 56.7 56.7 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Lama_Bekerja

Valid

Jenis_Kelamin

Valid

Departemen

Valid

Statistics N

(12)

Lampiran 5: Tabel Frekuensi Variabel Media Intranet

Credibility1 Credibility2 ReachExposure1 ReachExposure2

Valid 90 90 90 90

Missing 0 0 0 0

Efficiency1 Efficiency2 Flexibility1 Flexibility2

Valid 90 90 90 90

Missing 0 0 0 0

Flexibility3 Flexibility4 Context1 Context2

Valid 90 90 90 90

Missing 0 0 0 0

Tidak 26 28.9 28.9 28.9

Ya 64 71.1 71.1 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 21 23.3 23.3 23.3

Ya 69 76.7 76.7 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 23 25.6 25.6 25.6

Ya 67 74.4 74.4 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 28 31.1 31.1 31.1

Ya 62 68.9 68.9 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Statistics

Intranet_ReachExposure1 Valid

Intranet_ReachExposure2 Valid

Intranet_Credibility2 Valid

N

Statistics N

Intranet_Credibility1 Valid

N

Statistics

(13)

Lampiran 5: Tabel Frekuensi Variabel (Sambungan) Media Intranet

Tidak 25 27.8 27.8 27.8

Ya 65 72.2 72.2 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 23 25.6 25.6 25.6

Ya 67 74.4 74.4 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 29 32.2 32.2 32.2

Ya 61 67.8 67.8 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 15 16.7 16.7 16.7

Ya 75 83.3 83.3 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 32 35.6 35.6 35.6

Ya 58 64.4 64.4 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 17 18.9 18.9 18.9

Ya 73 81.1 81.1 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Valid

Intranet_Flexibility4 Valid

Valid

Intranet_Flexibility2 Valid

Intranet_Flexibility3 Intranet_Efficiency2 Valid

Intranet_Flexibility1 Intranet_Efficiency1 Valid

(14)

Lampiran 5: Tabel Frekuensi Variabel (Sambungan) Media Intranet

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Intranet_Credibility1 Intranet_Credibility2 Intranet_ReachExposure1 Intranet_ReachExposure2 Intranet_Efficiency1 Intranet_Efficiency2 Intranet_Flexibility1 Intranet_Flexibility2 Intranet_Flexibility3 Intranet_Flexibility4

Tidak 15 16.7 16.7 16.7

Ya 75 83.3 83.3 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 31 34.4 34.4 34.4

Ya 59 65.6 65.6 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Valid

Intranet_Context2 Valid

Intranet_Context1

(15)

Lampiran 5: Tabel Frekuensi Variabel (Sambungan) Media GSM

Credibility1 Credibility2 ReachExposure1 ReachExposure2

Valid 90 90 90 90

Missing 0 0 0 0

ReachExposure3 ReachExposure4 Efficiency1 Efficiency2

Valid 90 90 90 90

Missing 0 0 0 0

Flexibility1 Flexibility2 Context1 Context2

Valid 90 90 90 90

Missing 0 0 0 0

Tidak 19 21.1 21.1 21.1

Ya 71 78.9 78.9 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 42 46.7 46.7 46.7

Ya 48 53.3 53.3 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 21 23.3 23.3 23.3

Ya 69 76.7 76.7 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 30 33.3 33.3 33.3

Ya 60 66.7 66.7 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Valid Valid

GSM_ReachExposure1 Valid

GSM_ReachExposure2 N

GSM_Credibility1 Valid

GSM_Credibility2 N

Statistics N

Statistics Statistics

(16)

Lampiran 5: Tabel Frekuensi Variabel (Sambungan) Media GSM

Tidak 36 40.0 40.0 40.0

Ya 54 60.0 60.0 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 14 15.6 15.6 15.6

Ya 76 84.4 84.4 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 16 17.8 17.8 17.8

Ya 74 82.2 82.2 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 26 28.9 28.9 28.9

Ya 64 71.1 71.1 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 24 26.7 26.7 26.7

Ya 66 73.3 73.3 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 26 28.9 28.9 28.9

Ya 64 71.1 71.1 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Valid Valid

GSM_Flexibility1 Valid

GSM_Flexibility2 Valid

GSM_Efficiency1 Valid

GSM_Efficiency2 GSM_ReachExposure3 Valid

GSM_ReachExposure4

(17)

Lampiran 5: Tabel Frekuensi Variabel (Sambungan) Media GSM

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=GSM_Credibility1 GSM_Credibility2 GSM_ReachExposure1 GSM_ReachExposure2 GSM_ReachExposure3

GSM_ReachExposure4 GSM_Efficiency1 GSM_Efficiency2 GSM_Flexibility1 GSM_Flexibility2 GSM_Context1 GSM_Context2

/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Tidak 23 25.6 25.6 25.6

Ya 67 74.4 74.4 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Tidak 29 32.2 32.2 32.2

Ya 61 67.8 67.8 100.0

Total 90 100.0 100.0

Valid

GSM_Context1 Valid

GSM_Context2