• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS LEARNING DIFFICULTIES ON FUNGI SUBJECT MATTER IN GRADE X SCIENCE OF SMA NEGERI 3 MEDAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS LEARNING DIFFICULTIES ON FUNGI SUBJECT MATTER IN GRADE X SCIENCE OF SMA NEGERI 3 MEDAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014."

Copied!
20
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING DIFFICULTIES ON FUNGI SUBJECT MATTER IN GRADE X SCIENCE OF SMA NEGERI 3

MEDAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014

By:

Shelly Eka Putri

4103342023

Biology Bilingual Education

THESIS

Submitted to Fulfill the Requirement for the Degree of

Sarjana Pendidikan

BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCE

STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN

MEDAN

(2)
(3)

iii

ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING DIFFICULTIES ON FUNGI SUBJECT MATTER IN GRADE X SCIENCE OF SMA NEGERI 3 MEDAN

ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014

Shelly Eka Putri (NIM 4103342023)

ABSTRACT

This research aims to detect the learning difficulties of students on Fungi subject matter and the factors that influence it. This research belongs to quantitative descriptive. The population in this research is 40% of total students Grade X SMA Negeri 3 Medan. The number of population is 115 students. The samples taken by purposive sampling technique which chosen the students did not complete Fungi subject matter as much as 89 students of the population. Data collection technique used diagnostic test about Fungi subject matter and questionnaire. The result of this research after data analysis showed: (1) The percentage of students learning difficulty in cognitive aspect from knowledge aspect (C1) is 60,99% belongs to very high category of difficulty, comprehension (C2) is 40,45% belongs to high category of difficulty, application (C3) is 40,24% belongs to high category of difficulty, analysis (C4) is 53,18% belongs to high category of difficulty, synthesis or evaluation (C5) is 65,45 belongs to very high category of difficulty and creation (C6) is 56,55% belongs to high category of difficulty, (2) The percentage of students learning difficulty in learning indicator aspect from the first indicator is 64,89% belongs to very high category of difficulty, the second indicator is 56,63% belong to very high category of difficulty, the third indicator is 55,54% belongs to very high category of difficulty, the fourth indicator is 56,55% belongs to very high category of difficulty, the fifth indicator is 54,87% belongs to very high category of difficulty, the sixth indicator is 32,59% belongs to high category of difficulty, and the seventh indicator is 40,07% belongs to high category of difficulty, (3) The factor that very influencing students learning difficulty is parent factor followed by home atmosphere, teacher, school environment, subject matter, media and environmental factor, interest, health factor, psychiatric, intelligence and motivation.

(4)

v

TABLE OF CONTENT

Pages

Research Approval i

Biography ii

Abstract iii

Acknowledgment iv

Table of Content v

Table List viii

Appendix List ix

List of Appendix x

CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1

1.1. Background of the Study 1

1.2. Problem Identification 4

1.3. Problem Limitation 4

1.4. Research Question 5

1.5. Research Objective 5

1.6. Research Significant 5

CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW 7

2.1. Theoretical Framework 7

2.1.1. Introductory of Learning 7

2.1.2. Objective of Learning 7

2.1.3. Characteristics of Learning Behavior 8

2.1.4. Dynamic Elements of Learning 8

2.1.5. Learning Outcome 8

2.1.6. Learning Difficulty 9

2.1.7. Factors Affecting Learning Difficulties 10

2.1.8. Diagnosis of Learning Difficulties 13

2.1.9. Efforts to Overcome Learning Difficulties 14

(5)

vi

Pages

CHAPTER III. RESEARCH METHODS 25

3.1. Research Location and Time Allocation 25

3.2. Population and Sample 25

3.2.1. Population 25

3.2.2. Sample 25

3.2. Research Instrument 26

3.2.1. Test 26

3.2.1.1. Validity Test 27

3.2.1.2. Reliability Test 28

3.2.1.3. Difficulty Level Test 29

3.2.1.4. Different Power Test 29

3.2.2. Questionnaire 30

3.3. Type of Research 32

3.4. Research Procedure 33

3.5. Data Analysis Technique 33

CHAPTER IV. RESULT OF RESEARCH AND DISCUSSION 39

4.1. Description of Data Research 39

4.2. Results 40

4.2.1. Students Learning Outcome 40

4.2.2. Result of Analysis Student Learning Test 40

4.2.2.1. Analysis of Test Result in Cognitive Aspect 40

4.2.2.2. Analysis of Test Result in Each Learning Indicator Aspect 41

4.2.3. Result of Questionnaire 43

4.3. Discussion of Research Result 44

4.3.1. Result of Students Learning 44

4.3.1.1. Category of Students Learning Difficulties from Cognitive

Aspect 44

4.3.1.2. Analysis of Test Result of student Learning in Learning

(6)

vii

4.3.2. Analysis of Factors Influencing Students’ Learning Difficulty

Grade X Science in SMAN Negeri 3 Medan of Fungi Subject

Matter 50

4.3.2.1.Internal factor 50

4.3.2.2.External factor 52

CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 55

5.1. Conclusion 55

5.2. Suggestion 56

(7)

viii

Table List

Pages

Table 3.1. Kisi-kisi of Diagnostic Test 26

Table 3.2. Validity Test Criteria 28

Table 3.3. Relation Between Indicator with Questionnaire 31

Table 3.4. Distribution of Students Learning Difficulty in

Cognitive Aspect 36

Table 3.5. Distribution of Student Learning Difficulty in

Learning Indicator of Fungi Subject Matter 36

Table 3.6. Category of Influence of Factors in Learning Difficulty 37

(8)

xi

Figure List

Pages

Figure 2.1. Fungal Hyphae 16

Figure 2.2. Reproduction of Gaestrum triple 17

Figure 2.3. Life cycle of Hiopus sp. 18

Figure 2.4. Life cycle of Ascomycota 19

Figure 2.5. Example of Ascomycota 20

Figure 2.6. Life cycle of Basidiomycota 21

Figure 2.7. Lichenes 22

Figure 2.8. Reproduction of Lichen 23

Figure 4.1. Poligon Chart of Students Learning Difficulties in

Cognitive Aspect 41

Figure 4.2. Histogram Chart of Student Learning Difficulty in

Learning Indicator of Fungi Subject Matter 42

Figure 4.3. Histogram Chart of Students Questionnaire Result

Grade X SMA Negeri 3 Medan Academic Year

(9)

ix

Appendix List

Pages

Appendix 1 Syllabus 59

Appendix 2 Lesson Plan 63

Appendix 3 Diagnostic Test 69

Appendix 4 Key Answer 76

Appendix 5 Questionnaire 77

Appendix 6 Testing of Research Instrument 81

Appendix 7 Analysis of Question Variance 82

Appendix 8 Validity Calculation 83

Appendix 9 Reliability Calculation 85

Appendix 10 Difficulty Level Calculation 86

Appendix 11 Discriminant Power Calculation 87

Appendix 12 Result of Test Answer of Students 89

Appendix 13 Tabulation of Students Test in Each Cognitive Aspect 90

Appendix 14 Frequency Distribution of Students Test Result in

Fungi Subject Matter Grade X SMA Negeri 3 Medan

Academic Year 2013/2014 91

Appendix 15 Calculation of Mastery Level Percentage (PPS) of

Student in Each Cognitive Aspect 92

Appendix 16 Analysis of Students Correctly Answer the Test in

Cognitive Aspect 94

Appendix 17 Distribution of Students Learning Difficulty in

Cognitive Aspect 95

Appendix 18 Analysis of Students Correct Answer in Learning

Indicator Aspect of Fungi Subject Matter 96

Appendix 19 Distribution of Student Learning Difficulty in

Learning Indicator of Fungi Subject Matter 97

Appendix 20 Score of Questionnaire in Each Indicator 98

(10)

x

Indicator of Fungi Subject Matter 99

Appendix 22 Calculation of Mastery Level Percentage of Student

in Each Learning Indicator 100

Appendix 23 Tabulation of Questionnaire Result 102

Appendix 24 Calculation of questionnaire Answer Percentage 118

Appendix 25 Table of r Product Moment 121

(11)

1

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1.1. Background of the Study

Learning is not just the transferring of knowledge from the teacher to the

learner. It is an understanding process where relatively permanent changes are

caused by information and experience. These changes do not solely refer to outcomes of the learner’s behavior that are manifestly observable, but also to attitudes, feelings and intellectual processes that may not be so obvious (Atkinson

et al. in Chu, 2008). Learning for understanding can be achieved if educators make the effort to find out what students’ conceptions of learning are and what constitutes understanding.

According to Djamarah (2011), learning is a series of soul activities to

obtain a change in behavior as a result of the experience of individuals in

interaction with their environment involving cognitive, affective and

psychomotor. Changes that occur are as a result of learning activities that have

been carried out by individuals. That change is a result that has been achieved

from the learning process. So, to get the learning outcomes in the form of

"change" has to go through a specific process that is influenced by factors from

within the individual and beyond the individual.

These days a lot of thought said that the progress of modern society due to

the learning outcomes and better quality of education as a pillar in creating the

next generation of quality. Without good quality of education will never create

good quality human resources, especially the students in achieving success in

learning. That's because the quality of human resources, which is still very low,

the quality of education has not been achieved for example a low learning

achievement, especially for science subjects. Conceptual problems which might

possibly cause alternative conceptions were determined biology topics of science

and technology and some recommendations were made concerning about way of

(12)

2

education is optimal, then the aspects that are related to the learning process needs

to be evaluated, updated, and improved.

Realizing the process of teaching and learning are the most important

elements required include how teachers can stimulate and engage students in

learning, which in turn can encourage students in achieving optimal learning

outcomes with student learning can stimulate the brain for thinking and creativity

in driving behavior change and the student growth (Dalyono, 2005).

Unfortunately, the reality is happening in the field is inversely proportional to

Dalyono statement. Which became the center of attention at the time of the

learning process is just a teacher. Students not involved in learning activities,

which in turn makes them feel bored in following the teaching and learning

activities.

Biology as a subject is receiving a great deal of attention from educators

and administrators. Because the world is simmering with biological problems and

concerns ranging from the environment to an aging population, biology is

important in the General Education curriculum (Ghosh, 2000). Biology is a

unique discipline where experiments with living organisms can take place both in

the laboratory and in the field (Prokop, 2007). But, biological materials that exist

today is loaded with biological terms, mostly taken from the Latin so that the loss

of important concepts that are simply not understood by the students. Added with

the lack of teaching learning strategies that is used so that students unable to

complete the study. The success of students in learning activities is highly

desirable, but not infrequently lead to a variety of constraints that occur

disadvantaged students achieve results as expected. Affective perceptions are the

most important factors for quality of learning due to their effects on choice of

activities and assessment and on planning (Koksal, 2008).

After the initial observation by conducting interviews Biology teacher in

SMA Negeri 3 Medan, the first semester of academic year 2013/2014, data

showed that results of biological studies students on the fungi subject matter is

still much below the standard. Below standard means the average score obtained

(13)

3

Value that should be achieved by the students so that said complete in Fungi

subject matter in SMA 3 Medan is 75. Mastery learning classically obtained by

the students of SMA Negeri 3 Medan on fungal material is 40% from 288 students

or approximately only 115 students (Uji Kompetensi Data).

Learning difficulties faced by students Class X SMA Negeri 3 Medan,

such as: (1) Influenced by circumstances that are not conducive classroom, where

the presence of students who do not pay attention, talk during the learning process

takes place, (2) Students are less active to seek an explanation additional related to

the fungus that does not exist in the student handbook, (3) low ability students

who have given the subject matter taught. This situation will certainly lead to

students not able to absorb the subject matter so well that resulted in low student

learning outcomes.

The study revealed that it is difficult to teach biology using learner

centered methods because the range of abilities is too wide among many learners,

learners are not able to express themselves in English and they do not do their homework. The other factors influencing the learning of biology were teacher’s lack of adequate knowledge of the subject matter and teachers feeling insecure when teaching in English. The result seems to suggest that most learners’ inability to express themselves in English as indicated by many respondents can have

implications on the learning of biology in Zambian high schools (Manda, 2012).

Beside that, the research done by Cimer (2012) obtained the conclusion

that from 207 participants, 177 students have difficulties learning in biology.

According to the data analysis, five main reasons emerged: the nature of the topic, teachers’ style of teaching biology, students’ learning and studying habits, students’ negative feelings and attitudes towards the topic, and a lack of resources. According to Gibson and Chase in Prokop (2007) showed students lost interest in science when they moved from middle to high school.

Moreover, there was the research done by Tekkaya (2001) obtained data

that approximately 14,4% the students have learning difficulty in topic of

(14)

4

thought that biology is a course that presents very many content, most of whieh

depend on memorization.

By looking at the difficulties faced by the students in the study of biology

(especially fungi), it is necessary to research the title “Analysis of Students’

Learning Difficulties in Fungi Subject Matter Grade X Science of SMA

Negeri 3 Medan Academic Year 2013/2014”.

1.2. Problem Identification

Based on the background description above, researcher identified the

research problem as follows:

1. Limited practical work that was suited to the content of teaching fungi.

2. Difficult to remember the Latin name of fungi subject matter.

3. Limited learning resouces about fungi for senior high school grade.

4. Student low understanding in the fungi concept and knowledge.

1.3. Problem Limitation

In order to obtain an appropriate discussion, this research has some

limitations as follows:

1. Students learning difficulties category from cognitive aspect focuses on fungi

topic only in X Grade Science Students of SMA Negeri 3 Medan Academic

Year 2013/2014.

2. Students learning difficulties category from each learning indicators on fungi

topic in X Grade Science Students of SMA Negeri 3 Medan Academic Year

2013/2014.

3. Factros that influence the students’ learning difficulties on fungi topic in X

(15)

5

1.4. Research Question

There are some questions of this research as follow:

1. In what category of students learning difficulties from cognitive aspect on

fungi topic?

2. In what category of students learning difficulties from each learning indicators

on fungi topic?

3. What are the factors that influence the students’ learning difficulties on fungi

topic?

1.5. Research Objective

This research is conducted to achieve some objectives as follows:

1. To know the category of students learning difficulties from cognitive aspect on fungi topic in X Grade Science Students of SMA Negeri 3 Medan Academic

Year 2013/2014.

2. To know the category of students learning difficulties from each learning

indicators on fungi topic in X Grade Science Students of SMA Negeri 3 Medan

Academic Year 2013/2014.

3. To know the percentage of students understanding level based on fungi topic in

X Grade Science Students of SMA Negeri 3 Medan Academic Year

2013/2014.

1.6. Research Significant

Considering about the research result and discussion, this research

expected has significant beneficial both theoretical and practical.

In theoretical, this research significant as follows: as additional reference

for biology teacher about the students learning difficulties on fungi topic, to motivate the teacher to increase the learning process and understand the students

characteristics that meet the learning difficulties on fungi topic, and as another

researcher reference to develop other further research.

Meanwhile, in practical. This research significant as follows: as a

(16)

6

understand student understanding dynamic on fungi topic, as a reference for

headmaster to increase more the work of biology teacher in learning process, and

as a reference for biology teacher to develop the meaningful learning process on

(17)

55

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

5.1. Conclusion

From the research was done to the students Grade X Science in SMAN

Negeri 3 Medan Academic Year 2013/2014, there are three conclusions as

follows:

1. Learning difficulties on Fungi subject matter in cognitive aspect of knowledge

(C1), analysis (C4), synthesis (C5) and creation (C6) were categorized very

high, while comprehension (C2), and application (C3) were categorized high.

2. Learning difficulties on Fungi subject matter in sixth learning indicator aspect

is identifying the poisonous fungi and edible fungi, and the seventh indicator

is concluding the role of fungi in daily life were categorized high difficulty

and for the first indicator is identifying of general characteristics of fungi, the

second indicator is describing the differences of each fungi, the third indicator

is grouping fungi based on their characteristics, the fourth indicator is

identifying the characteristic of Bacidiomycota and Deuteromycota and the

fifth indicator is describing the way of fungi reproduction were categorized

very high difficulty.

3. Factors influencing students’ learning difficulties on Fungi subject matter

from external factors that very influential is parent factor, while factor of

home atmosphere, teacher, school environment, subject matter, media and environmental factor were categorized influential. While from internal factor

that has influential category only interest factor, and other factors such as

health factor, psychiatric, intelligence and motivation were categorized quite

(18)

56

5.2. Suggestion

The suggestions of this research are as follows:

1. For parents, in order to guide their children in learning at home and not

overload the child with work because it can lead to fatigue in child so that can

cause learning difficulties.

2. For school, in order to provide appropriate learning medium for instructional

material of Fungi so that students could find it easier to understand and are

interested in learning the material of Fungi.

3. For biology teacher Grade X Science in SMA Negeri 3 Medan in order to

further improve the quality of learning in a way that make use of varied teaching methods and the use of props when explaining the material of Fungi.

4. For students Grade X Science in SMA Negeri 3 Medan to be more active in

understanding the terms contained in the material of Fungi and frequent

practice in working on the problems that can reduce the students' learning

(19)

57

REFERENCES

Abdurrahman, M. 2009. Pendidikan bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Abidin, Z., S. Kamarul, & N. Firdaus. 2013. Define The Cognitive Levels in Bloom’s Taxonomy Through The Quranic Levels of Understanding. International Journal of Asian Social Science. 3(9): 2060-2065.

Anshori, M., & Martono, D. 2009. Biologi untuk Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA)-Madrasah Aliah (MA) Kelas X. Jakarta: Acarya Media Utama.

Arikunto, S. 2011. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Ariebowo, M. & Ferdinand, F. 2009. Praktis Belajar Biologi. Jakarta: Visindo Media Persada.

Chu, Y. 2008. Learning Difficulties in Genetics and the Development of Related Attitudes in Taiwanese Junior High Schools. Thesis, United Kingdom: Faculty of Education University of Glasgow.

Cimer, A. 2012. What Makes Biology Learning Difficult and Effective: Students’ Views. Educational Research and Reviews. 7 (3): 61-71.

Dalyono, M. 2005. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Dikmenli, M. 2009. Conceptual Problems in Biology-Related Topics in Primary Science and Technology Textbooks in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 4(4): 429-440.

Djamarah, S. 2011. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ghosh, R. 2000. The Challenges of Teaching Large Numbers of Students in General Education Laboratory Classes Involving Many Graduate Student Assistants. Thesis. Department of Life Sciences: Indiana State University.

Haambokoma, C. 2007. Nature and Cause of Learning Difficulties in Genetics at High School Level in Zambia. Journal of International Development and Cooperation. 13 (1): 1-9.

(20)

58

Koksal, S. 2008. Perceptions of Prospective Biology Teacher on Importance and Difficulty of Organs as a School Subject. World Applied Sciences Journal. 5(4): 397-405.

Manda, K. 2012. Learning Difficulties Grade 12 Pupils Experience in Biology: The Case of Selected High School in Samfya District of Zambia. Thesis, Lusaka: University of Zambia.

Munawar, I. 2009. Pengertian dan Definisi Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Prawirohartono, S., & S., Hidayati. 2007. Biologi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Prokop, P. 2007. Is biology boring? Student attitudes toward biology. Educational Research. 42(1): 36-39.

Riduwan. 2010. Rumus dan Data dalam Analisis Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sohail, M. 2014. Assessing the Learning Level of Students Through Bloom’s Taxonomy in Higher Education in Punjab. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 4(3). 83-87.

Subardi, Nuryani & Pramono. 2009. Biologi untuk Kelas X SMA dan MA. Jakarta: Usaha Makmur.

Sukmadinata, S. 2005. Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sulistyorini, A. 2009. Biologi untuk Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah Kelas X. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Suwarno. 2009. Panduan Pembelajaran Biologi untuk SMA & MA Kelas X. Jakarta: Karya Mandiri Nusantara.

Syah, M. 2010. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tekkaya, C., O. Ozkan, & S., Sungur. 2001. Biology Concepts Perceived as Difficult by Turkish High School Students. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi. 21: 145-150.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Dari penjelasan diatas dapat disimpulkan bahwa kinerja reksadana saham dengan metode sharpe berpengaruh terhadap Net Asset Value karena dilihat dari strategi manajer investasi

Pihak BRI Unit Cibungbulang dalam memilih debitur KUR Mikro sebaiknya memperhatikan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kelancaran pengembalian kredit terutama tingkat pendidikan

Analisis data dilakukan (1) untuk mengetahui jenis-jenis kesalahan yang dilakukan siswa yang didapat melalu itesdiagnostik (2) untuk faktor- faktorpenyebab siswa

Tahu APU (Al Azhar Peduli Ummat) yang beralamtkan di kecamatan Jatinom, Kabupaten Klaten, Proses Pembuatan tahu di CV Tahu APU (Al Azhar Peduli Ummat) masih menggunakan

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memformulasi gel tabir surya dari minyak nyamplung serta menguji sifat fisik dan nilai SPF dari sediaan gel dan mengubah pandangan

Permasalahan di dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana pengklasifikasian pantang larang masyarakat Melayu di kecamatan Siantan dan makna apa saja yang disampaikan melalui

Belum adanya data terkini mengenai angka kejadian DBD pada tahun 2014- 2015 di Sumatera Utara yang terbaru dari Riskesdas juga membuat peneliti tertarik

Agribisnis sebagai ilmu adalah merujuk pada rangkaian ilmu pengambilan keputusan, yaitu ilmu bisnis (ekonomi manajerial), manajemen, ilmu sistem, ilmu komunikasi dan ilmu penunjang