Intania Zainal Nurul Huda, 2016
PEMAHAMAN DAN PENALARAN SISWA SMP DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN MENGENAI PENGGUNAAN BAHAN PENGAWET PADA MAKANAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abdulmumeen, H., Risikat, A., & Sururah, A. (2012). Food: Preservatives, Additives, and Aplications. International Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Sciences. pp. 36-47.
Al-shammari, E., Bano, R., & Khan, S. (2014).The Effect Of Preservatives and Flavours Additive On The Productionof Oxygen-Free Radicals.
International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 3, 210-215 Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2009). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta:
Bumi Aksara
Bekiroglu, F. (2012). Examination of Relationship Between Engagment in Scientific Argumentation and Conceptual Knowledge. Internation Journal of Science and Mathemathics Education, 10, 1415-1443
Berne, B, .(2014). Progression in ethical reasoning when andressing socio-scientific issues in biotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 2958-2977
BPOM. (2015). Jakarta: Warta POM: Media Internall Badan POM. Edisi Maret-April 2015. (25 Juni 2015)
BSNP. (2006). BSNP : Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta
Campbell, Reece, & Urry. (2008). Biologi: edisi kedelapan. Jakarta: Erlangga Chaniago Amrean. (2002). Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung:
Pustaka Setia
Dawson. V. M., & Venbille, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing
students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high
school genetics. Reseach in Science Educarion, 40, 133-148.
Dermawan, Rizky. (2012). Pengambilan Keputusan Landasan Filosofis, Konsep dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Alfabeta
Furtak, E., Hardy, I., & Beinberch, C. (2008). A Framework for Analyzing Evidence-Based Reasoning in Science Classroom Discourse.
Educational Assesment, 15, 175-196
He, F.J.,& MacGregor. (2007). Dietary salt, high blood pressure and other harmful effects on health, Reducing salt in foods: Practical strategies. Kilcast D, Angus F, editors. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead. pp. 18–54. Herawati, Desti. (2015). Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa Sekolah Berorientasi
Lingkungan dan Sekolah Multinasional. Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Hornikx, J & Hann, U. (2012). Reasoning and Argumentation: Towards an Integrated Psychology of Argumentation. Thinking and Reasoning.
18(3), 225-243
Inch, E., Warnick, B., & Endres, D. (2006). Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument. USA: Pearson Education,Inc.
Irianto, Hariyadi. (2007). Upaya Peningkatan Keamanan, Mutu, Gizi dan Pangan. Jakarta : CV. Andi Offset
Ernawati. (2003) Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman
87
Intania Zainal Nurul Huda, 2016
PEMAHAMAN DAN PENALARAN SISWA SMP DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN MENGENAI PENGGUNAAN BAHAN PENGAWET PADA MAKANAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Khishfe, Roli. (2012). Nature of Science and Decision-Making. International Journal of Education,34, 67-100
Kimball, John. (1999). Biologi. Jakarrta: Erlangga Mahameru
Kurnadi, Kemal Adyana (2011).
Dasar-DasarAnatomidanFisiologiTubuhManusia.
Bandung :JurusanPendidikanBiologi FPMIPA UPI
Lawson, A.E. (2004). Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning. International Jounal of Science Education.
Lee, Yeung Chung & Grace. (2012). Students’ Reasoning And Decision
Making About A Socioscientific Issue : A Cross-Context Comparison. Science Education. 96:787–807
Mamun, M. A. (2011). Toxicological Effect of Formalin as Food Preservatives on Kidney and Liver Tissues in Mice Model. IOSR Journal of Enviromental Science, Toxicologu and Food Technology, 8, 47-51
Osborne, J.(2012). The role of argument: Learning how to learn in school science. In B.J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds), Second international handbook of science education. Springer International Handbooks of Educarion. New York. NY: Springer. pp.933-949
Sadler, T., & Zeidler, D. (2005). Patterns of Informal Reasoning In the Context of Socioscientific Decision Making. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 42, 112-138.
Sahidi, F., Kamil, J., & Arachichi, V. (1999). Food Aplications of Chitin and Chitosans. Trends in Food Science and Technology. Food Science and Technology(10), 37-51
Salusu, J. (2002). Pengambilan Keputusan Stratejik. Jakarta: Grasindo. Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational Psychology 5th ed. New York: The
Mc-Graw Hill Companies, Inc.
Simosi, M. (2003). Using Toulmin’s Framework for Analysis of Everyday
Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations, Argumentation,
17, 185-202
Suriasumantri, J.S. (2010). Filsafat Ilmi: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan
Tyler, R & Peterson, S.(2013). Contruction Representations to Learn in Science. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Verheji, B. (2005). Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme
Argumentation, 19, 347-371
Wang, Xingyu. (2007). The Cognitive Process of Decision Making.
International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, 12, 73-85
Winarno, F. G. (2004). Kimia Pangan dan Gizi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Winarno.Fardiaz, S, & Fardiaz, D. (1980). Pengantar Teknologi Pangan.
Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
http://www.surakarta.go.id/konten/17-persen-dari-800-sampel-88
Intania Zainal Nurul Huda, 2016
PEMAHAMAN DAN PENALARAN SISWA SMP DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN MENGENAI PENGGUNAAN BAHAN PENGAWET PADA MAKANAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
makanan-di-pasar-tradisional-mengandung-zat-berbahaya [5 November 2015]
Zo’bi, Abdullah. (2014). The Effect of Using Socio-scientific Issues
Approach in Teaching Environmental Issues on Improving the Students’
Ability of Making Appropiate Decisions Toward These Issues.
