• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Analisis Kausalitas Antara Risiko Kredit dan Risiko Likuiditas pada Bank BUMN Periode 2002-2010

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Analisis Kausalitas Antara Risiko Kredit dan Risiko Likuiditas pada Bank BUMN Periode 2002-2010"

Copied!
17
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

LAMPIRAN

1.

Uji Akar Unit Risiko Kredit Bank Mandiri (

Level

)

Null Hypothesis: RK has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 8 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -4.753452 0.0008

Test critical values: 1% level -3.699871

5% level -2.976263

10% level -2.627420

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

2.Uji Akar Unit Risiko Kredit Bank mandiri

(first Difference)

Null Hypothesis: D(RK,2) has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 2 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -11.16003 0.0000

Test critical values: 1% level -3.661661

5% level -2.960411

10% level -2.619160

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

3.Uji Akar Unit Risiko Likuiditas Bank Mandiri (Level)

Null Hypothesis: RL has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -1.592352 0.4758

Test critical values: 1% level -3.632900

5% level -2.948404

10% level -2.612874

(2)

4. Uji Akar Risiko Likuiditas Bank mandiri (

First Difference

)

Null Hypothesis: D(RL,2) has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -10.64769 0.0000

Test critical values: 1% level -3.646342

5% level -2.954021

10% level -2.615817

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

5.

Uji Akar Risiko Kredit Bank BRI (

Level

)

Null Hypothesis: RK has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 9 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic 1.503773 0.9988

Test critical values: 1% level -3.711457

5% level -2.981038

10% level -2.629906

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

6. Uji Akar Unit Risiko Kredit Bank BRI (

First Difference

)

Null Hypothesis: D(RK,2) has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 8 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -3.823409 0.0080

Test critical values: 1% level -3.724070

5% level -2.986225

10% level -2.632604

(3)

7.Uji Akar Unit Risiko Likuiditas Bank BRI (

Level

)

Null Hypothesis: RL has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.391688 0.1513

Test critical values: 1% level -3.632900

5% level -2.948404

10% level -2.612874

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

8. Uji Akar Risiko Likuiditas Bank BRI (

First Difference

)

Null Hypothesis: D(RL,2) has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 3 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -6.028396 0.0000

Test critical values: 1% level -3.670170

5% level -2.963972

10% level -2.621007

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

9. Uji Akar Unit Risiko Kredit Bank BNI (

Level

)

Null Hypothesis: RK has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 4 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -3.061466 0.0402

Test critical values: 1% level -3.661661

5% level -2.960411

10% level -2.619160

(4)

10. Uji Akar Unit Risiko Kredit Bank BNI (

First Difference

)

Null Hypothesis: D(RK,2) has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 2 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -9.301522 0.0000

Test critical values: 1% level -3.661661

5% level -2.960411

10% level -2.619160

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

11.

Uji Akar Unit Risiko Likuiditas Bank BNI (

Level

)

Null Hypothesis: RL has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -5.644969 0.0000

Test critical values: 1% level -3.632900

5% level -2.948404

10% level -2.612874

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

12. Uji Akar Unit Risiko Likuiditas Bank BNI (

First Difference)

Null Hypothesis: D(RL,2) has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 2 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -7.225695 0.0000

Test critical values: 1% level -3.661661

5% level -2.960411

10% level -2.619160

(5)

13

Uji Akar Unit Risiko Kredit Bank BTN (

Level

)

Null Hypothesis: RK has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -3.039108 0.0410

Test critical values: 1% level -3.632900

5% level -2.948404

10% level -2.612874

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

14.

Uji Akar Unit Risiko Likuiditas Bank BTN (

level

)

Null Hypothesis: RL has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.460868 0.1334

Test critical values: 1% level -3.632900

5% level -2.948404

10% level -2.612874

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

15. Uji Akar Unit Risiko Likuiditas Bank BTN (

First Difference

)

Null Hypothesis: D(RL) has a unit root Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 1 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=9)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -7.082805 0.0000

Test critical values: 1% level -3.646342

5% level -2.954021

10% level -2.615817

(6)

16

.

Lag length

Bank Mandiri

VAR Lag Order Selection Criteria Endogenous variables: RK RL Exogenous variables: C Date: 09/24/14 Time: 21:42 Sample: 2002Q1 2010Q4 Included observations: 31

Lag LogL LR FPE AIC SC HQ

* indicates lag order selected by the criterion

17.

Lag length

Bank BRI

VAR Lag Order Selection Criteria Endogenous variables: RK RL Exogenous variables: C Date: 09/24/14 Time: 21:45 Sample: 2002Q1 2010Q4 Included observations: 31

(7)

18.

Lag length

Bank BNI

VAR Lag Order Selection Criteria Endogenous variables: RK RL Exogenous variables: C Date: 09/24/14 Time: 21:46 Sample: 2002Q1 2010Q4 Included observations: 31

Lag LogL LR FPE AIC SC HQ

* indicates lag order selected by the criterion

19.

Lag length

BTN

VAR Lag Order Selection Criteria Endogenous variables: RK RL Exogenous variables: C Date: 09/24/14 Time: 21:47 Sample: 2002Q1 2010Q4 Included observations: 31

Lag LogL LR FPE AIC SC HQ

* indicates lag order selected by the criterion

20. Uji Kointegrasi Bank Mandiri

Date: 09/24/14 Time: 22:31

(8)

Series: RK RL

Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 1

Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Trace)

Hypothesized Trace 0.05

No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**

None * 0.323120 16.26098 15.49471 0.0383

At most 1 0.084241 2.992077 3.841466 0.0837

Trace test indicates 1 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level * denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level **MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values

21. Uji Kointegrasi Bank BRI

Date: 09/24/14 Time: 22:35

Sample (adjusted): 2002Q3 2010Q4 Included observations: 34 after adjustments Trend assumption: Linear deterministic trend Series: RK RL

Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 1

Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Trace)

Hypothesized Trace 0.05

No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**

None * 0.424236 19.99234 15.49471 0.0098

At most 1 0.035314 1.222372 3.841466 0.2689

Trace test indicates 1 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level * denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level **MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values

22. Uji Kointegrasi Bank BNI

Date: 09/24/14 Time: 22:36

Sample (adjusted): 2002Q3 2010Q4 Included observations: 34 after adjustments Trend assumption: Linear deterministic trend Series: RK RL

Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 1

(9)

Hypothesized Trace 0.05

No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**

None * 0.358765 27.27155 15.49471 0.0006

At most 1 * 0.300749 12.16333 3.841466 0.0005

Trace test indicates 2 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level * denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level **MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values

23. Uji Kointegrasi Bank BTN

Date: 09/24/14 Time: 22:37

Sample (adjusted): 2002Q3 2010Q4 Included observations: 34 after adjustments Trend assumption: Linear deterministic trend Series: RK RL

Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 1

Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Trace)

Hypothesized Trace 0.05

No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**

None 0.157374 9.823941 15.49471 0.2945

At most 1 * 0.111044 4.002050 3.841466 0.0454

Trace test indicates no cointegration at the 0.05 level * denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level **MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values

24. Uji VAR BTN

Vector Autoregression Estimates Date: 09/23/14 Time: 12:35 Sample (adjusted): 2002Q2 2010Q4 Included observations: 35 after adjustments Standard errors in ( ) & t-statistics in [ ]

RK RL

RK(-1) 0.504538 -0.003126

(0.15583) (0.02889) [ 3.23777] [-0.10821]

(10)

(0.68043) (0.12616)

Mean dependent 0.128632 -0.039336

S.D. dependent 0.167927 0.036626

Determinant resid covariance (dof adj.) 1.52E-05

Determinant resid covariance 1.27E-05

Log likelihood 97.97763

Akaike information criterion -5.255864

Schwarz criterion -4.989233

25.

Uji VECM Bank Mandiri

Date: 09/23/14 Time: 20:38

Sample (adjusted): 2002Q4 2010Q4 Included observations: 33 after adjustments Standard errors in ( ) & t-statistics in [ ]

Cointegrating Eq: CointEq1

RK(-1) 1.000000

RL(-1) 0.517951

(0.60505) [ 0.85604]

C -0.184535

Error Correction: D(RK) D(RL)

CointEq1 -0.709172 0.004153

(11)

D(RK(-1)) 0.287933 0.005846 (0.13793) (0.06581) [ 2.08759] [ 0.08883]

D(RK(-2)) -0.018401 -0.012641

(0.13568) (0.06473) [-0.13562] [-0.19527]

D(RL(-1)) 0.265159 -0.038554 [-0.79030] [-0.41622]

R-squared 0.536966 0.010323

Mean dependent -0.012204 -0.002623

S.D. dependent 0.104751 0.034185

Determinant resid covariance (dof adj.) 8.24E-06

Determinant resid covariance 5.52E-06

Log likelihood 106.1293

Akaike information criterion -5.583595

Schwarz criterion -4.948713

26. Uji VECM Bank BRI

(12)

Cointegrating Eq: CointEq1

Error Correction: D(RK) D(RL)

CointEq1 -0.661380 -0.171328

(0.18908) (0.06180) [-3.49792] [-2.77217]

D(RK(-1)) 0.258836 0.053021

Mean dependent 0.007536 -0.003377

(13)

Determinant resid covariance (dof adj.) 1.66E-05

Determinant resid covariance 1.11E-05

Log likelihood 94.60654

Akaike information criterion -4.885245

Schwarz criterion -4.250363

27

.

Uji VECM Bank BNI

Vector Error Correction Estimates Date: 09/23/14 Time: 22:00 Sample (adjusted): 2002Q4 2010Q4 Included observations: 33 after adjustments Standard errors in ( ) & t-statistics in [ ]

Cointegrating Eq: CointEq1

RK(-1) 1.000000

RL(-1) 0.810488

(1.37503) [ 0.58943]

C -0.426462

Error Correction: D(RK) D(RL)

CointEq1 -0.879864 -0.022689

(0.26178) (0.08463) [-3.36106] [-0.26810]

D(RK(-1)) 0.094057 0.006725

(0.21707) (0.07017) [ 0.43331] [ 0.09583]

D(RK(-2)) -0.056749 -0.035066

(0.18071) (0.05842) [-0.31404] [-0.60026]

D(RL(-1)) 1.171014 -0.714838

(0.58265) (0.18836) [ 2.00979] [-3.79515]

D(RL(-2)) 0.761346 -0.395975

(14)

C 0.006280 0.004115

Log likelihood -0.146334 37.11933

Akaike AIC 0.372505 -1.886020

Schwarz SC 0.644597 -1.613928

Mean dependent 0.014665 -0.000483

S.D. dependent 0.334627 0.103342

Determinant resid covariance (dof adj.) 0.000514

Determinant resid covariance 0.000344

Log likelihood 37.91671

Akaike information criterion -1.449498

Schwarz criterion -0.814616

28.

Granger Causality

Bank Mandiri

Pairwise Granger causality Tests Date: 09/23/14 Time: 10:42 Sample: 2002Q1 2010Q4 Lags: 1

Null Hypothesis: Obs F-Statistic Probability

RL does not Granger Cause RK 35 1.37572 0.24949

RK does not Granger Cause RL 0.01510 0.90297

BRI

29.

Granger Causality

Bank BRI

Pairwise Granger Causality Tests Date: 09/23/14 Time: 10:50 Sample: 2002Q1 2010Q4 Lags: 1

Null Hypothesis: Obs F-Statistic Probability

RL does not Granger Cause RK 35 6.45482 0.01612

(15)

30.

Granger Causality

Bank BNI

Pairwise Granger Causality Tests Date: 09/23/14 Time: 11:11 Sample: 2002Q1 2010Q4 Lags: 1

Null Hypothesis: Obs F-Statistic Probability

RL does not Granger Cause RK 35 0.35743 0.55414

RK does not Granger Cause RL 0.08458 0.77306

31.

Granger Causality

Bank BTN

Pairwise Granger Causality Tests Date: 09/23/14 Time: 11:07 Sample: 2002Q1 2010Q4 Lags: 1

Null Hypothesis: Obs F-Statistic Probability

RL does not Granger Cause RK 35 1.95276 0.17190

(16)
(17)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Penelitian ini menggunakan Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test dan menemukan bahwa bank syariah memiliki risiko kredit lebih tinggi dari bank konvensional menggunakan pengukuran risiko kredit

Bapak, semoga Allah senantiasa memberikan kesehatan dan kebarokahan kepada. Bapak

Deskripsi Hasil Penelitian Mengenai Risiko Kredit pada PT.. Bank Rakyat

Tabel 4.1 Rincian Non Performing Loan PT.Bank Rakyat Indonesia

Pengaruh Jumlah Kredit Yang Diberikan Dan Tingkat Likuiditas Terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. 2004, Manajemen

Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini saya, Ninda Desi Riswana, menyatakan bahwa skripsi dengan judul: ANALISIS HUBUNGAN KAUSALITAS ANTARA RISIKO KREDIT, KOMPETISI DAN

Salah satu risiko yang dihadapi bankdalam menjalankan bisnisnya adalah risikolikuiditas.Bagi perbankan, likuiditas tidak diukur dari acid test ratio maupun current

Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan oleh peneliti-peneliti sebelumnya bahwa Risiko Kredit dan Risiko Likuiditas tidak berpengaruh signifikan dan berpengaruh signifikan secara