Mendorong Daya Saing
Indonesia,
Mendorong Daya Saing
Indonesia,
Menyongsong ASEAN
Economic Community 2015
Menyongsong ASEAN
Economic Community 2015
By: Hendri Saparini, Ph.D
Managing Director
g g
ECONIT Advisory Group in Economic
saparini@econit.co.id
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
GLOBALISASI REGIONALISASI
GLOBALISASI, REGIONALISASI
DAN POSISI PENTING ASIA
TIMUR
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Asia Pra-Krisis: The Flying Geese
Before the crisis, “the flying geese” phenomenon was soaring throughout
Asia and influencing the Pacific Rim economies.
The formation resembled flying geese, headed by Japan, while the rest of the group followed.
3
Note:
“Flying Geese” is a concept developed by Kaname Akamasu that best describes the economic structure of Asia before the crisis.
y g g , y p , g p
Countries toward the front tend to transfer “older” industries to countries at the back.
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Krisis Asia Mengakhiri Flying Geese
Asian Economic Crisis in 1997-1998: The End of “Flying Geese”, The
Source: BBC
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Asia Paska-Krisis: The Regional Squadrons
After the crisis, squadrons of the former flying geese, who increasingly drive
regional integration.
SAARC
SAARC
Squadron
China Squadron
Korea Squadron
Japan
S
d
Squadron
5ASEAN
Squadron
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
2011
China dan India: Penentu Asia Timur
Manufacturing giant with the lowest
Strong technology and service industry
China
India
Manufacturing giant with the lowest prices
Hybrid communist-capitalist modelthat enables development
Solid primary schools
industry
Relatively efficient capital market
Strong private sector and legal framework Y kf
Stren
g
Stren
g
Infrastructure that lures foreign investment
Good distribution of wealth with higher per-capita income
Younger workforce
Growing population
Great university system
Strong entrepreneurial culture
Attracts higher prices
g
ths
g
ths
g p
Red tape, corruption, tough labor laws and bureaucracy all
d i
W
e
W
e
deter investment Woeful infrastructure Lackluster primary education system
Exclusive growth environment
Heavy reliance on low prices
Weak financial system
Inefficient capital system
Slow population growth
e
akness
e
e
aknesse
Exclusive growth environment to the rich
The privatization of key Slow population growth
e
s
s
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Arti Penting ASEAN Di Asia Timur
7
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
ASEAN Penentu Masa Depan Asia Timur
ASEAN
Neutral
High
Neutral
Position
Bargaining
Power
ASEAN i t id dAttractive Single
Regional Market
Competitive
Regional
Production Base
ASEAN is not considered a“threat” to China, India, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and
New Zealand
Huge market
High consumption
Less competitive
Smooth flow of goods, services, and people under FTA
Abundance of natural resources
Low labor cost
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
ASEAN COMMUNITY 2015:
ASEAN COMMUNITY 2015:
Bersatu Pasti
Menguntungkan Semua?
g
g
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
2011
Menuju ASEAN Community 2015
ASEAN Security ASEAN Economic ASEAN
Socio-ASEAN COMMUNITY 2015
ASEAN Security Community (ASC)
ASEAN Economic
Community (AEC) Cultural Community (ASCC)
The Peaceful, Prosperous, and People-Centric ASEAN
Single Regional Market Regional Production Base
Dual Track Strategy
Production/Supply Consumption/Demand
Dual Track Strategy
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Apa Arti ASEAN Integration?
Tariffs will be eliminated and non-tariff
b i ill b d ll h d t
barriers will be gradually phased out
Rules and regulations will be simplified and harmonized
ASEAN investors will be permitted to invest in
t f l l d t f i d th
All barriers to the free
flow of goods, services,
capital, and skilled labor
are removed
sectors formerly closed to foreigners and theservices sector will also be opened up
are removed
The region will become a
Applicable international standards and practices are followed, and policies on
intellectual property rights and competition are
The region will become a
more level playing field
put in placeRegional infrastructure will be more developed with the expansion of transportation,
telecommunications and energy linkages
11
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Tren Raksasa Korporasi Dunia dan ASEAN Integration
Global trends in manufacturing indicate a shift towards adopting
flexible production techniques and integrated production chains
It is no longer cost effective for all manufacturing activities to be done in
in-house or in a single country
MNCs are integrating their manufacturing activities across several locations
MNCs are integrating their manufacturing activities across several locations
MNCs are not only seeking large consumer markets but also regional sites
where they can establish efficient production networks
Regional Production Base
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Janji Cost Savings Atas ASEAN Integration
13
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Diperlukan Balanced Approach
Benefits to MNCs
Targeting more sales
Benefits to Local Companies
More export opportunities to
Targeting more sales volume in the ASEAN market
Components procurement on an ASEAN-wide basis
More export opportunities to ASEAN market
ASEAN-wide expansion opportunity for corporate growth strategy T h l d fi i l More product specialization to achieve economies of scale Greater emphasis on profitability using
ASEAN- Technology and financial support opportunities from MNCs
ASEAN-wide pool of talent profitability using ASEAN
wide operations
A Balanced Approach
A Balanced Approach
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
2011
Komoditas Ekspor ASEAN Ke China:
Penyangga Kebutuhan China (2008)
76.6 Marble,travertine, ecaussines etc 77.3 76.9 76.7 Ores & concentrates, nes Zinc ores & concentrates Niobium, tantalum, vanadium ores & concentrates 86 84.1 82.9
Zirconium & articles thereof, including waste & scrap Iron oxides & hydroxides compounded rubber, unvulcanised, in primary forms 94 8 91.8 89.9 86
Iron ores & concentrates; including roasted iron pyrites Alumunium ores & concentrates Chromium ores & concentrates Zirconium & articles thereof, including waste & scrap 99.9 97 94.8 Uranium or thorium ores & concentrates Slag. Dross other than granulated slag Iron ores & concentrates; including roasted iron pyrites 75 80 85 90 95 100 Percent
Source: ASEAN Economic Commonity Chartbook 2009
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Ekspor Utama ASEAN ke India:
Ketergantungan India Atas Bahan Baku ASEAN (2008)
Country Commodity Share of total
exportp (%)( )
Brunei Darussalam Crude petroleum oils 99.80%
Cambodia Palm oil & its fraction 88.80%
Myanmar Dried vegetables, shelled 61.70%
Indonesia Palm oil & its fraction 57.40%
Malaysia Crude petroleum oils 39 70%
Malaysia Crude petroleum oils 39.70%
Singapore Petroleum oils, not crude 22.20%
Viet Nam Coal; briquettes, ovoid & similar solid
f l f d f l
21.68% fuels manufactured from coal
Philippines Parts & access of motor vehicles 18.90%
Thailand Petroleum oils, not crude 6.40%
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
ASEAN trade with China:
Defisit Berlanjut
120 80 100 120 Import 40 60 ion US D Export ‐0.9 ‐1.7 ‐4 3 ‐2.0 ‐2.7 ‐4 0 ‐2.9 ‐3 7 ‐1.5 6 4 0 20 B ill ‐4.3 2.7 4.0 2.9 3.7 ‐6.4 ‐8.9 ‐9.9 ‐15.2 ‐21.4 ‐40 ‐20 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Balance of trade© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
2011
ASEAN - India Trade:
Surplus dengan Value Added?
35 25 30 15 20 B illio n US D Export Import 5 10 B Balance of trade 0 7 00 03
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
2011
PELUANG &TANTANGAN INDONESIA :
PELUANG &TANTANGAN INDONESIA :
Strategi & Daya Saing Menentukan
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Perbandingan PDB ANGGOTA ASEAN
(2008)
4,401.6 China 273.2 511.8 1,209.7 Thailand Indonesia India 168.6 181.9 222.2 Philippines Singapore Malaysia 14.6 27.2 89.8 Brunei Darussalam Myanmar Viet Nam 5.3 11.2 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 Lao PDR Cambodia 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
2011
Struktur PDB Indonesia:
Konsumsi Swasta Mendominasi PDB
120 39.7 28.8 27.8 41.1 15.2 8.0 19.1 23.1 2.8 1.1 80 100 13 5 10.7 12.5 11.6 11.9 8.4 6.2 9.7 12.9 44.4 30.9 19.1 39.8 60 80 P er c ent 20.1 36.1 41.0 45.2 54.7 54.8 60.9 67.3 71.1 20.8 13.5 20 40 P -5.3 -16.5 -1.8 -20 0
Brunai China Singaporeg p Malaysiay India Thailand Indonesia Vietnam Philipinap Private consumption Government consumption Gross domestic capital formation Net Export
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Terjadi Percepatan Deindustrialisasi:
Gap Indeks PDB dan Manufaktur Semakin Lebar
Gap Indeks PDB dan Manufaktur Semakin Lebar
Index, 2004=100 140 150 PDB 120 130 100 110 Industri Pengolahan 90 100 80
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
2011
Pertumbuhan FDI:
FDI Indonesia Lambat, Bukti Daya Saing Rendah
FDI Indonesia Lambat, Bukti Daya Saing Rendah
120 80 100 China 60 80 n USD ASEAN 20 40 Billio n Indonesia ‐ 980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 000 002 004 006 008 Indonesia India (20)198 198 198 198 198 199 199 199 199 199 200 200 200 200 200
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
2011
Mengapa Daya Saing Indonesia Rendah?
g p
y
g
Indonesia tidak memiliki
industrial policy and strategy
yang
komprehensif sehingga mengakibatkan:
komprehensif, sehingga mengakibatkan:
•
Visi industri dan perdagangan tidak jelas. Misal:
–
Tren menunjukkan peningkatan share ekspor bahan mentah dan
peningkatan impor pangan. Apakah ini yang menjadi visi
peningkatan impor pangan. Apakah ini yang menjadi visi
pembangunan industri?
–
Ketahanan pangan diikuti dengan ketergantungan pangan impor.
Inikah tujuan pembangunan industri pertanian?
•
Kebijakan perdagangan dan industri tidak memiliki referensi
dan arah serta keberpihakan yang jelas pada kepentingan
nasional Misal:
nasional. Misal:
–
UU Penanaman Modal No 25 Tahun 2007, Peraturan Presiden
No. 76 Tahun 2007, Peraturan Presiden No. 77 Tahun 2007 yang
diubah dengan Peraturan Presiden No. 111 Tahun 2007
kepemilikan asing di bank dinaikkan dari 95% menjadi 99%
kepemilikan asing di bank dinaikkan dari 95% menjadi 99%.
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
#2
Kebijakan pembangunan infrastruktur tidak memiliki
Kebijakan pembangunan infrastruktur tidak memiliki
perencanaan yang terintegrasi dengan rencana pembangunan
sektoral. Misal:
o Pembukaan dan dorongan investasi sektor tambang tidak diikuti dengang g g penyediaan transportasi yang cukup.
o Pembangunan industri pengolahan tidak diikuti pembangunan industri penyedia listrik, air bersih, pelabuhan, dll.
Kebijakan sumber daya manusia tidak direncanakan dengan
link and match
yang ketat antara sektor industri, pendidikan
dan ketenaga kerjaan. Contoh:
Malaysia lebih siap menangkap relokasi investasi Jepang berbasis SDM berketrampilan untuk menarik investasi sektor elektronik untuk basis produksi semi konduktor.
Saat ini strategi Indonesia menyiapkan SMK. Apakah sesuai dengan rencana pengembangan industrinya?
Sementara bbrp fakultas di perguruan tinggi seperti Geologi dan Pertanian, kekurangan mahasiswa. Padahal pertanian dan tambang adalah salah satu sektor potensial bagi Indonesia.
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
#3
Kebijakan keuangan, moneter dan fiskal, berpotensi kontraproduktif
terhadap pembangunan daya saing investasi langsung dan industri.
Contoh:
K bij k d i b b il i t k lib li i k tid k iliki h
–
Kebijakan devisa bebas, nilai tukar, liberalisasi keuangan tidak memiliki arah, menyulitkan pembangunan sektor riil,–
Kerjasama ekonomi internasional tidak memiliki rencana strategi, dll–
Kebijakan fiskal tentang subsidi, pajak, dll sering kontraproduktifKebijakan dan strategi perdagangan internasional berpotensi
memberi dampak negatif pada ekonomi nasional.
S t if d l l k k lib li i d b ik i l
–
Sangat agresif dalam melakukan liberalisasi perdagangan baik regional maupun bilateral. Mulai perdagangan bebas sampai EPA–
Berpotensi menimbulkan berbagai masalah di berbagai sektor. Misal: UU No. 18 Tahun 2009 Tentang PeternakanKebijakan ekonomi selain tidak fokus pada peningkatan daya saing
juga tidak mampu menyelesaikan masalah nasional seperti
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Top 10 Ekspor Indonesia ke India
86% Natural Resources (2008)
Coconut (copra),
Binders for foundry
molds or cores, 2% Petroleum coke, 1% Chemical wood 2% Others, 14% , pulp, 1% Natural rubber, 1% Copper ores and
concentrates, 4%
Palm oil & its Palm oil & its
fraction, 58% Coal, 17%
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Top 10 Impor Indonesia dari India
Didominated Barang Manufaktur (2008)
Semi‐finished
products of iron
4%
Ground‐nuts, not
roasted 3%
Trucks, motor
Television camera,
Cotton, not carded
or combed 5%
Trucks, motor
vehicles for the
transport of goods 3%
Others 45% Soya‐bean oil
9%
transmissn app
8%
Petroleum oils, not
crude Cyclic hydrocarbons 9%
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
2011
Top 10 Ekspor Indonesia ke China
70% did
i
i SDA
70% didominasi SDA
No Product Value (MillionUS$) Percent ( )1 Coal; briquettes, ovoids & similar solid fuels manufactured from coal 4070.7 26% 2 Palm oil & its fraction 1866.5 12% 3 Natural rubber,balata,gutta‐percha etc 1305.8 8%
4 Crude petroleum oils 705.6 4%
5 Chemical wood pulp, soda or sulphate, other than dissolving grades 644.9 4% 6 Petroleum coke, petroleum bitumen & other residues of petroleum oils 486.7 3% 7 Aluminum ores and concentrates 466.4 3% 8 Coconut (copra),palm kernel/babassu oil & their fractions 426.9 3%
9 Cyclic hydrocarbons 395.6 3%
10 Nickel ores and concentrates 348.4 2%
Total 10 Products 10,717.6 68% Total Export 15 692 6 100% Total Export 15,692.6 100%
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
2011
Top Impor Indonesia dari China
Dominasi Produk Olahan
Dominasi Produk Olahan
No Product Value Percent
No Product
(Million US$) Percent
1 Automatic data processing machines;optical reader, etc 1617.8 8% 2 Television camera, transmissn app for radio‐telephony 1414.4 7% 3 Petroleum oils, not crude 652.5 3% 4 Part suitable for use solely/princ with televisions, recpt app 552.9 3% 5 Electric app for line telephony,incl curr line system 546.5 3% 6 Printing machinery; machines for uses ancillary to printing 292.6 1% 7 Woven cotton fabrics, 85% or more cotton, weight less than 200 g/m2 279.7 1% 8 Cruise ship, cargo ship, barges 267.2 1% 9 Tubes, pipes and hollow profiles, seamless, or iron or steel 261.7 1% 10 Onions, garlic and leeks, fresh or chilled 248.2 1%
Total 10 Products 6133.4 30%
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
Neraca Perdagangan
Indonesia-China
Surplus pada Migas, Defisit pada Non Migas
Miliar US$ 2.4 3.6 2.1 1 7 4 6 Migas 0.5 0.8 1.7 1.1 0.4 1.4 2.1 0.9 0.1 0 0 1.7 0 2 Neraca Perdagangan ‐3.6 ‐2.5 ‐4.7 0.1 ‐0.6 0.0 ‐1.3 ‐4 ‐2 ‐7 2 ‐4.6 ‐5.6 ‐8 ‐6 Non Migas 7.2 ‐8 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
© Pusdiklat
Spimnas
2011
Peran China dan India di Indonesia
Bukan Lewat FDI?
Other Asia Countries 3.3% USA 1.0% China 0.9% Australia 0 3% Europe 7.3% 0.3% India 0.1% Mauritius 43.6% Joint Countries 21.8% ASEAN 12.5% Japan 9.2%