"
f T
NO. 10 SOLAR RADIATION
AND WEATHER
STUDIESABBOT
4Icomputed from
curvesi,3, 4, 6,8and9,isas followsandisillustrated atA
of figure 16.The mean
values which follow are expressed as usual inunitsofo.°i Centigrade/""1.3 2-3 2-8 5-4 5-2 4.6 3.4 2.3 0.6 —0.3 —1.8
—2.8 —1.9 —0.2 1.5 3.4 5.1 3.8 2.1 1.2 0.4
The
rangeof the generalmean
iso.°8 Centigrade. Thismean
curve represents the tabulation of39linesineach of its 21 columnsor819 months inall.The
contradictory results found in the remaining 24lines, representing 504 months, themselves
somewhat
approach acommon
type. Itsmean
form,shown
atB
of figure 16is as follows:—4.4 -4-2 -4-4 —5-1 —5-0
—
S-2 —2.8 —0.7 0.6 0.2 o.g0.8 —0.5 1.6 2.3 1.9 2.6 0.5 —1.3 —2.9 —4.3
Beingplainly associatedwithperiodicchangesinthe sun,as the dates of the appearance and disappearance of contrastingphases in these curves2, 5, 7,and 10 appearto be, the existence of thesecurves of a contradictory type does not,in
my
judgment, reasonably require ustodoubttheevidence of the other70years or oftheirown
40years that 21months
is a veridical period in terrestrial temperature, pro- ducedbya periodicsolar variation.c. ProgressiveRemovalofDetermined Periodicities
Acting on the conclusion just expressed, I have felt it justifiable toremove, oneafteranother, the
mean
evaluations of the variousperi- odicities,and
toremove them
inparcels of 11^or2^yearsatatime, so astoeliminatethem
tothehighestdegree possible despitechanges of both phase and amplitude.As
Iam
aware that this course will becriticizedand perhaps disowned bymeteorologistsandstatisticians, Ipauseat thispointtorefertothe 12-monthperiodicity, ascomputedfrom
the residuals of the 5-month smoothed Berlin temperatures, afterremovingintheway
just indicated, andinthe following order, the7, 8,II, 13.6, 21, 25, 34, 46, 68,and 9Imonth
periodicities.Mean
values foreach ii| years
from
1819to 1929aregiven by the dotted lines in figure 15. These resultsmay
becompared
with the closely juxtaposed curves for the 12-month periodicity, as previouslycom-
puteddirectlyfrom
theoriginal data, andalready referredto under 14-A.The
verygreat similarity in general between the two sets of curves indicatesthattheremovalofallofthosemany
periodicities in ii|-year or23-year parcels has not ruined the residuals for thepurpose of the 12-month analysis. Figure 15also includes a similar pair of juxtaposed analyses of 12-month periodicities for Copenhagen, and^"''The lines ofthese twotables (too long for page width) are tobe read consecutivelyliketwolinesof text,not staggeredasmightbethought.
42
SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS
COLLECTIONS VOL. 94 alsothe Qf-monthmean
curves for Berlin andCopenhagen
as com- putedfrom
the originaldata and againfrom
the residuals after re- moval ofmany
other periodicities. I hope that thismay
be a step toward promotinggreater confidenceinthe procedure.But
thecurves about tobe referredto, representing otherperiodicities, will furnish othergrounds for confidence inthesemethods.Ithas alreadybeenpointed out inthe analysis of theoriginal data thatthe expiration ofan integral multiple of 23 years
from
January 1819is often the signalwhich warns us of a reversal of phaseim- pending in the temperature periodicities.As
this also occurs fre- quentlyin periodicitieswhicharecomputed from
the residualswhich remain after removalofmany
determined periodicities by ii|-year and23-year steps, itwould
seemto indicatethat the data were notharmed
by suchremoval.For
itistoberecalledthattheeflfectofsuch removal, applying as it does the actualmean
values over each ii|- or23-year periodtocorrectallmonthlyvalueswithinthatveryperiod, must tend in the strongestzvay to smooththe residual curve which remains aftersuchremoval. If then suchasmoothed residualcurve shows plainlythe newly soughtperiodicity,and not onlyshows it in approximately thesame
phase atmany
intervals during a century, butalsoshowsthe reversalof itsphaseatthecriticaldates,after themanner
often noted in earlier analyses—
the combination of these regularitiesof behavior seemsto stronglysupportthe hypothesisthat thecomputed
periods are veridical, and cumulatively defends themethod
used intheir removal.But
still anothertype of confirmation of veridity is available. Itwill be notedthat inthe list of 10 periodicities which were said to have been
removed
before seeking the 12-month periodicity, one of 9fmonths was
mentionedlast. This periodicitywas
not noticed in theoriginal data,norwas
itsuspecteduntilafter the 68-month curvewas
determined.Then
sevenwaves appearedsodefinitely inthemean
curves for68 months,asshown
infigure 18, thatnoquestion of the reality of the9|-monthperiodicitycould be entertained. Yetthe 68-month
curves themselves were notcomputed
until after the entire previous listof eight periodicities had beenremoved
in ii|- or 23- yearparcels. Thatthe9|-month curveshouldhavesurvived somuch
modification of the dataseems toindicate that realandnot spurious periodicitieshad been found and removed. In order furtherto
demon-
strate this argument
more
conclusively, Ishow
in figure 15 the 95-month
curves for Berlinand Copenhagen,bothas computedfrom
the original dataand ascomputed
after nine periodicities had been re-moved
therefrom.NO. 10 SOLAR RADIATION
AND WEATHER
STUDIES ABBOT 43D. Criterion for True andFalse Periodicities andLimitto the
Number
OFPeriodicitiesIf it were the case that in long intervalsof time only very small changes inphase and amplitude took placeinthe forms of theperi- odicity curves, it
would
be simple as well as obviously indicated to pick out, evaluate, andremove
periodicity after periodicity until nomore
ofthem
could be discerned inthe residual temperature depar- tures. In fact it would have been done bymeteorologists long ago.But
aswe
havenow
shown,thissimplicitydoes notobtain. Although, for instance, the ii-month less 3 days periodicitymay
be traced at Berlin duringtimes oflowsun-spotnumbers
forno
years,with an average amplitude of about o.°4 Centigrade, there are wide fluctua- tionsof phaseand amplitude duringthat longinterval.So
theques- tion arises, ifwe
are toadmit that obscure causes produce reversals ofphaseand wide fluctuationsinamplitude,how
shallwe know
ifa supposedperiodicity is real or arbitrary?The
quandaryismuch more
serious forlong periods than for short ones.During
ii|^ years there are, for instance, twelve 11-month periodsandstillmore
of7, 8,and 9f months. If somany
repetitions yield, aswe
haveseen that they do, definite smoothmean
curves of considerable amplitude representing the periodicity throughout these abundant repetitions,and there follows an abrupt change toanother typewhich continues equally well verifiedthrough a second interval of ii|years,themere
changeof type,associatedas Halehasshown
ittobewitha reversal of themagneticstatusof the sun,isnotavalid argument for the rejection ofthis otherwise excellent periodicity.
When,
however,thelonger periods of 21 to68months
areinques- tion, thenumber
of repetitionsofthem
in 11^ or even in 23yearsis notenough to eliminate irregular fluctuations,or to inspire
much
confidence.
For
themean
curves are left very ragged. If no sup- porting evidenceswereavailable,theywould
sometimesseem probably accidental.But
letus take as aspecificexamplethe68-month curveat Berlin, asshown
in figure 18, I to V.The
following observationsmay
bemade
:
1.
Each
curve shows seven waves, indicating a periodicity of 9I months.2. Removing, inimagination, thewaves dueto the95-monthperi- odicity, eachsubfigure showsa smooth curve of 68 months' period, roughlysimilar in
form
to a sinecurve.4