NO. 10 SOLAR RADIATION
AND WEATHER
STUDIES ABBOT 83rORECAST- OBSERVLD
Fig. 37.
—
Eleven-year forecastsfor Vienna, Austria, and North Platte, Nebr., withverifications. Forecastsmade stepbystep.84
SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS
COLLECTIONS VOL. 94 ofweather. Thesearefoundtooccurat integralmultiples of ii^ years measuredfrom
January 1819.These phenomena, ifaccepted asfactsof Nature,propoundedtous several problems
:
A.
Why
should the sun, agaseous body, emitcomplex pulsations of radiationwhichare of thenature of afundamental and 1 1 ormore
overtones?A
violin stringmay
do this, butwhy
should a gaseous sphere?B.
Why
should the terrestrial responses to these pulsationsshow
changesof phase, form, and amplitudeat intervalsintimately related to thefundamental period of23years?C.
Are
the terrestrialresponses of an order of magnitude reason- ably corresponding to the solarimpulses?For
questionA,IconfessthatIhave nosuggestionto offer. Imust leaveitssolutiontothosetheoristswho may
beconvincedbysectionT ofthispaperthatthereisarealbodyoffactswhich provethe existence of complexsolar variation.As
for question B, themostnatural hypothesisistoassumethatthe phases and amplitudes of the solar periodicities themselves changefrom
time to time at intervals related to 117 years. Solar-constant observations are not yet of longenoughstandingtoverifythis. Ihave thereforesoughtto findsome
helping clueina regularity of behavior regarding changes ofphaseamong
thedifferent stations. In this in- quiry I havecompared
the changesshown
by the 8-, 11-, 21-, 25-, and 68-monthperiodicities intemperatureaspresentedbythevarious stations Berlin, Copenhagen, Helsingfors, Greenwich,Cape Town,
andAdelaide.Itseemedsuperfluoustoexaminethe precipitation which, as meteorologists areaware,is looselydependenton temperature.Ihavedevised asortof shorthand adaptedtoexhibit theresultsof this comparison. It is
shown
in figure 38.At
theleft of each sub- figure willbe found theapproximatedates of beginningand end of each ii^-yearintervalforwhichtabularcomputationsofperiodicities were made.Under
thenames
of the stations appear symbols which are designed to represent the types of curves found during the various intervals of 11^ years. These symbols are five in number, butmay
becombinedto indicate thatthe firsthalf of a curve is of onetype,andthesecondhalfof another.The
symbolsareas follows:Numbers
i and 2 are vertical and horizontal lines.They
represent invertedphasesofcurves ofapproximatelythesame
form.Numbers
3and 4arelinesinclinedat45° respectivelytotheleftandtheright.They
also represent inverted phases of curves of approximatelythesame
form, but of aform
essentially differingfrom
thatrepresentedNO. 10 SOLAR RADIATION
AND WEATHER
STUDIESABBOT
8586 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS
COLLECTIONS VOL. 94 by symbols iand2.Number
5isa zigzagline. Itrepresentsaninde- terminateform
of curve not similar tothose representedby i, 2, 3,and4. Itisnot intendedto implythatcurves i and2 or 3and 4are alwayssimilarin
form
asbetween representations ofperiodicities of different stationsorperiodicities of different lengths. It is only im- pliedthat allcurves i and 2 within a single vertical column of thesame
subfigure are approximately similar though inverted, and all those represented as 3and 4 within a single vertical column of thesame
subfigure areapproximatelysimilarthoughinverted.Owing
to local influences, itwas
not tobeexpected thatcompleteharmony would
prevail throughout all the subfigures.But
if the changes of phaseandform
in terrestrial periodicities to which ex- tendedreferences have been made,are dueto radical changes in the solar radiation,itwould
naturallybeexpectedthat similar mutations ofphase andform
wouldtendto occur inallterrestrial periodicities andallstations at aboutthesame
time.Figure 38 seemsto
show
thatonthewholethisexpectationis fairly supportedbythefacts.Though
exceptions occur, thereisa prevailing tendency for inversions to occur in all periodicities and all stations simultaneously. Thus, for illustration,at the years 1841, 1864, and1910, reversals or at least majormodifications of
form
occurredin nearlyall cases,and this also frequently happenedat theyear 1887.Itisbelieved that the exceptions are neither
more numerous
normore
radical than might fairly be attributed to local terrestrial influences affecting conditionsdifferently atthese widely separatedstations.
Ifthisconclusionissound, modifications
may
wellbeexpectedfrom
theprediction I have venturedof solar variation for the years 1935, 1936. and 1937 as given in figure 7.For
on that basis it is very probable that a radical change in the phases or amplitudes of solar variation,or inboth, willhaveoccurred about 1934, being 115 years after 1819,andwillgreatlymodifysolarvariationinsubsequentyears.Butyetthisresultmightnot occur, foratseveralepochstheterrestrial periodicities appear to havecontinued stability for23 years or even longer,which mightcallfor asimilarlylong-livedstability inthesolar variation,and no mutation ofit in1934.
As
forthe third query, C,letusrestrictourinvestigationtothein- terval 1920-1930, forit isonly thenthat
we
have actualobservations of the amplitudes of the periodicities, both of thesolarradiationand theterrestrial temperature. Intable 13 I give theamplitudes of the periodicities expressed in percentages of the solar constant (1.94 calories per square centimeter per minute) and in percentages of the absolutetemperatureof theearth,whichItakeas290°Centigrade.NO. 10 SOLAR RADIATION
AND WEATHER
STUDIESABBOT
87u o
0\•*ro•*00 -r
2
^S^°
f3o<
««