BAB VIII PENUTUP
B. Saran
4. Bagi Peneliti Selanjutnya
Peneliti lebih lanjut, direkomendasikan meneliti selanjutnya dapat dikembangkan dengan jumlah populasi lebih banyak dan jumlah variabel yang diteliti juga ditambah, sehingga dapat menghasilkan hasil yang lebih akurat. Analisa data yang digunakan untuk penellitian berikutnya tidak hanya pada analisis univariat dan bivariat saja, tetapi dapat dilakukan analisa secara multivariat.
70 DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Presiden Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan. Jakarta.2009:
Hal 4.
2. WHO. Global Status Report On Road Safety 2015. WHO Library-in- Publication Datas. Switzerland. 2015: Hal 2
3. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. Statistik Transportasi Darat 2014.
CV.Ryan Indah. Jakarta. 2014 : Hal 17-19
4. Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Daerah Sulawesi Selatan Direktorat Lalu Lintas. Anatomi Laka Lantas tahun 2015. Makassar. 2015. Hal 1.
5. Antonius HP, Thesis: Profil Penderita Fraktur Klavikula Di RSUP Haji Adam Malik Medan Periode Januari 2013-Desember 2014. Program Pendidikan Dokter Spesialis Ilmu Orthopaedi Traumatologi. Fakultas Kedokteran: Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.2015: Hal 1-3.
6. Riyadiana W, Subik IP. Profil Keparahan Cedera Pada Korban Kecelakaan Sepeda Motor Di Instalasi Gawat Darurat RSUP Fatmawati.Universa Medicina. 2007;26(2): Hal 5-6.
7. Simone P, David G, Marco M, Marco P, Giovabi Z, Rosario S, et al.
Advanced Accident Research System Based On a Medical and Enggineering Data in The Metropolitan Area Of Florebce. Piantini et al.
BMC Emergency Medicine 2013, 13(3): Hal 11-12:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/147-277x/13/3.
8. Putri CA. Karakteristik Kecelakaan Dan Faktor Penyebab Kecelakaan Pada Lokasi Blackspot Di Kota Kayu Agung.Teknik Sipil Universitas Sriwijaya .2014: 2355-374X: Hal 4
9. American Academy Of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Fracture (Broken Bones).
2012. Hal 1-3.
10. Djayalangkara H, Lisal JI., Rafiah S et al. Buku Ajar Anatomi Biomedik 1. Bagian Anatomi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Hasanuddin.
Makassar. 2013. 14-16, 19-25
71 11. John F.Sarwark,MD. Essentials Of Musculoskeletal Care 4. American Academy Of Orthopaedic Surgeons.United South American (USA). 2010.
12. Maier D, Jager M, Strohm PC, Sudkamp NP. Treatment Of Proximal Humeral Fractures-a Review Of Current Concepts Enlightened By Basic Principles.Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae Et Traumatology Cechos. 2012:
79. Hal 1-2
13. American Academy Of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Distal Humerus Fracture Of The Elbow. 2013
14. American Academy Of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Distal Radius Fracture (Broken Wrist). 2013.
15. Shah H, Chavali V, Daveshwar R, Adolescent Volar Barton Fracture With Open Physis Treated With Volar Plating Using Principle. J Malaysian
Orthopaedic. 2015 9 (2).Available
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1507.014
16. Babu SH, Satish K, Babu GS, Na: resh E. A Clinical Study Proximal Femur Nail (PFN) In The Management Of Communited Intertrochanteric Fractures Of The Femur. 2015 oct 26; 2(43) : 7558.
http://10.18410/jebmh/2015/1023.
17. Neumann MV, Niemeyer P, Sudkamp NP, Sthrohm PC. Patella Fracture- a Review Of Classification, Genesis and Evaluation Of Treatment. Acta Chirurigiae Orthopaedicae Et Traumatologiae Cechosl. 2014: 81. Hal 303- 302.
18. American Academy Of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Tibia (Shinbone) Shaft Fracture. 2013.
19. Sawarbandhie RJ. A Thesis For M.ch (Orthopaedics) : Management Of Tibial Plateau Fracture. University Of Seychelles & American Institute Of Medicine (USAIM). 2012.
20. Anonim. (1 Februari 2016). Profil Awal Bros Makassar. Diperoleh 25 Januari 2017. Dari http://listrumahsakit.com/profil-awal-bros-makassar/.
21. Anonim. (30 Januari 2017). Sejarah RS.Dr.Wahidin Sudirohusodo
Makassar. Di peroleh 2 Februari 2017. Dari
http://www.rsupwahidin.com/homepage/?page=sejarah.
72 22. Lucky Riandini I et al. Gambaran Luka Korban Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang Dilakukan Pemeriksaan di RSUP Dr. M. Djamil Padang. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Andalas. 2015; 4(2). Hal 5. Available http://jurnal.fk.unand.ac.id.
23. Dos Santos F, Silveira LO, Castillo JJAQ et al. Epidemiological Profile Of Extremity Fracture In Victims Of Motorcycle Accidents. Universitario Evangelico de Curtitibia Brzail. 2015 ; 23(1). Hal 4. Available DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522015230100998
24. Syam Y, Noersasongko D, Sunaryo H. Fraktur Akibat Osteoporosis.
Bagian Beda Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado
.2014; 2(2) Hal 1,6. Availbale :
http://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/eclinic/article/viewFile/4885/4410 25. Ebeling PR, Daly RM, Kerr DA et al. Building healthy Bones Throught
life :an evidence-inform strategy to prevent osteoporosis Australia.2012.
Hal 18. Available:
http://www.osteoporosis.org.au/sites/default/files/files/oa_consumer_ed2_
Aug2014.pdf.
26. J. Cowie dan C.Court-Brwon. Fokus On Tibial Fracture. The Journal Of Bone Joint Surgery. Edinbrugh. 2012. Hal : 1.
27. Salmien S. Femoral Shaft Fracture Adults; Epidemiologi,Fracture Patterns, Nonunions, and Fatigue Fracture. The Faculty Medicine of The University of Helsinki. 2005. Hal: 11
28. David C, Landy M.PH, Robert A.Norton, et al. Upper Extremity Fractures In Pedestrian Versus Motor Vehicle Accidents: AN Underappeciated Concern. Departement Orthopaedics University Of Miami Miller School Medicine. 2008. Vol 30: Hal 101
29. Syaikh‟Abdul „Aziz bin Fathi as-Sayyid Nada. Mausu‟atul Aadaab al- Islamiyyah (Ed.Indonesia: Ensiklopedi Adab Islam). Pustaka Imam
Syafi‟i. Jakarta. 2007. Available :
https://moslemkalijati.wordpress.com/2012/08/19/adab-adab-ketika- berkendaraan/
30. Syaikh Sa‟id bin „ Ali Wahf Al-Qahthani. Hisnul Muslim. Maktab Dakwah dan Bimbingan Jaliyah Rabwah.2010. Available : https://moslemkalijati.wordpress.com/2012/08/19/adab-adab-ketika- berkendaraan/
JENIS FRAKTUR BERDASARKAN EKSTREMITAS YANG TERKENA KLL
Statistics ekstremitas
N
Valid 82
Missing 0
ekstremitas
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
atas 34 41.5 41.5 41.5
bawah 48 58.5 58.5 100.0
Total 82 100.0 100.0
2
JENIS FRAKTUR BERDASARKAN EKSTREMITAS TERKENA NON KLL
ekstremitas
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
ekstremitas atas 6 28.6 28.6 28.6
ekstremitas bawah 15 71.4 71.4 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
JENIS FRAKTUR KLL
Statistics jenisfraktur
N
Valid 103
Missing 0
jenisfraktur
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
Klavikula 16 15.5 15.5 15.5
Humerus 7 6.8 6.8 22.3
Radius 11 10.7 10.7 33.0
Ulna 3 2.9 2.9 35.9
carpal 1 1.0 1.0 36.9
pelvis 2 1.9 1.9 38.8
femur 20 19.4 19.4 58.3
patella 2 1.9 1.9 60.2
Tibia 26 25.2 25.2 85.4
fibula 11 10.7 10.7 96.1
tarsal 4 3.9 3.9 100.0
Total 103 100.0 100.0
JENIS FRAKTUR NON KLL
Statistics
@9 N
Valid 24
Missing 0
@9
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
Humerus 4 16.7 16.7 16.7
Radius 3 12.5 12.5 29.2
Ulna 2 8.3 8.3 37.5
femur 9 37.5 37.5 75.0
Tibia 4 16.7 16.7 91.7
fibula 2 8.3 8.3 100.0
Total 24 100.0 100.0
JENIS KELAMIN KLL FRAKTUR
Statistics JK
N
Valid 77
Missing 0
JK
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
lakilaki 59 76.6 76.6 76.6
perempuan 18 23.4 23.4 100.0
Total 77 100.0 100.0
JENIS KELAMIN NON KLL FRAKTUR
JK
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
laki-laki 16 76.2 76.2 76.2
Perempuan 5 23.8 23.8 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
JENIS FRAKTUR BERDASARKAN BANYAKNYA TULANG TERKENA TERKENA KLL
Statistics multipletidak
N
Valid 77 Missing 0
multipletidak
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
multiple 16 20.8 20.8 20.8
single 61 79.2 79.2 100.0
Total 77 100.0 100.0
JENIS FRAKTUR BERDASARKAN BANYAKNYA TULANG TERKENA TERKENA NON KLL
multipel
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
singel fraktur 18 85.7 85.7 85.7
multipel fraktur 3 14.3 14.3 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
USIA KLL
Usia
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
0-5 tahun 1 1.3 1.3 1.3
5-11 tahun 6 7.8 7.8 9.1
12-25 tahun 27 35.1 35.1 44.2
26-45 tahun 24 31.2 31.2 75.3
46-65 tahun 15 19.5 19.5 94.8
>65 tahun 4 5.2 5.2 100.0
Total 77 100.0 100.0
Statistics Usia
N
Valid 77
Missing 0
USIA NON KLL FRAKTUR
Statistics usia
N
Valid 21
Missing 0
usia
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
0-5 tahun 3 14.3 14.3 14.3
12-25 tahun 4 19.0 19.0 33.3
26-45 tahun 5 23.8 23.8 57.1
46-65 6 28.6 28.6 85.7
>65 tahun 3 14.3 14.3 100.0
Total 21 100.0 100.0
LAMPIRAN BIVARIAT
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
etcausa * frakturtidak 114 100.0% 0 0.0% 114 100.0%
etcausa * frakturtidak Crosstabulation
frakturtidak Total fraktur nonfraktur
etcausa kll
Count 77 8 85
Expected Count 73.1 11.9 85.0
% within etcausa 90.6% 9.4% 100.0%
% within frakturtidak 78.6% 50.0% 74.6%
% of Total 67.5% 7.0% 74.6%
nonkll
Count 21 8 29
Expected Count 24.9 4.1 29.0
% within etcausa 72.4% 27.6% 100.0%
% within frakturtidak 21.4% 50.0% 25.4%
% of Total 18.4% 7.0% 25.4%
Total
Count 98 16 114
Expected Count 98.0 16.0 114.0
% within etcausa 86.0% 14.0% 100.0%
% within frakturtidak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 86.0% 14.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.920a 1 .015
Continuity Correctionb 4.509 1 .034
Likelihood Ratio 5.281 1 .022
Fisher's Exact Test .027 .021
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.868 1 .015
N of Valid Cases 114
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.07.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Asymp. Std.
Errora
Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .228 .106 2.477 .015c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .228 .106 2.477 .015c
N of Valid Cases 114
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
0
Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Odds Ratio for etcausa (kll / nonkll) 3.667 1.230 10.931 For cohort frakturtidak = fraktur 1.251 .989 1.582 For cohort frakturtidak = nonfraktur .341 .141 .826
N of Valid Cases 114
2