CHAPTER IV RESEARCH RESULT AND DISCUSSION
1. Description of Research Setting
a. Brief History About the Establishment of State Junior High School 8 of Metro in East Lampung.
This classroom action research was conducted atState Junior High School 8 of Metro in East Lampung.
State Junior High School 8 Metro East Lampung stands on a land area of 15,000 M2 on the basis of the Decree of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 2910199 on October 20th 1998.
Since the enactment of Law no. 20 of 2003 on the national system and PP no. 19 of 2005 on national education standards, have en couraged changes to the education management system in Metro City. The learning process at State Junior High School 8 Metro have imposed an educational unit curriculum (KTSP) for grades VII to class IX by applying contextual learning.
State Junior High School 8 Metrohave changed leader four times. These school had been led by the following principals:
1) H.Rozili.Z.Msc 1998 – 1999
2) Dra.Hj.Mulyasari 1999 – 2001
3) Drs.Bambang Irawan 2001 – 2006 4) Gono Irianto, S.Pd.M.M 2006 – 2012 5) Slamet, S.Pd 2012 up until now.
b. The Condition of Teachers in State Junior High School 8 Metro
The data of teachers inacademic year of 2017/2018 based on the employment of the status, it can be identified as follow;
Table 4
The Data of Teachers in State Junior High School 8 Metro
N o
Mata Pelajaran Permane nt
NON Permane
nt
Total
1 Civic Education 2 2
2 Religion a.
Islamic Study 4 4
b. Protes
tant
c. Chatol
ik 1 1
d. Hindu 1 1
e. Budha
f. Kongh
uchu 3 Indonesian
Language
6 6
4 English 5 5
5 History 5 5
6 Phycical Education
3 2 5
7 Mathematic 7 4 11
8 Physic 6 6
9 Biology 4 4
1 0
Sociology 2 2
1 1
Art 2 2
1 2
English Language 1 1
1 3
Lampung Language
2 2
1 4
Counseling 5 2 7
Total 52 12 64
Source: The documentation result
Table 5
The Data of Staff in State Junior High School 8 Metro
No Staf Permane
nt
NON Permane
nt
Total
1. Administration Staf 5 3 8
2. Laboratory assistant 2 2
3. Librarian 1 1
4. Security 1 1
5. Cleaning Service 3 3
6. Electric Technician 1 1
Total 8 8 16
Source: The documentation result of teacher in academic year of 2017/2018State Junior High School 8 Metro.
c. The Quantity of State Junior High School 8 Metro
The quantity of State Junior High School 8 MetroStudents in academic year of 2017/2018 can be identified as follows;
Table 6
The Quantity of the Students at State Junior High School 8 Metro
No Class Sex
Total Male Female
1. VII 110 80 190
2. VIII 90 108 198
3. IX 64 60 124
Total 264 248 512
Source: The documentation result of teacher in academic year of 2017/2018State Junior High School 8 Metro
d. Facilities and Infrastructure
The facilities and infrastructure of State Junior High School 8 Metro in academic year of 2017/2018 can be identified as follows;
Table 7
The Facilities and Infrastructure in State Junior High School 8 Metro
No Facilities
Conditions
Total Good Slightly
damage d
Seriousl y damage
d 1. Headmaster
room
1 1
2. Teacher room
1 1
3. Office house 1 1
4. Library 1 1
5. Computar lab
1 1
6. Science lab 1 1
7. Hall 1 1
8. Mosque 1 1
Total 8 8
Source: The documentation result of facilities and infrastructure in academic year of 2017/2018State Junior High School 8 Metro
e. Curriculum
Table 8
Curriculum in State Junior High School 8 Metro N
o
Periode Grade Curriculum
1. 2013/2014 VII, VIII, IX Cur th 2006
2. 2014/2015 VII, VIII, IX Cur 2006
3. 2015/2016 VII, VIII, IX Cur 2008
4. 2016/2017 VII, VIII, IX Cur 2008
5. 2017/2018 VII, VIII, IX Cur 2008
f. Location Sketch
The location sketch of State Junior High School 8 Metro in academic year of 2017/2018 can be identified as follows;
Picture 2
School Map Of State Junior High School 8 Metro A4
A5 A6
A5 A6 B1 B2
A7 A8 A9
F C
G
A1 A2
A3 D
Note : A1 – A15 : Classroom B1 – B2 : Teacher’s Room
C : Mosque
D : Science Laboratory E : Computer Laboratory F : Ceremony Yard
G : Library
1. Description of Data a. First Conditions
The learning was conducted on Thursday, November 16th 2017 at 07.30 until 09.00. All the students had already prepared when the teaching time came. The researcher greeted the students. The researcher told the students that the researcher would conduct the research in their class in order to know their ability of listening skill before doing the action of the classroom action research. The pre-test was administrated to the students to be finished individually.
The kind of the test was written test.The kind of test is multiplechoice. The table belows shows the data and the frequency of the students pre-test score:
Table 9 A1
0 A1
1 A1
2 A13 A14 A15 E
The Result of the Students’ Score in Pre-Test No Students’ Code Score Explanati
on
1 A M S 40 Failed
2 B F A 80 Passed
3 D A R 80 Passed
4 D W P 50 Failed
5 D Q P 30 Failed
6 D P S 30 Failed
7 E L S 20 Failed
8 E R D 50 Failed
9 F D A 50 Failed
10 F A 40 Failed
11 F A I 50 Failed
12 F P 30 Failed
13 J A S 40 Failed
14 I H 30 Failed
15 M N A 30 Failed
16 M N A P 40 Failed
17 N S 50 Failed
18 P L 50 Failed
19 P N 30 Failed
20 R F 80 Passed
21 R H 40 Failed
22 R A 30 Failed
23 R O 40 Failed
24 S Y P 20 Failed
25 S P A 40 Failed
26 Y A 60 Failed
Total Score 1130
Average 43,46
Highest Score 80
Lowest Score 20
Table 10
The Frequency of the Students’ Score in Pre- Test
No Score Frequenc Percentag Categor
y e y
1 ≥ 74 3 11,54% Passed
2 ≤ 74 23 88,46% Failed
Total 26 100%
Grap 1
Frequency of Students’ Passed at Pre-test
Failed Passed
0 5 10 15 20 25
23
3
Frequency
The result of the pre-test showed that there were 23 (88,46%) students failed to achive the minimum standard of mastery. Then, only 3 students (11,54%) got score up to the standard. The criterion of students who was successful in mastering the material was the students who got minimum score of 74. Learning
process is said succes when 70% students got score 74.
The fact showed that the result was unsatisfying.That is the reason, the researcherused Movie Media to increase listening skill at SMP 8 Metro .
b. Cycle 1 1) Planning
In this research, the researcher is as an English teacher with Mr. Agustinus Yuwono as collaborator.
Before the learning process began the researcher and the collaborator would like to discuss about, as follow:
(1)Preparing the material of Narrative.
(2)Preparing the lesson plan.
(3)To make the items that will be examined as the treatment and the post-test I in the cycle 1.
(4)Introducing the procedure of Movie Media as a media that used in the learning process.
(5)To make the observation sheet of the students activity 1.
The minimum mastery criteria (MMC) at State Junior High School 8 Metrofor English was 74. The lesson is Listening, Narrative especially. In this meeting, the students were expected by the teacher got specific information of the Narrative. In the first
and second meeting, the teacher would explain about The Material Narrative then applied the Movie Media as a media in learning process. Therefore, in the last meeting, the teacher would evaluate multiple choice for the 26 students of VIII A class. The evaluation was about multiple choice, it consisted of twenty questions based on the Narrative.
2) Acting
The action in the cycle 1 consist of two meetings, one meeting for the treatment and one meeting for the post test 1, there are:
a) The first meeting
The first meeting was conducted on Thursday, November16th 2017. In this meeting the collaborator was being the observer and the researcher was being the teacher.The meeting was started by praying and greeting, checking the attendence list, and asking the students condition. Before doing the next action, the teacher explained about movie media. Then the teacher gave information about narrative material. After the teacher explained the material, the teacher showed movie media with the title
“Beastalk”. After that, the teacher asked the
students to read and memorize the vocabularies that is in the movie, then the students watching movies. After the students watching the movies, the teacher asked the students to answer question in the movie one by one.
After give example of movie media the teacher asked the students what the problems were. The students said that listening is difficult because most of them were difficultto identify sound and have lack of vocabularies.
b) The Second Meeting
The second meeting was conducted on Friday, November 17th 2017 for 2x40 minutes. In this meeting, the researcher was being the teacher and the collaborator was being the observer. The meeting was started by praying and greeting, checking the attendence list, and asking the students condition.
At this meeting to measure the students’
listening skill after using Movie Media the researcher tasted the students by writen test.
There are twenty questions. The students did the test by individually. After thet, The teacher play audio, then the teacher asked the students to
answer the test. The teacher and students correct the result of assigment together. In this session, the researcher got the result of the students’ post test 1 in cycle 1. The result can be seen as follow:
Table 11
The Result of the Students’ Score in Post- Test 1
No Students’ Code Score Explanat ion
1 A M S 55 Failed
2 B F A 80 Passed
3 D A R 85 Passed
4 D W P 75 Passed
5 D Q P 70 Failed
6 D P S 40 Failed
7 E L S 40 Failed
8 E R D 65 Failed
9 F D A 75 Passed
10 F A 55 Failed
11 F A I 75 Passed
12 F P 50 Failed
13 J A S 75 Passed
14 I H 60 Failed
15 M N A 50 Failed
16 M N A P 60 Failed
17 N S 60 Failed
18 P L 75 Passed
19 P N 60 Failed
20 R F 85 Passed
21 R H 75 Passed
22 R A 50 Failed
23 R O 60 Failed
24 S Y P 50 Failed
25 S P A 65 Failed
26 Y A 85 Passed
Total Score 1675
Average 64,42
Highest Score 85
Lowest Score 40
Table 12
The Frequency of the Students’ Score in Post-Test 1
No Score Frequency Percenta ge
Categor y
1 ≥ 74 10 38,46% Passed
2 ≤ 74 16 61,54% Failed
Total 26 100%
Graph 2
Frequency of Students’ Passed at Post-test 1 in cycle 1
Failed Passed
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
16
10
Frequency
Based on the data above can be seen that 16 students (61,54%) got score less than standard and 10 students (38,46%) got score up to the standard. It was higher than the result of pre-test. The criterion of students who was successful in mastering the material was the students who got minimum score of
74. Learning process is said succes when 70%
students got score 74. The fact showed that the result was unsatisfying.
3) Observing
In observation of teacher’s action the researcher presented two meeting in cycle 1 of learning to find the information of the monolog in listening lesson.
This observation was conducted by the collaborator, Mr. Agustius Yuwono S.Pd. He is English teacher for the eighth grade students of State Junior High School 8 Metro.
The result of learning process to increase the students’ listening skill by using movie media in cycle 1 was rising than before. It can be seen from the score at pre-test and post-test.
The using of movie media in the learning process is something new at this class, because the students are supposed to be active, not only in a pair at every students, each one of them , also be expected to be active in this case, the first meeting many of them still confuse to determine main idea.
In the test 1 there were 3(11,54%) out students got good score. Although, only 10 the students who got good score. But, the result of the students’ test was better than students’ yet before giving
treatment.The data of the students’ activity can be seen in the table bellows:
Table 13
The Result of the Students’ Activity in the Learning Process of Cycle 1 N
o Students’ Activity Frequen cy
Percent age
% 1 Giving attention to the
teacher’s instruction 24 92,31%
2 Giving the respond to
the teacher’s
explanation-question 18 69,23%
3 Asking-answering the question to-from the
teacher-other students 15 57,69%
4 Doing the assignment 26 100%
Total 26
Graph 3
Frequency of Students’ Activities in Cycle 1
Giving attention to the teacher’s instruction 92.31%
69.23%
57.69%
100.00%
The data above explained that the total of students who paid attention to the teacher
explanation were 24 students (92,31%), 18 students (69,23%) responded to the teacher explanation.
Students were inactive in learning process, they were only 15 students (57,69%). 26 students (100%) were Contributed the active ways to doing assigment.
4) Reflecting
Based on the result of cycle I, it can be seen that most of students get difficulty in answering the questions about narrative. It happens because the students do not understand the meaning of the monolog although the teacher has guided the students to do the task. In the end of cycle 1 the result of students’ activities increase from the first meeting until next meeting. The students’ score also increase from the average in the pre test 42 and the average of post test 64 but it was not fulfill the completeness Standard at least 70% students must get ≥74. In the post test of cycle 1 showed that only 10 students who got score more than 74. It is not fulfill the MMC.
c. Cycle II
Because the action of cycle I was not success, in order that in the stage need to be held the cycle II to repair the weakness in the cycle I. The steps of the cycle II as follow:
1) Planning
Based on the reflection that had been conducted in the cycle 1, the researcher and the collaborator made the planning of the action, as follow:
(1) Preparing the material of narrative.
(2) Preparing the lesson plan.
(3) Preparing the items that will be examined as the treatment and the post-test in the end cycle.
(4) Giving instruction to the students as following the procedure of movie media for learning.
(5) Preparing the observation sheet of the students’ activity.
2) Acting
The action in the cycle II, consist of two meetings, one meetings for the action, and one meeting for the post-test 2 in the end cycle. They are:
a) The First Meeting
Based on the learning implementation plan II, the allocation of the time for two meetings (2 x 40 minutes), therefore, the first and the second meeting were used as the implementation of the action in cycle II.
The first meeting was conducted on Thursday, November 23th, 2017 for 2x40 minutes. In this
meeting, the researcher as a teacher and the collaborator as a observer. This meeting was started by praying and greeting, asking the students’ condition and checking the attendence list. Then, the teacher gave the information about the subject that would study.The teacher also gave the example of narrative. After that, the teacher showed the movie media with the title “The Princess and The Dragon”.After that, the teacher asked the students to read and memorize the vocabularies that is in the movie, then the students watching movies. After the students watching the movies, the teacher asked the students to answer question in the movie one by one.
b) The Second Meeting
The second meeting was conducted on Friday, November 24th 2017. This meeting used as the post-test II in the end of cycle II, for 2 x 40 minutes the students was given the action. The researcher gave post test to the students. In this meeting, most of students could answer well. It can be seen from the result of post test II. There were 24 students got appropriate score.
Table 14
The Result of the Students’ Score in Post- Test II
N
o Students’ Code Score Explanatio n
1 A M S 85 Passed
2 B F A 80 Passed
3 D A R 85 Passed
4 D W P 75 Passed
5 D Q P 95 Passed
6 D P S 85 Passed
7 E L S 85 Passed
8 E R D 70 Failed
9 F D A 90 Passed
10 F A 70 Failed
11 F A I 90 Passed
12 F P 80 Passed
13 J A S 85 Passed
14 I H 90 Passed
15 M N A 85 Passed
16 M N A P 70 Failed
17 N S 90 Passed
18 P L 90 Passed
19 P N 85 Passed
20 R F 80 Passed
21 R H 95 Passed
22 R A 75 Passed
23 R O 90 Passed
24 S Y P 85 Passed
25 S P A 90 Passed
26 Y A 90 Passed
Total Score 2.190
Average 85.23
Highest Score 95
Lowest Score 70
Table 15
The Frequency of the Students’ Score in Post-Test II
No Score Frequency Percenta ge
Categor y
1 ≥ 74 23 88,46% Passed
2 ≤ 74 3 11,54% Failed
Total 26 100%
Graph 4
Frequency of Students’ Passed at Post-test 2 in cycle 2
Failed Passed
0 5 10 15 20 25
3
23
Frequency
Based on the data above, it can be seen that there was an increasing from the score of post-test 1 and post-test 2. The highest score was 95 and the lowest score was 70. According to standard score, 70%
students had passed the test. Most of students could develop their listening skill. It means that cycle 2 was succesful.
3) Observing
In this step, there were also four indicators used to know the students’ activities like in learning process previously.
Based on the result of the observation sheet in cycle II, the researcher indicated that learning process in cycle II was successful. The result score of students’
learning activities observation, as follow:
Table 16
The Result of the Students’ Activity in the Learning Process of Cycle II N
o Students’ Activity Frequen cy
Percent age
% 1 Giving attention to the
teacher’s instruction 24 92,31%
2 Giving the respond to the teacher’s
explanation-question 21 80,77%
3 Asking-answering the question to-from the
teacher-other students 22 84,62%
4 Doing the assignment 26 100%
Total 30
Graph 5
Frequency Of Students’ Activities in Cycle 2
Giving attention to the teacher’s instruction
92% 81% 85% 100%
The table above showed that the students’ activity in cycle II was improved. The students’ activity that had high percentage were pay attention of teacher’s explanation (92,31%)and the students who gave respond to the teacher explanation (80,77%). Then, the students was the studentsask/answer the question fro the tacher or other students (86,62%), and the lastthe students Contributed the active ways to doing assigment (100%).Based on the result above, the researcher indicated that learning process in cycle II was successful because the fifth students’ activity got percentage ≥80%.
Based on the result of the research in cycle II, it could be inferred that cycle II was successful. The
researcher felt satisfied about the result of the research. There were ≥80% of students passed the examination. It means the students’ listening skill had improved. From the result above, the researcher concluded that this research was successful and would be not continued in the next cycle.
4) Reflecting
The result of cycle 2 was be better than cycle 1.
There was significant increase in this cycle. The condition of the class was getting better than before. It can be seen that the most of the students have not difficulty in listening skill. It happened because the teacher used Movie Media as a media. The students have serious in doing the assignment. In this meeting, most of students got good score. It happened caused the teacher and the researcher has revised and increased the teaching and learning process in cycle 1.
In the second cycle, the students were also active to do assignment than before. They also enjoyed in learning process. It means that Movie Media is efective technique to increase the students listening skill. The students who got score more than 74 were 23 (88,46%) out of 26 students.
B. Discussion
1. Interpretation and Learning Result in Cycle I and Cycle II
There was an increasing score of the students’ pre- test, post test 1 and post test 2 in cycle I and cycle II. This is the result score as follow:
Table 17
The Result Score of Students’ Pre test, Post-test 1 and Post test 2
NO Stude nts’
Code
Cycle I Incre asing
%
Cycle
II Incre asing
% Criteria Pre-
test
Post -test
I
Post test
II
1 A M S 40 55 38 85 54,5 Increase
d
2 B F A 80 80 0 80 0 Constan
t
3 D A R 80 85 6,25 85 0 Increase
d
4 D W P 50 75 50 75 0 Increase
d
5 D Q P 30 50 66,6 95 90 Increase
d
6 D P S 30 40 33,3 85 112,5 Increase
d
7 E L S 20 40 100 85 112,5 Increase
d
8 E R D 50 65 30 70 7,69 Increase
d
9 F D A 50 75 50 90 20 Increase
d
10 F A 40 55 37,5 70 27,27 Increase
d
11 F A I 50 75 50 90 20 Increase
d
12 F P 30 50 66,6 80 60 Increase
d
13 J A S 40 75 87,5 85 13,33 Increase
d
14 I H 30 60 100 90 50 Increase
d
15 M N A 30 50 66,6 85 70 Increase
d 16 M N A
P 40 60 50 70 16,67 Increase
d
17 N S 50 60 20 90 50 Increase
d
18 P L 50 75 50 90 20 Increase
d
19 P N 30 60 100 85 41,67 Increase
d
20 R F 80 85 6,25 80 -5 Decreas
ed
21 R H 40 75 87,5 95 46,6 Increase
d
22 R A 30 50 66,6 75 50 Increase
d
23 R O 40 60 50 90 50 Increase
d
24 S Y P 20 50 150 85 70 Increase
d
25 S P A 40 65 62,5 90 30,7 Increase
d
26 Y A 60 85 42 90 5,8 Increase
d Total 1.13
0 1.67
5 2.190
Average 43,4
6 64,4
2 84,23
From the increasing each cycle, it can be seen know that the use of Movie Media can increase the students’
listening skill, because the students could understood the meaning of each movie, so they could increase their
listening skill. It can be seen from the average 64,42% from the data become 84,23% in the cycle II. It means that the students could achieve the target, the target is 70%
students gained score ≥ 74.
Table 18
Frequency The Result of Students’ Score on Pretest, Post test 1, Post test 2
Name Frequenc
y Percenta
ge Category
Pretest 3 11,54% Passed
Post Test
1 10 38,46% Passed
Post Test
2 23 88,46% Passed
Graph 6
Graph of the Result of Pre-test, Post-test I and Post- test II
Pretest Post Test 1 Post Test 2 0
5 10 15 20 25
3
10
23
Frequency
There was an increasing of the students who got score up to the standard from the pre-test to the post-test 1,
and from post-test 1 to the post-test 2. From 3 students (11,54%) in pre-test to 10 students (38,46%) in post-test 1 and become23 students (73,68% ) in post-test 2.
The researcher was success if 70% of students able to achieving the minimum mastery criteria (MMC), that was 74. Based on the result of pre-test and post-test, it could be seen that Movie Media was able to increase the students listening skill significantly based on the students’
average before and after given the treatment. The students’ average in the pre-test was 43,46%, in post test 1 was 64,38% and in post-test 2 was 87,88%.
Based on the explanation above, the researcher concluded that the research was succesful because the result score of the students had achieved the indicator of succes that was 70% with the minimum mastery criteria was 74.
2. Result of the Students’ Activities
This observation sheet result was gotten when the learning process happened by the researcher. The result of the students’ activities in cycle I and cycle II could be seen as follow:
Table 19
Result of the students’ activities in Cycle I & Cycle II
N
o Students’ Activity Cycle
I Cycle
II Increasing