CASE STUDY: SHIPYARD)
2. MATERIAL/METHODOLOGY
3.2. Data of Respondents
3.2.2. Results and Measurement Analysis of Technology Aspects
From some of the respondents' samples taken from both shipyards whose market share has gone
ICMST 2019 August, 1 2019 international and that is still local, the values
obtained are part of the TCC (Technology Contribution Coefficient) calculation, while the values obtained are as follows:
a. Estimated degree of sophistication 1) Technoware
Table 3. Results of assessment of the sophistication of technoware
The use of tools or machinery in shipyards with a local market share is still very low, using only manual production equipment and some tools used are traditional equipment and so on, while at the Whale shipyard which is a shipyard whose market share has gone international, the level the highest production equipment used is sophisticated and automatic equipment.
2) Humanware
Table 4. Results of assessment of humanware sophistication
In the humanware section, the highest level for shark shipyards is that workers in the infrastructure section are able to repair damaged production equipment, with an upper 6 value, because equipment that is still at a standard level is different from the whale shipyard. This shipyard also has a level of humanware, namely
workers in the infrastructure section are able to repair damaged production equipment, the points given are 8, because the equipment in the infrastructure section has a high level of complexity, and also because the production equipment used in the frame is a sophisticated type and automatic.
3) Infoware
Table 5. Results of assessment of infoware sophistication
In the Sharks shipyard, having a low inforware value of only 3, and also the expert who plays a role in the information section in the rattan industry is only the owner / owner, because there are no office or administrative parts, while the Whale shipyard is competent in the field information, with the existence of a website and a clear flow of information, so that shipyards are easily recognized by consumers.
4) Organware
Table 6. Results of assessment of the degree of sophistication of organware
The organware assessment was also won by the Pope's shipyard, because the organization in this company was very clear, the job desk was clear, while in the Sharks shipyard it was not so
concerned with the organization, because the workers in this shipyard were still family.
b.
Assessment of state of the art (SOTA) 1) TechnowareTable 7. Calculation of SOTA Whale (International) and Shark (Local) shipyard
technoware
Based on table 7. above it is concluded that the rating value of SOTA (State of the Art) in the whale shipyard is greater than that of the shark shipyard. The rating value of SOTA for the assessment of technoware in the Sumber jaya Rattan industry is 0.556, while for the Sharks shipyard is 0.422.
2) Humanware
Table 8. Calculation of SOTA humanware
Based on table 8. above it is concluded that the rating value of SOTA (State of the Art) in the whale shipyard is greater than that of the
Sharks shipyard. The rating value of SOTA for the assessment of humanware at the Whale shipyard is 0.811, while for shipyard Sharks is 0.6.
3) Infoware
Table 9. Calculations of SOTA infoware Whale Shipyards (International) and Sharks (Local)
Based on table 9. above it is concluded that the rating value of SOTA (State of The Art) in the whale shipyard is greater than that of the Sharks shipyard. The rating value of SOTA for the infoware assessment at the whale shipyard is 0.917, while for the shipyard Shark is 0.25.
4) Humaware
Table 10. Calculation of SOTA infoware Whale shipyards (International) and Sharks (Local).
Based on table 10. above it is concluded that the rating value of SOTA (State of the Art) in the whale shipyard is greater than that of the Sharks shipyard. The rating value of SOTA for the assessment of organware at the whale
ICMST 2019 August, 1 2019 shipyard is 0.875, while for shipyard sharks is
0.79.
c.
Calculation of component contributions 1) Calculation of component contributions to the Pope's shipyard.Table 11. Calculation of component contributions to the Whale shipyard
Based on the calculations in table 11. It is known that the highest contribution value in the whale shipyard is humanware with a contribution value of 0.67, and the lowest contribution value is infoware with a contribution value of 0.43.
2) Calculation of the contribution of components in the shark shipyard.
Table 12. Calculation of component contributions in Shark shipyard
d.
Intensity calculation of component contributions In this step, the thing that is done is to compare the technological components in pairs and in the form of hierarchy, and the method used is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method.1) Whale shipyard.
Table 13. The results of the intensity calculation of the contribution of the
components of the Whale shipyard
Based on table 13. it can be concluded that the technoware component has the highest weight of 0.45, which means that the technoware component is the most important component for the whale shipyard, while the infoware component has a weight of 0.09 and is the lowest weight, which means that the infoware component does not get more attention from the company. This may be caused by various factors, such as websites with less optimal use, information on the use of tools that are not yet available, and other information that has not been delivered to workers.
2) Shark Shipyard.
Table 14. Results of the intensity calculation of the contribution components of the Sharks
shipyard
Based on table 14. it can be concluded that, the humanware component has the highest weight of 0.49, which means that the humanware component is important for shark shipyards, this is probably the shark shipyard that is more concerned with the welfare of its
workers, with prosperous workers productivity will increase, while infoware components the lowest weight is 0.07, which means that this infoware component does not get more attention from the company. This may be caused by various factors such as the unavailability of a website that is a tool to introduce the rattan industry itself to the global community, it is unclear how many orders will be produced because manual storage is not computerized.
e.
TCC Calculation (Technology Coefficient Contribution)Table 15. Calculation of TCC Whale shipyards.
Tabel 16. Calculation of TCC Shark shipyards.
Based on table 15. and 16. It can be concluded that, the TCC value for the Whale shipyard is 0.57 which means that the classification of technology is within reasonable limits, while in the Sharks shipyard it is 0.38 which means that the classification of technology is low. Whereas when viewed from the level of technology, based on the TCC values above it can be concluded that the Whale shipyard, the level of its technology is semi- modern, and for the shipyard of the Sharks, the level of technology is semi-modern as well.
f.
THIO DiagramFigure 1. THIO diagram results
Based on the picture 1. THIO diagram results above can be concluded that the level of sophistication of each criterion of technological components ranges from 0.2 to 0.6. Based on the comparison of the two, the lowest contribution value of technology for Shark shipyard is infoware with a value of 0.25, and in the Whale shipyard the lowest contribution value of technology is infoware with a contribution value of 0.43, whereas for the highest contribution value of technology for Shark shipyard is Organware with 0.47, and in the Whale shipyard the highest contribution of technology is humanware with a contribution value of 0.67.
4. CONCLUSION
Based on the results of research carried out on two shipyards namely the Whale (International) and Shark (Local) shipyards, related to the measurement of technological content using the technometric method, it can be concluded as follows:
a. Based on the results of calculations and comparisons of technological content in Whale (International) and Sharks (Local) shipyards, it can be seen that the component that has the lowest technological component contribution value is Infoware in Shark shipyard which is 0.25 and the lowest contribution value of technology components is Humanware in shipyards The pope is equal to 0.67. There is a significant comparison between the
ICMST 2019 August, 1 2019 technological content of the whale shipyard and the
shark shipyard.
b. Based on the TCC rating scale, it can be concluded that the TCC value of the Whale shipyard is 0.57 which means that the classification of technology is within reasonable limits and when viewed from the technological level, based on the TCC values above it can be concluded that the whale shipyard is semi-modern, while the TCC value is Shark shipyard is 0.38, which means the classification of technology is at a low limit and when viewed from the level of technology, based on the TCC values above it can be concluded that the shark shipyard, the level of technology is semi modern as well. Based on the above comparison it can be concluded that, Shark shipyard needs to be improved in the level of technological components, especially the technology component with the lowest contribution value, namely infoware. Implementation implemented as an effort to increase the contribution of infoware components, one of which is by creating a website that is used as a medium to introduce and market products more globally, and it is hoped that with this website Sharks shipyards can increase sales, in addition to creating websites to increase technological content, especially the technoware component is to advertise on professional sites or websites.
REFERENCE
Andriansyah. (2005). Transportation Management in Studies and Theories.
Arsyad A, M. U. (2005). Technology assessment of the press tool production process at PT.
precision kenza pratama with technometric approach. Surabaya: ITS Surabaya.
Cahyono. (2015). Technology Assessment Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Technometrics in the Production Department.
122–129.
Delee. (2012). Magic of Creativepreneur: How You Can Be Innovatively Miraculous and Become
an Entrepreneur Business Success in the Creative Economy Industry World.
ESCAP. (1989). Technology Atlas Project : Aan Overview of the Framework for Tevhnology- based, Development Economic and Social Commision for Asia and Pasific . United Nations.
Fauzan A, N. Y. (2009). Technology Level Assessment of DOK Guidance for BTPI UPT Muara Angke Jakarta. XVIII:93–101.
Hany, I. (2000). Content Analysis of Technology on Small-Scale Industrial Business Performance.
Thesis.
Harris I, W. Y. (2015). ICT in multimodal transport and technological trends: Unleashing potential for the future. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 159: 88–
103.
Indrawati. (2003). Analysis of the Effect of Technological Components on Technoware, Humanware, Inforware, and Organware on the Main Factors of Small Industry Competitiveness ”. Thesis.
MS, B. (1987). Management of Technology.
Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences .
Sabardi, W. (2008). Analysis of Relationship between Technoware Components, Humanware, Inforware and Organware with Employee Satisfaction Dimodetor Leadership Style at PT. Ecogreen Oleochemicals Medan.
Medan: University of North Sumatra.
Sandora R. (2008). Sophisticated Technology Performance Analysis Through a Technometric Model Approach.
Sultan, A. C. (2017). 3G Technology Content Analysis on Telkomsel Flash Services With Techometric Methods at PT. South Jakarta Telkomsel ". Jakarta.
Wiraatmaja, I. M. (2004). The Assesment of Technology in Supporting Industry Located at Tegal Industrial Park. Proceddings of Marine Transportation Engineering Seminar.
Yanthi, E. R. (2018). Analysis of the contribution of technological components (technoware, humanware, infoware, orgaware) to freight train service companies with a model approach. Bogor: Bogor Agricultural Institute.