• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

BAB V KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN

5.2 Saran

Berdasarkan hasil analisis, pembahasan, implikasi manajerial, dan kesimpulan dari penelitian ini dapat dijadikan saran untuk bank digital Jenius BTPN. Penelitian ini masih memiliki kekurangan dan keterbatasan sehingga masih memerlukan penyempurnaan bagi penelitian di masa yang akan datang.

Oleh karena itu, berikut beberapa saran yang dapat diberikan kepada bank digital bank Jenius BTPN dan untuk penelitian selanjutnya sebagai berikut:

1. Bagi bank digital Jenius BTPN

a. Karena terbukti nasabah digital natives merasa puas dengan bank digital Jenius BTPN karena tingkat co-creation, sehingga bank digital Jenius BTPN perlu meningkatkan kembali kinerja co-creation-nya dengan memperbanyak kegiatan yang melibatkan nasabah, serta mempublikasikannya dengan cara yang unik dan kreatif, mempublikasikan lewat media sosial, web, dan aplikasi Jenius dengan memunculkan notifikasi di aplikasi apabila ada kegiatan co- creation yang akan diselenggarakan oleh bank Jenius BTPN.

b. Meningkatkan hubungan baik dengan nasabah dengan cara maintenance nasabah Jenius dengan memberikan penawaran- penawaran menarik dengan cara menghubungi nasabah secara

langsung dan mengirimkan promo menarik ke aplikasi Jenius yang dimiliki oleh nasabah terpilih yang sering melakukan transaksi menggunakan Jenius dan nasabah yang sering menyimpan dana di Jenius. Karena terbukti bahwa loyalitas nasabah Jenius dipengaruhi oleh tingkat co-creation-nya.

c. Menambah fitur transaksi keuangan baru yang dibutuhkan oleh nasabah Jenius serta melakukan update fitur transaksi keuangan yang sudah tersedia berdasarkan dari hasil kegiatan co-creation.

2. Bagi Peneliti Selanjutnya

Bagi peneliti selanjutnya disarankan untuk menguji kembali penelitian ini pada objek yang berbeda, dimana disarankan untuk menguji pada objek perusahaan non-jasa seperti perusahaan dagang yang memproduksi dan menjual produk seperti contohnya produk fashion (pakaian, sepatu, tas, kosmetik) yang mana perusahaan tersebut melibatkan pelanggan dalam kegiatan produksinya atau dapat dibilang bahwa perusahaan tersebut melakukan kegiatan co-creation dalam proses produksinya.

Berdasarkan hal tersebut diharapkan penelitian pada customer co- creation dimasa yang akan datang dapat mengukur dan mnganalisa studi empiris dengan menghasilkan hasil penelitian yang lebih baik dan bermanfaat.

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Aladwani, M. A. (2001). Online Banking: A field study of drivers, development challenges abd expectations. International Journal of Information

Management, 21(3), 213–225.

Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., Williams, T. A., Camm, J. D., & Cochran, J. J.

(2014). Statistics For Business and Economics 12e (12th ed.). Canada:

Cengage Learning.

Apriyani. (2017). Jenius Masuk Dalam Top 50 Digital Only Banks 2017 Dari Financial IT. Retrieved from http://infobanknews.com/jenius-masuk-dalam- top-50-digital-banks-2017-dari-financial/

Auta, E. M. (2010). E-Banking in Developing Economy: Empirical Evidence From Nigeria. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 5, 212–222.

Retrieved from

http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=6302168 8&site=ehost-live

Bank BTPN. (2016). Jenius. Retrieved from https://www.btpn.com/id/tentang- kami/segmen-usaha/jenius

Barquin, S., & HV, V. (2015). Digital Banking in Asia : What do consumers really want? McKinsey, (March), 1–12. Retrieved from

http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey

Offices/Malaysia/PDFs/Digital_Banking_in_Asia_What_do_consumers_re ally_want.ashx

Benckendorff, P., Moscardo, G., & Pendergast, D. (2010). Tourism and Generation Y. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53).

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Cambra-Fierro, J., Pérez, L., & Grott, E. (2017). “Towards a co-creation framework in the retail banking services industry: Do demographics influence?” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34(October 2016), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.10.007 Cicilia, S. (2018). Pengguna layanan digital banking BTPN Jenius tembus

350.000. Retrieved from http://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/pengguna- layanan-digital-banking-btpn-jenius-tembus-350000

Combes, B. (2009). Generation Y : Are they really digital natives or more like digital refugees ? Synergy, 7(1), 31–40.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0009400133

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2011). Business Research Methods (eleventh e). New York: Mc Graw-Hil/Irwinl.

De Wulf, K., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Iacobucci, D. (2014). Investments and

Relationships : Exploration. Journal of Marketing, 65(4), 33–50.

Dong, B., Evans, K. R., & Zou, S. (2008). The effects of customer participation in co-created service recovery. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0059-8 East, R., Gendall, P., Hammond, K., & Lomax, W. (2005). Consumer Loyalty:

Singular, Additive or Interactive? Australasian Marketing Journal, 13(2), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3582(05)70074-4

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete dengan program SPSS 23.

Semarang.

Giese, J. L., & Cote, J. a. (2009). Defining Consumer Satisfaction. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1(3), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2850.2008.01371.x

Grissemann, U. S., & Stokburger-Sauer, N. E. (2012). Customer co-creation of travel services: The role of company support and customer satisfaction with co-creation performance. Tourism Management, 33(6), 1483–1492.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.02.002

Gupta, S., & Zeithaml, V. (2006). Customer Metrics and Their Impact on Financial Performance. Marketing Science, 25(6), 718–739.

https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0221

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Vectors. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.019 Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010).

Consumer Cocreation in New Product Development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510375604 Jenius. (2018a). Features. Retrieved from https://www.jenius.com/features/send-

it/

Jenius. (2018b). Jenius: tabungan di dalam smartphone-mu. Retrieved from https://www.jenius.com/

Kristensson, P., Matthing, J., & Johansson, N. (2008). Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co - creation of new technology - based services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 19(4), 474–491. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230810891914

Liana, L. (2009). Penggunaan MRA dengan Spss untuk Menguji Pengaruh Variabel Moderating terhadap Hubungan antara Variabel Independen dan Variabel Dependen. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi DINAMIK, XIV(2), 90–97.

Lovelock, C., & Wirtz, J. (2011). Service Marketing People, Technology, Strategy (Seventh Ed). United Kingdom: Pearson.

Lupiyoadi, R. (2013). Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Salemba

Empat.

Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing Research An Applied Orientation (6th ed.).

New Jersey: Pearson.

Mathis, E. F., Kim, H. L., Uysal, M., Sirgy, J. M., & Prebensen, N. K. (2016).

The effect of co-creation experience on outcome variable. Annals of

Tourism Research, 57, 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.11.023 Michels, N., & Bowen, D. (2005). The relevance of retail loyalty strategy and

practice for leisure/tourism. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 11(1), 5–19.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766705050839

Oliver, R. L. (1976). Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: An alternative interpretation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 480–486. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.4.480 Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence Consumer Loyalty ?, 63(1999), 33–44. Retrieved

from http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mksc.1060.0221

Ordanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: A conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 3–23.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510385332

Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0

Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., & Pahnila, S. (2004).

Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Research, 14(3), 224–235.

https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240410542652

Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.

https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives,Digital Immigrants Part 1.

Roberts, D., & Hughes, M. (2014). Exploring consumers ’ motivations to engage in innovation through co-creation activitiesa, 48(1), 147–169.

https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2010-0637

Ryan, D., & Jones, C. (2016). Understanding Digital Marketing Marketing strategies for engaging the digital generation. Kogan Page.

Salehi, M., & Alipour, M. (2010). E-Banking in Emerging Economy: Empirical Evidence of Iran. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2, 201–

209. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v2n1p201

Satish Nambisan, Nambiisan, S., & Nambisan, S. (2002). Designing Virtual Customer Environments For New Product Development: Toward a Theory.

Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 392–413.

https://doi.org/10.2307/4134386

Srinivasan, S. S., Anderson, R., & Ponnavolu, K. (2002). Customer loyalty in e- commerce: An exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Retailing, 78(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00065-3 Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for

Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036

Wibowo. (2016). Analisa Regulasi Fintech dalam Membangun Perekonomian di Indonesia. Ekonomi Dan Bisnis.

Wymbs, C. (2011). Digital marketing: The time for a new “academic major” has arrived. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(1), 93–106.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475310392544

Yang, Z., & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: The role of switching costs. Psychology and Marketing, 21(10), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20030

LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1: Kuesioner Penelitian

Lampiran 1: Kuesioner Penelitian (Lanjutan)

Lampiran 1: Kuesioner Penelitian (Lanjutan)

Lampiran 1: Kuesioner Penelitian (Lanjutan)

Lampiran 1: Kuesioner Penelitian (Lanjutan)

Lampiran 1: Kuesioner Penelitian (Lanjutan)

Lampiran 1: Kuesioner Penelitian (Lanjutan)

Lampiran 2: Uji Validitas Pre-Test 1. Degree of Co-Creation

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,720 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 53,927

df 10

Sig. ,000

Anti-image Matrices

DOC1 DOC2 DOC3 DOC4 DOC5

Anti-image Covariance DOC1 ,343 -,229 -,195 -,057 ,069

DOC2 -,229 ,461 ,016 ,068 -,179

DOC3 -,195 ,016 ,431 -,154 -,112

DOC4 -,057 ,068 -,154 ,677 -,177

DOC5 ,069 -,179 -,112 -,177 ,674

Anti-image Correlation DOC1 ,669a -,576 -,506 -,119 ,144

DOC2 -,576 ,688a ,035 ,122 -,321

DOC3 -,506 ,035 ,758a -,285 -,208

DOC4 -,119 ,122 -,285 ,790a -,263

DOC5 ,144 -,321 -,208 -,263 ,747a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Component Matrixa

Component 1

DOC1 ,850

DOC2 ,772

DOC3 ,842

DOC4 ,659

DOC5 ,675

Extraction Method:

Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted.

Lampiran 2: Uji Validitas Pre-Test (Lanjutan) 2. Satisfaction with the Co-Creation Performance

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,697 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 38,583

df 3

Sig. ,000

Anti-image Matrices

SCP1 SCP2 SCP3

Anti-image Covariance SCP1 ,373 -,243 -,121

SCP2 -,243 ,370 -,126

SCP3 -,121 -,126 ,607

Anti-image Correlation SCP1 ,657a -,655 -,254

SCP2 -,655 ,656a -,266

SCP3 -,254 -,266 ,837a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Component Matrixa

Component 1

SCP1 ,905

SCP2 ,906

SCP3 ,818

Extraction Method:

Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted.

Lampiran 2: Uji Validitas Pre-Test (Lanjutan) 3. Satisfaction with the Company

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,663 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 46,557

df 3

Sig. ,000

Anti-image Matrices

SWC1 SWC2 SWC3

Anti-image Covariance SWC1 ,335 -,212 -,005

SWC2 -,212 ,262 -,175

SWC3 -,005 -,175 ,537

Anti-image Correlation SWC1 ,656a -,716 -,011

SWC2 -,716 ,607a -,467

SWC3 -,011 -,467 ,780a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Component Matrixa

Component 1

SWC1 ,895

SWC2 ,941

SWC3 ,830

Extraction Method:

Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted.

Lampiran 2: Uji Validitas Pre-Test (Lanjutan) 4. Loyalty

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,797 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 69,990

df 10

Sig. ,000

Anti-image Matrices

LOY1 LOY2 LOY3 LOY4 LOY5

Anti-image Covariance LOY1 ,553 -,241 ,038 -,123 -,006

LOY2 -,241 ,513 ,027 -,060 -,095

LOY3 ,038 ,027 ,404 -,123 -,190

LOY4 -,123 -,060 -,123 ,376 -,111

LOY5 -,006 -,095 -,190 -,111 ,335

Anti-image Correlation LOY1 ,774a -,453 ,080 -,269 -,015

LOY2 -,453 ,803a ,058 -,136 -,230

LOY3 ,080 ,058 ,770a -,315 -,516

LOY4 -,269 -,136 -,315 ,844a -,312

LOY5 -,015 -,230 -,516 -,312 ,788a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Component Matrixa

Component 1

LOY1 ,709

LOY2 ,764

LOY3 ,788

LOY4 ,875

LOY5 ,868

Extraction Method:

Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted.

Lampiran 3: Uji Reliabilitas Pre-Test 1. Degree of Co-Creation

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

,808 5

2. Satisfaction with the Co-Creation Performance Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

,850 3

3. Satisfaction with Company

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

,855 3

4. Loyalty

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

,846 5

Lampiran 4: Uji Validitas Main-Test 1. Degree of Co-Creation

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,741 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 288,762

df 10

Sig. ,000

Anti-image Matrices

DOC1 DOC2 DOC3 DOC4 DOC5

Anti-image Covariance DOC1 ,440 -,075 -,219 -,019 -,088

DOC2 -,075 ,512 -,172 ,133 -,163

DOC3 -,219 -,172 ,397 -,076 -,006

DOC4 -,019 ,133 -,076 ,758 -,271

DOC5 -,088 -,163 -,006 -,271 ,582

Anti-image Correlation DOC1 ,777a -,158 -,523 -,033 -,174

DOC2 -,158 ,762a -,381 ,214 -,299

DOC3 -,523 -,381 ,734a -,138 -,013

DOC4 -,033 ,214 -,138 ,602a -,408

DOC5 -,174 -,299 -,013 -,408 ,755a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Component Matrixa

Component 1

DOC1 ,841

DOC2 ,782

DOC3 ,855

DOC4 ,473

DOC5 ,754

Extraction Method:

Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted.

Lampiran 4 Uji Validitas Main-Test (Lanjutan) 2. Satisfaction with the Co-Creation Performance

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,702 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 247,893

df 3

Sig. ,000

Anti-image Matrices

SCP1 SCP2 SCP3

Anti-image Covariance SCP1 ,428 -,205 -,048

SCP2 -,205 ,304 -,200

SCP3 -,048 -,200 ,443

Anti-image Correlation SCP1 ,737a -,568 -,109

SCP2 -,568 ,643a -,546

SCP3 -,109 -,546 ,748a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Component Matrixa

Component 1

SCP1 ,878

SCP2 ,933

SCP3 ,873

Extraction Method:

Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted.

Lampiran 4: Uji Validitas Main-Test (Lanjutan) 3. Satisfaction with the Company

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,750 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 351,508

df 3

Sig. ,000

Anti-image Matrices

SWC1 SWC2 SWC3

Anti-image Covariance SWC1 ,290 -,145 -,073

SWC2 -,145 ,226 -,137

SWC3 -,073 -,137 ,312

Anti-image Correlation SWC1 ,770a -,564 -,243

SWC2 -,564 ,699a -,518

SWC3 -,243 -,518 ,792a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Component Matrixa

Component 1

SWC1 ,926

SWC2 ,949

SWC3 ,921

Extraction Method:

Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted.

Lampiran 4: Uji Validitas Main-Test (Lanjutan) 4. Loyalty

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,821 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 396,822

df 10

Sig. ,000

Anti-image Matrices

LOY1 LOY2 LOY3 LOY4 LOY5

Anti-image Covariance LOY1 ,518 -,217 -,004 -,038 -,078

LOY2 -,217 ,417 -,164 -,001 -,007

LOY3 -,004 -,164 ,372 -,131 -,108

LOY4 -,038 -,001 -,131 ,444 -,183

LOY5 -,078 -,007 -,108 -,183 ,440

Anti-image Correlation LOY1 ,829a -,467 -,009 -,080 -,162

LOY2 -,467 ,784a -,416 -,001 -,016

LOY3 -,009 -,416 ,823a -,322 -,267

LOY4 -,080 -,001 -,322 ,832a -,415

LOY5 -,162 -,016 -,267 -,415 ,842a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Component Matrixa

Component 1

LOY1 ,770

LOY2 ,820

LOY3 ,868

LOY4 ,815

LOY5 ,825

Extraction Method:

Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted.

Lampiran 5: Uji Reliabilitas Main-Test 1. Degree of Co-Creation

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

,834 4

2. Satisfaction with the Co-Creation Performance Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

,876 3

3. Satisfaction with the Company

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

,922 3

4. Loyalty

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

,872 5

Lampiran 6: Uji Validitas Main-Test Setelah DOC 4 Dihapus 1. Degree of Co-Creation

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,780 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 247,794

df 6

Sig. ,000

Anti-image Matrices

DOC1 DOC2 DOC3 DOC5

Anti-image Covariance DOC1 ,441 -,075 -,225 -,114

DOC2 -,075 ,537 -,169 -,145

DOC3 -,225 -,169 ,405 -,041

DOC5 -,114 -,145 -,041 ,698

Anti-image Correlation DOC1 ,755a -,155 -,533 -,205

DOC2 -,155 ,820a -,363 -,237

DOC3 -,533 -,363 ,729a -,077

DOC5 -,205 -,237 -,077 ,867a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Component Matrixa

Component 1

DOC1 ,857

DOC2 ,824

DOC3 ,871

DOC5 ,718

Extraction Method:

Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted.

Lampiran 6: Uji Validitas Main-Test Setelah DOC 4 Dihapus (Lanjutan) 2. Satisfaction with the Co-Creation Performance

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,702 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 247,893

df 3

Sig. ,000

Anti-image Matrices

SCP1 SCP2 SCP3

Anti-image Covariance SCP1 ,428 -,205 -,048

SCP2 -,205 ,304 -,200

SCP3 -,048 -,200 ,443

Anti-image Correlation SCP1 ,737a -,568 -,109

SCP2 -,568 ,643a -,546

SCP3 -,109 -,546 ,748a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Component Matrixa

Component 1

SCP1 ,878

SCP2 ,933

SCP3 ,873

Extraction Method:

Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted.

Lampiran 6: Uji Validitas Main-Test Setelah DOC 4 Dihapus (Lanjutan) 3. Satisfaction with the Company

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,750 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 351,508

df 3

Sig. ,000

Anti-image Matrices

SWC1 SWC2 SWC3

Anti-image Covariance SWC1 ,290 -,145 -,073

SWC2 -,145 ,226 -,137

SWC3 -,073 -,137 ,312

Anti-image Correlation SWC1 ,770a -,564 -,243

SWC2 -,564 ,699a -,518

SWC3 -,243 -,518 ,792a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Component Matrixa

Component 1

SWC1 ,926

SWC2 ,949

SWC3 ,921

Extraction Method:

Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted.

Lampiran 6: Uji Validitas Main-Test Setelah DOC 4 Dihapus (Lanjutan) 4. Loyalty

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,821 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 396,822

df 10

Sig. ,000

Anti-image Matrices

LOY1 LOY2 LOY3 LOY4 LOY5

Anti-image Covariance LOY1 ,518 -,217 -,004 -,038 -,078

LOY2 -,217 ,417 -,164 -,001 -,007

LOY3 -,004 -,164 ,372 -,131 -,108

LOY4 -,038 -,001 -,131 ,444 -,183

LOY5 -,078 -,007 -,108 -,183 ,440

Anti-image Correlation LOY1 ,829a -,467 -,009 -,080 -,162

LOY2 -,467 ,784a -,416 -,001 -,016

LOY3 -,009 -,416 ,823a -,322 -,267

LOY4 -,080 -,001 -,322 ,832a -,415

LOY5 -,162 -,016 -,267 -,415 ,842a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Component Matrixa

Component 1

LOY1 ,770

LOY2 ,820

LOY3 ,868

LOY4 ,815

LOY5 ,825

Extraction Method:

Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted.

Lampiran 7: Uji Reliabilitas Main-Test Setelah DOC 4 Dihapus

1. Degree of Co-Creation

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

,834 4

2. Satisfaction with the Co-Creation Performance

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

,876 3

3. Satisfaction with the Company

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

,922 3

4. Loyalty

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

,872 5

Lampiran 8: Uji Normalitas Data

1. Variabel Dependen Satisfaction with the Company One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

Unstandardized Residual

N 153

Normal Parametersa,b Mean ,0000000

Std. Deviation ,74103037 Most Extreme Differences Absolute ,053

Positive ,038

Negative -,053

Test Statistic ,053

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,200c,d

a. Test distribution is Normal.

b. Calculated from data.

c. Lilliefors Significance Correction.

d. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

2 Variabel Dependen Loyalty

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

Unstandardized Residual

N 153

Normal Parametersa,b Mean ,0000000

Std. Deviation ,05101201 Most Extreme Differences Absolute ,069

Positive ,069

Negative -,062

Test Statistic ,069

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,074c

a. Test distribution is Normal.

b. Calculated from data.

c. Lilliefors Significance Correction.

Lampiran 8: Uji Normalitas Data (Lanjutan) 3. Variabel Dependen Expenditures

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

Unstandardized Residual

Setelah Transform

N 153

Normal Parametersa,b Mean ,0000000

Std. Deviation ,43415608 Most Extreme Differences Absolute ,062

Positive ,028

Negative -,062

Test Statistic ,062

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,200c,d

a. Test distribution is Normal.

b. Calculated from data.

c. Lilliefors Significance Correction.

d. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

Lampiran 9: Uji Autokorelasi Data

1. Variabel Dependen Satisfaction with the Company

Model Summaryb

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate Durbin-Watson

1 ,754a ,568 ,563 ,73945 2,007

a. Predictors: (Constant), Lag_SCP, Lag_DOC b. Dependent Variable: Lag_SWC

2. Variabel Dependen Loyalty

Model Summaryb

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate Durbin-Watson

1 ,760a ,577 ,571 ,60933 1,935

a. Predictors: (Constant), Lag_SCP2, Lag_DOC2 b. Dependent Variable: Lag_LOY2

Lampiran 9: Uji Autokorelasi (Lanjutan) 3. Variabel Dependen Expenditures

Model Summaryb

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate Durbin-Watson

1 ,247a ,061 ,049 1079020,79500 1,923

a. Predictors: (Constant), Lag_SCP3, Lag_DOC3 b. Dependent Variable: Lag_EXP

Lampiran 10: Uji Heteroskedastisitas Data

1. Variabel Dependen Satisfaction with the Company

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) -1,447 1,274 -1,136 ,258

DOC -,522 ,265 -,211 -1,970 ,051

SCP ,380 ,277 ,147 1,369 ,173

a. Dependent Variable: LNResidual_Kuadrat1

2. Variabel Dependen Loyalty

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) -2,881 1,871 -1,540 ,126

Log_DOC -2,770 2,916 -,102 -,950 ,344

Log_SCP -3,393 3,195 -,114 -1,062 ,290

a. Dependent Variable: LNResidual_Kuadrat2

Lampiran 10: Uji Heteroskedastisitas Data (Lanjutan) 3. Variabel Dependen Expenditures

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) -5,588 2,135 -2,617 ,010

Log_DOC2 -1,562 3,328 -,051 -,469 ,639

Log_SCP2 4,703 3,647 ,141 1,290 ,199

a. Dependent Variable: LNResidual_Kuadrat3

Lampiran 11: Uji R2

1. Variabel Dependen Satisfaction with the Company Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 ,721a ,519 ,516 ,80179

a. Predictors: (Constant), DOC

2. Variabel Dependen Loyalty Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 ,691a ,477 ,474 ,68952

a. Predictors: (Constant), DOC

3. Variabel Dependen Expenditures Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 ,160a ,025 ,019 1123493,42600

a. Predictors: (Constant), DOC

Lampiran 12: Uji t

1. Variabel Dependen Satisfaction with the Company Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) ,751 ,378 1,986 ,049

DOC ,886 ,069 ,721 12,776 ,000

a. Dependent Variable: SWC

2. Variabel Dependen Loyalty

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 1,805 ,325 5,548 ,000

DOC ,701 ,060 ,691 11,747 ,000

a. Dependent Variable: LOY

3. Variabel Dependen Expenditures Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) -197600,568 530217,473 -,373 ,710

DOC 193105,702 97231,276 ,160 1,986 ,049

a. Dependent Variable: EXP

Lampiran 13: Uji MRA DOC-SCP-EXP

Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 ,229a ,053 ,033 1115186,97800

a. Predictors: (Constant), Interaksi, SCP, DOC

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 1027394007000 0,000

3 3424646688000 ,000

2,754 ,045b

Residual 1853026573000 00,000

149 1243641995000 ,000 Total 1955765974000

00,000

152

a. Dependent Variable: EXP

b. Predictors: (Constant), Interaksi, SCP, DOC

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) -1849303,271 2927643,702 -,632 ,529

DOC 224118,304 597860,013 ,185 ,375 ,708

SCP 446267,942 514817,111 ,352 ,867 ,387

Interaksi -34663,102 99596,641 -,279 -,348 ,728

a. Dependent Variable: EXP

Lampiran 13: Uji MRA (Lanjutan) DOC-SCP-SWC

Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 ,769a ,591 ,583 ,74466

a. Predictors: (Constant), Interaksi, SCP, DOC

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 119,374 3 39,791 71,759 ,000b

Residual 82,623 149 ,555

Total 201,997 152

a. Dependent Variable: SWC

b. Predictors: (Constant), Interaksi, SCP, DOC

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) -2,673 1,955 -1,367 ,174

DOC 1,088 ,399 ,884 2,724 ,007

SCP ,854 ,344 ,663 2,484 ,014

Interaksi -,082 ,067 -,650 -1,234 ,219

a. Dependent Variable: SWC

Lampiran 13: Uji MRA (Lanjutan) DOC-SCP-LOY

Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 ,767a ,589 ,581 ,61573

a. Predictors: (Constant), Interaksi, SCP, DOC

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 80,905 3 26,968 71,134 ,000b

Residual 56,489 149 ,379

Total 137,393 152

a. Dependent Variable: LOY

b. Predictors: (Constant), Interaksi, SCP, DOC

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) -,172 1,616 -,107 ,915

DOC ,579 ,330 ,570 1,753 ,082

SCP ,617 ,284 ,582 2,172 ,031

Interaksi -,030 ,055 -,284 -,538 ,591

a. Dependent Variable: LOY

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL DETAILS

Full Name : Annisa Aryantiningrum Place, Date of Birth : Jakarta, 01st October 1996

Religion : Islam

Gender : Female Nationality : Indonesia

Address : Komplek POLRI Jl.J No.32, Ampera Raya, Jakarta Selatan, RT/RW: 007/006, Kecamatan Pasar Minggu, Kelurahan Ragunan, Kode Pos: 12550

Phone Number : 081218532464

E-mail : [email protected] FORMAL EDUCATION

2000 – 2002 : TK Kemala Bhayangkari, Jakarta 2002 – 2008 : SD Kemala Bhayangkari 3, Jakarta 2008 – 2011 : SMPN 56, Jakarta

2011 – 2014 : SMAN 49 Jakarta, Jakarta

2014 – 2018 : STIE Indonesia Banking School, Jakarta NON FORMAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING

2014 : Rindam Jaya Military Training Basic Activist Training Program 2014 : The British Institute

Dokumen terkait