BAB VI PENUTUP
B. Saran
Kegiatan pembelajaran dengan strategi pembelajaran berbasis proyek yang diterapkan untuk anak usia 5-6 tahun terbukti berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif anak. Adapun saran yang peneliti
rekomendasikan antara lain.
1. Bagi guru, disarankan untuk lebih memperhatikan aspek psikologis anak ketika melakukan suatu tindakan dalam kegiatan pembelajaran.
Lebih lanjut, hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi pertimbangan guru di TK An-Nur dalam menerapkan strategi pembelajaran yang dapat menunjang kemampuan berpikir kreatif.
2. Bagi sekolah, pemenuhan sarana dan prasarana perlu dipertimbangkan pihak sekolah termasuk dengan memperbanyak alat dan bahan yang memacu perkembangan kemampuan berpikir kreatif.
3. Bagi peneliti lain yang berkeinginan mengkaji tentang pembelajaran berbasis proyek, diharapkan dapat meneliti kemampuan atau aspek perkembangan yang lain dari adanya penerapan strategi pembelajaran berbasis proyek.
DAFTAR RUJUKAN
Aini, W. N. (2013). Teacher Student Interaction in a Project Based Learning Classroom. Indonesia University of Education, (1972), 196–205. (online), https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/192358-EN-teacher-student- interaction-in-a-project.pdf
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Aris Priyanto. (2014). Jurnal Ilmiah Guru “COPE”, No. 01/Tahun XVIII/Mei 2014.
Pengembangan Kreativitas Pada Anak Usia Dini Melalui Aktivitas Bermain, (01). (online), https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cope/article/view/2913 Ariyana, Y. M., Pudjiastuti, A., Reisky, B., & Zamroni. (2019). Buku Pegangan
Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Keterampilan Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi. In Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Hak. Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Hak.
B. Hurlock, E. (1980). Psikologi Perkembangan (5th ed.; R. Max Sijabar, Ed.).
Cahyono, T. (2018). Statistika Terapan dan Indikator Kesehatan. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama. (online), https://books.google.co.id/books
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design. In V. K. Editorial (Ed.), SAGE. London.
Dahlan, S. M. (2011). Statistik Untuk Kedokteran dan Kesehatan (3rd ed), Ciracas:
Salemba Medika. (online), https://books.google.co.id/books
David, Y. K. A. & K. J. (2017). Experiential Learning Theory as a Guide for Experiential Educators in Higher Education. ELTHE: A Journal For Engaged Educators, 1, 7–44. (online),
https://learningfromexperience.com/downloads/research-library/experiential-
learning-theory-guide-for-higher-education-educators.pdf
Delavari, N., & Delgoshaei, Y. (2012). Applying multiple-intelligence approach to education and analyzing its impact on cognitive development of pre-school children. 4th International Conference of Cognitive Science (ICCS 2011), 361–
366. (online), https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/277811/1-s2.0- S1877042812X00028/1-s2.0-S1877042812000559/main.pdf Dewey, J. (1976). Experience and Education (19th ed.). (online),
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL111355W/Experience_and_education Fajri, N., & Wahyuni, D. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek
Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa. Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajaran Biologi, 1. (online), http://e-
journal.hamzanwadi.ac.id/index.php/cob/article/view/1142/pdf_6
Fatmawati, J. (2018). Telaah kreativitas. Universitas Airlangga, (October), 0–21.
(online), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328217424
Fitri, H., Dasna, I. W., & Suharjo, S. (2018). Pengaruh Model Project Based Learning (PjBL) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Ditinjau dari Motivasi Berprestasi Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Briliant: Jurnal Riset Dan
Konseptual, 3(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v3i2.187
Gerhana, M. T. C., M, M., & Pramudya, I. (2017). The Effectiveness of Project Based Learning in Trigonometry The Effectiveness of Project Based Learning in Trigonometry. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE). (online), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320228328
Global Innovation Index. (2019). Global Innovation Index. (online), GlobalInnovationIndex.org
Gold Standard PBL: Essential Project Design Elements. (n.d.). (online), Buck Of Institute website: https://www.pblworks.org/what-is-pbl/gold-standard-project- design
Hardika, H., Nur Aisyah, E., & Gunawan, I. (2018). Facilitative Learning to Improve Student Learning Creativity. 269(CoEMA), 186–189.
https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=SLWV13AAAAAJ&hl=en Helmawati. (2019). Pembelajaran dan Penilaian Berbasis HOTS. Bandung: PT
Remaja Rosdarkarya.
Honeck, E. (2016). Inspiring Creativity in Teachers to Impact Students. Torrance Journal for Applied Creativity, 1, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12- 375038-9.00223-5
Juliandi. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. (online), https://books.google.co.id Karakoç, M. (2016). The Significance Of Critical Thinking Ability In Terms Of
Education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(7), 81–84.
(online), http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_6_No_7_July_2016/10.pdf Kim, K. H. (2017). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking - Figural or Verbal :
Which One Should We Use ? 4(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017- 0015
Lestari, F. D. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas Iv. (online),
http://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/pgsd/article/download/11019/1056 5
Lubart, T. I. (2016). Creativity And Convergent Thinking: Reflections, Connections And Practical Considerations. Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, (No 4 (2016), 7–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2016-4-7-15 Mardhiyana, D., & Sejati, E. O. W. (2016). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir
Kreatif dan Rasa Ingin Tahu Melalui Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah.
PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 672–688. (online), https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/21686
Masganti. (2016). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Usia Dini (1st editio). (online),
http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/2095/1/Buku Pengembangan Kreativitas Ok.Pdf Mulyati, S., Junaedi, I., & YL, S. (2018). PROSIDING : Seminar Nasional “
Pembelajaran Matematika. (online),
https://fkip.unissula.ac.id/download/prosiding_seminar_matematika_2016.pdf
Munandar, U. (1987). Mengembangkan Bakat dan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat (2nd ed.). Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Murniarti, E. (2017). Penerapan Metode Project Based Learning. 3(2), 369–380.
(online), http://ap.fip.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/28-Erni- Murniarti.pdf
Nadiem Sebut Kompetensi Menghafal Tak Lagi Dibutuhkan. (2019). CNN Indonesia.
(online), Nadiem Sebut Kompetensi Menghafal Tak Lagi Dibutuhkan
Novitasari, K. (2018a). Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Untuk Menanamkan Karakter Tanggung Jawab Pada Anak Kelompok B Di Tk Nasima Kota Semarang. PG PAUD Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta, Indonesia. (online), http://repository.upy.ac.id/1828/1/khikmah.pdf
Pearlman, B., & Thomas, J. W. (2000). Home Project-Based Learning 21st Century Learning: A Review Of Research On Project-Based Learning. (online),
http://www.bie.org/research/study/review_of_project_based_learning_2000 Pramono, P., & Nur Aisyah, E. (2018). Development Of Early Childhood Physical
Activity Game Model. 244(Ecpe), 160–163. (online),
http://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=SLWV13AAAAAJ&hl
Rachman, U. A. (2018). Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Prasekolah dan Sekolah Awal Parenting program is an educational. Scientific Journal of Preschool and Early School Education, III(2), 141–154. (online),
http://journal.umpo.ac.id/index.php/indria/article/view/1064/pdf
Roekel, D. Van. (2010). Preparing 21st Century Students for A Global Society (An
educator’s Guide to the “Four Cs”). (online),
http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/A-Guide-to-Four-Cs.Pdf
Semiawan, R. C., Putrawan, M., & TH, S. I. (1991). Dimensi Kreatif dalam Filsafat Ilmu. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdarkarya.
Sternberg, R., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying The Crowd Ultivating Creativity. New York: The Free Press.
Sugiyono. (2007). Statistika Untuk Penelitian (E. Mulyatiningsih, Ed.). Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (25th ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukardi, M., & Astuti, W. (2013b). Kajian Perkembangan Kognitif Anak (1st ed.).
MALANG: FIP Universitas Negeri Malang.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2004). Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdarkarya.
Supardi. (2015). Peran Berpikir Kreatif Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Matematika.
2(3), 248–262. (online),
https://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/Formatif/article/download/107/103 Sutama, I. W., & Mumtahanah, A. I. (2017). Science Learning in Early Childhood
Education. 118, 393–398. (online), https://scholar.google.com/citations?
user=LJaXEE8AAAAJ&hl
Sutama, I. W., Tegariyani Putri Santoso, S., Gonadi, L., & Wuri Astuti, W. (2018).
Improving Questioning Skill through Application of the Scientific Approach to Children 3-4 Years Old. 244(Ecpe), 80–84. (online),
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=LJaXEE8AAAAJ&hl
Syahrum, & Salim. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif.pdf (p. 184). p. 184.
Tumardi. (2015). Strategi Pembelajaran. Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Pemdidikan Universitas Negeri Malang.
Tumardi, & Sopingi. (2013). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Malang: FIP Universitas Negeri Malang.
Wena, M. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 1
Surat Keterangan Melakukan Penelitian
Lampiran 2
Rancangan Program Pembelajaran Harian (RPPH)
RPPH Pretest Kelompok Eksperimen (Kelas B1)
RPPH Pretest Kelompok Kontrol (Kelas B2)
RPPH Treatment Project Based Learning Kelompok Eksperimen (Kelas B1)
RPPH Posttest Kelompok Kontrol (Kelas B2)
Posttest Project Based Learning Kelompok Eksperimen (Kelas B1)
Lampiran 3
Data Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif
Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Pretest Kelompok Eksperimen
Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Pretest Kelompok Kontrol (Kelas B2)
Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Posttest Kelompok Kontrol (Kelas B2)
Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Posttest Kelompok Eksperimen (Kelas B1)
Lampiran 4
Dokumentasi Kegiatan
Pretest Kelompok Eksperimen (Kelas B1)
Setting Kelas Alat dan bahan yang digunakan saat Pretest
Guru memantau pekerjaan anak
SOP Penutup, berdoa sebelum pulang
Guru memantau pekerjaan anak
Recalling dan Reward Proyek Kelompok Eksperimen (Kelas B1) Saat Pretest
Pretest Kelompok Kontrol (Kelas B2)
SOP pembukaan, berkumpul dan bernyanyi bersama di depan kelas
Guru membagikan alat dan bahan
Proses pengerjaan produk oleh kelompok kontrol (Kelas B2) Proyek Kelompok Kontrol (Kelas B2) Saat Pretest
Treatment di Kelompok Eksperimen (Kelas B1)
Apersepsi oleh peneliti di kelas B1
Proses pengerjaan proyek
Proses pengerjaan proyek
Alat dan bahan ketika Treatment PjBl Anak mengerjakan proyek
Anak mengerjakan proyek Anak mengerjakan proyek
Display Proyek Hasil Kreasi Kelompok Eksperimen (Kelas B1)
Posttest Kelompok Eksprimen (Kelas B1)
Proses pengerjaan proyek
Peneliti memantau aktivitas anak
Proses pengerjaan proyek
Display Proyek Hasil Kreasi Kelompok Eksperimen
Posttest Kelompok Kontrol (Kelas B2)
Apersepsi oleh peneliti
Penjelasan Topik oleh Guru kelas
Proses pengerjaan tugas
Display Produk oleh kelompok Kontrol (Kelas B2)
Lampiran 5
Surat Validator Instrumen
Lampiran 6
Uji Validasi Ahli Instrumen
Lampiran 7
Hasil Uji Validitas Instrumen
Hasil Uji Validitas Pretest
Correlations
Fluency_1 Fluency_2 Flexibility Originality Elaboration Jumlah Fluency_1 Pearson
Correlation 1 .537** .507** .453* .469** .791**
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .001 .004 .003 .000
N 39 39 39 39 39 39
Fluency_2 Pearson
Correlation .537** 1 .439 .276* .383 .750**
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .005 .089 .016 .000
N 39 39 39 39 39 39
Flexibility Pearson
Correlation .507** .439 1 .381** .410** .755**
Sig. (1-tailed) .001 .005 .017 .009 .000
N 39 39 39 39 39 39
Originality Pearson
Correlation .453* .276* .381** 1 .345** .650**
Sig. (1-tailed) .004 .089 .017 .031 .000
N 39 39 39 39 39 39
Elaboration Pearson
Correlation .469** .383 .410** .345** 1 .709**
Sig. (1-tailed) .003 .016 .009 .031 .000
N 39 39 39 39 39 39
Jumlah Pearson
Correlation .791** .750** .755** .650** .708** 1
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
N 39 39 39 39 39 39
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).
Hasil Uji Validitas Posttest
Correlations
Fluency_1 Fluency_2 Flexibility Originality Elaboration Skor_Total Fluency_1 Pearson
Correlation 1 .292 .545** .216 .417* .702**
Sig. (2-tailed) .079 .000 .200 .010 .000
N 37 37 37 37 37 37
Fluency_2 Pearson
Correlation .292 1 .130 .097 .319 .487**
Sig. (2-tailed) .079 .443 .567 .054 .002
N 37 37 37 37 37 37
Flexibility Pearson
Correlation .545** .130 1 .576** .692** .853**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .443 .000 .000 .000
N 37 37 37 37 37 37
Originality Pearson
Correlation .216 .097 .576** 1 .525** .654**
Sig. (2-tailed) .200 .567 .000 .001 .000
N 37 37 37 37 37 37
Elaboration Pearson
Correlation .417* .319 .692** .525** 1 .849**
Sig. (2-tailed) .010 .054 .000 .001 .000
N 37 37 37 37 37 37
Skor_Total Pearson
Correlation .702** .487** .853** .654** .849** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .002 .000 .000 .000
N 37 37 37 37 37 37
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Lampiran 8
Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen
Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Pretest
Case Processing Summary
INstru
men N %
Cases Valid 39 100.0
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 39 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.775 5
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected Item- Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if Item
Deleted
Fluency_1 8.05 5.050 .678 .701
Fluency_2 7.77 4.498 .538 .744
Flexibility 8.28 4.734 .580 .723
Originality 8.54 5.360 .462 .761
Elaboration 8.38 5.032 .528 .741
Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Posttest
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 37 100.0
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 37 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.765 5
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected Item- Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if Item
Deleted
Fluency_1 10.76 7.467 .516 .728
Fluency_2 10.68 8.892 .270 .799
Flexibility 10.92 5.910 .708 .651
Originality 11.27 8.258 .501 .737
Elaboration 10.76 6.078 .709 .651
Lampiran 9
Hasil Uji Normalitas Data Hasil
Uji Normalitas Data Pretest
Kelompok Statistic Std. Error
Skor_Pretest Kelompok Eksperimen (Kelas B1)
Mean 11.00 .657
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Lower Bound 9.62
Upper Bound 12.38
5% Trimmed Mean 11.00
Median 10.50
Variance 8.632
Std. Deviation 2.938
Minimum 6
Maximum 16
Range 10
Interquartile Range 6
Skewness .346 .512
Kurtosis -1.018 .992
Kelompok
Kontrol(Kelas B2) Mean 9.47 .515
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Lower Bound 8.39
Upper Bound 10.56
5% Trimmed Mean 9.47
Median 10.00
Variance 5.041
Std. Deviation 2.245
Minimum 5
Maximum 14
Range 9
Interquartile Range 3
Skewness .088 .524
Kurtosis -.050 1.014
Tests of Normality Kelompok
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Skor_Pretest Kelompok Eksperimen(Kelas
B1) .163 20 .169* .920 20 .099
Kelompok Kontrol(Kelas B2) .172 19 .143 .966 19 .701
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
Hasil Uji Normalitas Data Posttest
Descriptives
Kelompok Statistic Std. Error
Skor_
Posttest
Kelompok Eksperimen(Kelas B1)
Mean 11.35 .573
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Lower Bound 10.15 Upper Bound 12.55
5% Trimmed Mean 11.33
Median 11.50
Variance 6.555
Std. Deviation 2.560
Minimum 6
Maximum 17
Range 11
Interquartile Range 3
Skewness .005 .512
Kurtosis .652 .992
Kelompok Kontrol(Kelas B2) Mean 16.24 .407
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Lower Bound 15.37
Upper Bound 17.10
5% Trimmed Mean 16.21
Median 16.00
Variance 2.816
Std. Deviation 1.678
Minimum 14
Maximum 19
Range 5
Interquartile Range 4
Skewness -.060 .550
Kurtosis -1.329 1.063
Tests of Normality
Kelompok
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Nilai Kelompok Eksperimen(Kelas
B1) .149 20 .200* .970 20 .760
Kelompok Kontrol(Kelas B2) .148 17 .200* .906 17 .087
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
Lampiran 10
Hasil Uji Homogenitas Data
Hasil Uji Homogenitas Data Pretest
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Skor_Pretest
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
1.800 1 37 .188
Skor_Pretest
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups .675 1 .675 .080 .779
Within Groups 311.684 37 8.424
Total 312.359 38
Hasil Uji Homogenitas Data Posttest
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Skor_posttest
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
1.499 1 35 .229
Skor_Pretest
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 219.310 1 219.310 45.256 .000
Within Groups 169.609 35 4.846
Total 388.919 36
Lampiran 11
Hasil Uji Hipotesis Data
Hasil Uji Hipotesis Data Pretest
Group Statistics
Kelompok N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Jumlah kontrol 20 11.00 2.938 .657
eksperimen 19 9.47 2.245 .515
Independent Samples Test Levene's Test
for Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig.
(2-tailed)
Mean Differen
ce
Std. Error Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference Lower Upper Jumlah Equal
variances
assumed 1.800 .188 1.816 37 .078 1.526 .841 -.177 3.230
Equal
variances not
assumed 1.828 35.414 .076 1.526 .835 -.168 3.220
Hasil Uji Hipotesis Data Posttest
Group Statistics
Kelas N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Jumlah kontrol 20 11.35 2.560 .573
eksperimen 17 16.24 1.678 .407
Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for
Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig.
(2-tailed)
Mean Difference
Std. Error Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference Lower Upper Jumlah Equal variances
assumed 1.499 .229 -6.727 35 .000 -4.885 .726 -6.360 -3.411
Equal variances
not assumed -6.955 33.038 .000 -4.885 .702 -6.314 -3.456
Lampiran 12
Daftar Riwayat Hidup
RIWAYAT HIDUP