CHAPTER I INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION
C. Suggestion
By referring to the conclusions and implications of the research, the researcher suggests the following so as to improve teaching and learning reading comprehension of narrative text quality through watching video movies.
1. The English teacher who has the same problem as the researcher is suggested to use video movies in teaching reading narrative.
2. The researcher as an English teacher should continue using video movies in teaching reading not only for reading narratives text. This is because using video movies can improve students’ reading comprehension very well.
3. The researcher as an English teacher should also be creative in selecting teaching material, interesting media, and instructional and motivated strategyto help make teaching and learning more interesting and attractive so students’ participation increases during the learning activities in the class room.
4. The other researchers who are interested in carrying out a research in other aspects of English can use video movies in their future studies.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aiex, N.K. 1999. Mass Media Use in The Classroom. ERIC Digest D147.
Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
Ahuja, P. and G.C. Ahuja. 2001.How to Increase Reading Speed, Procedures and Practices. New Delhi: Sterling Publisher.
Ames, C. 1992.‘Classroom: goals, structures, and student motivation’. Journal of Educational Psychology,Vol. 84, 261-271.
Anderson, M. and Anderson, K. 2003.Text Types in English 3.Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Anderson. 2000. Text Types. Cambridge: University Press.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2009. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (Edisi revisi cetakan kesembilan). Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Barlow, J. Aaron. 2004. The DVD Revolution. Brooklyin: Praeger.
Bush, L. Cliffort and Huebner, H. Mildred. 1979. Strategy for Reading in The Elementary School. London: Collier Macmillan Publisher.
Burnes, D and G. Page. 1985. Insight and Strategies for Teaching Reading. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanich Group. Pty Limited.
Burnes, D and G.Page .1991. Insight and strategies for Teaching Reading. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanich Group. Pty Limited.
Block, C.C., & Pressley, M. 2007. ‘Best practices in teaching comprehension’. In L.B. Gambrell, L. Morrow & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction(pp. 220–242). New York: The Guilford Press.
Brown,H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.
Carlisle, J.and M.Rice.2004. Assessment of reading comprehension. New York:
Guilford Press.
Colorado, Colorin. 2007. Reading is a Gift in any Language. Retrieved March 20 2013http://www.colorincolorado.org/webcasts/
Chain, Kate. et al. 2004. ‘Children’s reading comprehension ability: concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability and component skills’.
Journal of Educational Psychology 2004.Vol.
96.,http://www.phych.lans.ac.uk/people/uploads/katecain20050929T105.p df, retrieved on 6thJanuary 2013
Chen, J. 2005Whatis Reading? (http://www.Indiana.edu/~1517/what is reading.htm/, retrievedon 10th January2013 ).
Clay, M., M. (2002).An observation survey of early literacy(2nd ed.). Auckland:
Hein-emann.
Daniels, H. 2002.Teaching The Best Practice Way: Methods That Matter, K-12.
Portland, ME:Stenhouse Publishers
Davies,A. and Widdowson, HG. 1974.‘Reading and writing’. In J.P.B Allen and S.PitCorder 1974:155-177.
Davis, Randalls.2006. ‘Captioned Video: Making it work for you’. Journal of
Using video in the classroom 2004.Vol.
96.,http://www.phych.lans.ac.uk/people/uploads/katecain20050929T105.p df, retrieved on 6thJune 2013
DepartemenPendidikandanKebudayaan 2006: KurikulumBerbasisKompetensi:
Garis-GarisBesar Program PengajaranBahasaInggris. Jakarta:
DepartemenPendidikandanKebudayaan,
Derewianka, Beverly. 1995. Exploring How Texts Work. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association.
Devine, A. 1987. Teaching Reading Comprehension from Teaching to Practice.
Boston: Merril Publishing.
Diana, M. 2003. Children’s Literature: An Invitation to the World. Boston:
Pearson Education, Inc.
Drive, H. 2008. Genre and the Language Learning Classroom. An Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
Duran, E., and Carnine, D. (1997).Leo Beginning reading summary. Paper submitted to Lodi Unified School District. Lodi, CA.
Edward.D. 2007. Again alienation: Karol Wojtyla’s theory of participation.
Article.June 2007 vol.1 no.1 71- 81.
Fitri,Handayani. 2011.“Improving Students’ Speaking Skill on Transactional and Interpersonal Text by Using Video at Grade VIII.1 SMP N 1 Sungai Lasi”.Thesis.Padang: English Section, Graduate Program of UNP.
Fiene, J., & McMahon, S. 2007. ‘Assessing comprehension: A classroom based process the reading teacher’, 60(5), 406–417.
Gay. L. R and Peter Airasian. 2000. Education Research: Competencies for Analysing and Application ( 6thed). Saddle River, New Jersey :Pretice Hall.
Gay, L.R. 2000.Educational Research Competencies for analysis and Application.
Sixth Edition. Florida: Boston College Publishers.
Giles, Jim. 2004. The English Hand book. Education Department of South Monash: Publication Branch.
Graesser, A. C.,M. Singer, and T.Trabasso. 1994. Constructing Inferences During Narrative Text Comprehension. New York: Guilford Publications.
Graesser, A. C., D. S. McNamara, and M. M. Louwerse. 2003. What Do Readers Need to Learn in Order to Process Coherence Relations in Narrative and Expository Text?. New York: Guilford Publications.
Harmer, J. 2001. The practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman ELT.
Hatch and Farhady. 1982. Research Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics.
London: Newbury House Publisher
Hefzallah, M. I. 2004. The New Educational Technologies and Learning.Charles C. Thomas Publisher ltd.
Hugesh, Arthur. 1990. Testing for Languge Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutchins, Chryse. 2003. 7 Keys to Comprehension. New York: Three Rivers Press.
Irwin, Judith West. 1986. Teaching Reading Comprehension Process. New Jersey: Prentice–Hall. Inc.
Israel, S.E., Bauserman, K.I., & Block, C.C. 2005.‘Metacognitive assessment strategies’. Thinking Classroom, 6
Jhonson, Andrew, P. 2005. A short Guide to Action Research. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Kawai, Yasushi. 2008. Lessons from Good Language Learners. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Kemmis, Stephen and Mc Taggart Robin. 1988. The Action Research Plan.
Victoria:Deakin University Press
Keene, E. 2006.Assessing Comprehension Thinking Strategies. Huntington Beach, Cali-fornia: Shell.
King and Stanley 1997.Third Grade Reading Comprehension and 3rd GRADE ReadingLessonhttp://www.helium.com/items/1724098-reading-
comprehension-skills?page=2
Kuriyama, S. (2007, January).iMovies and the new horizons of academic presentation: A practical introduction. Seminar presented at the University of Toronto.
Middleton, M., & Midgley, C. 1997.‘Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An undexplored aspect of goal theory’.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.
Midgley, C. (Ed.). 2002. Achievement goals and goal structures. Goals, goal structures and pattern of adaptive learning. Mahwah, NJ: Elbaum
Miholic, V. (1994).‘An inventory to pique students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies’. Journal of Reading, 38(84–86).
Mokhtari, K., &Reichard, C.A. 2002.‘Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(249–259).
Murcia, M. 2001. Teaching English as a Second Language.Third Edition. New York: Thomson Learning Company.
McNeil, D. John. 1980. How to Teach Reading Successfully. Iowa: Wm. C.
Brown Company Publishers.
McWhorter, Kathleen. T. 1986. Guide to College Reading. Canada: Little, Brown
& company.
National Reading Panel. 2000. Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Neufeld, D. J. 2005. How to Teach Reading Successfully. Iowa: Wm. C. Brown
Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. 1977.’Telling more than we can know: Mental reports on mental processes’. Psychological Review, 84(231–259).
Nunan, David and Lindsay Miller. 1995. New Ways in Teaching Listening.
TESOL, Inc: Virginia.
Oakley, G., & Barratt-Pugh, C. 2007.‘The identification of assessment resources to support children learning to read in the early years of school’:
Literature review. Perth: Edith Cowan University
Parhusip, Dormauli. 2008. “Improving Students’ Interest and Ability in Writing Narrative Text through Video Shows at grade IX.1 SMPN 2 Pariaman”.
Unpublished Thesis. Padang: English Section, Graduate Program of UNP.
Rammal, Samir m.2006. “Using video in EFL classrooms:.Karen’s Linguistics Issues, November 2006. Retrieved on October 29th 2010 from http://www.telus.net/linguisticsissues/usingvideo.
Rebecca, J. L. 2003. A Critical Handbook of Children’s Literature. Massachuset:
Pearson Education, Inc.
Richards, Jack C.2008. Teaching Listening and Speaking from Theory to practice.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, S., Ludington, J., & Graham, S. (1998). Motivation and Learning.
Evergreen, CO: Peak Learning System.
Rogers, T., Winters, K.L., Bryan, G., Price, J., McCormick, F., House, L., et al.
2006. ‘Developing the IRIS: Toward situated and valid assessment measures in collaborative professional development and school reform in literacy’. The Reading Teacher, Vol.59 (6), 544–553.
Safridah, 2013.Using Animation Film to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text at Grade VIII.4 of MTsN Bukit Raya Pekanbaru. Thesis.English Education Program, Graduate Program, State University of Padang.
Sargan, N. et al. 1997. The Leraning Divide.A study of participation in adult learning in the United Kingdom. Leicester: NIACE.
Subroto, S. 1997. Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta: RinelaCipta.
Sumanto, Wasty. 2006. PsikologiPendidikan. PT Asdiahasatya, Jakarta.
Scacco, Jhon. 2007. Beyond Film: Exploring the content of movies.
Morrocco.English teaching forum.Number 1, 2007.
Schmidt, M.C. 1990. ‘A questionnaire to measure children’s awareness of strategic reading processes’. The Reading Teacher, 43(454–461).
Spear-Swerling, L. 2006.‘Children’s reading comprehension and oral reading fluency in easy text’. Reading and Writing, 19,199-220.
Stempleski, Susan and Barry Tomalin. 1990. Video in Action- Recipes for Using Video in Language Teaching. University Press:Cambridge.
St John, M.J. 1988. Attitudinal changes to self-acces in EAP. In A. and P. Grundy (Eds) Individualization and Autonomy in Language Learning.ELT Documents 131. London: Modern English Publications in association with The British Council
Sringer, T. Ernest. 2007. Action Research. California: Sage Publication Inc.
Tull, D. S and D.I Hawkins. 1976. Marketing Research: Meaning, Measurement and Method. London: Macmillan.
Urdan, T. 1997. Achievement and goal theory: Past results, future directions. In P.R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.). Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 10 (pp.99-142). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
Van den Broek. 2000. Comprehension Instruction. New York: Guilford Press.
Vetrie, Michael. 2004. ‘Using Film to Increase Literacy Skills’. English Journal.Vol 93.
Wallace, J. Michael. (1998). Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Wing Jan, L. 2004. Write Ways: Modelling Writing Forms-Narrative Information.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weir, J. Cyril. 2001. Language Testing and Validation. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Wolf, Grant S. 2006. ‘Using video to develop writing fluency in low profiency esl students’.The internet TESL Journal, vol XII, No 8, August.Retieved on
August 2007. Taken from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Wolf- UsingVideo.htlm
Wren&Martin.2007. High School Englsih Grammar and Composition. UK:
Amazon.co.
Zintz, Miles. V. 1975. The Reading Process. The Teacher and the Learner (Second edition).New York: Wm. C. Brown Company publisher.
Zainil. 2008. Actional Functional Model (AFM). Padang: Sukabina Offset.
Appendix 1
THE SCHEDULE AND TOPIC OF THE RESEARCH Cycle 1
Time : 4 x 45 minutes
Meeting/date Time Materials Media
Video Movie First meeting
September 23th 2013
07.15- 10.10am
Jack and Giant Slayer
Jack and Giant Slayer
Second meeting September 30th
2013
07.15- 10.10 Am Alice in the wonderland
Alice in the wonderland Third meeting
October 7th 2013
07.15- 10.10am Beauty and The Beast,
Beauty and The Beast,
Fourth meeting October 14th
2013
07.15- 10.10am Rio de Jenerio Rio de Jenerio
Cycle 1- Test October 21st
2013
07.15-10.10am
Snowhite and the huntsman, Madagascar and Smurf
Snowhite and the huntsman, Madagascar and Smurf
Cycle 2
Time : 4x 45 minutes
Meeting/date Time Materials Video Movie
First meeting October 28th
2013
07.15- 10.10 am
Puss in Boots Puss in Boots Second meeting
November 4th 2013
07.15- 10.10 am
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs Third meeting
November 11th2013
07.15- 10.10 am
Oz the great and Poweful
Oz the great and Poweful
Fourth meeting November 18th
2013
07.15- 10.10 am
DrSeushortons as a who!
DrSeushortons as a who!
Cycle 2- Test 25thNovember
2013
70.15- 9.20 am Moster in Paris, Prince of The Percia and Bee
Moster in Paris, Prince of The Percia and Bee
Steps:
D. Pre – teaching activities :
7. Teacher greeted the students
8. Teacher took the attendance list of the students 9. Teacher mentioned the purpose of the study
10. Teacher gave an explanation before listening and watching the video movie.
11. Teacher asked the students some questions related to the movie that will be showed.
12. Teacher showed the video movie of narrative story.
E. While-Teaching Activity
12.Students discussed about character.
13.Students discussed about the setting (Teacher monitors the activities).
14.Students discussed the plot/story line (Teacher monitors the activity).
15.Teacher and students discussed about the result of the group discussion.
16.Teacher asked about the moral value from the video movie of the narrative story.
17.Teacher delivered similar text in a jumble paragraph.
18.Students arranged the paragraph (The teacher monitors the activity).
19.The students checked whether they are arranged correctly or not.
20.Students read the original text carefully.
21.Teacher led a discussion about narrative text.
- Describe and determine the purpose of the text.
- Describe and determine part of the text (problem and resolution).
- Describe and determine the language features of the text (the use of verbs and preferences).
22.Teacher led discussion about narrative text F. Post – teaching activity
4. Teacher asked what her students do not understand about the narrative text.
5. Teacher delivered work sheet for students to find the answers to some comprehension questions.
6. Teacher collected the students’ worksheets and ended the class.
Observation Checklist of Teacher’s and Student’s Activities Based on Lesson Plan Date/ Time : Tuesday/ Sept 23rd, 2013
Time : 07.00-10.00 WIB
Meting/ Cycle : I/I
Topic : Jack and The Giant Slayer
Steps Teacher’s Activates Yes No Student’s Activities Yes No Description
Steps I Pre- Teaching
1. Teacher greets the students
√ 1. Student respond the teacher well
√ Teacher greeting used English.
2. Teacher takes the
attendance list. √ 2. Students pay the attention when teacher called his/ her name
√ Attendance was taken entirely in English, even additional information
Such as a student telling the teacher another student is sick.
3. Teacher mentions the purpose of study.
√ 3. Students listen to teacher √ Teacher mentioned the purpose of the study; she explained the purpose of narrative text.
Teacher used good examples such as Harry Potter to keep students interested.
Students seemed interested in types of stories and in coming up with more examples themselves 4. The teacher gives some
explanation to the students before watching the video
√ 4. Students listen the guidance √ Teacher asks them to take a note to write the information they got after watching. Teacher asks them to make a group.
5. Teacher asks students some questions related to the video movie of narrative story will be watched.
√ 5. Students answer the question √ Teacher made sure students were not afraid to answer by saying that wrong answers are ok and giving positive feedback to students.
Teacher went over all the parts and had students participate a lot by asking questions about parts of narrative text. After that the teachers uses a slideshow with students taking notes to explain narrative text further.
Steps II Whiles Teaching
6. The teacher shows video movie of narrative story through in focus media
√ 6. Students watched the video movie Jack and the Giant Slayer.
√ Teacher played the movie about Jack and the Giant Slayer, it is a Legend story.
Teacher set the sound loudly.
7. Teacher asks student to discuss about the character.
√ 7. Students discussed about character
√ Teacher discuss the characters based on the story
8. Teacher asks Student to discuss about the setting.
√ 8. Students discussed about the setting
√ Teacher discuss about setting from the story
9. The teacher ask moral value/ life lesson from the video movie of narrative story
√ 9. Students answered the moral value
√ Teacher asks them to answer the moral value from the story
Step III Post- Teaching
10. The teacher monitor the activity
√ 10. Students do the discussion with their friends
√ Teacher guides the activity
11. The teacher explores the same text with video movie of narrative story in jumble paragraph
√ 11. Students got the question sheet
about jumbled paragraph √ Teacher asks them to arrange the paragraph correctly
12. Teacher asks students to arrange the paragraph.
√ 12. Students read the text and try to arrange the paragraph
√ Teacher monitor the students when they arranged the paragraph
13. Teacher discuss the
correct text √ 13. Students discuss about their
answer √ Teacher answer the correct paragraph
14. Teacher asks student to comprehend the text.
√ 14. Students read the text √ Teacher asks them to read the text about the Jack and Giant Slayer for the next step.
15. Giving students chance to ask teacher about why they do not understand
√ 15. Students ask the instructions what they don’t understand
√
Teacher let them to ask some question if they don’t understand
Collaborator,
Louis Bergsman 16. Teacher delivers
worksheet for the students.
16. Students get the question sheet individually and they answer the questions
Teacher gives them 9 question based on the indicators.
17. The teacher submits the students’ work sheet and ended the class.
17. Students submit their task and pray together
Teacher closed the meeting and say good bye to the students.
Observation Checklist of Teacher’s and Student’s Activities Based on Lesson Plan Date/ Time : Tuesday/ Sept 30th , 2013
Time : 07.00-10.00 WIB
Meting/ Cycle : II/I
Topic : Alice in The Wonderland
Steps Teacher’s Activates Yes No Student’s Activities Yes No Description
Steps I Pre- Teaching
1. Teacher greets the students
√ 1. Student respond the teacher well
√ Teacher greeting used English and smile to the students
2. Teacher takes the
attendance list. √ 2. Students pay the attention when teacher called his/ her name
√ Teacher calls their name to get some information about their attendance
3. Teacher mentions the purpose of study.
√ 3. Students listen to teacher √ Lots of asking questions to review narrative since they have studied it before.
4. The teacher gives some explanation to the students before watching the video movie
√ 4. Students listen the guidance √ Teacher ask them to take a note to write the information they got after watching
5. Teacher asks students some questions related to the video movie of narrative story will be watched.
√ 5. Students answer the question √ Teacher asks some question about narrative structures.
Steps II Whiles Teaching
6. The teacher shows video movie of narrative story through in focus media
√ 6. Students watched the video movie Alice in the wonderland
√ Teacher played the movie about Alice in the Wonderland, it is a fantasy story.
7. Teacher asks student to discuss about the character.
√ 7. Students discussed about character
√ Teacher discuss the characters based on the movie
8. Teacher asks Student to discuss about the setting.
√ 8. Students discussed about the setting
√ Teacher discuss about setting from the movie
9. The teacher ask moral value/ life lesson from the video movie of narrative story
√ 9. Students answered the moral value
√ teacher asked a question about the word life lesson and moral value .
Step III Post- Teaching
10. The teacher monitor the activity
√ 10. Students do the discussion with their friends
√ Teacher tries to monitor during the activity
11. The teacher explores the same text with video movie of narrative story in jumble paragraph
√ 11. Students got the question sheet
about jumbled paragraph √ Teacher explains what should students do
12. Teacher asks students to arrange the paragraph.
√ 12. Students read the text and try to arrange the paragraph
√ Teacher ask them to arrange the paragraph correctly
13. Teacher discuss the
correct text √ 13. Students discuss about their
answer √
Teacher tells the correct paragraph to the students.
14. Teacher asks student to comprehend the text.
√ 14. Students read the text √ Teacher asks them to read the text carefully
15. Giving students chance to ask teacher about why they do not understand
√ 15. Students ask the instructions what they don’t understand
√ Teacher let them to ask some question if they don’t understand.
Collaborator,
Louis Bergsman 16. Teacher delivers
worksheet for the students.
16. Students get the question sheet individually and they answer the questions
Teacher gives them 9 question based on the indicators.
17. The teacher submits the students’ work sheet and ended the class.
17. Students submit their task and pray together
Teacher closed the meeting and say good bye to the students
Observation Checklist of Teacher’s and Student’s Activities Based on Lesson Plan Date/ Time : Tuesday/ October 7th, 2013
Time : 07.00-10.00 WIB
Meting/ Cycle : III/I
Topic : Beauty and The Beast
Steps Teacher’s Activates Yes No Student’s Activities Yes No Description
Steps I Pre- Teaching
1. Teacher greets the students
√ 1. Student respond the teacher well
√ Teacher greeting used English and smile to the students and praying together.
2. Teacher takes the
attendance list. √ 2. Students pay the attention when teacher called his/ her name
√ Teacher calls their name to get some information about their attendance
3. Teacher mentions the purpose of study.
√ 3. Students listen to teacher √ Teacher just explains the structure of narrative text shortly.
4. The teacher gives some explanation to the students before watching the video movie (make group and discuss)
√ 4. Students listen the guidance √ Teacher asks them to take a note to write the information they got after watching. And teacher asks them to sit based on their group.
5. Teacher asks students some questions related
√ 5. Students answer the question √ Teacher asks some question about narrative structures. And asks them to guess the plot if