Referring to result of this research, the writer offers some suggestions considered on teaching vocabulary as follows:
1. For the Teachers
244 As the good teachers, they must be able to master the class and material during the teaching-learning activity is doing in the classroom. The teachers should know and understand the students’ ability. Finally the successful teaching learning process can be gained.
2. For the Students
The students are hoped to be more focuse, active and creative in teaching learning process, so it can make the students are interested and motivated in learning English.
Moreover they will get the better result in English.
3. For Other Researcher
For the other writers, this research will be one of the references in vocabulary mastery of English while the writer has been studying in the English Department of FKIP HKBP Nommensen University Pematangsiantar. The other writer may use Metacognitive Strategy in other skills besides vocabulary skill namely writing. reading, speaking, and listening skill. So for the other researchers, it is useful as their guidance to write the research.
4. For the Readers
For the readers, the researcher believes that this research is far from being perfect. So, the writer will accept good suggestion and constructive criticism to make this research better.
The researcher also hopes that this research will be useful and contribute some value thing to the writer herself and all readers generally.
References
Ary, D. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Belmont: Wadswoth.
Anderson, N. (2002). Using telescopes, microscopes, and kaleidoscopes to put metacognition into perspective. TESOL Matters, 12(4), 1-10.
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
______. (2006). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Brown, A. L. & Gonzo. (1999). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown. (2001). Teaching by principles an interactive approach to language pedagogy.
NewYork: Longman.
Chamot, B. S. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. New York: Longman.
O’malley& Chamot. (1994). The CALLA handbook: how to implement the cognitive academic language learning approach.reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Cross, D. (1991). A practical handbook of language teaching. London: Cassel.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving.In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Folse, K.S. (2008). Six activities for English language classroom. English Teaching Forum.
46(3), 12-20.
Fountas & Pinnell. (2000). Metacognition overview: Benchmark Education Company (http://www.benchmarkeducation.com/best-practices-library/metacognitive-
strategies.html).
Hornby, A.S. (1974). Oxford advanced learners’ dictionary of current English. Oxford:
Oxford University.
________. (1989). Oxford advanced learners’ dictionary of current English. Oxford: Oxford University.
245 ________. (2000). Oxford advanced learners’ dictionary of current English. Oxford: Oxford
University.
________. (2010). Oxford advanced learners’ dictionary of current English. Oxford: Oxford University.
Kasihani, K.E, S. (2008). English for young learners. Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Kerr, F. W. (1996). Expression and meaning (A handbook for vocabulary development).Belmont: Dickenson Publishing Company.
Krashen. (1998). The natural approach English acquisition in the classroom. California:
University of Southern California.
Lerner, J. W. (2006). Learning disabilities and related disorders. Cambridge University Press.
Myers, M. & Paris, S.G. (1978). Children’s metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70: 680 –690.
Nababan.(1991).Metodologi pengajaran bahasa. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers
Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Learning vocabulary in another language Cambridge. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I.S.P. (1997). L1 and L2 use in the classroom: A Systematic approach. TESL Reporter 30, 2: 19-27.
Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
O'Malley. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pikulski, J.J. (2004). Teaching and developing vocabulary: Key to long-term reading success.
Boston, MA: Houghton & Mifflin.
Read, J. (2000). Assesing vocabulary. Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Stahl, S. (2005). Four problems with teaching word meanings (and what to do to make vocabulary an integral part of instruction). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sugiyono (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan (pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung :Alfabeta.
Sukardi (2003). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan kompetensi dan prakteknya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow: Longman.
Wallace, C. (1987). Variability and the reading behavior of L2 readers. Astor Ave: Second Language Acquisition in Context, Article, p 165-178.
Wenden, A. L. (1998). Meta-Cognitive knowledge and language learning.applied linguistics, 19(4), 515-537.
Wilkins, D. A. (1974). Second-language learning and teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
246 THE EFFECT OF SELF TALK STRATEGY IN PUBLIC SPEAKING AS EFL
CLASSROOM
Rudiarman Purba, S.Pd.,M.Pd
(English Study Program, University of HKBP Nommensen, Indonesia) Email: [email protected]
Abstract
This research tends to find out the effect of self talk strategy in public speaking as EFL classroom at English Department of FKIP Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar. The population is the third year students (Academic Year 2013) at English Department that sit in Public Speaking Class.
There are 40 students taken as the sample of this research. The sample was divided into two groups: the first group (20 students) as the experimental group and the second group (20 students) as the control group. After analyzing and calculating the data, it is found that the mean score was 7.8 and the value of t-test was higher than t-table (t-test > t-table), 2.671 > 1.686. There is a significant influence of the students’ speaking ability taught by using self-talk strategy.
Key Words: English foreign language, listening comprehension, self talk strategy, speaking, teaching
I. Introduction
This research is aimed to find out the effect of self talk strategy in public speaking as EFL classroom on the third year students (Academic Year 2013) at English Department in FKIP Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar
There are some reason why this research is necessary tobe done. First, the need of documentation for English department of Teacher Training Faculty Nommensen HKBP University Pematangsiantar. It is alse can be useful fro the needs practical and scientific uses in future. The second is for the researchers themselves as the strategy for them to teach the students with lack of self confidence in doing public speaking in EFL class
The findings of the preliminary research of this study shows that there many students are lack of confidence in in doing public speaking in EFL class.
To get the real data of this reasearch, the writer formulate the reserach probem by the following question: “Is there any significant effect of self talk strategy in public speaking as EFL classroom on the third year students (Academic Year 2013) at English Department in FKIP Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar?”
II. Literature Review