CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD RESEARCH METHOD
A. Findings
2. The Students’ Motivation in Listening through CALL Model
Table 4.4 T-test of the Students’ Listening Comprehension
Variabel T-test Value T-table Value
Listening Comprehension Test 11.32 2.045
Table 4.5 shows that the t-test value (11.32) is greater than t-table value (2.045). Based on this result, it is concluded that difference of both t-value is statically significant.
After calculating the t-test value, then it is compared with the value of t- table with the level of significance p = 0.05 with the degree of freedom (df = 29), because the total number of the students 30 students (N-1 = 29) therefore df (29). The value of t-test is greater than t-table value.
These findings are used to determine whether or not the hypothesis stated in this research is statically proved. As being stated in previous chapter that the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected when the value of t-test is greater than t-table and alternative hypothesis (H1) is accepted. Therefore based on the above result where the value of t-test is greater than than the value of t-table the alternative hypothesis (H1) is accepted and the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected this means that the hypothesis “There is any effect of the use of CALL model in improving the students’ listening comprehension” is accepted.
test. The number of questions in this questionnare is 15. The result of the questionnaire can be shown by the following explanation above:
a. The Students’ Questionnaire
In this part of the questionnaire, there were ten positive statements and five negative statements. Here are the following explanation:
Table 4.5 Learning Listening by Using CALL Model is Really Interesting
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Agree 16 53.33%
2. Agree 14 46.67%
3. Uncertain - -
4. Disagree - -
5. Strongly Disagree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 16 students (53.33%) said “Strongly Agree”, 14 students (46.67%) said “Agree”, 0 student said “Uncertain”, 0 student said “Disagree” and 0 student said “ Strongly Disagree”. So, we could conclude that mostly students are really interested in learning listening by using Call Model.
Table 4.6 Learning Listening by Using CALL Model is Effective and Creative in Improving Listening Skill
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Agree 24 80%
2. Agree 6 20%
3. Uncertain - -
4. Disagree - -
5. Strongly Disagree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 24 students (80%) said “Strongly Agree”, 6 students (20%) said “Agree”, 0 student said “Uncertain”, 0 student said “Disagree” and 0 student said “ Strongly Disagree”. So, we could conclude that mostly students strongly agree with learning listening by using CALL model is effective and creative in improving listening skill.
Table 4.7 CALL Model Can Attract Me to be Active in Learning Process
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Agree 11 36.67%
2. Agree 19 63.33%
3. Uncertain - -
4. Disagree - -
5. Strongly Disagree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 11 students (36.67%) said “Strongly Agree”, 19 students (63.33%) said “Agree”, 0 student said “Uncertain”, 0 student said “Disagree” and 0 student said “ Strongly Disagree”. So, we could conclude that mostly students can attract to be active in learning process.
Table 4.8 CALL Model Motivate Me in Learning Listening
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Agree 15 50%
2. Agree 15 50%
3. Uncertain - -
4. Disagree - -
5. Strongly Disagree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 15 students (50%) said “Strongly Agree”, 15 students (50%) said “Agree”, 0 student said “Uncertain”, 0 student said “Disagree” and 0 student
said “ Strongly Disagree”. So, we could conclude that mostly students are motivated in learning listening by using Call Model.
Table 4.9 The Use of CALL Model in Learning Process is Really New for Me
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Agree 16 53.33%
2. Agree 14 46.67%
3. Uncertain - -
4. Disagree - -
5. Strongly Disagree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 16 students (53.33%) said “Strongly Agree”, 14 students (46.67%) said “Agree”, 0 student said “Uncertain”, 0 student said “Disagree” and 0 student said “ Strongly Disagree”. So, we could conclude that mostly students stated that the use of CALL model in learning process is really new for them.
Table 4.10 After Attending The Learning Process by CALL Model through Audio Visual Application Forced Me to Improve My Listening Skill
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Agree 18 60%
2. Agree 11 36.67%
3. Uncertain 1 3.33%
4. Disagree - -
5. Strongly Disagree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 18 students (60%) said “Strongly Agree”, 11 students (36.67%) said “Agree”, 1 student (3.33%) said “Uncertain”, 0 student said
“Disagree” and 0 student said “ Strongly Disagree”. So, we could conclude that
mostly students stated that the use of CALL model through audio visual application forced them to improve their listening skill.
Table 4.11 CALL Model Can Improve My Interest in Doing Tasks of Listening
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Agree 14 46.67%
2. Agree 16 53.33%
3. Uncertain - -
4. Disagree - -
5. Strongly Disagree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 14 students (46.67%) said “Strongly Agree”, 16 students (53.33%) said “Agree”, 0 student said “Uncertain”, 0 student said “Disagree” and 0 student said “ Strongly Disagree”. So, we could conclude that mostly students stated that CALL Model can improve their interest in doing tasks of listening.
Table 4.12 Learning Listening Through CALL Model Make Me to be More Focus in Learning Process
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Agree 5 16.67%
2. Agree 23 76.67%
3. Uncertain 2 6.67%
4. Disagree - -
5. Strongly Disagree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 5 students (16.67%) said “Strongly Agree”, 23 students (76.67%) said “Agree”, 2 students (6.67%) said “Uncertain”, 0 student said
“Disagree” and 0 student said “ Strongly Disagree”. So, we could conclude that
mostly students agree with learning listening through CALL model make them to be more focus in learning process.
Table 4.13 Learning Listening Through CALL Model is Easy in Capturing Materials
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Agree 8 26.67%
2. Agree 20 66.67%
3. Uncertain 2 6.67%
4. Disagree - -
5. Strongly Disagree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 8 students (26.67%) said “Strongly Agree”, 20 students (66.67%) said “Agree”, 2 students (6.67%) said “Uncertain”, 0 student said
“Disagree” and 0 student said “ Strongly Disagree”. So, we could conclude that mostly students are easy in capturing the materials through CALL model.
Table 4.14 CALL Model Gave a New Knowledge about The Use of Technology in Learning
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Agree 17 56.67%
2. Agree 12 40%
3. Uncertain 1 3.33%
4. Disagree - -
5. Strongly Disagree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 17 students (56.67%) said “Strongly Agree”, 12 students (40%) said “Agree”, 1 students (3.33%) said “Uncertain”, 0 student said
“Disagree” and 0 student said “ Strongly Disagree”. So, we could conclude that
mostly students stated that CALL model gave a new knowledge about the use of technology in learning.
Table 4.15 Learning by CALL Model is Really Boring
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Disagree 5 16.67%
2. Disagree 24 80%
3. Uncertain 1 3.33%
4. Agree - -
5. Strongly Agree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 5 students (16.67%) said “ Strongly Disagree”. 24 students said “Disagree” , 1 students (3.33%) said “Uncertain”, 0 student said “Agree” and no one student said “Strongly Agree. So, we could conclude that mostly students stated that CALL model is not really boring.
Table 4.16 Learning by CALL Model is Not Enjoyable
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Disagree 16 53.33%
2. Disagree 14 46.67%
3. Uncertain - -
4. Agree - -
5. Strongly Agree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 16 students (53.33%) said “ Strongly Disagree”. 14 students ( 46.67%) said “Disagree” 0 student said “Uncertain”, 0 student said “Agree” and no one student said“StronglyAgree“. So, we could conclude that mostly students is enjoyable in learning by CALL model.
Table 4.17 CALL Model is Not Appropriate in Improving Listening Skill
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Disagree 15 50%
2. Disagree 15 50%
3. Uncertain - -
4. Agree - -
5. Strongly Agree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 15 students (50%) said “ Strongly Disagree”. 15 students ( 50%) said “Disagree” 0 student said “Uncertain”, 0 students said “Agree” and no one student said “Strongly Agree“. So, we could conclude that mostly students stated that CALL model is appropriate in improving listening skill.
Table 4.18 I am Not Interested in Learning Listening Through CALL Model
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Disagree 13 43.33%
2. Disagree 17 56.67%
3. Uncertain - -
4. Agree - -
5. Strongly Agree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 13 students (43.33%) said “ Strongly Disagree”. 17 students ( 56.67%) said “Disagree” 0 student said “Uncertain”, 0 students said “Agree” and no one students said “Strongly Agree“. So, we could conclude that mostly students is interested in learning listening through CALL model.
Table 4.19 Learning by CALL Model is Really Hard
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1. Strongly Disagree 6 20%
2. Disagree 22 73.33%
3. Uncertain 2 6.67%
4. Agree - -
5. Strongly Agree - -
Total 30 100%
There were 6 students (20%) said “ Strongly Disagree”. 22 students ( 73.33%) said “Disagree” 2 students ( 6.67%) said “Uncertain”, 0 students said
“Agree” and no one students said “Strongly Agree“. So, we could conclude that mostly students stated that learning by CALL model is not really hard.
b. The Students’ Mean Score of Questionnaire
After calculating the score of students’ questionnaire with total questions is 15 from 30 students, the researcher got mean score of students’
questionnaire is 66.33. it is indicated that students’ motivation was categorized high motivation. It is logically with the classification of intensities motivation in the previous chapter that classify high in rate (61- 80).