AND GALL MODEL
6. Trial phase III
In trial third phase is done by using big group trial or operational field test or is done at class X AK 3 with 32 students as action class and X-1 with 32 students as control class. The following of pretest score and post test score from X-1 class as control class and X-3 as experiment class, so for seeing the difference of increasing average score that is reached by student can be describe in picture1:
The 1st International Conference on Economics, Education, Business, and Accounting (ICEEBA 2016)
Picture 1. Post Test Score Expert and Pretest Students for control class and action class.
Pretest and post test result for Basic Banking subject before tested, validity test and reliabity test is for knowing the question that being tested is valid or not. This trial is done at outside class X-3 and X-1. The result of validity trial is done by using product moment correlation method, and a data is called if r-hitung> r-tabel in significance phase 5 %. For pre test and post test question already have filled the requirement r hitung> r table with significance score < 0,05. That’s why , all of question for multiple choice and short essay in pretest and post test can be used and can be trusted for collecting data. The result of reliability trialin this research can be stated reliable through pattern KR-20 by Kuder
Richardson because score that is gained in instrument earn dichotomy score ( 1 and 0). From P KR-20 can be known that reliability score is 0,7214 for multiple choice is enough because in range 0,6
< R <0,8 and for essay is 0.61071 that reliability score for essay is stated enough because in range 0,6
<R 0,8.
In normality trial is used for knowing sample is normal distribution or not , it can be seen in table 3 :
Table 3. Normality Trial Test Of Normallity
Class Kolmogrov-Spirnov Shapiro - Wilk
Statistic Df Sig. Statistic Df Sig.
Score Action Class 130 32 181 947 32 121
Control Class 137 32 135 902 32 007
a. LillieforsSignifance Correction
From table 3 can be seen that Sig score in Kolmogorov-Spirnov from normality trial ( simbol a) ( sig .0,05) is experiment class 0, 181 > 0,05 and control class 0, 135 > 0,05 so that can be concluded that sample is normal distributed.
In homogeneity trial is used for knowing the variant of each group from the data that is gained between group that is tested different or not. Homogeneity result for pretest of control class and experiment class can be seen in table 4.
Table 4. Homogeneity Trial Test Of Homogeneity of Variances Score
Levenue Statistic
Df1 Df2 Sig.
2, 762 1 62 ,102
In table 4 can be seen that homogeneity of pretest for control class and experiment has score 0,102 > 0,05 so that is stated both class have homogeny variant.
In t related trial is used for knowing the occurring of the increasing of student’s score with Ho : There is no difference between control class and action class. For t related trial can be seen in table 5:
Table 5 t related trial
In Sig Column (2- tailed) in table 4.19 is in 0, 000< 0,05 is called Ho is rejected so that it can be concluded that there is an increasing.
In t independent trial for knowing there is difference in learn prestige with Ho : There is no difference in difference of student’s learn prestige that can be explained in table 6:
Table 6. Independent Independent Samples Test Levene’s Test for Equality of
Variances
t-test for Equality of means F Sig. T Df Sig. (2-
tailled)
Mean Differe nce
Std.
Error Differe nce
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference Lower Upper Nila
i
Equal Variances assumed
,09 3
,76 2
15,56 6
62 ,000 25,8125 1,65827 22,4976 6
29,12734 Equal variance
not assume
15,56 6
60,82 1
,000 25,8125 1,65827 22,4964 8
29,12862
In Sig column (2-tailed) in table 6 all is in 0,000 < 0,05 it means Ho is rejected so that can be concluded that there is difference between control class with action class. For knowing evaluation result of every student in using Online Accounting of learning supplement, so every student in action class will be given evaluation test. The result of student’s evaluation can be seen in table 7:
Table 7 The result of evaluation phase III
No. Indicator PFT
1. Beauty Interface 4,22
2. Readable text 4,34
3. Graphics Quality 4,16
4. Color Harmony 4,00
5. Choosing Menu 4,09
1. Learning Purpose 4,34
2. Learning Direction 4,31
3. Material Description 4,38
The 1st International Conference on Economics, Education, Business, and Accounting (ICEEBA 2016)
5. Easiness Learning material 4,34
6. Clarity of Example and Exercise 4,28
7. Availability test for understanding whole material 4,28 Total Score
Trial Average Criteria: Good
Description: Necessary to be Revised
51,19 4,27
From the table 7 can be known that for every indicator has score above 4,27 so that every indicator in Online accounting already have been good enough categorized based on evaluation from student. This thing is proven by average score for all indicator is 4,27 that includes into good category and only be revised briefly or already have been deserved for being used.
For knowing student’s response in using Online Accounting can be seen through student’s response that the result can be seen in table 8:
Table 8 The result of student’s response
No. Indicator Total Agreed Respondents
1. Active Participate to do learning activity 32
2. Finish task quickly and correct 30
3. Try to understand every material on Basic Competence 32
4. More interested to learn material with technology 32
5. Have extra skill in learning activities 31
1. Positive Response (happy, active, discipline, collaborate, improvement of achievement)
30 2. Negative Response (sleepy, don’t care, not active, don’t have
improvement of achievement)
2
No. Indicator Total Agreed Respondents
1. Active Participate to do learning activity 32
2. Finish task quickly and correct 30
3. Try to understand every material on Basic Competence 32
4. More interested to learn material with technology 32
5. Have extra skill in learning activities 31
1. Positive Response (happy, active, discipline, collaborate, improvement of achievement)
30 2. Negative Response (sleepy, don’t care, not active, don’t have
improvement of achievement)
2
From table 8 can be known that most of student have positive response through lesson of Banking Basic that using Online Accounting. This things also see from student’s answer through student response when follow the lesson of Basic banking in active indicator in learning activity, fast in finishing many assignment, try to understand the material, interest for learning the material and has additional skill in learning activity.