• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Antenna isolation for wireless communications systems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Antenna isolation for wireless communications systems"

Copied!
29
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Ansoft, San Diego 10/12/01

(2)

Company History:

- Created in May 2000

- Funded by Sevin Rosen and US trust

Targeted markets and applications:

- Embedded antennas for Cell Phones - Laptops and all wireless applications

between 800 MHz and ISM Located:

San Diego Tech Center

9605 Scranton Road, suite 850

San Diego, CA 92121

(3)

for wireless communications systems

Gregory Poilasne, S. Rowson, L. Desclos

(4)

1 - Antenna and Surrounding Interaction a) Antenna placement

b) Radiation pattern - Efficiency evaluation c) Bit rate Measurements

3 - Internal antenna isolation

a) Experimental and numerical results 2 - Isolation Measurements

a) Interaction with the case and the components b) Interaction with the user

CONCLUSION

(5)

a) Antenna placement

Home-RF solution

(6)

a) Antenna placement

Proposed solution

Antenna position

(7)

b) Radiation pattern - Efficiency evaluation

Efficiency = power at the antenna input radiated power

Takes into account:

input mismatch

loss into the antenna

loss into the surroundings

Measured by comparing:

free space dipole to

the antenna inside the system

(8)

b) Radiation pattern - Efficiency evaluation

Antenna X Ripples due to the

interactions Isolated Antenna

Smooth radiation pattern

4dB Efficiency difference

(9)

c) Bit rate Measurements Practical efficiency measurement:

Antenna

Laptop Communication

channel

Bit rate measurement versus

the distance between the two laptops

Antenna

(10)

c) Bit rate Measurements

Distance (feet)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Bit rate (bit/s)

0 100 200 300 400 500

Proxim facing transmitter Photonic RF facing transmitter Proxim looking away from transmitter Photonic RF looking away from transmitter

Parking Lot Test - Minimum Possible Multipath (Office test is Isotropic)

ET Antenna is vertical

ET antenna ET antenna

AUT AUT

(11)

c) Bit rate Measurements Practical efficiency measurement:

Antenna Attenuator

Laptop Communication

channel

Bit rate measurement versus

the attenuation

(12)

c) Bit rate Measurements

Ref : Ideal dipole away from any absorber.

ET ant: Isolated antenna

Antenna X: antenna sold with the Home RF card.

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Attenuation (dB)

Bit Rate (KB/s)

Dipole PRFC ant Symphony

ET ant.

Ant. X

Approximately 4.5dB of efficiency difference

Efficiency difference

(13)

Interaction between the antenna and the case: Reduction of efficiency

Need for a tool to measure the interaction: Antenna Isolation

(14)

a) Interaction with the case and the components

Shields tend to short

circuit antennas

(15)

a) Interaction with the case and the components

Example of a PIFA

E field

Metallic shield

(16)

d

Point A

Decay associated Point A

p

a) Interaction with the case and the components

Antenna

Shield

(17)

a) Interaction with the case and the components

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 42 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28

30-35 25-30 20-25 15-20 10-15 5-10 0-5

antenna

Shift in MHz
(18)

a) Interaction with the case and the components

y = 0.0245Ln(x) + 0.048

y = 0.0109Ln(x) + 0.0195

-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Freq (GHz)

measurements

fitting

Distance in cm

(19)

a) Interaction with the case and the components

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 42 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28

19-20 18-19 17-18 16-17 15-16 14-15 13-14 12-13 11-12 10-11 9-10 8-9 7-8 6-7 5-6 4-5 3-4 2-3

antenna

Shift in MHz

C B

(20)

b) Interaction with the user

3D Radiation pattern

Loss into the user body

Need to shield the user - Performance

- Health

Frequency shift/matching

Need for isolated antennas

- Performance

(21)

b) Interaction with the user

Frequency: 1.575GHz Bandwidth: 8MHz Critical case

Antenna

(22)

b) Interaction with the user

Frequency shift: 2.5MHz

Blue curve: free space

Antenna

(23)

b) Interaction with the user Hand over the side of the antenna

Blue curve: free space

Frequency shift: 1MHz

Antenna

(24)

Current distribution:

It has to be confined nearby the antenna.

Nearfield distribution:

The nearfield has to be shaped away from parasitic elements

Confined the field as much as possible Nearfield probing: long and no so accurate

Simulation tools: Faster and faster, easy to visualize

(25)

Experimental and numerical results

PIFA:

Currents are leaking

on the sides.

(26)

Experimental and numerical results

Isolated Antenna:

Low currents outside

the antenna.

(27)

Experimental and numerical results

PIFA with shield:

Coupling with the shield.

Frequency shift:

9%

(28)

Experimental and numerical results

Isolated antenna

with shield:

Low coupling with the shield.

Frequency shift:

3%

(29)

Isolation means:

- Low interaction between an antenna and its surroundings Inside the enclosure: components, case

Outside the enclosure: user body, table,...

- Better efficiency in real world applications - Semi-standard products

drop-in component

fast turn-around design and optimization

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

This project discussed about the performance of designed Microstrip Patch antenna and Microstrip Patch antenna with Split Ring Resonator (SRR) for a Short Range

4.37 Manufacturing dual-mode rectangular microstrip patch antenna 109 4.38 Measured results of dual-mode rectangular microstrip patch antenna 109 4.39 Comparison between

antenna such as matched impedance, gain, frequency, bandwidth, return loss, amplitude of. radiation pattern and feeding technique must be taking into considerations

The simulation of the antenna is carried out to obtain the return loss, bandwidth, gain, directivity and radiation pattern.. Measurement results also showed

To be suitable for MIMO application, the antenna array should have good radiation pattern, high radiation efficiency, high peak gain, low envelope correlation, and high isolation

Since the patch design, in general, plays important role in the antenna radiation, different patch shapes have been considered to enhance the antenna bandwidth and efficiency [9, 10],

Comparison between the measured radiation patterns of the unbent and concave bent antenna at a 0.9 GHz b 2 GHz c 2.5 GHz TABLE III GAIN COMPARISON BETWEEN UNBENT AND BENT ANTENNA

c The radiation efficiency of an antenna, which is defined by the ratio of the time-average radiation power to the total input power, is equivalent to the ratio of the power gain to the