ATOM INDONESIA JOURNAL
Associate Editor's ReportArticle No. : 475
Title of Paper : Shielding Design for the PGNAA Experimental Facility at Kartini Reactor Associate Editor Name : Jos Budi Sulistyo
Comment on Descriptions
Criteria Evaluation
Associate editor's evaluation
Yes No Comments
1. Originality of the article
Free of Plagiarism/Similarity(max 20%) v
New article/not yet Published (presented/ in proceeding max 30%)v
2. Related to nuclear/atomic science
and technology v
3. Reference
The number of references at least10 v
The use of recent references 80%(maximum 5 years ago) x Out of 13 references, excluding the online ones, 8 satisfy the requirements (61 %)
Type of the references (primarily,secondary etc.) 85% from journal x In total, only 7 of 13 sources (54 %) are from journals.
Cross link reference (traceable) xAdding DOI references, if ther are available, would have been helpful. For instance, for [4], the DOI identifier is
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2007.971158 0
Reference style standard: Elseviernumeric without title x
Titles and ending pages should not have been given. Titles of journals and conference proceedings titles should be properly abbreviated. One of the available information sources on title abbreviations is
http://www.efm.leeds.ac.uk/~mark/ISIabbr/ .
When reference has more than 3Authors, write only 3 name, et al. x
For [4], “Et Al” (incorrect capitalization – should be all lowercase instead, and in this journal italicized) is given after just one author's name.
For [10], all six authors are named; instead, should name only the first three and use “et al” in place of the rest.
Article follows the Atom Indonesiatemplate and guidelines x
The captions/titles below some pictures use
“Fig.” (for instance, Fig. 1), but some others use
“Figures” (such as Figure 3). Should be “Fig.”
for the captions of/below all pictures.
Table (clear, without vertical line) x The tables have vertical lines – they should not.
Figure (clear, min 300 dpi) vFinal recommendation:
1. Continue review process [ ] 2. Return to the Author [ x ] 3. Reject [ ]
Comments:
The paper should be returned to the author to allow for the necessary improvements to be made.
