Geology and
Palaeontology.925
lips,
Eudadocrinus
millebranchiatus "VVachs.and
Sp.,Platycrinus hemisph&ricus M. and W., Arthroacantha pundobrachiata
AYil-Hams,
Pterotocrinusacutus Weth., P.
bifurcatusWeth., P.
spatula-tus
Weth., Cromyocrinus
simplex Trauts.,Scaphiocrinus
sp.und.
and Adinocrinus
verrucosus Hall. It willbe observed
that in allthe above
species,with two
exceptions, the vault ismore
or lessdepressed or
nearly
flat,with a simple
analopening, while
in thelast species
mentioned
the anal aperture is at theextremity of a prolonged
analtube —
the so-called " proboscis "— but
in this singleinstance the
tube appeared
tobe
injured,and probably has
asecond
opening
at the base.In every example, whether
attached to thevault, as in
the majority of the
genera, or to the sideof
the calyx, as in Platycrinus, themollusoan
shell is situatedover
the analSumming up
thepredominant
physiologicaland
structural featuressuggested by
recent investigations, itappears:
(1) thatthe
Platyceraswas
attached to the crinoid fora
considerable lengthof
time,
and very probably
for life, as isevidenced by
themargin of
the
gastropod
shell,corresponding
exactly to the irregularitiesof
the crinoidal
surface—
first suggests!by Meek and Worthen
; (2)
that the anterior portion of the shell is
always
directlyover
the anal apertureof the
crinoid,and
that asgrowth
in the shellcon-
tinues the posterior
margin
isremoved
fartherand
fartherfrom
the vaultopening,
as isshown by
theshallow
concentricchannels made
by
themargin of the
shell in the vattltsof
Strotocrinusand Physe-
tocrinus; (3) that the
nourishment of
themollusc must have been
derived
chieflyfrom
the excrementitioosmatter from
the crinoid,though
thegasteropod may have
subsisted alsoon animalcules and
microscopic
plants, as in the raseof
the living representativesof
the closely allied
genus Capulus
; (4) that theshape of
the shellaperture
and
itsmarginal
configurationwere dependent
entirelyupon
the surfaceof attachment, and hence
areof small
classificatoryvalue; and
(5) that the entireform of
the shellwas determined
toa
greater or lesser extentby
the surfaceupon which
thegasteropod was
stationed.The
speciesof Platyceras
inwhich
the sedentary habits are posi-tively
known from
theattachment of
the gasteropod shells to crin-oids are :
P.
equilalerumHall, P. infundibulum M. and W., P.
parasiticus Trauts., I\
met
tun Hall, P.fonnosum Keyes, P.
ches-terense
M. and W., P. dumomm Conrad, and
severalundetermined
species.—
CharlesE. Keyes.
Glyptocephalus not Identical with Bucklanpium.—
In
theAmerican Naturalist
forMay and September, 1888
(Vol.XXII., pp.448,828),
1aavensed
theDame BucMandkan (Kceuig)
as a substitute for
Glyptocephalus of Agassiz
(1843), the lattername
926 General
Notes.having been previously given
to awell-marked
existinggenus of
Pleuronectids bv Gottsche
(1835).I did
this, as indicated inmy communication
(p. 828), solelyon
theauthority of
Pictet,who
believed that
the Bucklandium was the same
as Giypto<:rph<du,iAgass., 1 the
work of
Koetiignot being
accessible tome
at the time,and
Prof. Pictei boinurco^mzed
as a special authorityon
eocenefishes.
But
in the GcoIo<,ira/ -Vuqozii) for Oct.,1888
(p. 471),and
also in
The Annals and Magazine of Nat. History
for Oct. (6 ser., v.II, p. 355),
Mr. A. Smith Woodward,
afteran examination of
thetype of Buck/and!
tun di(»vii, "determined
that it is truly theim-
perfect
head and
pectoral arc!) of a Siluroid." Incredible assuch
amalidentifi -ation
on
the partof
Pictetmust
appear, Ipresume
thedetermination of Mr. Woodward must be
accepted, and, atany
rate,that the
name Biwldandium
hasnothing
todo with
Glyptoeephalus.Consequently,
anew name must be provided
forGlyptoeephalus Agass.
Gli/ptoeara,having
thesame meaning, may
beemployed.
— Theo Gill
Dr.
C.A. White, of
theUnited
StatesGeological Survey,
writes
the
senior editor as follows:— "I have just returned from
Texas. I went
toBaylor, Archer and Wichita
counties,and found
that
Mr. Cummins was
entirely correct in hisreported
discoveryof
Mesozoie and
Palaeozoic types of invertebratescommingled
inone and the same
layerof the Permian. I went with him
to hislocalities,
and
collectedwith my own hand-
agood
lotof
the fossils.I
shallsupport your published opinion—or
ratherdetermination
—
as to the
Permian age of
theformation."
The Nomenclature of the Mammalian Molar Cusps.—
Every
freshdiscovery among
the primitivemammals
tends to con-firm the
theory
thatthe
evolutionof the molar crowns has
been, ina
successionof stages beginning
with the single reptilian cone, thehomodont type of Riitimeyer (Haplodont Cope). Compilative
anatomy and
the palaeontological recordcombine
todemonstrate
tinsproposition for all orders
of mammals excepting
theMonotremes,
Multituberculates and Edentates—
the historyof
the teethof
theformer
classes is incomplete.Our knowledge of
the _ edentatesleaves it uncertain
whether
themolar crowns
are ina
primitive ordegenerate
condition ;we know
thatthey once
possessedenamel, but
the analogicaldegeneration of
themolar crowns among the
cetacea
from a complex
to a primitivetype makes any
conjecture asto the
crowns of
the primitive edentatesvery
doubtful.Exclud-
ing
the representativesof
theMultituberculata, Cope has shown
1
Je
croisque
e'est [i.e.,"Glyptocephalus radiatm
Agass."] la.m
espfceeque eel!. ?;/>*, pi. s, sous le ^JJJ
de Bucklandium. Voyez
[Traitede
Paleontologie par PictetJ, i. a.,v
144, ett. II., p. 66 [et p. 123].