Amirullah Ubhara Surabaya
Paper ID 14742 Review Progress
Amirullah Ubhara Surabaya
IREMOS] Editor Decision
Dewan Redaksi Berhadiah Layak Pujian
Thanks for your responding
Copyright Form + Treatment Personal Data Amirullah IREMOS Paper ID 14742
Amirullah Ubhara Surabaya
Paper ID 14742_Amirullah_Revised Paper
Amirullah Ubhara Surabaya
Fw: Pembayaran Anda kepada PRAISE WORTHY PRIZE S.R.L
Praise Worthy Prize
2/5 Amirullah Ubhara Surabaya
Hadiah Terpuji
PDF File IREMOS_Amirullah_Paper ID 14742
Amirullah Ubhara Surabaya
Cc: Technical Staff
Ik kan https://www.praiseworthyprize.org/jsm/index.php?journal=iremos&page=login&op=signIn niet openen. Bcc: Amirullah Ubhara Surabaya
High Performance of Unified Power Quality Conditioner and Battery Energy Storage Supplied by Photovoltaic
Ontoseno Penangsang 2 , Adi Soeprijanto 3
- Introduction
- Proposed Method
- Result and Discussion
- Conclusion
UPQC delivered PV performance using FLC without and with BES in scenario 4 (Sag-NL). c) Load voltage UPQC + PV with FLC without BES. Figure 9 shows load voltage harmonic spectra on phase A of UPQC supplied by PV using FLC without and with BES in scenario 6. Spectra of load voltage harmonics on phase A of UPQC supplied PV using FLC in scenario 6 ( Inter NL).
11 shows performance of average THD for load voltage and source current on UPQC supplied by PV using PI control and FLC without and with BES in six disturbance scenarios. Load voltage average THD performance for UPQC supplied by PV using PI and FLC in six disturbance scenarios. Source current average THD performance for UPQC supplied by PV using PI and FLC in six disturbance scenarios.
Otherwise under scenario 6 (Inter-NL) FLC can significantly reduce average THD of load voltage than PI controller. Otherwise under scenario 6, FLC method can significantly reduce the average THD of load voltage than PI controller.
Acknowledgements
11a shows that in scenario 1(NL), scenario 2. Unba-LN), scenario 3 (Dis-NL), scenario 4 (Sag-NL) and scenario 5 (Swell-NL), the implementation of the PI controller in UPQC provided from PV without BES able to result average THD of source current slightly better than FLC. Otherwise, according to scenario 6 (Inter-LN) the PI controller gives a significantly better mean THD result of the source voltage than the PI. 11b shows that in six scenarios, the use of FLC in UPQC supplied by PV with BES is able to give the average THD of the source current better than the PI controller.
Furthermore, under scenario 6 (Inter-NL), the FLC is able to reduce the average THD of the source current significantly than the PI controller. The implementation of FLC on UPQC supplied PV with BES results, average THD of load voltage slightly lower than using PI controller. In disturbance scenarios 1 to 5, implementation of the FLC method UPQC supplied PV with BES is able to reduce the average THD of the load voltage slightly better than the PI controller and has already met the limits prescribed in IEEE 519.
In disturbance scenarios 1 to 5, this method is able to provide the average THD of the source current better than the PI controller. Furthermore, under scenario 6, it is also able to provide significantly better performance of the average THD of the source current than the PI controller.
The use of BES supplied by PV connected to three-phase grid through UPQC's DC link to improve power quality with PI controller and FLC has already been discussed. In scenario 6, PV can generate power to UPQC-DC link and inject full average compensation voltage through injection transformer on active serial filter, keeping average load voltage stable. During interrupt voltage, even though there is low source current, the combination of PV and BES can deliver power, store excess energy from PV and inject compensation current into the load bus through an active shunt filter.
Authors’ information
For jointly authorized works, all joint authors must sign, and one of the authors must sign as an authorized agent for the other. The processing of the personal data useful for the fulfillment of these obligations is necessary for the proper handling of the relationship and its provision is mandatory to achieve the aforementioned purposes. In addition, the Controller informs that any failure or incorrect transmission of the mandatory information may mean that the Controller cannot guarantee the congruence of this processing.
5, 6 and following of the GDPR and by using the minimal emergency measures provided by the disciplinary technician. Data Controller: the Controller of the processing of the personal data, according to the Law, is the Commendable Price S,r,l., Ma G. The data subject has the right to request from the Controller the: a@ess to , correction of, deletion (right to be forgotten') ol restriction of processing oi data transferability ol to object to processing of personal data, as well as in a general way you can exercise all the rights provided from the advertisement.15 (and following) 1S23) of the GDPR reported below.
When personal data is transferred to a third country or an international organization, the DDA subject will have the fghl to be informed of the appropriate safeguards in accordance with Article 46 regarding the transfer. The performance of the proposed model is validated and investigated through simulations using Matlab/Simulink.
Nomenclature
FLC method on UPQC provided by PV with BES can lead to an average THD of load voltage slightly better than PI controller. FLC method on UPQC provided by PV with BES is also able to give the average THD of source current better than PI controller. Under scenario 6 (Inter-NL), FLC is able to significantly reduce the average THD of load voltage and source current than PI controller.
11 shows the performances of average THD of load voltage (VL) and source current (IS) on UPQC supplied by PV using PI controller and FLC without and with BES in six disturbance scenarios. 10b shows that in six scenarios the use of FLC on UPQC provided by PV with BES is able to lead average THD of VL slightly better than PI controller. Otherwise, under scenario 6 (Inter-NL), FLC is able to significantly reduce average THD of VL as PI controller.
11a shows that in scenario 1 (NL), scenario 2 (Unba-LN), scenario 3 (Dis-NL), scenario 4 (Sag-NL) and scenario 5 (Swell-NL), the implementation of the PI controller in the UPQC supplied by PV without BES able to result average THD of IS slightly better than FLC. 11b shows that in six scenarios, the use of FLC in PV-supplied UPQC with BES is able to give better IS average THD than the PI controller.
INVOICE
The FLC method is also able to maintain and improve the average THD of load voltage within the IEEE 519 limit. The highest and the lowest average THD for IS are achieved in scenario 6 (Inter-NL). 10a shows that in scenario 1(NL), scenario 2 (Unba-NL), scenario 3 (Dis-NL), scenario 4 (Sag-NL) and scenario 5 (Swell-NL), the implementation of FLC on UPQC provided by PV without BES is able to result in average THD of VL slightly better than PI controller and also limits prescribed in IEEE 519.
Unba-LN), scenario 3 (Dis-NL), scenario 4 (Sag-NL) and scenario 5 (Swell-NL), the implementation of PI controller on UPQC provided by PV without BES is able to result in average THD on IS slightly better than FLC. In disturbance scenarios 1 to 5, the implementation of the FLC method UPQC supplied PV with BES is able to reduce the average THD of the load voltage slightly better than the PI controller and has already met the limits prescribed in IEEE 519. Otherwise, under scenario 6, the FLC -method able to reduce the average THD of load voltage significantly than the PI controller.
In disturbance scenarios 1 to 5, this method is able to give the average THD of the source current better than the PI controller. However, except for scenario 2, the average THD of the source current in UPQC supplied by PV without/with BES using the FLC method still does not meet the limits described in IEEE 519.
