TEMPLATE PROPOSAL BY Dr. HAVID ARDI
Mahasiswa NIM
Thesis Proposal
Dr. Havid Ardi, S.Pd., M.Hum.
FBS UNP Prop
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS...i
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION...1
A. Background of the Problem...1
B. Identification of the Problems...2
C. Limitation of the Research...3
D. Formulation of the Problems...3
E. Research Question...3
F. Purpose of the Research...4
G. Significance of the Research...5
H. Definition of the Key term...6
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE...7
A. Review of Related Theories...7
1. Definition of Motivation...7
2. Learning Style...7
3. Politeness...7
B. Review Relevant Studies...7
C. Conceptual Framework...8
D. Hypothesis (experiment)...8
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD...9
A. Research Design...9
B. Data (Ql: Data & Source of Data)/(Qn: Population and Sample)...9
E. Instrumentation...9
F. Technique of Data Collection...10
G. Technique of Data Analysis...10
H. Research Procedure...10
REFERENCE...11
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Problem Pengantar
Apa fakta atau masalah empiris yang ditemukan
1. Observasi terhadap fenomena (fakta empiris) misal masalah dalam pembelajaran B. Ingg (materi, guru, media, siswa, skill, dll)
tersebutkan dan tunjukkan itu penting
2. Review konsep terkait fenomena atau teori terkait masalah. Spt apa seharusnya?
3. Sejauh mana telah diteliti + gap. Apakah yang diangkat oleh peneliti lain dan apa yang belum mereka bahas. However … Gap: Celah yang masih ada yang belum digali oleh peneliti lain dan merupakan hal yang perlu diteliti.
State of the arts: perkembangan terkini pada ilmu tersebut.
Cari rujukan dulu.
- Reputable journal. Bukan predatory: lihat beallist. Hindari mengutip dan submit ke sana IPB (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh).
- Scopus, EBSCO, DOAJ, ELSEVIER, univ.
Politeness have been studied by some researchers, such as, in business (Fuertes- Olivera & Nielsen, 2008; Zhang, 2011), literary works (Brookins, 2010), however their study ….
Application in teaching pronunciation gives good effect (Fouz-González, 2020;
Liubiniene, 2009) however this studies were limited on students’ perception.
Fouz-G gambarkan perjelas Beri pernyataan gap Arah penelitian
State of the arts: perkembangan terkini pada bidang kajian.
Novelty: Kebaruan atau kontribusi keilmuan dari penelitian kita Unique: Kekhasan atau perbedaan
Gap: apa yang belum dikaji peneliti sebelumnya.
B. Identification of the Problems
Identifikasi semua masalah yang dapat diteliti terkait topik.
Speaking: Pronounce, intonation, stress, ability, problems, fluency.
Translation: Quality, grammar (accept), semantics, pragmatics, technique, student’s ability, problems
C. Limitation of the Research In this research ….
This research is limited ….
Kita hanya Bahas Quality n technique
Hanya bahas vowel or diphthong pronunciation ability of the Third year
D. Formulation of the Problems
Formulation buat pertanyaan umum atau besar yang diajukan terkait limitation.
The problems of this research can be formulated as follow “How does English department student’s ability and problems in pronouncing diphthong?
E. Research Question
Buat pertanyaan secara rinci.
Based on the formulation of the research, the
1. How does English department student’s ability in pronouncing high diphthong?
2. What are the problems faced by English department …?
3.
F. Purpose of the Research This research …
1. Identify English department student’s ability in pronouncing diphthong.
2. Find out the problems faced by English department …?
G. Significance of the Research Teoritis: kontribusi keilmuan ke teori?
Praktis: untuk kependidikan seperti apa?
H. Definition of the Key term
Terkait teknis yang digunakan dalam penelitian
Ability: the ability in this research is related to students’ ability in translating cultural term from English into Indonesia.
Jadi tidak harus sesuai konsep teori.
Reading ability: student’s ability in understanding specific information in narrative texts.
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
A. Review of Related Theories 1. Definition of Motivation
Review dan adu pendapat para pakar (adu domba mereka) Simpulan sebagai posisi peneliti dalam penelitian.
Apa yang kita ambil dalam penelitian kita dari definisi. Atau klasifikasi, atau cara evaluasi.
2. Learning Style
3. Politeness
It is explain (Brown & Levinson, 1987; Leech, 2014) by I. Review Relevant Studies
Penelitian terdahulu.
1. Berikan kelemahan atau hal yang belum mereka angkat Dari artikel journal
Some related studies related to …. Have conducted by some researchers that also give contribution to this research
A research ( ….) put in details
Kontribusinya apa? Apa yang belum diangkat, dan bedanya,
J. Conceptual Framework
Hubungkan antar teori dalam penelitian ini.
K. Hypothesis (experiment) Based on the theory:
H0: tidak terdapat pengaruh yang significant antara penghasilan ortu dengan hasil belajar.
H1: terdapat pengaruh yang significant antara penghasilan ortu dnegan hasil belajar.
H1: Think pair share produces/gives a better result on students’ reading ability H0: Think pair share does not produce/give a better result on students’ reading ability
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD
A. Research Design
Jenis yang mana dan kenapa? Qualitative research(Thuy, 2013)
B. Data (Ql: Data & Source of Data)/(Qn: Population and Sample) Batasan data: orang, benda, dimana, kapan, kenapa dipilih?
Homogenitas data normalitas Objektif: langsung dair lapangan Afektif: hasil penilaian dari orang lain Kognitif: asal, pandanga
Informant: participant
Dokumen: RPP, materi, tugas, Artefak:
Triangulasi: metode, sumber data, teori
L. Instrumentation
Alat yng dipakai utk mengumpulkan data.
Ada kisi2 atau indicator yang sebelumnya direview di bab 2 Uji validitas & reliabilitas.
1. Observation checklist 2. Indicator
3. Interview guidelines
4. Indicator, validity, face, reliant, 5. Guidelines
6. Guideline, question
M. Technique of Data Collection
1. Observation
2. Distributing Questionnaire 3. Interview
4. Test
5. Document analysis 6. FGD
(Ardi, 2014; Birkan-Baydan & Karadağ, 2014; Cook, 2008)
N. Technique of Data Analysis Uji: hypothesis, uji T, Uji R, Domain data:
Domain dan taksonomi
Domain BOR POS NEG OR
Kelas 1 22 2
Kantin 17 15 2
Kantor 3 12 1
Taksonomi data: kategori based teori Miles dan Hubberman
Data redu Data display Verifikasi
O. Research Procedure
Terdapat beberapa model penelitian (Mayangsari, Nuriman, & Agustiningsih, 2014). Hal ini telah dilakukan peneliti sebelumnya (Ardi, 2015). (May, n.d.)
REFERENCE
Ardi, H. (2014). Raising teacher’s grammatical consciousness on English medio- passive constructions. Leksika, 8(2), 18–26.
Ardi, H. (2015). Cross cultural communication awareness in translation.
Proceeding of International Seminar on Languages and Arts (ISLA), 229–
234. Padang: FBS Universitas Negeri Padang.
Birkan-Baydan, E., & Karadağ, A. B. (2014). Literary translation workshop:
Social constructivist approach classroom activities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 984–988.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.354
Brookins, T. A. (2010). A politeness analysis of Catullus’ polymetric poems: Can Leech’s GSP cross the ancient-modern divide? Journal of Pragmatics, 42(5), 1283–1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.014
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cook, V. . (2008). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. In Computers and Education (Fourth Edi).
https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130
Fouz-González, J. (2020). Using apps for pronunciation training: An empirical evaluation of the English file pronunciation app. Language Learning &
Technology, 24(1), 62–85.
Fuertes-Olivera, P. a., & Nielsen, S. (2008). Translating politeness in bilingual English-Spanish business correspondence. Meta: Journal Des Traducteurs, 53(3), 667–678. https://doi.org/10.7202/019246ar
Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Liubiniene, V. (2009). Developing listening skills in CLIL. KALBŲ STUDIJOS, 15(1), 89–93. Retrieved from
http://www.kalbos.lt/zurnalai/15_numeris/14.pdf May, P. (n.d.). Knockout: First certificate.
Mayangsari, D., Nuriman, & Agustiningsih. (2014). Penerapan metode
eksperimen untuk meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar IPA Siswa Kelas VI pokok bahasan konduktor dan isolator SDN Semboro Probolinggo Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal Edukasi UNEJ, 1(1), 27–31.
Thuy, P. T. (2013). House ’ s functional-pragmatic model of translation
assessment and implications for evaluating English-Vietnamese translation quality. 29(1), 56–64.
Zhang, T. (2011). Politeness principle in the translation of business letters. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(6), 615–621.
https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.6.615-621
