FF usion Reactor Technology I usion Reactor Technology I
FF usion Reactor Technology I usion Reactor Technology I
(459.760, 3 Credits) (459.760, 3 Credits)
P f D Y S N Prof. Dr. Yong-Su Na (32-206, Tel. 880-7204)
( , )
Contents Contents
Week 1 Magnetic Confinement
Contents Contents
Week 1. Magnetic Confinement
Week 2-3. Fusion Reactor Energetics
Week 4 Basic Tokamak Plasma Parameters Week 4. Basic Tokamak Plasma Parameters Week 5. Plasma Heating and Confinement Week 6 Plasma Equilibrium
Week 6. Plasma Equilibrium
Week 8. Particle Trapping in Magnetic Fields Week 9 10 Plasma Transport
Week 9-10. Plasma Transport
Week 11. Energy Losses from Tokamaks Week 12 The L and H modes
Week 12. The L- and H-modes Week 13-14. Tokamak Operation
2
Contents Contents
Week 1 Magnetic Confinement
Contents Contents
Week 1. Magnetic Confinement
Week 2-3. Fusion Reactor Energetics
Week 4 Basic Tokamak Plasma Parameters Week 4. Basic Tokamak Plasma Parameters Week 5. Plasma Heating and Confinement Week 6 Plasma Equilibrium
Week 6. Plasma Equilibrium
Week 8. Particle Trapping in Magnetic Fields Week 9 10 Plasma Transport
Week 9-10. Plasma Transport
Week 11. Energy Losses from Tokamaks Week 12 The L and H modes
Week 12. The L- and H-modes Week 13-14. Tokamak Operation
3
Heating and Current Drive Heating and Current Drive Heating and Current Drive Heating and Current Drive
http://iter.rma.ac.be/en/img/Heating.jpg
4
Ohmic
Ohmic HeatingHeating Ohmic
Ohmic HeatingHeating
Electric blanket
5
Ohmic
Ohmic HeatingHeating Ohmic
Ohmic HeatingHeating
Φ
ICS Ip
Ip LpIp + IpRp =Vp = −φ
V
ICS Vp
http://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=File:Transformer.svg&filetimestamp=20070330220406 6
Ohmic
Ohmic HeatingHeating Ohmic
Ohmic HeatingHeating
φ p + p p = p = −
pI I R V
L
Total change in magnetic flux needed to induce a final current
f p f i
p p t
ind l I
k R R
I L
f dt
⎥⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
⎡ ⎟+ −
⎠
⎜ ⎞
⎝
≈ ⎛
=
=
Δφind ∫0 φ p p μ0 0 ln 8 0 2 2 p k
a ⎥
⎢ ⎦
⎣ ⎝ ⎠
∫0 0 0 2
[1.65 0.89( 1)]
ln + 95 −
≈ q
li internal inductance
4 . 0
0 ,
0 ≈
=
Δφres CEμ R Ipf CE
Additional magnetic flux needed to overcome resistive losses during start up Ejima coefficient
0
0 p E
E
res μ
φ
dt'
R
t I
f
b = ∫
Δφ
Further change in magnetic flux needed to maintain Ip after start up
0 Ip Rpdt
burn = ∫
Δφ
ΔB
Δφ 2
Technological limit to the maximum value of BOH
T k k i i h tl l d d i
7 OH
v B
r Δ
≈
Δφ π 2 Tokamak is inherently a pulsed device.
Ohmic
Ohmic HeatingHeating
j2
PΩ =η
Ohmic
Ohmic HeatingHeating
Ohmic heating density
Neoclassical resistivity
1
2 2 1
⎟⎟
⎞
⎜⎜
⎛
⎟⎞
⎜⎛
−
=
r
s n
η η
: Spitzer resistivity
) 3 /
2 / (
/ 10
8 1
2 3 8
⎟⎟⎠
⎜⎜⎝
⎟⎠
⎜⎝
− Z T R
R ηs: Spitzer resistivity
) 3 /
, 2 / (
/
10
8× 8 2 = =
≈ Zeff Te r a R a
η
) ) / ( 1 ( )
(r = j0 − r a 2
j v
⎥⎤
⎢⎡
⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎛
−
−
=
2 +1 0
2
0 1 1
) (
r v
j r a
B μ
Ampère’s law
) 1 2
2 /(
0
2 = j v+
j ⎥⎥
⎢ ⎦
⎢
⎣ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎟⎟⎠
= + 1 1 2
) 1 (
) 2
(r v r a
Bθ Ampère s law
0 0 0
0 1, 2 /
/ ,
/ θ φ μ
φa B R q q v j B Rq
B
qa = φ θ , qa q0 = + , j0 = φ q0μ0
qa a
⎟⎞
⎜⎛
⎟⎟⎠
⎜⎜ ⎞
⎝
= ⎛
2
0 2
1 2 1
R j B
μ
φ
8
⎟⎠
⎜ ⎞
⎝⎛ −
⎠
⎝ 0 0
0
2 q q
R q
a
μ
Ohmic
Ohmic HeatingHeating
L
E P
nT j
PΩ =η 2 = 3 /τ =
Ohmic
Ohmic HeatingHeating
) 2 / (
/ ) / ( 10
0 .
1 5 3/2 2
2
o a
o
effT B R q q q
Z
j = × − φ −
η
5 4 5
2
0
108
7 .
2 ⎟⎟
⎠
⎜⎜ ⎞
⎝
⎟⎟ ⎛
⎠
⎜⎜ ⎞
⎝
× ⎛
= R
B q
nq T Z
a E
effτ φ
0 ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
⎝ qaq
/ ) /
( 20 2
5 .
=1
Zeff qaqo =1.5 2 / ) 10 /
(n 20 a2
E =
τ
4
Alcator scaling
5 4
87 .
0 Bφ T =
Average temperatures above ~ 7keV are necessary before alpha heating is
9
Average temperatures above 7keV are necessary before alpha heating is large enough to achieve a significant fusion rate
Ohmic
Ohmic HeatingHeating Ohmic
Ohmic HeatingHeating
Plasma stability requires:
R j B a R
j a B I R
a B R
B a q B
p a
0 2
0 0
2 2 μ π
μ φ μ φ φ
θ
φ = = = >
=
j B
R j a
R j a
p 0 0
0
2 2
μ π
μ π
μ
φ θ
< R j
μ0
<
10
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
Injection of a beam of neutral
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
B fi ld fuel atoms (H, D, T)
at high energies (Eb > 50 keV)*
B-field
Ionisation in the plasma⇓
H,D,T
Beam particles confined⇓ Beam particles confined Collisional slowing down⇓
11
* Eb = 120 keV and 1 MeV for KSTAR and ITER, respectively
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
Neutralizer
Extraction Vacuum valve
• Generation of a neutral fuel beam
Neutralizer
Ion source H
Extraction acceleration grids
Deflection t
Vacuum valve
Beam
H H2
Low H+
magnet duct
o H
temperature H plasma,
5 eV
H+ H+
B
H+, e- H2+ H
H+
100 kV -3 kV O kV Beam dump
Ex) W7-AS: V=50 kV, I=25 A, power deposited in plasma: 0.4 MW 12
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• Ion source
13
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• Ion acceleration
14
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• Ion neutralization
15
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• Ion deflection
16
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• Neutral injection
17
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• JET NBI System
18
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• JET NBI System
19
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• JET NBI System
JET with machine and Octant 4 Neutral Injector Box 20
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• JET NBI System
Octant 4 Neutal Injector Box 21
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• Ion sources
RF Source Duopigatron
0.4 - 0.8 m
Cathodes difficult to replace, finite life time 22
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
3 lens system
• Extraction and steering
• 3-lens system
potential lines 0.2m
H+ 85%
H 85%
H2+ 12%
H3+ 3% 0.5m
100 kV -3kV 0kV
Typically 800 extraction
Grid system at ASDEX Upgrade
23
holes per source
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• Neutralizer
N N N N
fast slow fast gas
D D
D
D+ + 2 → + 2+
Charge exchange:
Re-ionization: ND + ND → N ND+ + D +e−
fast gas fast gas
2 2
Efficiency:
24
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• Negative ion beam development in JT-60U
25
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
Charge exchange: H + H + → H + + H
• Ionisation in the plasma
Charge exchange: H fast + H → H fast + H
Ion collision: H fast + H + → H +fast + H + + e−
Electron collision: H + e− → H + + 2e−
Electron collision: H fast + e → H fast + 2e
Attenuation of a beam of neutral particles in a plasma
NBI
Andy Warhol
n: density
ti
beam energy
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/galex/20070815/f.html 26
σ: cross section
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
Charge exchange: H + H + → H + + H
• Ionisation in the plasma
Charge exchange: H fast + H → H fast + H
Ion collision: H fast + H + → H +fast + H + + e−
Electron collision: H + e− → H + + 2e−
Electron collision: H fast + e → H fast + 2e
b x N
dN ( ) ( ) ( )
Attenuation of a beam of neutral particles in a plasma
Ex) beam intensity: I(x) = I0 ⋅exp(− x /λ)
tot b
b N x n x
dx x
dN ( ) ( ) ( )σ
−
=
) y ( ) 0 p( )
Eb0 = 70 keV σtot = 5⋅10−20m2
3
1020
5 1020 −3 1 5⋅
= m
n m
n 1tot ≈ 0.4
= σ λ
In large reactor plasmas
27
In large reactor plasmas, beam cannot reach core!
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
Charge exchange:
• Ionisation in the plasma
H H
H
H + + → + +
Charge exchange:
Ion collision:
Electron collision:
H H
H
H fast + → fast +
− +
+
+ → + +
+ H H H e H fast fast
− +
− → +
+ e H e
H 2
Electron collision:
Attenuation of a beam of neutral particles in a plasma
b x N
dN ( ) ( ) ( )
+
→
+ e H e H fast fast 2
tot b
b N x n x
dx x
dN ( ) ( ) ( )σ
−
=
28
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• Slowing down
⎞
⎛
81 4
/ 3
, 6
ln
2 12 2 23 12
2 1 2
3 2 2
3
2 1 4 2 2
1
≈
⎟ =
⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎜
⎝
⎛ Λ +
−
= e b e b b e i
b C Z M m m
W C T
W M
m e Z n dt
dW π
ε π
6π 2ε0Mb ⎜⎝Te2 Wb2 ⎟⎠
3 19
2
, C ≈
Wb crit
Critical energy W : W 14 8 Ab T [ ]keV
3 ≈19
= C Te
Critical energy Wb,crit: T [ ]keV
W A e
i b crit
b, =14.8⋅ 2 3 ⋅
The electron and ion heating rates are equal.g q
29
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• Slowing down
2 1
/ 3 ⎟⎞
⎜⎛ ⎛ξ ⎞
ξ 2
2 1
b b
b = m v
ξ
] [keVs
ˆ 1 10
71 .
1 1
2 / 3
18 −
− ⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
⎟⎟⎠
⎜⎜ ⎞
⎝ +⎛
×
=
b c e
b b e
T A P n
ξ ξ ξ
Ion h
3 / 2
8 ˆ .
14 AbTe
ξ = 2/3 heating f
) ( i i
c Z A
ξ
raction
e 30
b /Tˆ ξ
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
v
v⊥
vb
• Slowing down
1. ξb > ξc: Slowing down on electrons no scatter
v||
vb
v||
v⊥
vbb v||
2. ξb < ξc: Slowing down on ions scattering of beams
1
Fraction of initial beam energy going to ions
31
0 ξb/ξc 10
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• Injection angle
Radial (perpendicular, normal) B injection
Tangential injection injection
t d d t Radial injection: B
• standard ports
• shine-through
• particle loss
∇B
.
32
∇B
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• Injection angle
Radial (perpendicular, normal) B injection
Tangential injection injection
KSTAR NB hi th h
33
KSTAR NB shine-through armor
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
• Injection angle
I
. B Ip
P j t d
Better heating efficiency Worse
heating efficiency
Projected particle
drifts
efficiency efficiency
34
At low magnetic fields heating efficiency depends on NBI direction.
Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection Neutral Beam Injection
ASDEX Upgrade
JET
35
Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves
Tuning forkg
Resonance
36
Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves
Tacoma Narrows Bridge (1940 11 4)
37
(1940. 11. 4)
Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves
Microwave oven
http://blog.naver.com/rlhyuny27?Redirect=Log&logNo=30029307561 38
http://cafe.naver.com/nadobaker.cafe?iframe_url=/ArticleRead.nhn%3Farticleid=82
Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves
• Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating (ECRH)
Linear / Circular polarization
39
polarization
http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%ED%8E%B8%EA%B4%91
Electromagnetic Waves
Electromagnetic Waves Resonance Electromagnetic Waves
Electromagnetic Waves
Excitation of plasma wave
(f ) l d
Resonance zone (frequency ω) near plasma edge
Antenna
B m qB
c = ω ωc
ω =
R 40
ωc
ω
Electromagnetic Waves
Electromagnetic Waves Resonance Electromagnetic Waves
Electromagnetic Waves
Excitation of plasma wave
(f ) l d
Resonance zone
(frequency ω) near plasma edge wave transports power ⇓
into the plasma center absorption near resonance, ⇓
e g ω ≈ ω
Antenna
e.g. ω ≈ ωc ,
i.e. conversion of wave energy into kinetic energy of
resonant particles B
resonant particles
Resonant particles thermalise⇓
m qB
c = ω ωc
ω =
R 41
Resonant particles thermalise ω ωc
Plasma Waves Plasma Waves Plasma Waves Plasma Waves
• Considering externally driven perturbations in the magnetic and electric fields and in the current, relative to an
0 2
1 t E j c
B ∂
+ ∂
=
×
∇
G G G μ
equilibrium condition for a cold plasma w/o external magnetic fields
t E B
t c
∂
− ∂
=
×
∇
G ∂
G Maxwell equation
2 2 0 2
2 1
) (
)
( t
E c
t E j
E
E ∂
− ∂
∂
− ∂
=
∇
−
⋅
∇
∇
=
×
∇
×
∇
G G G
G
G μ
∑
≡
i
i ieu n j
G ⎞
⎛ ∂
e u
p B
u E e n u
t u n u
m
i
i i
i i
i i
i i
G G
G G G G
G
∂
∇
−
× +
⎟ =
⎠
⎜ ⎞
⎝
⎛ + ⋅∇
∂
∂ ( ) ( ) Equations of motion:
isotropic pressure assumed
42
m E e t
u
i i =
∂
⇒ ∂
Plasma Waves Plasma Waves Plasma Waves Plasma Waves
Plane waves with space
d ti d d
E E e
E n
E i
G G G
G ⎟⎟⎞ − ∂
⎜⎜⎛
−
=
∇
−
⋅
∇
∇( ) 2 μ0 ∑ 2 1 2 and time dependences
e E E n
E k E
k k
t E c
E m E
i
i i
G G
G G G
G
⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎛
−
= +
⋅
−
⎟⎟ ∂
⎜⎜ ⎠
∇ ⎝
∇
∇
∑
∑
2 2 0
2 2
2 0 2
) (
) (
ω μ μ
[
( )]
exp i kG⋅r −ωt m E
c E E
k E
k k
i i ⎟⎟⎠
⎜⎜⎝
+ 2 0 ∑
)
( μ
frequency :
vector wave
: ω
kG
B0
k k⊥
0
External magnetic field
k||
43
Plasma Waves Plasma Waves
Plane waves with space
d ti d d
E E e
E n
E i
G G G
G ⎟⎟⎞ − ∂
⎜⎜⎛
−
=
∇
−
⋅
∇
∇( ) 2 μ0 ∑ 2 1 2
Plasma Waves Plasma Waves
and time dependences
e E E n
E k E
k k
t E c
E m E
i
i i
G G
G G G
G
⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎛
−
= +
⋅
−
⎟⎟ ∂
⎜⎜ ⎠
∇ ⎝
∇
∇
∑
∑
2 2 0
2 2
2 0 2
) (
) (
ω μ μ
[
( )]
exp i kG⋅r −ωt m E
c E E
k E
k k
i i ⎟⎟⎠
⎜⎜⎝
+ 2 0 ∑
)
( μ
E kG G
|| :frequency
vector wave
: ω
kG E
k ||
2 2
0
2 1
p
i i
i
m e
n ω
ω = ε ∑ ≡ Plasma frequency
•
E kG G
⊥
2 2
2 2
•
2 2
2 2
k p
c ω
ω = +
44
Plasma Waves Plasma Waves
• Waves applied to the edge of a plasma tend to be “shielded”
t f th hi hl d ti l
Plasma Waves Plasma Waves
(η μo) B
E t
B /∂ = −∇× = / ∇2
∂ G G G
out of the highly conducting plasma.
( )
ω μ η δ
μ η
δ
o x
o
o
e B
BG ≈ K − / , ≈ /
• Externally applied RF waves can penetrate the plasma only by coupling to natural waves in the plasma determined by the plasma dielect ic tenso
E K c
EG I G
⋅
=
×
∇
×
∇ ( ) (ω / )2
the plasma dielectric tensor.
) (
) (
Dielectric tensor
45
Determinant = 0 Disperison relation D(ω, k) = 0
Dispersion Relation Dispersion Relation Dispersion Relation Dispersion Relation
Plasma waves are solutions of disperison relation D(ω, k)=0.
ll generally:
ω given by generator k|| given by antenna where k >k
solution: k⊥ = k⊥ (ω, k||) where k||>k||,Vacuum
Special cases:p
1 k → 0
Perpendicular to magnetic field
cutoff“ reflection
1. k⊥→ 0 „cutoff tunnelling
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/srh/jetstream/atmos/ionosphere_max.htm
2. k⊥→ ∞ „resonance“ mode converison
absorption
46
Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic Waves
• Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating (ICRH):
30 MHz 120 MHz ( 10 m) ω ~ ωci, 30 MHz – 120 MHz (~ 10 m)
eB z m
n m +n
ω
ω (1 / )
2
Ion-ion resonance frequency
Lower Hybrid (LH) Resonance Heating:
i i ci
c c
ii m
eB z Z
n Z n Z
m Z
m
m n m
n =
+
= ω ω + ω
ω ,
) /
/ (
) /
1 (
1 1 2 2 2
1 1 2
1 1 2 2 2
2 1
• Lower Hybrid (LH) Resonance Heating:
ωci < ω < ωce, 1 GHz – 8 GHz (~ 10 cm)
• Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating (ECRH):
2 2
2 2
2
2 pi /(1 pi / ce), pi ci
LH ω ω ω ω ω
ω ≈ + >>
Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating (ECRH):
ω ~ ωce, 100 GHz – 200 GHz (~ mm)
2 2
2
47 2
2 2
ce pe
UH ω ω
ω ≈ +
ICRH
ICRH –– Wave PropagationWave Propagation ICRH
ICRH Wave PropagationWave Propagation
Loci of cut off and resonances in the poloidal cross section of a tokamak. The fast wave is
evanescent in the hatched region.
48
ICRH
ICRH –– Wave PropagationWave Propagation ICRH
ICRH Wave PropagationWave Propagation
ASDEX Upgrade Alcator C-Mod
Re(Ey)
Multiple current straps
49
ICRH
ICRH –– Wave PropagationWave Propagation ICRH
ICRH Wave PropagationWave Propagation
50
ICRH
ICRH –– Minority HeatingMinority Heating
Plasma ith mi t e of H and D
ICRH
ICRH Minority HeatingMinority Heating
• Plasma with mixture of H and D with nH << nD
nDD →→ polarizationpo a at o propagation nH → absorption
B e⋅B
• Production of tail in H velocity distribution function
• Good single pass absorption
H
H m
B
= e
= ω ω
B e⋅
=
=ω ω
g p p
51 H
D = ⋅m
=ω 2 ω
Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating
• JET ICRH System
Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating
52
Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating
• JET ICRH System
- 8 x 4 MW RF generators, each one has two 2 MW outputs giving a possible 32 MW total.
- Frequency range 23 MHz -57 MHz q y g (excluding 39-41MHz)
- 8 HVDC Power supplies.
- 4 x 4 strap antenna system with - 4 x 4 strap antenna system with
vacuum interspace, Getter pumping and Penning gauge protection.
53
Lower Hybrid Heating Lower Hybrid Heating Lower Hybrid Heating Lower Hybrid Heating
• JET LH System
54