• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

implementation of the world bank projects in kazakhstan

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "implementation of the world bank projects in kazakhstan"

Copied!
87
0
0

Teks penuh

A dissertation submitted to the School of Humanities and Social Sciences of Nazarbayev University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of. Director of the MA Program in Political Science and International Relations, School of Humanities and Social Sciences. The aim of this thesis is to conform or refute some theories and arguments, and to discover what factors explain the different outcomes of the World Bank projects.

Why Are Some World Bank Projects Successful and Others Are Not?

Much has been written about the implementation of World Bank projects and programs in developing countries. Many debates in the scholarly work on the World Bank's activity are centered around the effectiveness of World Bank projects. In this thesis, I hope to confirm or refute some of the scholars' arguments on the example of my case study on the implementation of World Bank projects in Kazakhstan.

Factors in Determining Success of the World Bank Projects

Macro-level Factors

  • Income Level, Economic Capacity and External Economic Environment
  • Centralization of a Government
  • Institutional Capacity
  • Country Ownership
  • Political Contestations and Domestic Opposition

It is clear that public institutions play a major role in the implementation of WB projects in Kazakhstan, as different ministries are considered the main implementers of the projects depending on the sector of the project. As for Helmke and McLean (2013), the scholars study the implementation of the World Bank's legal reforms. Another case is related to the implementation of the World Bank projects in the health and education sectors in Timor-Liste (Rosser and Bremner 2015).

Micro-level Factors

  • Project Effectiveness Delays
  • Management Capacity

The example of Sener (2015) is very relevant for Kazakhstan (or any other country implementing WB projects) because projects are implemented within the framework of state rules and laws, in combination with World Bank regulations. Moreover, the World Bank is one of the largest lenders not only in Kazakhstan, but in the entire Central Asian region. Most importantly, there has been insufficient attention in the academic literature on the implementation of the World Bank's projects in the Central Asian region.

Project Outcome, Macro-level and Micro-level Factors

  • Research Questions
  • Dependent Variable
  • Independent Variables and Hypotheses
    • Macro-level Factors: Institutional Capacity, Country Ownership and
    • Micro-level Factors: Project Effectiveness Delays and Management
  • Case Study: Kazakhstan
  • Data
  • Sampling of Research Participants

It was prepared by an independent World Bank team (ICR team) not involved in the project execution process (interview with WB1). At the same time, even the assessment of the World Bank project can be a reason for disagreement. Similarly, Denizer et al.'s (2013) paper raises doubts about the credibility of the assessment of the World Bank's projects.

Based on TVEMP, both MoeS1, PMU1 and WB1 agreed with the project's assessment and had an overall positive view of the project. Since Sener (2015) also shows that the intersection between the World Bank's rules and procedures (especially on procurement management) and those of the state can create an obstacle for a project's implementation, I also measure management capacity based on the interviewees' perception of the local area. the staff's29 practical knowledge of. Mainly, I do several case studies within a single case study: implementation of the three World Bank projects in Kazakhstan.

Then, the case study is important when the research requires a broad and “deep” explanation of the phenomenon (Yin 2014, 4). What do you think, if the anti-corruption recommendations were taken into account during the implementation of the project. I have access to all these documents through the official website and database of the World Bank.

The PMU is responsible for the day-to-day management of the project and consists of a project director, a financial management specialist, coordinators for the project's components and an administrative assistant or a translator (World Bank 2010a, 16).

Table 1. Selection of Cases
Table 1. Selection of Cases

Project Development Objectives, Indicators, and Disbursement Records

Cases

  • Technical and Vocational Education Modernization Project
  • Forest Protection and Reforestation Project
  • Customs Development Project

The achievement of the goal was measured with two PDO indicators (Table 4 in the appendix). Second, according to Table 4, both ZOP indicators are positive: ZOP indicator 1 was exceeded, and ZOP indicator 2 was achieved. The achievement of the ZOP was measured with the ZOP indicators presented in Table 5 (in the appendix).

According to table 5, it can be seen that, as in TVEMP, all PDO indicators of FPRP are satisfactory: 4 indicators have been achieved, while 2 indicators have been exceeded. In contrast to TVEMP and FPRP, CDP represents an example of the least successful project: the disbursement record is 50.7 percent and most of its PDO indicators were not achieved (Table 6 in the Appendix). Although unlike the two previous projects, no clear assessments were made of the achievements/failures of some PDO indicators43, I had to refer to the comments made in the PCN reports and the interview findings to assume that as well as PDO indicator 1, indicators 2, 3, 4 and 5 were not achieved.

Even though the report states that the data on actual performance against standards is not disclosed on the SRC's website and it can be difficult to analyze what makes good performance, it highlights that (the) adoption of the standards is a significant improvement in transparency and public accountability to which the CDP has contributed”. As for the rest of PDO indicators according to reports and interview data, there are some inconsistencies in the data as the ICR report states that "the ICR team could not find credible evidence of the CDP's contribution to this positive trend" , "it is difficult to confirm that the project contributed to this result" or "as with other indicators, it is not possible to identify if and how the CDP contributed to this trend." (World Bank 2016c, vi-viii). Both WB3 and SRC1, just like the ICR report, highlighted that the reason why the ICR team could not find the credible evidence on the achievement of PDO indicators and 7) is the fact that the integrated ICT system and e declaration has not been fully implemented. , so it was probably assumed that the positive trends are occurring due to other factors, such as Kazakhstan's entry into the Eurasian Customs Union (WB3).

The achievement of the PDO indicators could therefore be influenced by the merger of both committees.

Findings

  • Institutional Capacity
  • Country Ownership and Domestic Opposition
  • PIE’s Bureaucratic System of Decision-making
  • Management Capacity

Due to the presidential decree47 on the reform of the public administration system, the Ministry of Agriculture was reorganized and. At the end of the project's implementation, the Customs Control Committee and the Tax Committee were merged into a single unit [State Revenue Committee]. Furthermore, the respondent emphasized that the establishment of e-declaration was the main objective of the entire project.

Likewise, FPRP interviewees also indicated that country ownership was present in project implementation. In addition, NJPMN2 mentioned that until the end of the project there was a sociological research - population survey, according to which there were mostly positive evaluations. Speaking about the CDP, SRC1 said that even before the implementation of the project, there was the President's annual speech to the people of Kazakhstan, according to which the President instructed to carry out reforms in the tax and customs administration57.

Then both parties, the Minister of Finance and the representative of the World Bank, sign the loan agreement. In particular, WB2, WB3 and FWC1 said that the projects were extended due to the delay of the initial project during the long ratification of the loan agreement. In contrast, the interviews with SRC1 and WB3 show that respondents' opinions about management capacity at the initial stage of the project were quite positive; however, due to the state reform on the reorganization of the CCC and the Tax Board, the management capacity has weakened.

SR1, in turn, added that as the executive in the face of the first leadership, that is, it was perhaps one of the key factors that influenced the implementation of the project. We therefore see that in the case of CDP, SRC1 and WB3 had a much less positive perception of the management capacity after the change in the project's leadership.

Limitations of the Study

Instead, from the point of view of PMU1, foreign companies and experts should cooperate and work together with domestic companies so that the gradual transfer of knowledge takes place in Kazakhstan.

Factors That Influence the Outcomes of the World Bank Projects

In the second project, management capacity in the first phase was also high; however, it weakened due to the significant influence of the state reform on the reorganization of the PIE and the change in the project management leading the project, which in turn led to an unsuccessful outcome. In addition, it fills a gap in the academic literature by providing empirical research on World Bank project implementation in the Central Asia region. First, although this research represents a case study, the findings can still be used to develop a comparative analysis on the implementation of World Bank projects in other developing countries, particularly in Central Asia, as Central Asian countries have a more similar history. backgrounds, political system and public administration system.

Finally, this research can benefit the World Bank, the Government, the Ministry of Finance and other governmental or non-governmental entities, who in turn can use the research findings to provide policy recommendations for the implementation of World Bank projects in Kazakhstan. PDO indicator 2: Share of existing programs in schools supported by the revised project in accordance with newly introduced competency standards. Presentation of regeneration plans after the project to restore the Irtysh forest and the dry bed of the Aral according to the provisions of the indicative vision until 2025, the repetition of a program of saxaul lands and the application of lessons from sub-projects (under the plan .. for increased Project rates of successful rehabilitation of the dry Aral seabed and Irtysh pine forest, forest fire protection and joint forests. sub-grants) management Date.

The amount of people employed during the project, or otherwise involved as a result of the project. Speech of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev, to the people of Kazakhstan." Akorda.kz. The President of RK signed the decree on the reform of the public administration system of the Republic of Kazakhstan].

Bureaucratic Imperatives and Policy Outcomes: The Origins of World Bank Structural Adjustment Lending.” Review of International Political Economy.

Table 3. Coding of Interviewees
Table 3. Coding of Interviewees

Gambar

Table 1. Selection of Cases
Table 2. Dependent Variable: Project Outcome Degree of
Figure 1. Project Governance
Table 3. Coding of Interviewees
+5

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

152 Basicsin Education CHArACTEriSTiCS OF A gOOD SyLLABUS A good syllabus a is flexible; b is community centred; c is life centred; d is activity centred; e is experience centred;