• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

There is no universally recognized formula for research paper formats. If your

instructor has not provided you with specific guidelines, it is recommended to look at some research papers online from better universities.

ESH recommends the following research paper format:

The various sections of a research paper are described on the following pages.

Cover page

(Administrative pages: for ESH, please include a copyright page and an optional dedication page)

Abstract Key words

Biographical material of author(s): limit to one sentence each

Table of Contents List of Tables List of Figures Introduction

Context or statement of the problem purpose of the study

research questions, objectives or hypotheses theoretical perspectives

definition of terms

delimitations and limitations of the study Review of Literature

Methods

research design

sample, population or subjects of inquiry instrumentation and materials

variables in the study data analysis

Results

Conclusions or Discussion References

7.10.1  Abstract  

This is the last part of your paper you should write. It will give a concise summary of the purpose of the study, the research problem, a brief description of the methods, the results obtained, including specific data, and a short conclusion, in a single paragraph.

7.10.2  Table  of  contents  

The  table  of  contents  may  be  created  using  the  automatic  Word  (Insert  -­‐  Index  &  

Tables)  function  for  the  Classic  TOC  and  include  at  least  three  levels  of  headings.  

7.10.3  List  of  Table  and  List  of  Figures  

These  lists  should  go  on  separate  pages  and  contain  references  to  all  tables  and   figures  in  the  body  of  the  document  but  not  the  appendix.  

7.10.4  Introduction    

The  introduction  states  one  major  idea  per  paragraph.    It  explains  the  purpose   and  objectives  of  the  study,  and  describes  the  context  of  the  research  question,   research  problem  or  hypothesis  (or,  pl.,  hypotheses).    It  describes  the  

importance,  defends  the  model,  and  provides  a  rationale.  The  context  may  be   that  it  is  an  academic  study  undertaken  to  achieve  a  certain  degree;  that  it  was   undertaken  alone  or  in  a  team.  It  discusses  what  theories  are  applied,  challenged   and  are  likely  to  be  impacted.    All  technical  vocabulary  necessary  to  the  

understanding  of  the  report  is  explained.    Delimitations  will  describe  the  self-­‐

imposed  limits  of  the  study  that  allow  it  to  focus  on  just  a  certain  area  without   looking  too  broadly  at  a  subject.    All  studies  experience  some  kind  of  limitations   that  are  imposed  on  them,  usually  lack  of  time  or  specific  deadlines,  finances,  or   qualified  colleagues.  

7.10.5  Review  of  Literature  

A  review  of  literature  is  an  overview  of  the  previous  research  that  has  been   conducted  and  published  on  a  particular  topic.  You  will  spend  the  Discovery  part   of  your  Project  Management  course  reading  or  reviewing  what  has  been  said  and   done  on  your  subject  in  order  to  gain  in-­‐depth  of  knowledge,  to  become  

"experts"  on  your  topic.    The  purpose  of  your  reading  is  not  to  justify  a  pre-­‐study   bias  on  the  topic  but  to  give  you  enough  information  to  identify  gaps  in  research   or  see  new  directions  to  explore.    

7.10.6  Methods  

This  section  should  be  the  easiest  to  write  but  students  sometime  over-­‐write  it   and  turn  it  into  a  How  To  section,  which  it  is  not.    The  purpose  is  not  to  describe   every  detail  of  your  process  but  to  provide  proof  that  your  study  is  scientifically   sound.  You  will  want  to  describe  the  key  methods  and  procedures  you  used  to   conduct  your  study  but  avoid  extraneous  detail.    You  will  provide  information  on   your  research  design:  what  procedure  did  you  follow?  What  was  your  sampling   (who  participated  in  the  study  and  why  were  they  chosen)?    What  material,  if   any,  did  you  use?  What  kind  of  surveys  did  you  run  to  obtain  your  observations  

 

or  data?  What  equipment,  if  any,  was  required?  What  were  the  variables?    What   actions  did  the  participants  take?      

 

Basically,  you  need  to  give  enough  information  so  that  another  researcher  can   replicate  your  study  based  on  your  described  methods.  

 

This  section  is  always  written  in  the  past  tense.    If  you  mention  steps  and   procedures  in  the  method  section,  these  elements  should  also  be  present  in  the   results  and  discussion  sections.  You  are  encouraged  to  consult  a  range  of  online   guidelines  while  writing  this  section;  a  rough  draft  should  be  hammered  out  with   one  or  more  teachers.  

 

The  methods  section  will  usually  have  the  following  four  sub-­‐sections:      

 

1. Participants:  Who?  How  many?  How  did  you  select  them?  

For  example:  "The  sample  group  for  our  survey  consisted  of  100   randomly  selected  tourists  who  answered  our  survey  on  

surveymonkey.com  that  was  broadly  distributed  through  our  private   contact  channels  on  four  continents."  

2. Materials:  What  measures,  equipment,  or  material  such  as  books  or   images  did  you  use  to  test  your  problem  question  or  statement?  Did  you   use  some  financial  or  psychological  lure  to  get  people  to  participate?    

For  example:  "To  insure  the  participation  of  top  executives  among  those   interviewed,  we  offered  our  participants  the  opportunity  to  receive  a   free  copy  of  our  research  results."      

3. Design:  What  type  of  design  (process)  did  you  use  to  run  your  study?  

List  the  steps  taken.    What  were  your  variables?  Did  you  use  a  within-­‐

groups  or  between-­‐groups  design?    

For  example:  "The  experiment  used  a  between-­‐subjects  design.  The   independent  variables  were  age  and  beliefs."  

 

A  between-­‐group  design,  widely  used  in  social  sciences,    has  two  or   more  subject  groups;  usually  one  is  regarded  as  the  treatment  group   (treated  with  a  some  variable)  and  a  control  group  that  receives  no   variable  treatment  and  is  used  as  the  reference  to  prove  any  deviance  in   the  treatment  group.  

 

A  within-­‐groups  designuses  the  same  subjects,  such  as  rats,  with  every   condition  of  the  research,  including  the  control.  Measures  may  be  

collected  over  time  in  a  longitudinal  (long)  study.  

 

4. Procedure:  The  next  part  of  your  method  section  should  detail  the   procedures  used  in  your  experiment  or  study.  How  did  you  collected   data?  What  did  you  have  participants  do?  What  order  or  steps  were   applied?    

For  example:  "Each  member  of  the  team  interviewed  two  hotel  

management  employees  individually  at  their  offices  in  one  session  that   lasted  20  minutes  on  average.  The  interviewers  asked  the  same  five   questions  (list  the  questions)  of  each  manager.    They  were  each  assured   of  anonymity  and  offered  the  option  of  receiving  the  results  of  the  study.    

All  sessions  were  videotaped  so  the  information  could  later  be  verified."  

7.10.6  Results    

The  length  of  this  section  will  be  determined  by  the  amount  of  information  you   have  collected.    The  purpose  is  to  present  and  illustrate  your  findings,  if  

necessary  with  figures  and  tables.  First  describe  your  results,  analyze  the  data,   and  prepare  the  analyzed  data  in  a  graph,  figure,  or  table  as  well  as  text.  

 

Do  not  include  your  raw  data.  You  just  want  to  present  the  final  analyzed  data   here.    Explanations  can  be  given  during  the  jury  session  or  if  anyone  asks  for  it.  

 

Do  not  present  opinions  or  discussion  in  this  section;  it  is  reserved  for  the   following  section.  

 

7.10.8  Conclusions  and  Discussion    

The  objective  of  this  section  is  to  provide  an  interpretation  of  your  results.    The   significance  of  the  findings  must  be  clearly  described.  

 

Avoid  summarizing  the  whole  paper  here,  but  rather  offer  interpretations  and   recommendations.  

 

Briefly,  interpret  your  data  results  using  the  past  tense.  Did  they  meet/surpass   your  expectations?  Why?    Is  your  hypothesis  to  be  retained  or  rejected?    What   future  directions  should  other  studies  take  based  on  your  results?    How  could   your  results  be  linked  to  other  studies?    

 

Try  to  avoid  being  superficial;  rather  imagine  applications  for  your  results.  

 

7.10.9  References    

 

Use  the  Harvard  in-­‐text  style  of  citation  and  referencing.    Create  a  Reference   rather  than  a  Bibliography.  You  may  single-­‐space  the  references  and  use  a   smaller  font  (8)  for  URLs.  

 

 

7.7.10  Appendix    

Include  only  information  that  is  necessary  to  understanding  the  research  paper   (e.g.,  questionnaires,  results).    Do  not  include  research  material  for  the  Review  of   Literature.    

   

SAMPLE  RESEARCH  PAPERS:  

 

http://www.insead.edu/facultyresearch/research/doc.cfm?did=50311    

http://www.shannoncollege.com/wp-­‐content/uploads/2009/12/THRIC-­‐2010-­‐

Full-­‐Paper-­‐S.-­‐Duffy.pdf    

http://www.sd.polyu.edu.hk/iasdr/proceeding/papers/Emotional%20design%

20for%20hotel%20stay%20experiences_%20Research%20on%20guest%20em otions%20and%20design%20opportunities.pdf  

 

http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/lib/thesis/2002/2002petcharakp.pdf  

Figure  56  Sample  Research  Papers  

 

Exercise  

1. Draft  an  interview  and  a  survey  questionnaire  according  to  the  above   guidelines.  

 

2. Identify  your  targeted  sample  group  according  to  criteria  of  gender,  age,   social  and  economic  situation,  culture,  language,  nationality,  and  sexual   orientation.    What  are  the  subgroups  you  specifically  need  to  target?  

 

3. What  is/are  the  law/laws  governing  the  collection  of  data  in  your  country   (in  this  case,  France)?  Does  your  survey  meet  legal  and  ethical  guidelines?  

 

4. How  and  where  are  you  going  to  find  the  requisite  sample?  

 

5. Draft  a  tentative  schedule  for  conducting  your  research,  with  the  end  date   being  no  later  than  the  end  of  the  first  week  in  December.    Allow  one   week  for  the  analysis  of  your  results.  

 

References

Caprette,  David  R.  (n.d.),  Writing  Research  Papers,  Rice  University  Web  site,     [Online]  At  http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~bioslabs/tools/report/reportform.html   [Accessed  November  22,  2012]  

Cherry,  Kendra  (2012),  How  to  Write  a  Methods  Section,  About.com  Psychology,   [Online]  At  http://psychology.about.com/od/psychologywriting/ht/method.htm   [Accessed  November  22,  2012|  

Owl  Purdue  Online  Writing  Lab  (2012)  APA  Style,  Purdue  Owl,  [Online]  At  

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/10/  [Accessed  November  26,  2012]  

London  South  Bank  University  (2013),  How  to  Reference  Using  the  Harvard   System,  My.Lsbu,  [Online]  At  https://my.lsbu.ac.uk/assets/documents/library/h2g-­‐library-­‐

30.pdf  [Accessed  September  1,  2013]  

London  South  Bank  University  (n.m.),  Referencing  your  work,  My.lsbu,  [Online]  

At  https://my.lsbu.ac.uk/page/referencing-­‐your-­‐work  [Accessed  September  1,  2013]  

McNamara,  Carter,  MBA,  PhD  (2010),  adapted  from  the  Field  Guide  to  Nonprofit   Program  Design,  Marketing  and  Evaluation,  Free  Management  Library   [Online]  At  http://www.managementhelp.org/research/planning.htm,    

[Accessed  on  September  5,  2010]  

Pallas,  Christopher  L.  (n.m.)  A  Style  Guide  for  PhD  Theses  in  the  Department  of   Social  Policy,  London  School  of  Economics,  [Online]  At  

http://www.lse.ac.uk/socialpolicy/pdf/informationforcurrentstudents/phdstyleguide.pdf  

[Accessed  September  1,  2013]  

Phillips,  Paul,  PhD  (2013),  Analyzing  Data,  Class  lecture  at  ESH,  January  2013   Roberts,  Elizabeth,  PhD  (2004),  Managerial  Communication,  Class  lecture  at  

ESSEC,  France,  2004  

SurveyMonkey,  2013,  Marketing  Survey  Templates,  [Online]  At  

https://fr.surveymonkey.com/mp/marketing-­‐survey-­‐templates/  [Accessed  September  

2013]  

Turner,  Jane  (2004),  Seminar  in  basic  coaching,  Le  Dojo,  2004