• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

A831/2005 SCA APPEAL CASE NUM - ConCourt Collections

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "A831/2005 SCA APPEAL CASE NUM - ConCourt Collections"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT CASE NO:

TPD APPEAL CASE NUMBER: A831/2005 SCA APPEAL CASE NUMBER: 274 / 08

In the matter between:

THE TRUSTEES FOR THE TIME BEING OF Applicants

THE BIOWATCH TRUST (Applicants a quo)

and

THE REGISTRAR, GENETIC RESOURCES First Respondent (1st Respondent a quo)

THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL FOR Second Respondent GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS (2nd Respondent a quo)

THE MINISTER FOR AGRICULTURE Third Respondent (3rd Respondent a quo)

MONSANTO SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD Fourth Respondent (4th Respondent a quo)

STONEVILLE PEDIGREED SEED COMPANY Fifth Respondent (5th Respondent a quo)

D&PL SA SOUTH AFRICA INC Sixth Respondent (6th Respondent a quo)

THE OPEN DEMOCRACY ADVICE CENTRE Amicus Curiae

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

TAKE NOTICE THAT the applicants intend to apply, on a date to be determined by the above honourable Court, for an order in the following terms: –

(2)

- 2 -

1. Granting the applicants leave to appeal to the above honourable Court against the judgment and order handed down by his Lordship Mr Justice Mynhardt on behalf of the majority of the Full Bench of the Transvaal Provincial Division on 6 November 2007, leave to appeal having been refused by the Supreme Court of Appeal on 2 September 2008;

2. Directing that the costs of this application for leave to appeal shall be costs in the appeal;

3. Further and/or alternative relief.

TAKE NOTICE THAT the order sought on appeal is the following:

“1) The appeal is upheld;

2) The costs order contained in paragraph (d) of the order of the Transvaal Provincial Division is set aside and substituted with the following order:

First to third respondents are ordered to pay the applicant’s costs. No further costs orders are made.

3) The first to fourth respondents are ordered to pay the applicants’

costs in the Supreme Court of Appeal and in this Court jointly and severally, the one paying, the other to be absolved, including the costs attendant upon the employment of two counsel. The costs order in the full bench appeal is set aside and no costs order is made in relation to that appeal.

(3)

- 3 -

TAKE NOTICE THAT the judgments appealed against, namely the judgments of the Supreme Court of Appeal refusing leave to appeal to that court, the judgment of Dunn AJ and the majority of the Full Bench are attached, together with the judgment of the minority of the Full Bench.

TAKE NOTICE THAT the accompanying affidavit of LESLIE LIDDEL together with the annexures thereto will be used in support of this application.

TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that the applicants have appointed the address of their attorneys as set out below at which they will accept notice and service of all process in these proceedings.

TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that if you wish to oppose this application you are required to do so in writing within ten (10) days from the date upon which this application is lodged with the Registrar of the above honourable Court, and to indicate the grounds of such opposition.

DATED at JOHANNESBURG on this the day of SEPTEMBER 2008

___________________________

LEGAL RESOURCES CENTRE Attorneys for the Applicants 9th Floor, Bram Fischer House 25 Rissik Street, Johannesburg Tel: (011) 836-9831

(4)

- 4 -

Fax: (011) 834-4273 Email: [email protected] Ref: Mr.A Mayet / 4263/05

TO: The Registrar of the above Honourable Court

JOHANNESBURG

AND TO: THE STATE ATTORNEY

1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents’ Attorneys 8th Floor, Old Mutual Centre

167 Andries Street PRETORIA

Ref: PC/eb/897/2002/3863/H2

AND TO: BOWMAN GILFILLAN INC Fourth Respondent’s Attorneys 165 West Street

Sandown, Sandton Tel: (011) 669-9000 Fax: (011) 669-9001 Ref: Mr A Purchase

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE No: SCA CASE No.: 419/09 In the matter between: NAIDOO, RAJAN First Applicant NAIDOO, DOLLY Second Applicant TWOLINE TRADING 87

Today, the Constitutional Court handed down judgment in three consolidated applications for leave to appeal against a judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal SCA, which held that a

The question at the High Court as well as the Court of Appeal was whether the Iban customs of creating pemakai menoa, the temuda formerly cultivated lands at various stages of young

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case no: CCT ________ LAC case no: DA24/06 LC case no: D293/04 In the matter between: BILLITON ALUMINIUM SA LTD t/a HILLSIDE

AD PARAGRAPH 34:- Whilst I admit the provisions of the section in question, I deny the allegation that the Labour Appeal Court was dealing with a constitutional matter and I insist

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO: SCA NO: 678/2012 NGHC NO: 7477/2012 In the matter between ALLPAY CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENT HOLDINGS PTY LTD First Applicant

KODE/CODE 2712 DOCEX54 E-MAIL: [email protected] Ons/Our Mr HSJ Kruger/M Capazorio/ms DB0081 U/Your ATTTENTION: OUMA THE DIRECTOR; CONSTITUTIONAL COURT BRAAMPARK FORUM II 33 HOOFD

The nature of the proceedings: This is an application for leave to appeal against two judgments and orders handed down by the Land Claims Court “LCC” at Cape Town, by the Honourable Mr