• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

BONGINKOSI GIFT KHANYILE Applicant and THE STATE Res

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "BONGINKOSI GIFT KHANYILE Applicant and THE STATE Res"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case CCT 23/17 In the matter between:

BONGINKOSI GIFT KHANYILE Applicant

and

THE STATE Respondent

DIRECTIONS DATED 1 FEBRUARY 2017

The Chief Justice has issued the following directions:

1. The respondent must file an answering affidavit on or before Monday, 6 February 2017.

2. Further directions may be issued.

MR KGWADI MAKGAKGA REGISTRAR

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

TO: FARRELL INC. ATTORNEYS 271 Problem Mkhize Road

DURBAN 4001 P O Box 78045

AVONDALE ROAD, 4101 Docex 29 DURBAN

(2)

Email: [email protected] Tel: (031) 312 4242

Fax: 086 615 9446

Ref: D FARRELL/ECO1.1

c/o CHARMAIN GIBBENS 6 DE VI, MARBLE TOWERS

CNR. JEPPE & VON WIELIGH STREETS P.O. BOX 2469

TEL: (011) 333 1054 FAX: (011) 336 9673

EMAIL: [email protected]

AND THE NATIONAL DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

SOUTHERN LIFE BUILDING 88 JOE SLOVO STREET DURBAN

4001

REF: STATE VS BONGINKOSI GIFT KHANYILE CASE NUMBER: 23/15869/16

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The applicant requested the court to provide a constitutional interpretation on how to assure the quality or competence of experts, the concrete circumstances or parameters

REGIONAL LAND CLAIMS COMMISSIONER: SEVENTH RESPONDENT EASTERN CAPE Fifth Respondent in the Court a quo LANDMARK MTHATHA PTY LIMITED EIGHTH RESPONDENT Sixth Respondent in the

MR KGWADI MAKGAKGA REGISTRAR CONSTITUTIONAL COURT TO: VINNICOMBE & ASSOCIATES Attorneys for the Applicant Thornville KWAZULU-NATAL Tel: 033 251 0977 / 083 629 3172 Fax: 033

Being appointed to the Constitutional Court allowed Sachs to continue his life-long dedication to justice and human rights in South Africa.. Whether it is through the ANC, the

The matter wa s then taken on a ppeal to the 1-.Tati\' e Appeal Court, which held that ne ithe r the Chief's Court nor the Nati\'P Commissioner's Court had jurisdiction to determine any

Although the Constitutional Court was highly divided on this matter in relation to its reasoning in reaching its decision Van der Westhuizen J par 8-10, see also Sachs J par 300 and

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case no: CCT ________ LAC case no: DA24/06 LC case no: D293/04 In the matter between: BILLITON ALUMINIUM SA LTD t/a HILLSIDE

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO: SCA NO: 678/2012 NGHC NO: 7477/2012 In the matter between ALLPAY CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENT HOLDINGS PTY LTD First Applicant