• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

CCT 1/16 In the matter between - ConCourt Collections

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "CCT 1/16 In the matter between - ConCourt Collections"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: CCT 1/16 In the matter between:

NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION

OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS Applicant

and

MINISTER OF JUSTICE

AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT First Respondent

NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC

PROSECUTIONS Second Respondent

and

CORRUPTION WATCH Amicus Curiae

___________________________________________________________________

PRACTICE NOTE FOR CORRUPTION WATCH

THE NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS

This is an application for leave to appeal against a decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA). It concerns the constitutionality of section 7(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 (CPA).

(2)

1

ISSUES TO BE ARGUED BY THE AMICUS

 Whether excluding juristic persons from bringing a private prosecution gives rise to a constitutional defect

 Whether that defect is to be resolved by interpretation or a declaration of invalidity

PORTIONS OF THE RECORD NECESSARY FOR DETERMINATION OF MATTER The whole record.

ESTIMATED DURATION OF ORAL ARGUMENT Half a day.

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT

Precluding juristic persons from ever engaging in a private prosecution, no matter the circumstances, is not consistent with the Constitution. Not only is it inconsistent with section 9(1) of the Constitution (the submission correctly advanced by the applicant), it is also inconsistent with the constitutional duty on the State to take reasonable measures to prevent corruption.

There is nothing in the language of section 7(1)(a) of the CPA that requires that this interpretation is adopted. On the contrary, once the interpretative approach required by section 39(2) of the Constitution is applied, the approach of the Appellate Division in Barclays v Black and of the SCA in the present matter falls to be rejected.

(3)

2

Alternatively, to the extent that section 7(1)(a) of the CPA is only capable of the interpretation adopted by the SCA, it is unconstitutional and invalid.

AUTHORITIES ON WHICH PARTICULAR RELIANCE WILL BE PLACED

Glenister v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others 2011 (3) SA 347 (CC)

STEVEN BUDLENDER GIFT MOTAUNG

Counsel for Corruption Watch Chambers, Johannesburg

29 July 2016

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO: 98/15 In the matter of - SUSARA ELIZABETH MAGDALENA JOOSTE Applicant FILING SHEET IN RESPECT OF NOTICE OF MOTION AND ANNEXURES

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Cases CCT 323/18 and CCT 69/19 Case CCT 323/18 In the matter between: JABULANE ALPHEUS TSHABALALA Applicant and THE STATE Respondent and

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 122/17 and CCT 220/17 CCT 122/17 In the matter between: MOSES TSHOGA Applicant and THE STATE Respondent CCT 220/17 In the matter

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Cases CCT 27/19 and CCT 86/19 Case CCT 27/19 In the matter between: ROAD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CORPORATION Applicant and TASIMA PTY LIMITED

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 62/20 In the matter between: THE PUBLIC PROTECTOR First Applicant THE ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS Second Applicant AMABHUNGANE CENTRE FOR

osman6 # CCT 37/97 IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between - MOOSA OSMAN MOHAMED SHIRAZ OSMAN and First Applicant Second Applicant THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL

1 | P a g e IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO: CCT 87/13 SCA CASE NO.: 660/2012 THC CASE NO.: 1354/2010 In the matter between:- ANELE NGQUKUMBA Applicant and

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 41/11 In the matter between: HLOPHE, MANDLAKAYISE JOHN Applicant and THE PREMIER OF THE WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE Respondent ORDER DATED