• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Directions by the Chief Justice 7 April 2010-15043.pdf

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Directions by the Chief Justice 7 April 2010-15043.pdf"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

CASE NO: CCT 18/10

In the matter between:

THE CAMPS BAY RATEPAYERS’ AND

RESIDENTS’ ASSOCIATION First Applicant

PS BOOKSELLERS (PTY) LTD Second Applicant

and

GERDA YVONNE ADA HARRISON First Respondent

THE MUNICIPALITY OF THE

CITY OF CAPE TOWN Second Respondent

DIRECTIONS DATED 7 APRIL 2010

The Chief Justice has issued the following directions:

1) The application for leave to appeal against the judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal handed down on Wednesday 17 February 2010 is set down for hearing on Thursday 5 August 2010 at 10h00.

2) The record, properly paginated and indexed, must be prepared by the applicants and lodged on or before Friday 18 June 2010.

3) For this purpose, the applicants may use the record as prepared and paginated in the Supreme Court of Appeal, together with any affidavits or other papers filed in this Court that are necessary for the determination of the issues relevant to the hearing.

4) In addition, the applicants are required, not later than ten days before the hearing,

(2)

to –

a) lodge one copy of a supplemental volume to the record, consisting of all documents filed in this Court which do not form part of the record already lodged;

b) number these documents consecutively beginning with the page immediately after the last page of the record already lodged; and c) provide an updated index which includes the supplementary

volume(s).

5) Written argument must be lodged by:

a) the applicants on or before Friday 25 June 2010 and b) the respondent on or before Friday 9 July 2010.

6) Written and oral argument must be restricted to the following issues:

(i) whether the proper interpretation and application of section 7(1) of the National Building Regulations and Building Standards Act, 103 of 1977 arises in this matter, and, if so;

(ii) its proper interpretation and application in the light of this Court’s judgment in Walele v The City of Cape Town and Others [2008] ZACC 11; 2008 (6) SA 129 (CC); 2008 (11) BCLR 1067 (CC) and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal in True Motives 84 (Pty) Ltd v Madhi and Others 2009 (4) SA 153 (SCA),

(iii) the proper interpretation and application of section 7(1) of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 in relation to the applicants’ challenge of the alleged contravention of section 47 of the applicable Zoning Scheme Regulations.

(iv) the nature of the restrictive conditions in clause D of the title deed and whether a contravention of those conditions, if established, could lawfully be approved by the second respondent in relation to the impugned development.

7) Further directions may be issued in due course.

MS STANDER

SENIOR REGISTRAR: CONSTITUTIONAL COURT TO: ABE SWERSKY & ASSOCIATES

Attorneys for the Applicants 10th Floor

Picabel Parkade 58 Strand Street CAPE TOWN Tel: (021) 425 4270 Fax: (021) 419 6022

(3)

Ref: A HERMAN/aw/25264 c/o: LOUIS & ASSOCIATES 1st Floor, Oxford Manor

196 Oxford Road (cnr Chaplin Rd) Illovo

JOHANNESBURG Tel: (011) 268 1130 Fax: (011) 268 1140 Ref: MR K LOUIS

AND TO: KRITZINGER & COMPANY Attorneys for the First Respondent

33 Church Street CAPE TOWN Tel: (021) 426 0600 Fax: (021) 426 0606 Ref: K M KRITZINGER

AND TO: ABRAHAMS & GROSS INC.

Attorneys for the Second Respondent First Floor

56 Shortmarket Street CAPE TOWN Tel: (021) 422 1323 Fax: (021) 422 1406 Ref: KD/nf/W43382

c/o: WEBBER WENTZEL 10 Fricker Road

Illovo Boulevard JOHANNESBURG Tel: (011) 530 5322 Fax: (011) 530 6322 Ref: Mr Martin Versfeld

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE No: SCA CASE No.: 419/09 In the matter between: NAIDOO, RAJAN First Applicant NAIDOO, DOLLY Second Applicant TWOLINE TRADING 87

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO : CCT 59/09 In the application of: BRIDON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Applicant and SCAW SOUTH AFRICA PTY LIMITED First Respondent

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 23/17 In the matter between: BONGINKOSI GIFT KHANYILE Applicant and THE STATE Respondent DIRECTIONS DATED 1 FEBRUARY 2017 The

1 IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CCT CASE NO.: 296/17 In the matter between: THE COMPETITION COMMISSION OF SOUTH AFRICA Applicant and HOSKEN CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS

CCT 15/1998 APPLICANT IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between SUSARA ELIZABETH MAGDALENA JOOSTE and SCORE SUPERMARKET TRADINGfPTYl LTD RESPONDENT and THE

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NUMBER: CCT 304/2016 In the matter of: LIESCHING, PIET PIETERJIE 1st APPLICANT SWARTZ, MALVIN NAAS 2nd APPLICANT MALGAS,

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO: HC Case NO: 88359/19 In the matter between: SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES Applicant and ARENA HOLDINGS PTY LTD First

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 62/20 In the matter between: THE PUBLIC PROTECTOR First Applicant THE ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS Second Applicant AMABHUNGANE CENTRE FOR