• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Editorial

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Editorial"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Editorial

The authors of the first paper in this issue of ORiON are Venter and Mar´e, and the title of their article is “GARCH option pricing models in a South African equity context”.

In this paper, the authors compare the performance of three different GARCH processes that are used to model the implied South African Volatility Index (SAVI). Three different log-likelihood functions are applied to estimate the GARCH model parameters, and his- torical SAVI data is used to evaluate the accuracy of the estimated GARCH option pricing models. Their results show that although an asymmetric GARCH model outperforms the symmetric counterpart when modelling the GARCH implied SAVI, the improvement pro- vided by the asymmetric GARCH option pricing models is marginal.

The second paper, by Du Pisanie and Visagie, is entitled “On testing the hypothesis of population stability for credit scorecards”. This paper is concerned with testing the as- sumption that the risk characteristics of a population have remained unchanged over a period of time, which is a factor often considered when determining whether or not a cur- rently used model is still suitable for the population in question. Traditionally, a measure known as the population stability index is used to make this determination. The paper highlights some weaknesses of this measure and proposes a new methodology which can be used to test the assumption of population stability.

The third paper in this issue of ORiON is by Kazmaier and van Vuuren with the title

“Sentiment analysis of unstructured customer feedback for a retail bank”. In their pa- per, sentiment analysis methods are applied to customer reviews related to products and services of a retail bank, to extract valuable insight that may inform decision making. A three-stage approach was followed as part of a case study involving a preprocessing step, a structured model building and evaluation step, and finally, an analysis to identify patterns in the data that may indicate trends in and possible causes of sentiment. The resulting machine learning models achieved median AUC scores of up to 0.9 and outperformed com- mercial tools and existing lexicon-based models from the literature.

I want to convey my sincerest thanks to Susan Campher, the ORiON journal manager, and to Zander Labuschagne, our typesetting assistant, for all the effort in preparing this issue of ORiON. A final word of appreciation to all the ORiON authors and reviewers.

Thank you to the authors for submitting your scholarly work and to all the anonymous reviewers who contributed towards providing quality feedback.

Fanie Terblanche June 2020

i

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The loss in accuracy ∆F C ASE D in percent of estimated pose parameters at noise level σ0 l = 0.0001 and different relative precision σ 0 x of approximate values, both in

After analyzing several parametric statistical distribution models (Gauss, Gamma, Beta, Weibull, Log-normal, Fisher), their parameters are estimated on real data

This paper tried to estimate the parameters of bivariate binary probit model using Maximum Likelihood Estimation method, whereas to get the statistical test using Maximum

The Chi-Square statistic is computed based on the log-likelihood value of the last iteration of the

coined the term “multimodal airway approach”.5 Since then, this practice has been explored further by anesthesiologists and is now included as an option in the American Society of

Predict test circuit behavior in the reference extract using the circuit specific parameters estimated in the first correction step, and extract specific parameters estimated in the

U Kang 4 Outline The Log-Likelihood Gradient Stochastic Maximum Likelihood and Contrastive Divergence Pseudolikelihood Noise-Contrastive Estimation Estimating the Partition

To quantify the relationship between NGO/CO existence and the chance of likelihood of the local conflict, we estimated the following equation: Likelihood Conflict γ = α + β1DumNGO/CO