• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:E:Economics of Education Review:Vol18.Issue3.Jun1999:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:E:Economics of Education Review:Vol18.Issue3.Jun1999:"

Copied!
15
0
0

Teks penuh

Loading

Gambar

Fig. 1.Optimal schooling investments and liquidity con-stop school atstraints. a: No liquidity constraints; different investors face dif-ferent marginal benefits schedules depending on individualschooling differentials, time preferences and working horizons
Table 1
Fig. 2.Frequency distribution of Mexican urban households by income level: national and schools samples
Table 2
+6

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

(5), in addition to the number of outstanding common stock shares and warrants, exercise price, and dilution factor, the theoretical DECS value is determined by five other factors:

After observing that banks established one period earlier become insolvent and that the state of the economy indicates a positive correlation among the returns in the banking

Accord- ingly, in this plausible case, where the expected return on high-risk loans declines more rapidly with aggregate loan volume than does the equilibrium return on low- risk

23 In 1992, newly efficient management correctly focused on overall efficiency, but also gave particular attention to input variables, especially cash, labor expense, real capital

We show that (1) joint ownership can be superior to the other ownership structures by overcoming vertical externality of double marginalization; (2) collusive outcomes, however,

The focus of this paper however is to examine the structure of the relationship in the short term interest rates, in a fixed exchange rate regime and as in the current case where

Taking the loan market setting with asymmetric information as a micro-foundation for investment, this paper further develops a macro model of a small open economy under the regime

The ®nal (1992) net worth for a family farm applying discretionary rates of fertilizer varied from $0.13m to ÿ$1.00m for those families raising over 25 years zero or three