PERBINCANGAN DAN KESIMPULAN
5.4 Implikasi Kajian
5.4.2 Implikasi Kajian Ke atas Praktis
Keputusan kajian ini menunjukkan bahawa pihak pengurusan dan pentadbiran sekolah rendah terutamanya guru besar perlu sentiasa mengamalkan keadilan organisasi di samping menyematkan kepercayaan kepada guru-guru untuk meningkatkan perlakuan inovatif guru bagi mendidik dan melahirkan anak bangsa yang lebih produktif dan berinovasi pada alaf yang akan datang. Guru memainkan peranan yang penting dalam perlaksanaan sesuatu inovasi kurikulum. Tanpa penglibatan guru secara aktif, matlamat kurikulum yang dirancang sukar untuk dicapai. Pihak pengurusan sekolah perlu didedahkan dengan pengetahuan persekitaran keadilan dan kepercayaan organisasi melalui kursus-kursus kepimpinan atau taklimat oleh pihak Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia atau Jabatan Pelajaran Negeri atau Pejabat Pelajaran Daerah. Di samping itu pihak pengurusan di peringkat sekolah perlu menyediakan atau membekalkan keperluan-keperluan asas guru di sekolah misalnya keselesaan tempat kerja, semangat kerja berkumpulan, penghargaan diri, kebebasan dan keyakinan dalam memberi dan menerima pendapat serta pengembangan diri untuk merangsang tingkah laku kerja yang berinovatif. Kajian juga mendapati sekiranya guru dilayan dengan adil dan mereka percaya terhadap guru besar dan sekolah maka prestasi dan perlakuan inovatif akan ditunjukkan melalui gerak kerja semasa p&p di dalam kelas mahupun di luar kelas.
155
Dalam konteks ini kesungguhan untuk bertindak secara proaktif, kreatif dan berinovasi berasaskan pengetahuan dan kemahiran serta keupayaan untuk memanifestasikan pengetahuan dan kemahiran dalam bentuk tingkahlaku adalah perkara pokok yang wajar dititikberatkan oleh golongan guru ke arah menzahirkan inovasi kurikulum di sekolah. Keadaan ini sekaligus dapat melahirkan sekolah pemikiran seperti yang diidamkan melalui projek kerajaan yang baru iaitu i-Think bermula tahun 2014. Projek ini membantu pihak sekolah dengan memupuk kemahiran berfikir; menyemai budaya pembelajaran sepanjang hayat; mahir di dalam menyelesaikan masalah dan berupaya menghasilkan jalan penyelesaian secara kreatif di kalangan murid sekolah. i-THINK melahirkan inovator generasi masa depan Malaysia dengan kebolehan dan kemahiran berfikir secara kritis serta berupaya untuk menyesuaikan diri dan menangani cabaran pada masa akan datang. Agensi Inovasi Malaysia (AIM) merupakan badan berkanun yang ditubuhkan oleh Kerajaan Malaysia untuk memacu dan memperkukuh kemajuan Malaysia dengan mempercepat budaya inovasi. Penyediaan peluang sama rata serta pendidikan berkualiti untuk semua merupakan fokus utama Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Matlamat pendidikan Malaysia telah dimanifestasikan dalam Falsafah Pendidikan Kebangsaan dengan tujuan muktamad untuk mencapai wawasan negara dalam menyediakan anak-anak Malaysia supaya menjadi individu yang berpengetahuan dan berkemahiran ke arah menghadapi cabaran Abad ke-21 (http://www.ithink.org.my/bmhome/ page/aboutus retrieved 6/5/2014).
156 5.5 Cadangan Kajian Lanjutan
Kajian ini dijalankan hanya di daerah pulau, Pulau Pinang sahaja. Oleh itu, kajian yang sama diharap dapat menggunakan saiz sampel yang lebih besar serta merentasi beberapa buah negeri di Malaysia bagi memperoleh kesan statistik yang lebih kukuh. Di samping itu kajian hanya dilaksanakan di sekolah rendah sahaja justeru dicadangkan supaya kajian perbandingan dijalankan sama ada di antara jenis-jenis sekolah rendah seperti sekolah jenis-jenis kebangsaan dan sekolah kebangsaan.
Seterusnya dicadangkan juga kajian ini dibuat dengan menggunakan
Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Penggunaan kaedah ini membolehkan sesuatu
model yang dibina oleh pengkaji itu diuji kesesuaiannya (goodness-of-fit). Penggunaan kaedah ini juga mempunyai beberapa kelebihan seperti dapat menguji model kajian secara menyeluruh, menguji model yang mempunyai pelbagai variabel bersandar, kebolehan mentafsir data yang sukar dan sebagainya. Penggunaan kaedah ini juga dapat menjadikan kajian ini lebih menyeluruh kerana semua kaedah telah diterokai.
Kajian ini hanya mengunakan semata-mata kaedah kuantitatif. Oleh itu kajian lanjutan adalah disarankan supaya mengunakan gabungan kaedah kualitatif dan kuantitatif bagi mengumpulkan maklumat mengenai sesuatu variabel secara holistik dan yang lebih mantap. Perlakuan inovatif guru umpamanya dapat disahkan dengan menjalankan pemerhatian. Adalah diharapkan dengan dengan cara ini, kemiringan
157
dalam mendapatkan maklumat dapat dikurangkan dan dapatan yang lebih tinggi kebolehpercayaan dan kesahihannya dapat dihasilkan.
Kajian akan datang juga disarankan mengambil kira faktor-faktor yang lain berdasarkan tinjauan literatur supaya lebih banyak faktor dapatkan dikaji. Dapatan kajian tersebut kelak dapat membantu pihak pengurusan dan pentadbiran pendidikan terutamanya sekolah rendah dapat mengambil tindakan intervensi yang bersesuaian bagi meningkatkan perlakuan inovatif guru seterusnya dapat meningkatkan prestasi murid ke arah alaf baru, menaikkan kualiti pencapaian sekolah, memudahkan pengurusan pendidikan di peringkat yang seterusnya.
5.6 Kesimpulan
Secara keseluruhannya, kajian ini memberi satu pengetahuan yang bernilai kepada organisasi terutamanya sekolah rendah dalam memahami pengaruh keadilan organisasi terhadap perlakuan inovatif guru dan kepercayaan pemimpin dan kepercayaan organisasi sebagai moderator. Perbincangan yang dibuat dalam bab ini memberi satu gambaran kepada guru besar atau pihak pengurusan sekolah dalam menilai aspek-aspek yang harus diberi perhatian. Perbincangan dalam bab ini juga boleh membantu pihak pengurusan sekolah atau guru besar memperbaiki kelemahan yang ada dalam pentadbiran mereka dalam aspek yang melibatkan variabel kajian ini. Moderator yang dikaji dalam kajian ini juga boleh membantu pihak pengurusan
158
sekolah mengkaji kepentingan kepercayaan dalam hubungan antara keadilan organisasi dan perlakuan inovatif guru.
159 BIBLIOGRAFI
Ab. Aziz Yusof. (2000). Pengurus dan gelagat organisasi di abad ke 21. Kuala Lumpur: Prentice Hall.
Abdul Ghani, K. A., Tang, K. N., & Aziah Ismail. (2007). Keadilan Organisasi, Kepercayaan dan Altruisme. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 22, 75-92.
Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah, Abd Rahman Abd. Aziz, & Mohammad Zohir Ahmad. (2008). Gaya-gaya kepimpinan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional.
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. New York: Academy Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1989). Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity: Crown House Publishing Limited.
Ambrose, Schminke, M., & Mayer, D. M. (2013). Trickle-down Effects of Supervisor Perceptions of Interactional Justice: A Moderated Mediation Approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 678.
Ambrose, Seabright, & Schminke. (2002). Sabotage in the Workplace: The Role of Organizational Injustice. Organization Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 89, 947-965.
Arshad, M. Y., & Alias, S. H. (2011). Tahap Kreativiti di Kalangan Pelajar Program Sains di Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. unspecified, 1-7.
Aryee, Budhwar, & Chen. (2002). Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 267-285.
160
Aryee, Wu, Ladd-Acosta, Herb, Feinberg, Yegnasubramanian, & Irizarry. (2011). Accurate Genome-scale Percentage DNA Methylation Estimates from Microarray Data. Biostatistics, 12(2), 197-210.
Asmuni, A., Mohamad, M., & Ismail, N. Z. A. I. A. (2012). Tinjauan Hubungan Gaya Kepimpinan dengan Komitmen Organisasi. Eksplanasi, 6(1).
Baier, A. (1986). Trust and Antitrust. Ethics, 231-260.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive
theory: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Basu, R., & Green, S. G. (1997). Leader Member Exchange and Transformational Leadership: An Empirical Examination of Innovative Behaviors in Leader Member Dyads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(6), 477-499.
Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job Satisfaction and the Good Soldier: The Relationship Between Affect and Employee "Citizenship". Academy of
Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
Belogolovsky, E., & Somech, A. (2010). Teachers' Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Examining the Boundary between In-role Behavior and Extra-role Behavior from the Perspective of Teachers, Principals and Parents. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 26(4), 914-923.
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. (1978). Interpersonal attraction: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional Justice : Communication Criteria Of Fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 43-55.
161
Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional Fairness Judgments: The Influence of Causal Accounts. Social Justice Research, 1(2), 199-218.
Blackburn, S. (2008). Plato's republic: A biography: Grove Press.
Blaikie, N. (2003). Analyzing quantitative data. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Blase, J., & Kirby, P. C. (1992). The Power of Praise - A Strategy for Effective Principals. NASSP Bulletin, 76(548), 69-77.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Blau, P. M. (1986). Exchange and power in social life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Bobocel, D. R., & Zdaniuk, A. (2005). How Can Explanations be Used to Foster Organizational Justice. Handbook of Organizational Justice, 1, 469-498.
Brockner, J., & Greenberg, J. (1990). The Impact of Layoffs on Survivors: An Organizational Justice Perspective. Applied Social Psychology and
Organizational Settings, 45, 75.
Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning: A teacher's guide to statistics and research design (pp. 240). UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement: Russell Sage Foundation.
162
Bunce, D., & West, M. A. (1995). Self Perceptions and Perceptions of Group Climate as Predictors of Individual Innovation at Work. Applied Psychology,
44(3), 199-215.
Buntat, Y., Nasir, M., & Sharliana, N. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang Mendorong Kreativiti di Kalangan Pelajar, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Journal of
Educational Psychology and Counseling, 2(7), 175-208.
Calder, M. (2000). A Concern for Justice: Teaching Using a Global Perspective in the Classroom. Theory into Practice, 39(2), 81-87.
Canrinus, E. T., Helms-Lorenz, M., Beijaard, D., Buitink, J., & Hofman, A. (2012). Self-efficacy, Job Satisfaction, Motivation and Commitment: Exploring the Relationships between Indicators of Teachers’ Professional Identity.
European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1-18.
Champoux, J. E., & Peters, W. S. (1987). Form, Effect Size and Power in Moderated Regression Analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60(3), 243-255.
Chegini, M. G. (2009). The Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. American Journal of Economics and
Business Administration, 1(2), 173-176.
Chory ‐ Assad, R. M. (2002). Classroom Justice: Perceptions of Fairness as a Predictor of Student Motivation, Learning, and Aggression. Communication
Quarterly, 50(1), 58-77.
Chughtai, A. A., & Buckley, F. (2009). Linking Trust in the Principal to School Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Organizational Identification and Work Engagement. International Journal of Educational Management, 23(7), 574-589.
163
Clark, K., D. (2003). Network Structure and Teamwork. International Handbook of
Organizational Teamwork and Cooperative Working.
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
86(2), 278-321.
Cohen, R. L., & Greenberg, J. (1982). The Justice Concept in Social Psychology.
Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, 1-41.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400.
Cook, C. W., Hunsaker, P. L., & Coffey, R. E. (1997). Management and
organizational behavior.
Cooper, J. M. (1977). The Psychology of Justice in Plato. American Philosophical
Quarterly, 151-157.
Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1991). Procedural Justice and Worker Motivation.
Motivation and Work Behavior, 5, 131-143.
Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. G. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource
management (Vol. 7): Sage Publications, Incorporated.
Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in Organizational Justice: Tunneling Through the Maze. International Review of Industrial and
Organizational Psychology, 12, 317-372.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
164
Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation.
Daly, A. J., Chrispeels, J., & Einstein, A. (2005). From Problem to Possibility: Leadership for Implementing and Deepening the Processes of Effective Schools. Journal for Effective Schools, 4(1), 7-25.
Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role Making Process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,
13(1), 46-78.
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective: Yale University Press New Haven, CT.
Dirks. (2000). Trust in Leadership and Team Performance: Evidence from NCAA Basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 1004.
Dirks, & Ferrin. (2002). Trust in Leadership: Meta-analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611.
Dorenbosch, L., Engen, M. L., & Verhagen, M. (2005). On the Job Innovation: The Impact of Job Design and Human Resource Management through Production Ownership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 129-141.
Driscoll, J. W. (1978). Trust and Participation in Organizational Decision Making as Predictors of Satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 21(1), 44-56.
165
Earley, P. C., & Lind, E. A. (1987). Procedural Justice and Participation in Task Selection: The Role of Control in Mediating Justice Judgments. Journal Of
Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1148.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of applied psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Justice and Leader-Member Exchange: The Moderating Role of Organizational Culture. Academy of
Management Journal, 49(2), 395-406.
Ertürk, A. (2007). Increasing Organizational Citizenship Behaviors of Turkish Academicians: Mediating Role of Trust in Supervisor on the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of
Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 257-270.
Evers, W. J. G., Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2002). Burnout and Self-efficacy: A Study on Teachers' Beliefs When Implementing an Innovative Educational System in the Netherlands. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 227-243.
Ferrin, & Dirks. (2003). The Use of Rewards to Increase and Decrease Trust: Mediating Processes and Differential Effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 18-31.
Fiedler, F. E. (1966). The Effect of Leadership and Cultural Heterogeneity on Group Performance: A Test of the Contingency Model. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 2(3), 237-264.
Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness (Vol. 111): McGraw-Hill New York.
166
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions. Academy of Management Journal,
32(1), 115-130.
Frost, T., Stimpson, D. V., & Maughan, M. R. (1978). Some Correlates of Trust.
Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied.
Fullan, Bertani, & Quinn. (2004). New Lessons for Districtwide Reform.
Educational Leadership, 61(7), 42.
Galford, R. M., & Drapeau, A. S. (2002). The trusted leader: Bringing out the best in
your people and your company: Simon and Schuster.
Gay, & Airasian. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and
applications.
Gillespie, N. A., & Mann, L. (2004). Transformational Leadership and Shared Values: the Building Blocks of Trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology,
19(6), 588-607.
Gok Poh Suan. (2006). Hubungan Keadilan Organisasi Dengan Komitmen dan
Kepuasan Guru. Tesis Sarjana (tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Sains Malaysia,
Penang.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership Over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-level Multi-domain Perspective. The
Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
Greenberg, J. (1987). A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories. Academy of
167
Greenberg, J. (1993). The Social Side of Fairness: Interpersonal and Informational Classes of Organizational Justice. Justice in the Workplace: Approaching
Fairness in Human Resource Management.
Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. A. (1997). Behavior in organizations: Understanding and managing the human side of work: Prentice Hall (Upper Saddle River, NJ).
Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. A. (2010). Behavior in Organizations.
Hallinger, P. (1998). Educational Change in the Southeast Asia. The Challenge of Creating Learning System. . Educational Administration, 6(5), 492-509.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and
culture in the postmodern age: Teachers College Pr.
Harvey, T. (1990). Checklist for change. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Havelock, E. A. (1978). The Greek concept of justice: From its shadow in Homer to
its substance in Plato: Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad. Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42-63.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 597-606.
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms.
Hoy, & Sweetland. (2001). Designing Better Schools: The Meaning and Measure of Enabling School Structures. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(3), 296-321.
168
Hoy, & Tarter. (2004). Organizational Justice in Schools: No Justice Without Trust.
International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4), 250-259.
Hoy, & Tschannen-Moran. (1999). Five Faces of Trust: An Empirical Confirmation in Urban Elementary Schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184-208.
Hoy, & Tschannen-Moran. (2000). A Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Nature, Meaning, and Measurement of Trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547-593.
Hoy, & Tschannen-Moran. (2003). The Conceptualization and Measurement of Faculty Trust in Schools. Studies in Leading and Organizing Schools, 181-207.
Hsiao, H. C., Tu, Y. L., Chang, J. C., & Chen, S. C. (2011). The Influence of
Teachers’ Self-efficacy on Innovative Work Behavior. Paper presented at the
International Conference on Social Science and Humanity, Singapore
Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2002). Diagnosing and Fighting Knowledge-sharing Hostility. Organizational Dynamics, 31(1), 60-73.
Jaafar Muhamad. (2007). Kelakuan organisasi (6 ed.). Selangor, Malaysia: Leed Publications.
Jaafar Sulaiman. (1998). Sistem Nilai Guru Terhadap Stail Pengurusan Pengetua
dan Suasana Kerja Guru. M. Ed, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.
Jabatan Perdana Menteri. (2010). Pelan hala tuju kerajaan melalui Program
Transformasi Kerajaan. Putrajaya: Unit Pengurusan Prestasi Dan
169
Janssen, O. (2000a). Job demands, perceptions of effort ‐ reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and organizational
psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
Janssen, O. (2000b). Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort :Reward Fairness and Innovative Work Behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational
Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative Behaviour and Job Involvement at the Price of Conflict and Less Satisfactory Relations with Co-workers. Journal of
Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 347-364.
Janssen, O. (2005). The Joint Impact of Perceived Influence and Supervisor Supportiveness on Employee Innovative Behaviour. Journal of Occupational
and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 573-579.
Janssens, M., Sels, L., & Brande, I. (2003). Multiple Types of Psychological Contracts: A Six-cluster Solution. Human Relations, 56(11), 1349-1378.
John K Butler, J., & Cantrell, R. S. (1994). Communication Factors and Trust: An Exploratory Study. Psychological Reports, 74(1), 33-34.
Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The Role of Transformational Leadership in Enhancing Organizational Innovation: Hypotheses and Some Preliminary Findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 525-544.
Kalleberg, A. L., Berg, P., & Appelbaum, E. (2004). How trust really works in high performance work organizations: Working Paper.
Kamarulzaman, W., & Hashim, R. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia (Pppm) 2013-2025: Unity Among Students. Available at SSRN.
170
Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and
social conditions for innovation in organization: JAI Press Greenwich, CT.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, K. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan
Malaysia 2013-2025. Kuala Lumpur.
Kerkhof, P., Winder, A. B., & Klandermans, B. (2003). Instrumental and Relational Determinants of Trust in Management among Members of Works Councils.
Personnel Review, 32(5), 623-637.
Khan, S. (1997). The Key to Being a Leader Company: Empowerment. Journal
Personality and Participation, 44-50.
Kickul, J., & Liao-Troth, M. A. (2003). The Meaning Behind the Message: Climate Perceptions and the Psychological Contract. American Journal of Business,
18(2), 23-32.
Klein, H. J., & Kim, J. S. (1998). A Field Study Of The Influence Of Situational Constraints Leader-Member Exchange, And Goal Commitment On Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 88-95.
Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a Multi-dimensional Measure of Individual Innovative Behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296.
Konovsky, M. A., Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1987). Relative Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Employee Attitudes. Representative
Research in Social Psychology.
Konting, M. M. (1990). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
171
Krause, D. E. (2004). Influence-based Leadership as a Determinant of the Inclination to Innovate and of Innovation-related Behaviors:: An Empirical Investigation.
The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 79-102.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Kumar, R., & Uzkurt, C. (2010). Investigating the Effects of Self Efficacy on Innovativeness and the Moderating Impact of Cultural Dimensions. Journal
of International Business and Cultural Studies.
Laschinger, H., & Finegan, J. (2005). Using Empowerment To Build Trust and Respect In The Workplace: A Strategy For Addressing The Nursing Shortage.
Nursing Economics, 23(1), 6.
Lawson, R. B., & Shen, Z. (1998). Organizational psychology: Foundations and
applications: New York: Oxford.
Lee, M. N. N. (2004). Restructuring Higher Education in Malaysia Monograph
series No. 4/2004. School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia,
Penang.
Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond Fairness: A theory of
allocation preferences. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Lewicki, McAllister, & Bies. (1998). Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438-458.
Lewicki, Wiethoff, & Tomlinson. (2005). What is the role of trust in organizational justice?
172
Liden, R. C., Seibert, S. E., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2003). A Group Exchange Structure Approach to Leadership in Groups. Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows
and Whys of Leadership, 173-214.
Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future.
Likert, R. (1967). The human organization: its management and values.
Likert, R. (1974). The Method of Constructing an Attitude Scale. Scaling: A
Sourcebook for Behavioral Scientists, 233-243.
Lind, E. A., Lissak, R. I., & Conlon, D. E. (1983). Decision Control and Process Control Effects on Procedural Fairness Judgments1. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, 13(4), 338-350.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice: Springer.
Luthans, F. (1973). The Contingency Theory of Management: A Path Out of the Jungle. Business Horizons, 16(3), 67-72.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review; Psychological
Review, 98(2), 224.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality.
Maslow, A. H., Frager, R., & Fadiman, J. (1970). Motivation and personality (Vol. 2): Harper & Row New York.
173
Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating Justice and Social Exchange: The Differing Effects of Fair Procedures and Treatment on Work Relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738-748.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 709-734.
McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships. Academy of Management
Review, 473-490.
McMillan, C. R., & Binhammer, P. A. (2009). Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery. Hand, 4(3), 311-318.
Meriam Ismail. (2005). Tahap inovasi di kalangan Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi Swasta (IPTS) di Malaysia yang bertaraf dan bukan universiti serta bersaiz kecil, sederhana dan besar: satu keperluan kajian. Retrieved 20 Januari 2010 http://www.studymalaysia.com/ips/berita/artbuletin4.doc
Mohammed Sani Ibrahim, & Bity Salwana Alias. (2009). Reaksi Guru Terhadap Penilaian Prestasi. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 19 (1), 45-80.
Mohd Nor Jaafar. (2004). Kepemimpinan Pengajaran Guru Besar, Komitmen Dan
Kepuasan Kerja Guru: Satu Kajian Perbandingan Dan Hubungan Antara Sekolah Berkesan Dengan Sekolah Kurang Berkesan. Universiti Sains
174
Moorman, R. H., & Byrne, Z. S. (2005). How Does Organizational Justice Affect Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Handbook of Organizational Justice, 12, 355-380.
Mumford, M. D., & Licuanan, B. (2004). Leading for Innovation: Conclusions, Issues, and Directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 163-171.
Musa Muhammad. (2000). Ucapan Perasmian di Seminar Pendidikan Tinggi Swasta: Konsep Penggabungan IPTS Subang, Selangor.
Mustapha, R., Karim, F., Yasin, R. M., Azman, N., Yamat, H., Muhammad, A. W.,